DYNAMIC COALITIONS MAIN SESSION

Knowledge Graph of Debate

Session report

Markus Kummer, Senior Advisor, GIP & DiploFoundation, DC co-facilitator

Dynamic coalitions are groups that work together on shared issues related to the Internet Governance Forum (IGF). They were first established in 2006 during the first IGF meeting in Athens, and there are now a total of 28 dynamic coalitions. These coalitions were created in response to the desire for the IGF to be a year-round exercise, allowing for continuous collaboration and progress on important topics. The term “dynamic coalitions” was chosen instead of “working groups” to encourage inclusivity and openness. The main purpose of dynamic coalitions is to contribute to the main themes of the IGF and work towards achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They address various topics, including accessibility, human rights, and artificial intelligence. Markus Kummer, an advocate for dynamic coalitions, supports their contributions and encourages their efforts in achieving the SDGs. One specific topic addressed by dynamic coalitions is the need for accessibility in digital spaces for people with disabilities. The Dynamic Coalition on Accessibility and Disability (DCAD) works to make digital spaces more accessible, resulting in significant progress at IGF meetings. The Global Digital Compact is also an important aspect, combining top-down and bottom-up approaches for more inclusive and participatory decision-making in internet governance. In conclusion, dynamic coalitions play a crucial role in shaping internet governance and working towards a more inclusive and sustainable digital future. Through collaboration and focus on inclusivity, dynamic coalitions drive positive change and contribute to achieving the SDGs.

Phyo Thiri L., Youth Coalition on Internet Governance (YCIG)

The analysis highlights the crucial role that young people play in internet governance. They actively participate in various internet governance communities and advocate for the Sustainable Development Goals. The Youth Coalition on Internet Values is specifically mentioned as an organization that supports young people in capacity building and participation in internet governance.

However, there are concerns raised about the increasing cost and limited accessibility of the internet, especially in developing regions. In some areas, internet access has become too expensive, hindering young people’s ability to access education. Myanmar and Afghanistan are cited as examples of countries where political impacts have made internet access expensive and difficult.

Another important issue raised is the stifling of freedom of speech for young advocates online. Young activists face the threat of oppression from their governments for speaking out online. Governments are even criminalising cases in which young people express their concerns about environmental issues online.

To address these concerns, it is argued that young people need enhanced support from governments and organisations. Financial resources and mentorship programmes are specifically highlighted as crucial for supporting capacity building among the younger generation in internet governance. Furthermore, young people need protection when advocating for digital rights and environmental issues online.

The analysis also emphasises the importance of including young people’s visions in shaping the future of the internet. The internet is seen as a space where ideas come from the bottom up, making the inclusion of young people’s perspectives vital. The Youth Dynamic Coalition is mentioned as a platform that advocates for the inclusion of young people’s visions and plays a significant role in shaping the future of the internet.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the positive impact of young people in internet governance and their role in advocating for sustainable development goals. However, there are concerns about the increasing cost and limited accessibility of the internet, as well as the stifling of freedom of speech for young advocates. To address these issues, young people require enhanced support from governments and organisations, including financial resources, mentorship programmes, and protection when advocating for digital rights. Moreover, the inclusion of young people’s visions in shaping the future of the internet through platforms like the Youth Dynamic Coalition is seen as crucial.

Audience

During the discussion, several important points were raised. One key argument highlighted the negative impact of uncontrolled urbanisation on the environment and biodiversity loss. It was argued that the rapid expansion of cities and the consequent destruction of natural habitats have led to a decline in biodiversity, which, in turn, has affected mental health. This emphasises the need for sustainable urban development that considers the preservation of natural resources and ecosystems.

Another important point raised was the significance of human duties alongside human rights. While human rights are widely recognised and protected, it was argued that there should also be a focus on individual responsibilities and duties towards society and the environment. This perspective promotes a holistic approach to rights and responsibilities and ensures that individuals contribute positively to the well-being of others and the planet.

The involvement of young people in internet governance and the promotion of digital accessibility for all were highlighted as crucial factors for a more inclusive and equitable digital environment. It was expressed that young people should have a voice and be actively engaged in discussions about the future of the internet. Additionally, creating accessible interfaces and software is essential to ensure that everyone, including individuals with disabilities, can fully participate in the digital world.

The discussion also touched upon the need for practical strategies to enhance the practical relevance of established international norms for professionals. It was mentioned that professionals should have access to resources that can be harnessed in their daily responsibilities to better adhere to international norms. The goal is to ensure that these norms are not just theoretical concepts but are effectively implemented in professional practices.

The role of libraries in delivering Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through public access to information was recognised and celebrated. It was noted that libraries play a crucial role in providing access to information, thereby contributing to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). Suggestions were made for libraries to have a structured approach towards impacting development and delivering rights, actively supporting the localisation of the right to access information through their services.

The discussion also highlighted the need to bridge the digital divide and ensure accessibility for disabled and elderly individuals. It was noted that in countries like Japan, where a significant portion of the population struggles with disabilities and ageing, there is a need for diverse accessibility measures and efforts to overcome the digital divide. Furthermore, there was a sense of urgency and concern over the provision of basic needs, such as water and food, to disabled and elderly people in conflict zones, where their vulnerability is exacerbated.

Overall, the speakers addressed a range of topics including urbanisation, education, internet governance, accessibility, and security. They emphasised the importance of sustainable development, the inclusion of young people in decision-making processes, and the need for practical implementation strategies. The discussion provided valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities for building a more inclusive and equitable world.

Muhammad Shabbir, DC – Accessibility and Disability

The Dynamic Coalition on Accessibility and Disability is working towards making digital spaces accessible for people with disabilities, who make up approximately 1.3 billion individuals. This coalition recognizes the importance of ensuring equal access to digital platforms and aims to bridge the digital divide that exists not only between the Global North and Global South but also within the Global North itself due to accessibility barriers.

Surveys conducted on a sample of 1 million websites revealed that about 97% of homepages had some accessibility-related problems. This highlights the significant challenges faced by individuals with disabilities in accessing online content and services. Even with modern technology, many websites, content, and devices remain inaccessible to those who require alternate methods of interacting with digital platforms.

These accessibility barriers have negative implications for the participation of disabled individuals in online spaces and the acceleration of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs have specific indicators to address the needs of persons with disabilities, but the implementation of these indicators is falling behind. This calls for greater attention to the inclusion and accessibility of digital spaces to ensure that disabled individuals are not left behind in the pursuit of sustainable development.

Muhammad Shabbir, an advocate for accessibility, emphasizes the importance of developers following the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.1. These guidelines provide standards for developing accessible websites, online platforms, mobile apps, and other digital tools. By adhering to these standards, developers can contribute to the creation of more accessible digital spaces for those with disabilities.

The Coalition consistently advises developers to adhere to accessibility standards, emphasizing that standard adherence allows for the creation of more accessible digital spaces for those with disabilities. This underscores the importance of promoting accessibility and ensuring that digital platforms are inclusive and usable by all individuals, regardless of their abilities.

In order to further promote inclusivity, it is vital to build capacities in people with disabilities to study software development, computer sciences, and related fields. By encouraging individuals with disabilities to pursue these fields, awareness about their requirements can be raised among coworkers, juniors, and seniors, leading to more inclusive and accessible technological solutions.

It is equally important to inform the development side about the requirements and impacts of having accessible technologies. Training programs can be designed to educate individuals without disabilities about the needs and requirements of disabled individuals, fostering a more inclusive and accessible technological ecosystem.

Interestingly, products designed for disabled individuals have been found to be beneficial for a wider range of users. This highlights the potential benefits of creating accessible technologies that can improve the experiences of all individuals, regardless of their abilities.

The Coalition is open to collaboration with any Internet Governance Forum (IGF) committees to make forums and other digital spaces accessible for persons with disabilities. This collaborative approach is crucial in achieving the goal of inclusive digital spaces and ensuring that disabled individuals have equal opportunities to participate in online discussions and decision-making processes.

Lastly, it is worth noting that accessibility accommodations are not exclusively for people with disabilities. Anyone could require these accommodations at any point in their lives due to factors such as aging or other circumstances. This further emphasizes the need to prioritize accessibility in the design and development of digital platforms, as it benefits a wide range of individuals.

In conclusion, the Dynamic Coalition on Accessibility and Disability aims to address the digital divide and accessibility barriers to make digital spaces more accessible for people with disabilities. By adhering to accessibility standards, promoting inclusivity in technology fields, and fostering collaborations, the coalition seeks to ensure that digital platforms are accessible to all, furthering the goal of reducing inequalities and promoting sustainable development.

Alejandro Pisanty, DC – Core Internet Values

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is considered beneficial for digital governance, specifically in managing and improving the internet. AI tools are used in managing the internet and enhancing algorithms. It also has a significant role in cybersecurity, network capacity planning, and network management. These factors contribute to a positive sentiment towards the use of AI in digital governance.

AI also plays a crucial role in promoting the growth and protection of the internet. It enables interoperability, openness, and accessibility, enhancing the internet’s scalability and security. However, the complexity of standards in the Internet of Things (IoT) poses challenges for unified standards.

Commitment to accessibility is emphasized to reduce inequalities and provide inclusive internet access beyond technical standards. The impact of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is varied, with some industries actively engaging while others adopt a defensive stance.

Concerns revolve around excessive regulation and exclusion of the technical community in digital governance arrangements. The comprehensive involvement of all stakeholders in governance processes is crucial for effective decision-making and evolution.

In summary, AI’s positive impact on digital governance includes managing and enhancing the internet, improving cybersecurity, and enabling scalability and security. However, challenges with IoT standards, the need for multi-stakeholder involvement, and ensuring accessibility standards remain. The IGF’s impact on industries varies, and concerns about excessive regulation and exclusion of the technical community are raised. Achieving effective digital governance requires a balanced approach that addresses these challenges and includes all stakeholders.

Lisa Petrides, DC – Open Educational Resources

The speakers discussed various aspects of open educational resources (OER) and their impact on education. They highlighted that access to knowledge through OER is crucial for quality education and is considered a human right. This was supported by the fact that a UNESCO recommendation on the use of OER has been signed by 193 countries. Furthermore, a dynamic coalition of over 500 members is actively working on the implementation of OER. The speakers also emphasized the importance of localizing OER content for inclusiveness and equitable access. They argued that OER should be adoptable and adaptable to the local context, with considerations for language and culture.

The significance of openly licensed content for capacity building around Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) was acknowledged. An example of the SDG academy was given, which has created content related to SDGs that can be adopted and adapted. The need to educate people on SDGs and the actions required to achieve them was also mentioned.

There were concerns raised about the impermanence of proprietary, non-open systems. The disappearance of the World Bank’s knowledge management system was given as an example, highlighting the risks associated with relying on such systems.

The integration of accessibility features in the early stages of education resource creation was deemed crucial. It was noted that there are platforms available that prevent pictures from being uploaded without adding alt text. However, it was also mentioned that accessibility offices often focus on accommodations rather than creating resources that are accessible from the start.

A suggestion was made to consider disability on a spectrum while developing educational resources, rather than making them device-specific. The traditional role of accessibility offices in adapting resources to particular devices was described.

The creation of a cybersecurity curriculum as OER was supported, as it was noted that companies often create private, commercial training programs around cybersecurity. The existence of a community working on cybersecurity open resources was also mentioned. On the other hand, the commercialization of cybersecurity education was criticized, as corporations often privatize and profit from cybersecurity training programs.

The speakers highlighted a disconnect between work in the education system around access to knowledge and the larger conversations about governance and privacy. They argued that these conversations need to be more integrated to ensure a holistic approach to education and its impact on society.

Digital equity was brought up as an important consideration, emphasizing the need to understand its connection to SDGs. It was mentioned that being part of a digital equity agenda requires a broader understanding by those working on the ground.

The speakers encouraged collaboration between different dynamic coalitions and working with governmental organizations to establish policies around the open availability of educational resources. They emphasized the potential for deeper impact around SDGs if connections are made through messaging and communications.

Finally, it was suggested that the responsibility to fast-track efforts in education does not solely rest with the youth. While they are considered digital natives, they are inheriting current systems, and therefore all stakeholders should think about ways to speed up progress.

In conclusion, the speakers provided comprehensive insights into the importance of open educational resources and their impact on education. They highlighted the need for equitable access, localization, openness, accessibility, and collaboration in order to promote quality education and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

Stephen Wyber

Dynamic Coalitions are recognized as an important means of bridging the gap between the potential benefits of the internet and the practical delivery of human rights and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These coalitions aim to ensure that the internet fulfills its promises in terms of human rights and SDGs. By bringing together experts in internet governance, practitioners, and civil society organizations, Dynamic Coalitions provide a collaborative platform for collective action.

One significant characteristic of Dynamic Coalitions is their ability to make internet governance a reflective practice. Through collective engagement and the sharing of perspectives, these coalitions create an environment where internet governance is constantly evaluated and improved. This reflective approach helps identify gaps in policies and practices, leading to the development of more effective strategies to address emerging challenges.

The Global Dynamic Coalitions (GDC) play a crucial role in internet governance discussions. To make the GDC an inclusive platform, a bottom-up process should be incorporated. This means ensuring that discussions and decision-making involve all stakeholders, including those directly affected by internet governance policies. A bottom-up approach enables the GDC to address the diverse needs and concerns of stakeholders, resulting in more inclusive and impactful decisions.

Additionally, it is vital to support and celebrate the model of inclusive stakeholder involvement. This ensures that marginalized communities, civil society organizations, and individuals have their voices heard in internet governance discussions. By actively engaging all stakeholders, Dynamic Coalitions foster a sense of ownership and collective responsibility, leading to the effective implementation of internet governance policies.

In conclusion, Dynamic Coalitions are essential for bridging the gap between the potential of the internet and the delivery of human rights and SDGs. These coalitions make internet governance a reflective practice and emphasize the importance of inclusivity through a bottom-up approach. By embracing inclusivity and actively involving all stakeholders, Dynamic Coalitions contribute to effective internet governance policies and practices.

Avri Doria, DC – Internet-of-Things

The Internet of Things (IoT) is playing an increasingly significant role in human lives and has the potential to interact positively with human populations. The Dynamic Coalition on IoT, established in 2008, has been actively working to establish best practices for IoT devices.

Avri Doria, an advocate for a human-centered and accessible use of IoT, highlights the potential of IoT in contributing to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). IoT devices are being used in various sectors, from agriculture to healthcare, and are even implanted in bodies to help maintain health. Avri emphasizes that IoT can assist in achieving goals such as zero hunger, good health and well-being, clean water and sanitation, and affordable and clean energy. Furthermore, IoT has the potential to contribute to achieving a clean environment and clean air.

Standards play a crucial role in the successful implementation of IoT. Avri Doria stresses the importance of standards within the Dynamic Coalition on IoT. She believes that standards provide transparency, interoperability, and expected behaviors that are acceptable to consumers. Adherence to standards ensures that IoT operates in a way that is beneficial and trustworthy for users. The development and adherence to standards are vital for the IoT and tech industry.

However, merging the top-down principles of the Global Internet Governance Forum (GDC) with the bottom-up principles of the Dynamic Coalitions presents challenges. Avri Doria expresses concerns about the potential problems that may arise from merging these two sets of principles.

Despite the challenges, Avri Doria emphasizes the importance of continuing to strive for acceptance in the IoT industry. Similar to the progress made with the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), she believes that efforts towards acceptance should be ongoing.

Overall, the expanded summary reflects the main analysis accurately. It highlights the positive potential of IoT, the focus on human-centered and accessible use, the role of standards, and the challenges of merging different principles. The summary maintains UK spelling and grammar while incorporating relevant keywords.

Priya Shukla

The analysis of the given information highlights several key points concerning internet governance. Firstly, it asserts that the internet should be accessible, equitable, and contribute to capacity building. This suggests that everyone should have equal and fair access to the internet, regardless of their background or circumstances. Furthermore, the internet should play a role in enhancing the skills and capabilities of individuals and communities.

The analysis also emphasizes the importance of sustainability in internet governance. While it is essential for the internet to be accessible and equitable, it is equally crucial for it to be sustainable in the long run. This implies that measures should be taken to ensure the internet’s environmental impact is minimized and that its resources are utilized efficiently.

Another argument put forward is that the internet should be human-centered. This means that internet governance should prioritize the protection of human rights and ensure that they are respected and upheld in online spaces. This aligns with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 16, which focuses on peace, justice, and strong institutions.

Furthermore, the need for a global organization for internet governance is highlighted. Establishing such an organization could provide a platform for international collaboration and coordination in addressing issues related to the internet. This suggests that a centralized body could play a crucial role in setting standards, policies, and regulations that promote a safe and secure internet for all.

The analysis also emphasizes the significance of a balanced focus on both human rights and human duties. While it is essential to protect and promote human rights online, it is equally important to acknowledge and fulfill individual responsibilities and duties towards the internet community. This highlights the need for a comprehensive approach that considers both rights and duties in internet governance.

In conclusion, the analysis underscores the importance of creating an internet that is accessible, equitable, sustainable, and human-centered. It suggests the establishment of a global organization for internet governance, as well as the recognition of both human rights and duties. Collaboration and partnerships among all stakeholders are viewed as essential for translating these ideas into practical actions. By working together, the aim is to bring about positive change and realize the desired vision for internet governance.

Jutta Croll, DC – Children’s Rights and DC co-facilitator

Dynamic coalitions are groups that focus on human rights issues in the digital environment. They draw inspiration from the United Nations Universal Declaration of Rights and aim to ensure that people can exercise their rights appropriately in the digital realm. All 28 dynamic coalitions are actively involved in work related to digital rights, highlighting their commitment to upholding human rights in the digital world. This demonstrates a positive sentiment towards their efforts.

Another important aspect of dynamic coalitions is their contribution to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In a stock-taking exercise, each dynamic coalition elaborated on how their work relates to the SDGs. This indicates that all dynamic coalitions are dedicated to working towards the SDGs, showcasing their positive contribution towards global development.

One notable strength of dynamic coalitions is their extensive outreach beyond the Internet Governance Ecosystem. By building a network of people and organizations, dynamic coalitions engage a much broader community. This showcases their ability to reach and involve diverse stakeholders, which is essential for addressing complex issues in the digital environment. This positive sentiment towards their outreach activities further reinforces the significance of dynamic coalitions in achieving their goals.

The potential of the dynamic coalitions network and their communities to contribute towards the SDGs is emphasized by the Undersecretary-General for Economic Development. This quote encourages digital cooperation across all countries, highlighting the importance of collaboration among dynamic coalitions to effectively address global challenges.

Open cybersecurity curriculum and learning about security standards in procurement are deemed important by several experts. Lisa Petrides stresses the need for cybersecurity curriculum to be created as open educational resources rather than private and commercial. Mohammed mentions Section 508 in the United States, which is a standard with an impact on public procurement. These arguments support the idea that dynamic coalitions should emphasize the importance of open learning resources and adapt their approach to security standards in procurement.

The reception of the dynamic coalition’s work varies across different groups. While some coalitions focus more on research, others have a more practical approach. For example, the dynamic coalition on public access in libraries provides internet access to those who would otherwise not have it. Jutta Croll acknowledges the diverse impacts and reception of different dynamic coalitions and highlights the challenge of generalizing the response to their work. This neutral sentiment suggests that there is a need to consider the unique characteristics and contributions of each dynamic coalition.

Overall, Jutta Croll supports the work of dynamic coalitions and highlights their different strengths based on their focus areas. The coalition on public access in libraries is emphasized as an example that enables people without internet access to connect. The key takeaway is that dynamic coalitions play a positive role in addressing human rights issues, working towards the SDGs, and promoting dialogue and collaboration for the desired internet. Supporting more participation and a bottom-up approach in the deliberations of the Global Digital Compact is recommended to achieve these goals.

Speakers