FTC seeks comment on AI accuracy policy for model outputs
The FTC’s proposed AI accuracy policy also raises questions about whether state AI laws could conflict with federal consumer protection rules.
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is seeking public comment on a proposed policy statement examining whether AI companies may violate consumer protection law by manipulating model outputs in ways that conflict with users’ expectations of objectivity and accuracy.
The proposed statement says AI companies could violate Section 5 of the FTC Act if they deliberately distort AI outputs to pursue undisclosed ideological objectives while marketing their systems as accurate, objective or suitable for specific purposes. Section 5 prohibits unfair or deceptive business practices.
The FTC also questions whether certain state AI laws, specifically Colorado’s Artificial Intelligence Act, could be preempted if they conflict with a federal regulatory framework. According to the Commission, state requirements that compel changes to AI outputs may be incompatible with federal policy.
The proposal follows a December executive order issued by President Donald Trump directing the FTC to examine the legal implications of state laws requiring changes to what the order described as the ‘truthful outputs of AI models.’
The proposed policy statement will be published in the Federal Register, with public comments accepted until 31 July 2026. The Commission approved the notice in a 2–0 vote.
Why does it matter?
The proposal reframes AI output accuracy as a consumer protection issue rather than solely a question of content moderation or AI governance. If adopted, it could expose companies to regulatory scrutiny when they market AI systems as objective or reliable while modifying outputs in ways users are not informed about.
The consultation also highlights growing tension between federal and state approaches to AI regulation in the United States. By questioning whether state laws could be overridden by a federal framework, the FTC is signalling that AI governance may increasingly become the subject of broader legal and constitutional debates over regulatory authority.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!