WSIS Forum 2026
AI-generated report

Universal Acceptance for a Multilingual Internet: Launch of the UNESCO–ICANN Policy Brief

7 speakers
Summary

This session, jointly convened by UNESCO and ICANN, marked the launch of a joint policy brief on advancing universal acceptance (UA) of all domain names and email addresses for a multilingual internet . The discussion brought together representatives from UNESCO, ICANN, and the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF) to explore the technical, policy, and cultural dimensions of making the internet fully accessible in all languages and scripts.

UNESCO's Guilherme Canela emphasised that multilingualism is not merely about preserving languages but about ensuring full participation in the digital world, noting that internationalized domain names and multilingual email addresses are already supported by global technical standards, yet many systems still fail to process them correctly . ICANN's Theresa Swinehart highlighted that this challenge is solvable, and outlined ICANN's ongoing efforts, including the delegation of over 150 internationalised top-level domains representing 37 languages and 23 scripts, as well as engagement with open-source developers and big tech organisations . Dr Sarmad Hussain provided concrete data illustrating the scale of the problem, noting that a survey of approximately 1,000 websites across 20 countries found an average acceptance rate of only 12% for local-language email addresses, and that fewer than 30% of global email servers support internationalised email addresses .

UNESCO's Xianhong Hu underscored that achieving UA requires human and policy dimensions beyond purely technical fixes, and that the policy brief offers actionable recommendations for governments, civil society, academia, and international organisations . Henri Monceau of the OIF added that universal acceptance has taken on new urgency in the AI era, warning that languages marginalised in internet infrastructure risk being equally marginalised in AI training datasets .

Audience questions raised the importance of focusing on end users in UA efforts and the potential tension between AI sovereignty initiatives and universal accessibility . Panellists responded by affirming that end-user communities are central to the policy brief's recommendations and that smaller, locally developed language models can complement broader multilingual goals rather than contradict them .

Overall, the session concluded with a shared call for stronger political commitment, procurement policies, and cross-sector collaboration to ensure that universal acceptance becomes a foundational pillar of an inclusive, linguistically diverse digital future .

Keypoints
  • Overall Purpose

  • The session was jointly convened by UNESCO and ICANN to launch a collaborative policy brief titled Advancing Universal Acceptance of All Domain Names and Email Addresses for Multilingual Internet. The overarching goal was to raise awareness of the barriers preventing millions of people from accessing the internet in their own languages and scripts, and to present actionable policy recommendations for governments, technical communities, civil society, and international organisations to address these barriers.
  • --
  • Major Discussion Points

  • The current state and technical foundations of Universal Acceptance (UA): Speakers explained that while internationalized domain names (IDNs) and multilingual email addresses are already supported by global technical standards, many websites and applications still fail to process them correctly. Data from a survey of approximately 1,000 websites across 20 countries showed an average acceptance rate of only 12% for local-language email addresses, and fewer than 30% of email servers globally support internationalised email addresses.
  • The launch and content of the UNESCO-ICANN policy brief: The policy brief was formally launched at the session and presented as a practical tool to advance multilingualism online. It identifies gaps in awareness, technology, capacity, and policy; delineates the responsibilities of different stakeholders including governments, technology developers, civil society, and academia; and proposes a suite of measurements to track progress on UA adoption.
  • The role of governments and international policy frameworks in driving UA adoption: Multiple speakers highlighted that UA is not merely a technical issue but requires political will and governance decisions. International frameworks including ITU Resolution 82, ITU Plenipotentiary Resolution 133, the WSIS+20 outcome document, and UNESCO's 2003 Recommendation on multilingualism were cited as mandates for action. Governments were identified as key stakeholders who can mandate or incentivise UA adoption, particularly through e-government services.
  • Capacity building and awareness initiatives to accelerate UA adoption: ICANN and UNESCO described ongoing efforts to build awareness and technical capacity, including UA Day events held in 86 countries across 42 languages reaching over 29,000 participants, and a university curriculum integration programme partnering with institutions in Bahrain, Mexico, India, Zimbabwe, and Bolivia. These initiatives aim to ensure that the next generation of software developers is equipped to support multilingual internet infrastructure.
  • The intersection of Universal Acceptance, linguistic diversity, and artificial intelligence: The OIF representative and UNESCO speakers argued that UA has taken on new urgency in the AI era, as languages marginalised in internet infrastructure risk being equally marginalised in AI training datasets. With 2 billion people still unconnected and the linguistic divide persisting or expanding, ensuring that all languages are fully represented online is now also a prerequisite for equitable AI development.
  • --
  • Overall Tone

  • The overall tone of the discussion was collaborative, advocacy-driven, and cautiously optimistic. Speakers from UNESCO, ICANN, and the OIF consistently emphasised shared purpose and the importance of multi-stakeholder cooperation, maintaining a constructive and collegial atmosphere throughout.
  • The opening remarks carried a sense of momentum and milestone-marking, with speakers noting that multilingualism is finally receiving the political attention it deserves. The technical presentation introduced a more sober, data-driven register, grounding the discussion in concrete evidence of how far the ecosystem still has to go. Towards the close, the Q&A introduced a slightly more critical edge, with audience members raising concerns about the exclusion of end users from the conversation and the potential tensions between AI sovereignty and universal accessibility. Panellists responded thoughtfully and acknowledged the complexity of these issues, maintaining a tone of openness rather than defensiveness. Overall, the session remained positive and forward-looking throughout.
Speakers Overview
MG
Mr. Guilherme Canela
128 wpm · 8 min
MT
Ms. Theresa Swinehart
146 wpm · 8 min
DS
Dr. Sarmad Hussain
122 wpm · 12 min
DX
Dr. Xianhong Hu
127 wpm · 9 min
MH
Mr. Henri Monceau
100 wpm · 6 min
A
Audience
92 wpm · 2 min
MD
Mr. David Castillo Parra
148 wpm · 4 min

Session Overview

This session, jointly convened by UNESCO and ICANN at the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), marked the formal launch of a collaborative policy brief titled Advancing Universal Acceptance of All Domain Names and Email Addresses for Multilingual Internet . Moderated by Mr. David Castillo Parra, the session brought together senior representatives from UNESCO, ICANN, and the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF) to explore the technical, policy, and cultural dimensions of making the internet fully accessible in all languages and scripts. The discussion was framed as both a milestone event and a call to action, with speakers consistently emphasising that the challenge of universal acceptance (UA) is not merely a technical matter but a fundamental prerequisite for digital inclusion, linguistic equality, and equitable participation in the digital world .

---

Opening Remarks: UNESCO's Normative and Policy Framing

Mr. Guilherme Canela, Director for the Division of Digital Inclusion and Policies and Digital Transformation at UNESCO, opened the session by situating the launch of the policy brief within UNESCO's long-standing normative commitment to multilingualism . He noted that this was the first time in the preceding two and a half days that he was speaking on a panel about multilingualism, and characterised this as a positive sign that the multilingualism agenda is gaining the political importance it deserves - progress he attributed to sustained cooperation between organisations including ICANN and the OIF . Canela was careful to distinguish UNESCO's framing of multilingualism from a purely cultural or preservationist agenda: for UNESCO, multilingualism is not simply about preserving languages but about ensuring that everyone can fully participate in the digital world . A multilingual internet, he argued, expands access to information, education, services, innovation, and opportunity .

Canela acknowledged that while internationalised domain names and multilingual email addresses are already supported by global technical standards, many websites, applications, and online services still fail to recognise or process them correctly, preventing millions of people from fully accessing digital services in their own languages and scripts . This gap, he stressed, is not merely a technical inconvenience but a governance and policy failure requiring deliberate political decisions to address . He traced the normative foundations of this agenda to UNESCO's 2003 Recommendation on the Promotion and Use of Multilingualism and Universal Access to Cyberspace, adopted by 194 member states, and noted that UNESCO has been monitoring its implementation for the past 23 years . More recently, UNESCO launched the Global Roadmap for Multilingualism in the Digital Era, encompassing tools such as the World Atlas of Languages and specific policy toolkits . The joint policy brief with ICANN, he concluded, represents one of the most practical instruments for translating multilateral normative commitments into concrete guidance .

---

ICANN's Perspective: Technical Progress and the Scale of the Challenge

Ms. Theresa Swinehart, Senior Vice President of Global Domain and Strategy at ICANN, joined remotely to deliver opening remarks that complemented UNESCO's normative framing with a technical and operational perspective . She emphasised that a linguistically diverse internet is fundamental to human nature and essential for bridging the digital divide, enabling everyone to navigate online in their native language or script . Multilingual support, she stressed, is not only about online content but also about the domain names and email addresses that serve as the mechanisms by which people navigate and communicate online .

Swinehart traced the origins of the multilingual internet agenda to the WSIS meeting in Tunis in 2005, where participants committed to advancing the introduction of multilingualism in domain names and email addresses through strengthened international cooperation . She outlined ICANN's subsequent work with the community, beginning with the introduction of internationalised country code top-level domains (IDN CCTLDs) in 2009 and the new generic top-level domain (GTLD) round that opened in 2012 . This work has resulted in the delegation of more than 150 internationalised top-level domains, representing 37 languages and 23 scripts . A further expansion of the domain name system is expected through the new GTLD programme, which Swinehart stated was launched in April 2026 .

Despite this technical progress, Swinehart acknowledged that many people around the world remain excluded from experiencing the full benefit, simply because many software applications and systems do not yet recognise or appropriately process domain names or email addresses in local languages . She was emphatic that this is a solvable problem , illustrating the human cost through everyday scenarios: a person using a local-language email address might receive an error message when trying to complete an online transaction, sign up for a class, or order food delivery . She described UA as a technical best practice that ensures all valid domain names and email addresses, regardless of script, language, or character length, can be equally used by all internet-enabled applications, devices, and systems . Achieving UA, she argued, will ensure that everybody has the ability to experience the full social and economic power of the internet in their language and script of choice .

Swinehart also highlighted the growing international policy recognition of UA, citing ITU's World Telecommunications Development Conference Resolution 82 (2025), which calls for cooperation between stakeholders and governments in the development and implementation of UA and multilingualism ; ITU Plenipotentiary Conference Resolution 133, which asks for further development and deployment of IDNs and promotion of UA adoption ; and the WSIS Plus 20 outcome document (2025), which commended work on the multilingual nature of the internet and called for fully accessible and affordable internet services . She outlined ICANN's own efforts, including engaging with large technology organisations, submitting code fixes in open-source projects, supporting the domain name industry, updating ICANN's own software systems to 92% UA readiness, and organising UA Day events globally . She also described a university curriculum integration programme to ensure that the next generation of software developers is equipped to support multilingual internet infrastructure, including both internationalised domain names and Email Address Internationalisation (EAI) .

---

Technical Evidence: The Gap Between Standards and Practice

Dr. Sarmad Hussain, Senior Director for IDN and EUA Programmes at ICANN, provided a detailed technical presentation that grounded the discussion in empirical evidence . He confirmed that the technology, standards, and policy for internationalised domain names and email addresses are already in place, with real domain names registered and functional in scripts including Armenian, Odia, and Georgian . However, he emphasised that when users attempt to use these domain names and email addresses in practice, they encounter significant challenges because many websites and applications are not updated to accept them correctly .

To illustrate the scale of the problem, Hussain described a survey of approximately 1,000 websites across 20 countries, covering government, banking, academic, and media sectors . Researchers submitted email addresses in the local language of each country - for example, a Chinese email address on Chinese websites - and found that on average only approximately 12% of websites accepted such addresses . This means that more than 850 out of 1,000 tested websites would not accept email addresses in their own country's local language and script . Hussain also reported on an analysis of approximately 32 million email servers deployed worldwide, finding that while acceptance of internationalised email addresses has improved over time, it remains below 30% . These figures provided a stark quantitative measure of the gap between the existence of technical standards and their actual implementation.

Hussain described the policy brief as identifying all the different areas where UA can contribute, the gaps in awareness, technology, capacity, and policy, and the roles of different stakeholders . He highlighted governments as particularly significant actors, noting that they can mandate or incentivise the use of multilingual domain names and email services, especially in e-services provided to citizens . He also described ICANN's capacity-building efforts in detail: more than 200 UA Day events have been held over four years in 86 countries and 42 languages, reaching more than 29,000 participants . ICANN is also working with universities globally - including the American University of Bahrain, the University of Modelo in Mexico, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology in India, Women's University in Zimbabwe, and institutions in Bolivia - to integrate internationalised domain names and email addresses into technology degree programmes . Stakeholders were invited to contact ICANN at uaprogram@icann.org for questions or collaboration opportunities .

---

UNESCO's Broader Multilingualism Agenda and the Policy Brief's Scope

Dr. Xianhong Hu, Programme Specialist at UNESCO, joined remotely to present the policy brief in greater depth and to situate it within UNESCO's broader multilingualism work . She opened by noting that despite being at the third decade of WSIS, approximately 2 billion people remain unconnected to the internet, and the linguistic divide continues to persist and even expand in the AI era . She argued that the lack of universal acceptance in the digital ecosystem significantly limits the potential for AI - limiting what AI can learn, perform, and benefit - making the resolution of the linguistic divide even more urgent .

Hu noted that the latest global responses, including the WSIS Plus 20 review and the Global Digital Compact, have recognised the urgent need to promote and preserve cultural diversity, heritage, and language, and have highlighted the multilingual nature of the internet, IDNs, and universal acceptance . She described UNESCO's unique mandate and commitment to multilingualism, including its role as Secretariat for the UN International Decade of Indigenous Languages and the 45 actions for stakeholder involvement outlined in the Global Roadmap for Multilingualism . She also noted that UNESCO's cooperation agreement with ICANN was recently renewed in 2025, with UA Day celebrations identified as a major area of collaboration .

Characterising the policy brief as a unique knowledge product for both advocacy and action, Hu emphasised that it not only identifies the challenges of language as a barrier to meaningful connectivity but also provides actionable policy recommendations for all stakeholders . She drew attention to the holistic perspective of the brief, which sheds light on the comprehensive importance and benefits of UA - contributing to digital economic growth, safeguarding linguistic diversity, supporting online education, and enabling e-governance . A key message she wished to convey was that achieving UA is not just a technical issue but requires human dimensions and significant policy development involving all stakeholders .

The policy brief offers recommendations to governments, the technical community, civil society, academia, language communities including indigenous peoples, and international organisations . For UNESCO specifically, its normative authority, technical expertise, and global convening power position it to develop international cooperation, accelerate cross-border alignment on technical protocols, and promote UA as a core pillar of the digital inclusion agenda at the national level . Hu also highlighted the brief's proposed measurement framework, encouraging member states and stakeholders to conduct voluntary assessments of UA along the dimensions outlined . She noted that UNESCO has integrated UA into its sixth monitoring cycle of the Recommendation on the Promotion and Use of Multilingualism, with national reports due by February 2027, and encouraged member states and stakeholders to include UA aspects in their reporting . She also directly called on participants to support translation of the policy brief - available in English and French at the time of the session - into additional languages in their own countries .

---

The OIF's Perspective: Universal Acceptance, Political Will, and the AI Imperative

Mr. Henri Monceau, from the Permanent Observatory of the OIF to the United Nations in Geneva and Vienna, offered three reflections that added both political urgency and a forward-looking AI dimension to the discussion . His first reflection was that universal acceptance is a prerequisite for genuine digital inclusion: if citizens cannot use their own language or script in a domain name or email address, digital inclusion remains incomplete . UA, he argued, is not merely about technical interoperability but about enabling every individual to participate fully in digital society while preserving their linguistic identity - an ambition at the heart of UNESCO's vision of inclusive knowledge societies, and one the OIF fully shares .

His second reflection was that artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed the significance of universal acceptance . Tomorrow's AI systems will increasingly rely on multilingual digital content generated through websites, digital services, email exchanges, and online interactions . The richer and more linguistically diverse the internet becomes, the richer and more representative AI training data will become . Conversely, languages that remain marginalised in internet infrastructure are also likely to remain marginalised in the datasets that shape artificial intelligence . This argument elevated UA from a technical compliance issue to a strategic AI governance concern: universal acceptance is no longer simply about making every language work on the internet but about ensuring that every language can help shape the future of artificial intelligence .

His third reflection was that universal acceptance deserves stronger political support . Technology alone will not achieve UA; governments, international organisations, the technical community, the private sector, academia, and civil society all have a role to play . He called for awareness, standards, implementation, and capacity building - particularly in developing countries - as well as procurement policies that encourage UA by design and integration of UA into national digital and AI strategies . He concluded by affirming that the OIF will continue to stand alongside UNESCO, ICANN, and all partners committed to making universal acceptance not simply a technical standard but the cornerstone of a multilingual, culturally diverse, and human society-centred digital future .

---

Audience Discussion: End Users, Civil Society, and AI Sovereignty

The Q&A segment introduced two important critical perspectives that enriched the discussion. The first came from an unidentified French-speaking audience member who raised the importance of centring end users in the UA effort, noting the challenges that arise when tools are made on one side of the Atlantic without adequate consideration of multilingual users elsewhere . The comment suggested that placing users - since everything is done for them so that they can use the internet in good conditions - at the centre of UA efforts should be a more prominent pillar of the agenda .

Hussain responded by affirming that the entire UA effort is focused on the ability of end users to come online in their own language, and described ICANN's work with at-large advisory committees and at-large structures that represent local communities . Hu similarly asserted that users are at the centre of the policy brief, both as the end goal and as participants in monitoring, raising awareness, and advocating for UA implementation . She also noted that the policy brief was developed with consistent engagement with users and communities, including at ICANN 86 . Monceau added that the real advocacy drivers have included specific francophone communities, particularly organisations in Quebec such as Point Québec and the Internet Society, which he described as having been absolutely essential in this debate and fight .

The second audience question, from Mirab Labazo of Georgia, introduced a more complex governance dilemma: the potential tension between AI sovereignty and universal accessibility . The questioner noted that local efforts to build sovereign AI in small languages might, in the name of digital sovereignty, create content that exists in a readable format but is intentionally not universally available , and asked whether there is any way out of this tension . Canela offered a nuanced response, acknowledging that the question is far more complicated than can be resolved in a few minutes . He noted that there are different ways of using AI, and that locally developed models - such as a Quechua-language model developed in Peru - can be very useful for Quechua speakers in different countries, suggesting that local sovereignty and broader accessibility are not necessarily contradictory . He also noted that smaller, locally focused models may consume less water and energy, pointing to environmental benefits . He concluded by acknowledging the complexity and the need for further discussion .

---

Conclusions and Next Steps

The session concluded with a shared call for stronger political commitment, cross-sector collaboration, and concrete action to ensure that universal acceptance becomes a foundational pillar of an inclusive, linguistically diverse digital future . Participants were invited to attend a follow-up ICANN-organised session the following day from 1:00 to 1:45 to continue the conversation . The policy brief, available in English and French at the time of the session, with translations into additional languages forthcoming, was presented as a document that stakeholders were encouraged to support translating into their own national languages . UNESCO's integration of UA into its sixth monitoring cycle of the Recommendation on the Promotion and Use of Multilingualism, with national reports due by February 2027, was identified as a concrete mechanism for tracking progress .

Overall, the session demonstrated a high degree of consensus among all speakers on the core issues: that UA is a prerequisite for genuine digital inclusion; that the technical standards exist but practical implementation lags severely; that a multi-stakeholder approach is essential; and that the AI era has added new urgency to the multilingualism agenda. The most significant unresolved tensions - the potential conflict between AI sovereignty and universal accessibility, and the question of how to more meaningfully involve end users and communities beyond awareness campaigns - were acknowledged as requiring further research, dialogue, and policy development .

Mr. David Castillo Parra
moderating today's session. So briefly this session is jointly convened by UNESCO and ICANN and marks a very important milestone, the launch of the UNESCO ICANN policy brief advancing universal acceptance of all domain names and email addresses for multilingual internet. A quick note for our remote participants, please submit your questions through the chat at any point and I will bring them into our discussion during the Q &A segment. And without further ado, I would like to give the floor to Mr. Guilherme Canela, Director for the Division of Digital Inclusion and Policies and Digital Transformation at UNESCO to open the session. Over to you, Guilherme.
Mr. Guilherme Canela
Thank you, David. Gracias. Good afternoon, everybody. A pleasure to be here with you. I must tell you this is, I guess, the first time in these last two days and a half that I'm speaking in a panel about multilingualism. And this is not a complaint. This is a good thing. It seems to me that this very crucial agenda is gaining the importance it deserves, and it was not necessarily the case a few years ago. And this is thanks to the strong cooperation and collaboration of all of us in this particular case, ICANN and UNESCO, but I also see here our colleagues from OEF who are always pushing very hard also for this agenda and others. So thank you very much. It's a real pleasure to co -organize this session with ICANN, as David already mentioned, and to be here with several members of the ICANN family. So thank you all for this. Also, a strong welcome for all those representatives from the different, different stakeholder groups that are. interested in this agenda of universal acceptance and multilingualism. Today marks this important milestone as we are launching here in the context of WISIS this UNESCO ICANN policy brief on advancing universal acceptance of all domain names and email addresses for a multilingual internet. This will be a key element for our discussions today. It is already available in English and French, and many more languages are coming very soon. Needless to say, for us here, the internet should be accessible to everyone. Hence, language and scripts are an essential part of this puzzle. For UNESCO, multilingualism is not simply about preserving languages. It is about ensuring that everyone can fully participate in the digital world. A multilingual internet expands access to information, education, services, innovation, and opportunity. Yet, achieving this vision requires more than technical possibility. Internationalized domain names and multilingual email addresses are already supported by global technical standards. Even with that, many websites, applications, and online services still fail to recognize or process them correctly, preventing millions of people from fully accessing digital services in their own languages and scripts. So that's why universal acceptance matters. As you probably will hear in more details from the other speakers, universal acceptance ensures that all valid data, including domain names and email addresses, work consistently across digital systems, regardless of language, script, or length. While this may seem like a technical issue, it has profound implications for the different areas of our lives, and hence they require a governance decision. They require policy decisions to move ahead with this. So just very briefly, and then I will conclude, this discussion of the universal acceptance is rooted in a broader international standards and regulations and law conversation from the perspective of the UN system in general and UNESCO in particular. UNESCO for decades has been pushing the multilingualism as an essential. Element to achieve the free flow of information and ideas. But just to give more specific elements, in 2003, our 194 member states adopted this recommendation concerning the promotion and use of multilingualism and universal access to cyberspace. So for the last 23 years, we have been monitoring how this legal instrument is being or not implemented by our member states. More recently, we launched the Global Roadmap for Multilingualism in the Digital Era, and there is a series of different elements from the World Atlas of Languages to the specific toolkits that we have been developing throughout these years to actually move ahead with these overall policies. So this specific discussion of universal acceptance, and more specifically, this policy brief. is one of these, we would say, very practical tools on how we can advance on this, let's say, rights agenda or policy agenda that was approved as multilateral agreements by our member states in Paris, in this case, because it's UNESCO. So how we walk this talk, and to walk this talk, we need very specific elements, and one of them, because we developed this together with ICANN, is related to the universal acceptance and the very specific guidance and policy suggestions and recommendations that are included in this policy brief. So I hope today's discussion will strengthen these partnerships, deepen our collective commitment, and accelerate the global adoption of universal acceptance. Thank you very much. Back to you,
Mr. David Castillo Parra
David. Thank you very much, Guillerme, for setting the stage for this. I will now turn to Teresa Sreinhardt, Senior Vice President of Global Domain and Strategy at ICANN, joining us remotely to deliver her opening remarks. Over to you, Teresa, and thanks.
Ms. Theresa Swinehart
Thank you so much, and it's truly a pleasure to be joining this panel. I know we've had the opportunity to do a few of these sessions to talk about this. It goes without a doubt that languages comprise a multilingual world, and for the internet to be useful to the communities globally, it really needs to be able to support the ability to use these languages in the scripts in which they're written, and the opening remarks by Guillerme had really reinforced the value of this. A linguistically diverse Internet contributes to a knowledge -based society, but it also helps to bridge the digital divide. It allows everybody to navigate the Internet in their native language or script and the use of whatever formulation of expressions that they're most comfortable with for their culture and for their language. So it's really fundamental to human nature and the benefits that we've seen of that in the offline world we need to enable for the online world. Multilingual languages is not just about online content, but it's also about the domain names and email addresses, the mechanism by which we can navigate and communicate online. And that's really essential to making the entire ecosystem and that entire experience work. This was identified very early on at the WSIS meeting in Tunis in 2005. Participants committed to advancing the introduction of multilingualism in domain names and email addresses, importantly by strengthening cooperation for their global deployment. And that's what we're seeing happening as we have evolved. ICANN and its community have been working tirelessly with others to contribute to and achieve these goals. So within ICANN, we've worked with the community on the introduction of internationalized top -level domains. This began with applying for IDN country code top -level domains, referred to as CCTLDs, in 2009, so shortly after the Tunis Agenda in 2005, and then the new generic top -level domains with the round that had opened in 2012. This also led to the delegation of 150, including 31 IDN GTLDs and IDN CCTLDs in the domain name system. This represents 37 languages and 23 scripts. So that's a very practical execution of this. This DNS expansion has led to the greater innovation and consumer choice in the domain name industry, but it's also reduced linguistic barriers to the Internet for users in communities around the world. There's another expansion of the DNS expected through the new GTLD program, which was launched in April 2026 of this year. And based on this work, it's now possible for communities around the world to apply for, register, and use domain names and email addresses in their own languages and scripts that would be to the right or to the left of the dot for the new TLD program that was launched in 2026. However, as was touched upon in the opening remarks, many people around the world are currently excluded from experiencing this full benefit, simply because they're unable to access it. Actually use the domain name or email address of their choice in their language and script. So it exists and is possible, but the challenge is really that many software applications and systems don't recognize yet or are appropriately processing domain names or email addresses in local languages. Fortunately, this is a solvable problem. But imagine trying to complete a transaction online, signing up for a class, ordering a food delivery, or subscribing to your favorite newsletter. And if you're using an email address in your local language and script, you might get an error message back and be unable to complete your transaction. And this type of scenario happens every day for Internet users. But again, it is solvable. This is the universal acceptance challenge that ICANN, in collaboration with UNESCO and the communities around the world, are working to address and create awareness about. Universal acceptance is a technical best practice. It's one that ensures that all valid domain names and email addresses, regardless of the script language or character length, can be equally used by all Internet -enabled applications, devices, and systems. And we rely on those applications, devices, and systems in our day -to -day lives. Achieving universal acceptance will ensure that everybody has the ability to experience the full social and economic power of the Internet in their language and script of choice. Now, there's been much progress made in making multilingual domain names available, but it's really around universal acceptance that we need to do further work. This has been acknowledged by governments and intergovernmental organizations. ITU's World Telecommunications Development Conference, WTDC. In 2025, Resolution 82 asks to promote cooperation between stakeholders and governments in the development and implementation of universal acceptance and multilingualism. ITU Plenipotentiary Conference Resolution 133 also asks for the further development and deployment of IDNs and to consider how to further promote the adoption of universal acceptance in respect to IDNs and to collaborate and coordinate with relevant organizations and stakeholders in enabling the use of IDNs in the Internet. And as recently also as the WSIS Plus 20 outcome document in 2025, which commended the work on multilingual nature of the Internet, including internationalized domain names and universal acceptance, and asked to ensure that the Internet services become fully accessible and affordable. So we're making progress, but still more to do. Let me touch quickly on ICANN's work. Within the community, we've identified gaps in awareness and capacity, technology, and policy for UA adoption, and addressing these gaps requires broader engagement and engagement. We've been promoting universal acceptance capacity development by talking with big tech organizations to support UA in their applications and services. Submitting code fixes in open source projects to support UA and engaging with open source code maintainers to incorporate these code fixes. Supporting the domain name industry in enabling UA in their systems, including having a roadmap domain name registry and registrar system publication report to show registry service providers and their reporting on their UA support. We've been updating our own software systems, and I'm proud to say that we're 92 % UA ready now. Creating awareness by supporting the community to organize UA day events globally. And local initiatives. Engaging with IGOs, including UNESCO and ITU, to promote UA adoption. And also building capacity through UA curriculum programs. Working with universities to integrate topics, including UA IDNs and EAI, into relevant degree programs. So the software developers in our next generations. have the knowledge and the capacity to contribute to this work. As Gero said, still more needs to be done. All of us, as different stakeholders, need to step up to ensure that we can provide access. In this context, it's really been a true pleasure to collaborate with UNESCO to develop this policy brief, Advancing Universal Acceptance of All Domain Names and Email Addresses for Multilingual Internet. The policy brief, as has been mentioned, touches on some core areas. Importantly, it also delineates the role that we must all be playing. What's the role of technology developers, email software and service providers, government policymakers, civil society, and academia? The brief also suggests how we can measure progress. This brief is intended for the public sector, which is a major stakeholder and can help drive the demand. So we hope that this work will contribute to this important effort and enable us to all work towards multilingualism. Thank you for your time today. And I truly look forward.
Mr. David Castillo Parra
Thank you very much, Teresa, for those inspiring remarks. I will now move to our panel and our panelists. I will invite each speaker in turn and ask that we keep interventions around five to seven minutes so we have time for good discussion afterward. And with this, I would like to welcome Dr. Sarmad Hussain, Senior Director for IDN and EUA programs at ICANN, who will walk us through the technical substance of the policy brief and what EUA implementation looks like in practice. Over to you, Sarmad.
Dr. Sarmad Hussain
Thank you, David, and I'll share my presentation. So I'll build on what Teresa just explained and highlight, obviously, not just the context and the context, but the context of the policy brief. So I'll build on what Teresa just explained and highlight, obviously, not just the context of the policy brief. So I'll build on what Teresa But also some of the practical work which is being done to address the issues of the policy brief. But also some of the practical work which is being done to address the issues of the policy brief. But also some of the practical work which is being done to address the issues of the policy brief. so as speakers before me have already noted we live in a multilingual world and it is essential that our languages and scripts are represented on the internet for us to obviously engage with the internet broadly for this purpose of course content is the key but it is also equally important that we have domain names and email addresses which help us navigate and communicate online to be in local languages as well so I can the technical community the regular linguistic community we've been working for many years now as was mentioned by Teresa and Guilherme The initial ask came as early as 2003 with UNESCO's recommendations and Tunis' agenda in 2005, where there were explicitly calls for making domain name system multilingual so that people around the world can navigate in their own languages. Following the early work on standardization, there was a series of expansions in the domain name system of the Internet, which has led to now, as Teresa summarized, more than 151 top -level domains, both in the generic top -level domain space and the country code top -level domain space. What this has done is allowed for domain names and email addresses to actually be represented in local languages. So the technology, the standards, the policy, it's already there, not just for domain names, but now email addresses as well. And what that allows is to now have domain names, for example, in Armenian, Oria, Georgian, and many of the other scripts. And these are examples of real domain names which we have actually registered, and they work. Similarly, you can use these domain names to actually have email addresses in these local languages as well. And again, some of these email addresses we've deployed to make sure that these are functional. So the core technology is already in place. However, when you start using them, then you start facing some challenges. The challenges are that the websites, the applications which input domain names and email addresses, either they're not familiar with these or they're not updated to make sure that these domain names are accepted properly. So just to give you some data, what we did was we actually looked at 50 websites in 20 different countries, about 1 ,000 websites. And for each of the country's websites, we went to their government websites, banking, academia, media, all the different kinds of sectors. And we would go to their contact us page and put in an email address in the language of that country. So for Chinese websites, we would put a Chinese email address for contact us page. And for India, we would put in Hindi. Hindi and so on. and what we found out was that, as you can see on the screen here, that really a small number of websites actually support domain names or email addresses in this case in their local languages. And the acceptance rates on average are around 12%. So if you think about it, out of 1 ,000 websites, we still have more than 850 websites which would not accept such email addresses and domain names in their own local languages and scripts. So there is obviously an awareness gap. And obviously one of the other things which we've done is under the GTLD programs, GTLD data, we're actually paying all the email servers which are deployed across the world, about 32 million of them. and found out that over time, though the response of email servers to support internationalized email addresses or email addresses in local languages is improving, even to date the acceptance rate of local language email addresses is still less than 30%. So, as has been shared, this is a technical standard which is already in place. Universal acceptance is basically focusing on ensuring that all valid domain names and valid email addresses, regardless of their script, language, and character length, can be used equally by all Internet -enabled application devices and systems. And there is a role to play for all of us in the process with IDNs and internationalized email addresses. now available. We need to make our websites, update our websites, update our applications, and not just ours, but also obviously we're working with big tech organizations which develop applications which are used by millions of users or hundreds of millions of users to make sure that they are also addressing this aspect. And in that capacity, one of the significant stakeholders are the governments because they can mandate or incentivize use of such domain names and email services, especially, for example, in their e -services which they provide to their citizens. And we've been working. We are very thankful to UNESCO for an exciting collaboration in this area where we have recently worked together to develop. policy brief. What this policy brief does is identifies all the different areas where universal acceptance can contribute. It also identifies what are some of the gaps in awareness, technology, capacity, and policy, and then highlights the role of the different stakeholders, what each of the stakeholders can do and contribute in this area. Obviously, ICANN has been doing a lot of work in this area to do our part. We hold UA Day events in collaboration, in very close collaboration with UNESCO and the community, and we've been doing that for the last four years to create more awareness and capacity around the world. We've already had more than 200 UA Day events over the last four years. in 86 countries and 42 languages, reaching out to more than 29 ,000 participants. We are also, for sustainable capacity development, working with universities around the world to integrate a concept of domain names and email addresses in local languages in the curriculum so that when the technology students come out and graduate, they are well -versed and are cognizant of these areas when they eventually develop technology. We've already been working very closely with the American University of Bahrain, University of Modelo in Mexico, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology in India, Women's University in Zimbabwe. We also recently signed up a collaboration in Bolivia, another one in India, so we continue to expand this network. Thank you. And we also obviously are working very losely with the domain name registries and registrars to support this effort. So with this, please feel free to connect with us at uaprogram at ICANN .org in case you have any questions or you want to collaborate. And with that, back to you, David. Thank you.
Mr. David Castillo Parra
Thank you very much, Sarmat, for the presentation. I will now turn to my colleague, Xiang Hong, who is a program specialist at UNESCO, joining us virtually. Over to you, Xiang Hong.
Dr. Xianhong Hu
Thank you. Thank you, David. Also, warm greetings from Paris to all the participants in the room, also online, actually. I found we have so many participants online, almost 40 people in the Zoom, really. Thank you for your interest in the subject. Particularly, it's lunchtime for me. Thank you. So, complementing the presentation of Samad, I'm very happy to co -present the policy brief a bit further and also share UNESCO's broader work in this area of promoting multilingualism. Next slide, please. Now we are at the third decade of WSIS, but compared to 20 years ago, we are facing the hard fact that the global digital divide and the global inequality continue to persist even today. We should not forget that 2 billion people are not yet connected to the internet. One of the barriers is the language, and the scale of the linguistic divide is still outstanding and even expanding in the AI era. The lack of universal acceptance in the digital ecosystem significantly limits the potential for AI and limits what AI can learn, can perform, and can benefit. That's also what we had discussed. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Next slide, please. That's why the latest global response from whether WSIS Plus 20 review and also Global Digital Compact all recognized the urgent need to promote and preserve cultural diversity, heritage, and language. Which only for closing all language divide, all digital divide, and expanding the multilingual nature of the Internet, IDNs, and universal acceptance, as highlighted by our colleague Guillerme and Teresa of ICANN in their opening remarks. Next slide, please. UNESCO has a unique mandate and commitment to multilingualism. We have our nomad. We have our nomad. on the multilingualism. We are hosting the Secretariat to implement the UN International Decade of Indigeneous Languages. And the latest autumn on the Global Roadmap was sketched 45 actions for stakeholders' involvement. You can all scan the QR code to download these publications. Next slide, please. It is in this context UNESCO has a decade -long collaboration with ICANN. Actually, we just have our cooperation agreement recently renewed in 2025 with universal acceptance and the UA Day celebration identified as one of the major collaboration area. Next slide, please. Next slide, please. Yes. That's why today we are here. to present this important joint policy brief. It's one unique knowledge product for both advocacy and action. It not only identifies the challenges of the language as a barrier for meaningful connectivity and participation, but also provides actionable policy recommendations and actions for all the stakeholders. And now it's available in English -French, and you can all download from the link on this slide. I will also post a link in the chat. It will be available in more languages. encourage your support to put it into more languages in your country. Next slide, please. And I also like to draw attention to the holistic perspective of this policy brief because it really sheds light on the comprehensive importance and benefits of UA to every country, not only contributing to the digital economic growth, but also safeguarding the linguistic diversity of human civilizations. It supports the education delivery online for all the children's schools, as well as help with e -governance and the digital services. Certainly it's unpacked some barriers ranging from awareness, technical barrier to capacity policy and regulations. It was done. One key message I'd like to share from this brief is that to achieve UA is just a technical issue. It really requires human dimensions and significant policy development involving all stakeholders. Next slide, please. That's why this policy brief offers strong recommendation to governments, to technical community, to civil society, academia, language communities, including indigenous peoples, as well as international organizations like UNESCO. For us, with our normative authority, technical expertise, and global convening power, we are positioned to help develop international cooperation, accelerate cross -border alignment, and collaboration on the technical protocols of UA, supporting the national level capacity building and implementation. To promote UA as a core pillar of the digital inclusion agenda at the national level as well. Next slide, please. The policy brief also proposes a suite of measurements as a useful guidance to measure the progress of UA. So we do encourage the member states and the stakeholders to consider conducting a voluntary assessment of universal acceptance along these dimensions, which can be very useful, a good starting point for UA adoption in the next step. Next slide, please. The UNESCO has integrated UA to our current monitoring, the sixth monitoring of the Recognition Zone 3. The timeline is to receive the national reports on the implementation by February 2027. We do encourage member states and stakeholders to integrate UA aspect in this reporting. You could also access the documents and the questionnaire by scanning the QR on this slide. We also post your link in the chat. So, lastly, really a multilingual thanks to all of you. Let's continue with our advocacy and also action to make sure all the languages are equally present in the digital space. Thank you.
Mr. David Castillo Parra
Thank you so much, Xiaohong, for your presentation. I am pleased to welcome Mr. Henri Monceau from Permanent Observatory of the OEF to the United Nations in Geneva and Vienna. Henri, are you there in the room? Sorry that I cannot see you well. Where is it? Here, yes. Thank you. You have some five minutes so that we can go to the question and answer. Thanks.
Mr. Henri Monceau
Merci beaucoup. Bonjour. Allow me first to warmly thank UNESCO and ICANN for organizing this important event and for their excellent cooperation in producing this policy brief on universal acceptance. La Francophonie is proud to support this initiative genuinely and unreservedly. Today, universal acceptance is no longer simply about making every language work on Internet. It is about ensuring that every language can help shape the future of artificial intelligence. Allow me to offer three brief reflections. First, universal acceptance is a prerequisite for genuine digital inclusions. For billions of people, language is the first gateway to the digital world. If citizens cannot use their own language or script in a domain name or an email address, digital inclusion remains incomplete. Universal acceptance is therefore not merely about technical interoperability. It is about enabling every individual to participate fully in the digital society while preserving his or her linguistic identity. That ambition lies at the heart of UNESCO's vision of inclusive knowledge societies, and it is one that the francophonie fully shares. Second, artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed the significance of universal acceptance. Tomorrow's AI systems will increasingly rely on multilingual digital concepts. Content generated through website digital services, email exchanges, and online interaction. The richer and more linguistically diverse the Internet becomes, the richer and more representative AI training data will become. Conversely, languages that remain marginalized in the Internet's infrastructure are also likely to remain marginalized in the datasets that shape artificial intelligence. That is why universal acceptance is no longer simply about making every language work on the Internet. It is about ensuring that every language can help shape the future of artificial intelligence. Third, this is why universal acceptance deserves stronger political support. Technology alone will not achieve universal acceptance. Governments, international organizations, the technical community, the private sector, academia, and civil society all have a role to play. We need awareness, we need standards, we need implementation, we need capacity building, particularly in developing countries. We also need procurement policies that encourage universal acceptance by design. And we need to integrate universal acceptance into national digital strategies and AI strategies. Allow me to conclude. The Internet was designed to connect humanity. Our artificial intelligence is now shaping the way humanity communicates, creates. If we want this future to reflect the richness of the world's languages and cultures. We must begin with the foundations. Universal acceptance is one of those foundations. It may appear to be a technical matter. In reality, this is one of the most concrete expressions of digital inclusion, linguistic equality, and cultural diversity. Because every language that can fully exist online is a language that can continue to create, innovate, and enrich our shared humanities. The OIF will therefore continue to stand alongside UNESCO, ICANN, and all partners committed to making universal acceptance not simply a technical standard, but the cornerstone of a multilingual, culturally diverse, and human society centered digital future. Thank you.
Mr. David Castillo Parra
Merci beaucoup, Monsieur Monceau, pour votre présentation. Well, I would like now to move to maybe a little round of questions and discussion. I know that we received a note from Mr. Steve Sanz, who I believe you're in the room from DigiConnect. Maybe you want to comment on something. Go ahead if you're in the room. Mr. Sanz? I don't think so, David. All right. Well, in that case, we will take maybe one or two questions, please. I appreciate colleagues in the room if they
Dr. Sarmad Hussain
Thank you, David. We have a hand up. Please go ahead.
Audience
Hello. Thank you. Since there is an interpretation that I just discovered, I will use French. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Alors, c 'est compliqué quand on n 'a pas de voix, c 'est compliqué quand on n 'a pas de voix multilangue, c 'est compliqué quand on a des outils qui sont faits d 'un côté de l 'Atlantique et pas sur le reste du monde. Donc je pense que, en plus de l 'acceptation universelle, accepter la place des utilisateurs, parce que c 'est pour eux que tout ça doit être fait, c 'est pour qu 'ils puissent utiliser l 'Internet dans de bonnes conditions, et ils ont une maison à l and it would be good not to forget it. Thank you.
Mr. David Castillo Parra
e can take one other question and then we respond.
Audience
Hey, I'm Mirab Labazo from Georgia. My friends are trying to do some... efforts to make Georgian AI visible. But my question is about dilemma. There is this AI sovereignty on the table. So does it contradict people? And these efforts are sometimes trying to limit and to create their own AI, which might be not accessible universally. So there could be some local efforts in small languages in the name of the digital or AI sovereignty. And these materials could exist, but in a readable format, but sometimes on purpose may not universally available. So is there any way out of this? Thank you.
Dr. Sarmad Hussain
So maybe I can respond to the – or just make a short comment on the first question about the role of end users in the universal acceptance discussion. Of course, from an ICANN perspective, this whole effort is to ensure that the multilingual Internet universal acceptance, more specifically, is a feature of Internet which is available for the end users themselves. So all this effort is actually then eventually focused on the ability of end users to be able to come online in their own language. As far as working together with end users is concerned, we do work very closely with the community closer to ICANN, but also – More broadly, just to give you, you know, I shared an example earlier that we collaborate not only with UNESCO, but also with the community within ICANN, which includes at -large advisory committee and at -large structures, which actually represent the local communities to create awareness of universal acceptance through the UADA. We also obviously are reaching out to the community, I guess, more from a technical perspective through the UA curriculum integration program. So we do run multiple programs to reach out to the community because, of course, a lot of this work or most of this work is, of course, focused on making sure that they can access the Internet. Thank you.
Dr. Xianhong Hu
If I may just briefly compliment what Samad said. First of all, thanks for this question. Very relevant. I had to go through my PPT very fast. Actually, in the slide on the policy recommendation, we do have a major category to address the role of civil society, including users, the academia, and the different communities, including indigenous peoples. I suppose users really are at the center of this policy brief. It's the end of, and also the means we also recognize the important role of the users, civil society, to monitor, to raise awareness, to advocate for the UA implementation, to share the stories, et cetera. And secondly, that's in the whole process of the development of this policy brief, and also the ongoing advocacy, we do engage with users consistently. For example, we just presented this policy brief in. And ICANN 86, I was personally engaging with a lot of at -large community in the conference. I was discussing, we were really engaging directly with all the users and communities to make sure that this brief is inclusive. Also, certainly I encourage ISOC and your community can also engage with us in the next step of the advocacy and action. Thank you
Mr. David Castillo Parra
Thank you, Sir. I think that we will need to wrap up the session now because we are already five minutes late. So perhaps those who are... I don't know. Henri, do you want 30 seconds to comment on one of the questions and I can give a quick comment on the last one?
Mr. Henri Monceau
Merci, Guillermo. Alors, en effet, moi aussi j 'ai découvert entre temps qu 'il y avait une interprétation synthétique. But the habits are taken, it seems, in relation to the absence of multilingualism. Thank you for that. I want to return to the question of users by underlining that for those who concern the EIF and the work of the EIF with ICANN, we must highlight the work of the communities that carried this dossier and continue to carry it. I think, for example, of our friends from Quebec, both from the Internet Society and Point Québec, who were absolutely essential in this debate and this fight, I would say, and which is obviously fundamental, since, as I have highlighted, it is an issue that is also political and not only technical.
Mr. Guilherme Canela
Thank you. Thank you, Henri. Very briefly. On your question, I think it's obviously much more complicated than the one or two minutes we have, but a couple of, I guess, important observations. One. And obviously, when we speak about AI, there's a lot of things under this umbrella of AI, right? So, this building of smaller models, it's related also to the specific usage of that, right? So, I see your point in terms of some of the risks in terms of creating an encapsulated situation. But in some of these for particular education applications, et cetera, it also can be very useful in the way you do it. But even in that situation, when the broader generative AI or chats and so on, if you talk about, for example, a specific indigenous language community, if you have some of these communities that speak Quechua developing a particular model in Peru, this can be very useful for other Quechua speakers in different. So, it's not that easy to answer the question in a broader manner because there are... are different ways of using that. But for example, we have been listening from education systems in different parts of the world, in local, not in the sense that it's a very smaller community, that makes sense to look into this kind of specific models for that specific reality for different reasons, digital sovereignty and so on. But also, these models consume a lot less water and energy and so on. So there are different implications for this conversation. But thank you for the question. It's very interesting and it's part of what we need to discuss. Back to you David.
Mr. David Castillo Parra
Thank you, Guillermo. I actually would like to invite all of you in the room for the event tomorrow at the same time, 1 to 1 .45, organized by ICANN, Sarmad, and other colleagues will be also there. And you will be probably able to, you know, talk to each other about the topic. Talk a little bit more about this and this will be a good opportunity to continue the conversation. so I don't know if there is anything else in the room if not then we can conclude and I thank you all joining remotely and in the room for your presence and have a good afternoon thank you bye bye

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.