Universal Acceptance for a Multilingual Internet: Launch of the UNESCO–ICANN Policy Brief
This session, jointly convened by UNESCO and ICANN, marked the launch of a joint policy brief on advancing universal acceptance (UA) of all domain names and email addresses for a multilingual internet . The discussion brought together representatives from UNESCO, ICANN, and the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF) to explore the technical, policy, and cultural dimensions of making the internet fully accessible in all languages and scripts.
UNESCO's Guilherme Canela emphasised that multilingualism is not merely about preserving languages but about ensuring full participation in the digital world, noting that internationalized domain names and multilingual email addresses are already supported by global technical standards, yet many systems still fail to process them correctly . ICANN's Theresa Swinehart highlighted that this challenge is solvable, and outlined ICANN's ongoing efforts, including the delegation of over 150 internationalised top-level domains representing 37 languages and 23 scripts, as well as engagement with open-source developers and big tech organisations . Dr Sarmad Hussain provided concrete data illustrating the scale of the problem, noting that a survey of approximately 1,000 websites across 20 countries found an average acceptance rate of only 12% for local-language email addresses, and that fewer than 30% of global email servers support internationalised email addresses .
UNESCO's Xianhong Hu underscored that achieving UA requires human and policy dimensions beyond purely technical fixes, and that the policy brief offers actionable recommendations for governments, civil society, academia, and international organisations . Henri Monceau of the OIF added that universal acceptance has taken on new urgency in the AI era, warning that languages marginalised in internet infrastructure risk being equally marginalised in AI training datasets .
Audience questions raised the importance of focusing on end users in UA efforts and the potential tension between AI sovereignty initiatives and universal accessibility . Panellists responded by affirming that end-user communities are central to the policy brief's recommendations and that smaller, locally developed language models can complement broader multilingual goals rather than contradict them .
Overall, the session concluded with a shared call for stronger political commitment, procurement policies, and cross-sector collaboration to ensure that universal acceptance becomes a foundational pillar of an inclusive, linguistically diverse digital future .
Overall Purpose
- The session was jointly convened by UNESCO and ICANN to launch a collaborative policy brief titled Advancing Universal Acceptance of All Domain Names and Email Addresses for Multilingual Internet. The overarching goal was to raise awareness of the barriers preventing millions of people from accessing the internet in their own languages and scripts, and to present actionable policy recommendations for governments, technical communities, civil society, and international organisations to address these barriers.
- --
Major Discussion Points
- The current state and technical foundations of Universal Acceptance (UA): Speakers explained that while internationalized domain names (IDNs) and multilingual email addresses are already supported by global technical standards, many websites and applications still fail to process them correctly. Data from a survey of approximately 1,000 websites across 20 countries showed an average acceptance rate of only 12% for local-language email addresses, and fewer than 30% of email servers globally support internationalised email addresses.
- The launch and content of the UNESCO-ICANN policy brief: The policy brief was formally launched at the session and presented as a practical tool to advance multilingualism online. It identifies gaps in awareness, technology, capacity, and policy; delineates the responsibilities of different stakeholders including governments, technology developers, civil society, and academia; and proposes a suite of measurements to track progress on UA adoption.
- The role of governments and international policy frameworks in driving UA adoption: Multiple speakers highlighted that UA is not merely a technical issue but requires political will and governance decisions. International frameworks including ITU Resolution 82, ITU Plenipotentiary Resolution 133, the WSIS+20 outcome document, and UNESCO's 2003 Recommendation on multilingualism were cited as mandates for action. Governments were identified as key stakeholders who can mandate or incentivise UA adoption, particularly through e-government services.
- Capacity building and awareness initiatives to accelerate UA adoption: ICANN and UNESCO described ongoing efforts to build awareness and technical capacity, including UA Day events held in 86 countries across 42 languages reaching over 29,000 participants, and a university curriculum integration programme partnering with institutions in Bahrain, Mexico, India, Zimbabwe, and Bolivia. These initiatives aim to ensure that the next generation of software developers is equipped to support multilingual internet infrastructure.
- The intersection of Universal Acceptance, linguistic diversity, and artificial intelligence: The OIF representative and UNESCO speakers argued that UA has taken on new urgency in the AI era, as languages marginalised in internet infrastructure risk being equally marginalised in AI training datasets. With 2 billion people still unconnected and the linguistic divide persisting or expanding, ensuring that all languages are fully represented online is now also a prerequisite for equitable AI development.
- --
Overall Tone
- The overall tone of the discussion was collaborative, advocacy-driven, and cautiously optimistic. Speakers from UNESCO, ICANN, and the OIF consistently emphasised shared purpose and the importance of multi-stakeholder cooperation, maintaining a constructive and collegial atmosphere throughout.
- The opening remarks carried a sense of momentum and milestone-marking, with speakers noting that multilingualism is finally receiving the political attention it deserves. The technical presentation introduced a more sober, data-driven register, grounding the discussion in concrete evidence of how far the ecosystem still has to go. Towards the close, the Q&A introduced a slightly more critical edge, with audience members raising concerns about the exclusion of end users from the conversation and the potential tensions between AI sovereignty and universal accessibility. Panellists responded thoughtfully and acknowledged the complexity of these issues, maintaining a tone of openness rather than defensiveness. Overall, the session remained positive and forward-looking throughout.
Session Overview
This session, jointly convened by UNESCO and ICANN at the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), marked the formal launch of a collaborative policy brief titled Advancing Universal Acceptance of All Domain Names and Email Addresses for Multilingual Internet . Moderated by Mr. David Castillo Parra, the session brought together senior representatives from UNESCO, ICANN, and the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF) to explore the technical, policy, and cultural dimensions of making the internet fully accessible in all languages and scripts. The discussion was framed as both a milestone event and a call to action, with speakers consistently emphasising that the challenge of universal acceptance (UA) is not merely a technical matter but a fundamental prerequisite for digital inclusion, linguistic equality, and equitable participation in the digital world .
---
Opening Remarks: UNESCO's Normative and Policy Framing
Mr. Guilherme Canela, Director for the Division of Digital Inclusion and Policies and Digital Transformation at UNESCO, opened the session by situating the launch of the policy brief within UNESCO's long-standing normative commitment to multilingualism . He noted that this was the first time in the preceding two and a half days that he was speaking on a panel about multilingualism, and characterised this as a positive sign that the multilingualism agenda is gaining the political importance it deserves - progress he attributed to sustained cooperation between organisations including ICANN and the OIF . Canela was careful to distinguish UNESCO's framing of multilingualism from a purely cultural or preservationist agenda: for UNESCO, multilingualism is not simply about preserving languages but about ensuring that everyone can fully participate in the digital world . A multilingual internet, he argued, expands access to information, education, services, innovation, and opportunity .
Canela acknowledged that while internationalised domain names and multilingual email addresses are already supported by global technical standards, many websites, applications, and online services still fail to recognise or process them correctly, preventing millions of people from fully accessing digital services in their own languages and scripts . This gap, he stressed, is not merely a technical inconvenience but a governance and policy failure requiring deliberate political decisions to address . He traced the normative foundations of this agenda to UNESCO's 2003 Recommendation on the Promotion and Use of Multilingualism and Universal Access to Cyberspace, adopted by 194 member states, and noted that UNESCO has been monitoring its implementation for the past 23 years . More recently, UNESCO launched the Global Roadmap for Multilingualism in the Digital Era, encompassing tools such as the World Atlas of Languages and specific policy toolkits . The joint policy brief with ICANN, he concluded, represents one of the most practical instruments for translating multilateral normative commitments into concrete guidance .
---
ICANN's Perspective: Technical Progress and the Scale of the Challenge
Ms. Theresa Swinehart, Senior Vice President of Global Domain and Strategy at ICANN, joined remotely to deliver opening remarks that complemented UNESCO's normative framing with a technical and operational perspective . She emphasised that a linguistically diverse internet is fundamental to human nature and essential for bridging the digital divide, enabling everyone to navigate online in their native language or script . Multilingual support, she stressed, is not only about online content but also about the domain names and email addresses that serve as the mechanisms by which people navigate and communicate online .
Swinehart traced the origins of the multilingual internet agenda to the WSIS meeting in Tunis in 2005, where participants committed to advancing the introduction of multilingualism in domain names and email addresses through strengthened international cooperation . She outlined ICANN's subsequent work with the community, beginning with the introduction of internationalised country code top-level domains (IDN CCTLDs) in 2009 and the new generic top-level domain (GTLD) round that opened in 2012 . This work has resulted in the delegation of more than 150 internationalised top-level domains, representing 37 languages and 23 scripts . A further expansion of the domain name system is expected through the new GTLD programme, which Swinehart stated was launched in April 2026 .
Despite this technical progress, Swinehart acknowledged that many people around the world remain excluded from experiencing the full benefit, simply because many software applications and systems do not yet recognise or appropriately process domain names or email addresses in local languages . She was emphatic that this is a solvable problem , illustrating the human cost through everyday scenarios: a person using a local-language email address might receive an error message when trying to complete an online transaction, sign up for a class, or order food delivery . She described UA as a technical best practice that ensures all valid domain names and email addresses, regardless of script, language, or character length, can be equally used by all internet-enabled applications, devices, and systems . Achieving UA, she argued, will ensure that everybody has the ability to experience the full social and economic power of the internet in their language and script of choice .
Swinehart also highlighted the growing international policy recognition of UA, citing ITU's World Telecommunications Development Conference Resolution 82 (2025), which calls for cooperation between stakeholders and governments in the development and implementation of UA and multilingualism ; ITU Plenipotentiary Conference Resolution 133, which asks for further development and deployment of IDNs and promotion of UA adoption ; and the WSIS Plus 20 outcome document (2025), which commended work on the multilingual nature of the internet and called for fully accessible and affordable internet services . She outlined ICANN's own efforts, including engaging with large technology organisations, submitting code fixes in open-source projects, supporting the domain name industry, updating ICANN's own software systems to 92% UA readiness, and organising UA Day events globally . She also described a university curriculum integration programme to ensure that the next generation of software developers is equipped to support multilingual internet infrastructure, including both internationalised domain names and Email Address Internationalisation (EAI) .
---
Technical Evidence: The Gap Between Standards and Practice
Dr. Sarmad Hussain, Senior Director for IDN and EUA Programmes at ICANN, provided a detailed technical presentation that grounded the discussion in empirical evidence . He confirmed that the technology, standards, and policy for internationalised domain names and email addresses are already in place, with real domain names registered and functional in scripts including Armenian, Odia, and Georgian . However, he emphasised that when users attempt to use these domain names and email addresses in practice, they encounter significant challenges because many websites and applications are not updated to accept them correctly .
To illustrate the scale of the problem, Hussain described a survey of approximately 1,000 websites across 20 countries, covering government, banking, academic, and media sectors . Researchers submitted email addresses in the local language of each country - for example, a Chinese email address on Chinese websites - and found that on average only approximately 12% of websites accepted such addresses . This means that more than 850 out of 1,000 tested websites would not accept email addresses in their own country's local language and script . Hussain also reported on an analysis of approximately 32 million email servers deployed worldwide, finding that while acceptance of internationalised email addresses has improved over time, it remains below 30% . These figures provided a stark quantitative measure of the gap between the existence of technical standards and their actual implementation.
Hussain described the policy brief as identifying all the different areas where UA can contribute, the gaps in awareness, technology, capacity, and policy, and the roles of different stakeholders . He highlighted governments as particularly significant actors, noting that they can mandate or incentivise the use of multilingual domain names and email services, especially in e-services provided to citizens . He also described ICANN's capacity-building efforts in detail: more than 200 UA Day events have been held over four years in 86 countries and 42 languages, reaching more than 29,000 participants . ICANN is also working with universities globally - including the American University of Bahrain, the University of Modelo in Mexico, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology in India, Women's University in Zimbabwe, and institutions in Bolivia - to integrate internationalised domain names and email addresses into technology degree programmes . Stakeholders were invited to contact ICANN at uaprogram@icann.org for questions or collaboration opportunities .
---
UNESCO's Broader Multilingualism Agenda and the Policy Brief's Scope
Dr. Xianhong Hu, Programme Specialist at UNESCO, joined remotely to present the policy brief in greater depth and to situate it within UNESCO's broader multilingualism work . She opened by noting that despite being at the third decade of WSIS, approximately 2 billion people remain unconnected to the internet, and the linguistic divide continues to persist and even expand in the AI era . She argued that the lack of universal acceptance in the digital ecosystem significantly limits the potential for AI - limiting what AI can learn, perform, and benefit - making the resolution of the linguistic divide even more urgent .
Hu noted that the latest global responses, including the WSIS Plus 20 review and the Global Digital Compact, have recognised the urgent need to promote and preserve cultural diversity, heritage, and language, and have highlighted the multilingual nature of the internet, IDNs, and universal acceptance . She described UNESCO's unique mandate and commitment to multilingualism, including its role as Secretariat for the UN International Decade of Indigenous Languages and the 45 actions for stakeholder involvement outlined in the Global Roadmap for Multilingualism . She also noted that UNESCO's cooperation agreement with ICANN was recently renewed in 2025, with UA Day celebrations identified as a major area of collaboration .
Characterising the policy brief as a unique knowledge product for both advocacy and action, Hu emphasised that it not only identifies the challenges of language as a barrier to meaningful connectivity but also provides actionable policy recommendations for all stakeholders . She drew attention to the holistic perspective of the brief, which sheds light on the comprehensive importance and benefits of UA - contributing to digital economic growth, safeguarding linguistic diversity, supporting online education, and enabling e-governance . A key message she wished to convey was that achieving UA is not just a technical issue but requires human dimensions and significant policy development involving all stakeholders .
The policy brief offers recommendations to governments, the technical community, civil society, academia, language communities including indigenous peoples, and international organisations . For UNESCO specifically, its normative authority, technical expertise, and global convening power position it to develop international cooperation, accelerate cross-border alignment on technical protocols, and promote UA as a core pillar of the digital inclusion agenda at the national level . Hu also highlighted the brief's proposed measurement framework, encouraging member states and stakeholders to conduct voluntary assessments of UA along the dimensions outlined . She noted that UNESCO has integrated UA into its sixth monitoring cycle of the Recommendation on the Promotion and Use of Multilingualism, with national reports due by February 2027, and encouraged member states and stakeholders to include UA aspects in their reporting . She also directly called on participants to support translation of the policy brief - available in English and French at the time of the session - into additional languages in their own countries .
---
The OIF's Perspective: Universal Acceptance, Political Will, and the AI Imperative
Mr. Henri Monceau, from the Permanent Observatory of the OIF to the United Nations in Geneva and Vienna, offered three reflections that added both political urgency and a forward-looking AI dimension to the discussion . His first reflection was that universal acceptance is a prerequisite for genuine digital inclusion: if citizens cannot use their own language or script in a domain name or email address, digital inclusion remains incomplete . UA, he argued, is not merely about technical interoperability but about enabling every individual to participate fully in digital society while preserving their linguistic identity - an ambition at the heart of UNESCO's vision of inclusive knowledge societies, and one the OIF fully shares .
His second reflection was that artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed the significance of universal acceptance . Tomorrow's AI systems will increasingly rely on multilingual digital content generated through websites, digital services, email exchanges, and online interactions . The richer and more linguistically diverse the internet becomes, the richer and more representative AI training data will become . Conversely, languages that remain marginalised in internet infrastructure are also likely to remain marginalised in the datasets that shape artificial intelligence . This argument elevated UA from a technical compliance issue to a strategic AI governance concern: universal acceptance is no longer simply about making every language work on the internet but about ensuring that every language can help shape the future of artificial intelligence .
His third reflection was that universal acceptance deserves stronger political support . Technology alone will not achieve UA; governments, international organisations, the technical community, the private sector, academia, and civil society all have a role to play . He called for awareness, standards, implementation, and capacity building - particularly in developing countries - as well as procurement policies that encourage UA by design and integration of UA into national digital and AI strategies . He concluded by affirming that the OIF will continue to stand alongside UNESCO, ICANN, and all partners committed to making universal acceptance not simply a technical standard but the cornerstone of a multilingual, culturally diverse, and human society-centred digital future .
---
Audience Discussion: End Users, Civil Society, and AI Sovereignty
The Q&A segment introduced two important critical perspectives that enriched the discussion. The first came from an unidentified French-speaking audience member who raised the importance of centring end users in the UA effort, noting the challenges that arise when tools are made on one side of the Atlantic without adequate consideration of multilingual users elsewhere . The comment suggested that placing users - since everything is done for them so that they can use the internet in good conditions - at the centre of UA efforts should be a more prominent pillar of the agenda .
Hussain responded by affirming that the entire UA effort is focused on the ability of end users to come online in their own language, and described ICANN's work with at-large advisory committees and at-large structures that represent local communities . Hu similarly asserted that users are at the centre of the policy brief, both as the end goal and as participants in monitoring, raising awareness, and advocating for UA implementation . She also noted that the policy brief was developed with consistent engagement with users and communities, including at ICANN 86 . Monceau added that the real advocacy drivers have included specific francophone communities, particularly organisations in Quebec such as Point Québec and the Internet Society, which he described as having been absolutely essential in this debate and fight .
The second audience question, from Mirab Labazo of Georgia, introduced a more complex governance dilemma: the potential tension between AI sovereignty and universal accessibility . The questioner noted that local efforts to build sovereign AI in small languages might, in the name of digital sovereignty, create content that exists in a readable format but is intentionally not universally available , and asked whether there is any way out of this tension . Canela offered a nuanced response, acknowledging that the question is far more complicated than can be resolved in a few minutes . He noted that there are different ways of using AI, and that locally developed models - such as a Quechua-language model developed in Peru - can be very useful for Quechua speakers in different countries, suggesting that local sovereignty and broader accessibility are not necessarily contradictory . He also noted that smaller, locally focused models may consume less water and energy, pointing to environmental benefits . He concluded by acknowledging the complexity and the need for further discussion .
---
Conclusions and Next Steps
The session concluded with a shared call for stronger political commitment, cross-sector collaboration, and concrete action to ensure that universal acceptance becomes a foundational pillar of an inclusive, linguistically diverse digital future . Participants were invited to attend a follow-up ICANN-organised session the following day from 1:00 to 1:45 to continue the conversation . The policy brief, available in English and French at the time of the session, with translations into additional languages forthcoming, was presented as a document that stakeholders were encouraged to support translating into their own national languages . UNESCO's integration of UA into its sixth monitoring cycle of the Recommendation on the Promotion and Use of Multilingualism, with national reports due by February 2027, was identified as a concrete mechanism for tracking progress .
Overall, the session demonstrated a high degree of consensus among all speakers on the core issues: that UA is a prerequisite for genuine digital inclusion; that the technical standards exist but practical implementation lags severely; that a multi-stakeholder approach is essential; and that the AI era has added new urgency to the multilingualism agenda. The most significant unresolved tensions - the potential conflict between AI sovereignty and universal accessibility, and the question of how to more meaningfully involve end users and communities beyond awareness campaigns - were acknowledged as requiring further research, dialogue, and policy development .
AI sovereignty and local language models - There is a tension between efforts to build locally sovereign AI models in smaller or indigenous languages and the goal of universal accessibility, though such models can serve specific educational and community purposes and may also offer benefits in terms of energy and resource consumption (Mr. Guilherme Canela)
Arg. 1Mr. Canela acknowledged the complexity of the tension between AI sovereignty and universal accessibility, noting that the term AI covers a wide range of applications and that locally developed models in smaller or indigenous languages can serve valuable purposes. He gave the example of a Quechua-language model developed in Peru that could benefit Quechua speakers across different countries, suggesting that local models need not be inherently exclusionary. He also noted that smaller, locally focused models may offer environmental benefits in terms of lower energy and water consumption.
Mr. Canela noted that there are different things under the umbrella of AI, and that building smaller models is related to specific usage contexts . He gave the example of a specific indigenous language community speaking Quechua developing a particular model in Peru, which could be very useful for other Quechua speakers in different countries . He also noted that these models consume a lot less water and energy, pointing to environmental benefits , and acknowledged that education systems in different parts of the world are looking into specific models for their specific realities for reasons including digital sovereignty .
on: Whether AI sovereignty and locally developed language models are compatible with or in tension with universal accessibility goals
Linguistic diversity bridges the digital divide - A multilingual internet allows everyone to navigate online in their native language and script, which is fundamental to human nature and essential for bridging the digital divide (Ms. Theresa Swinehart)
Arg. 1A linguistically diverse internet contributes to a knowledge-based society and helps bridge the digital divide by enabling all users to navigate online in their native language or script. This is described as fundamental to human nature, mirroring the benefits of linguistic diversity already experienced in the offline world. Multilingual support must therefore extend beyond online content to encompass domain names and email addresses as the core mechanisms of online navigation and communication.
Ms. Swinehart noted that a linguistically diverse internet contributes to a knowledge-based society and helps bridge the digital divide, allowing everybody to navigate the internet in their native language or script . She emphasised that multilingual languages are not just about online content but also about domain names and email addresses, which are the mechanisms by which people navigate and communicate online .
on: Universal acceptance is a prerequisite for genuine digital inclusion, not merely a technical issue
DNS expansion and IDN deployment - ICANN has worked with the community to introduce internationalised top-level domains since 2009, resulting in over 150 delegated IDN CCTLDs and GTLDs representing 37 languages and 23 scripts (Ms. Theresa Swinehart)
Arg. 2ICANN and its community have made significant technical progress in expanding the domain name system to support multilingual internet navigation, beginning with IDN country code top-level domains in 2009 and continuing with generic top-level domains from 2012. This work has resulted in the delegation of more than 150 internationalised top-level domains representing 37 languages and 23 scripts. A further expansion is expected through a new generic top-level domain programme launched in 2026.
ICANN began applying for IDN country code top-level domains in 2009, shortly after the Tunis Agenda in 2005, and then introduced new generic top-level domains in a round that opened in 2012 . This led to the delegation of 150 IDN GTLDs and IDN CCTLDs in the domain name system, representing 37 languages and 23 scripts . A further expansion of the DNS was expected through the new GTLD programme launched in April 2026 .
The problem is solvable - Many software applications and systems do not yet recognise or appropriately process domain names or email addresses in local languages, but this is a solvable technical and awareness challenge (Ms. Theresa Swinehart)
Arg. 3Despite the technical standards for internationalised domain names and email addresses being in place, many software applications and systems still fail to recognise or process them correctly, preventing users from completing everyday online transactions in their local language. Ms. Swinehart illustrated this with practical examples such as being unable to complete a food delivery order or sign up for a class when using a local-language email address. She emphasised, however, that this is a solvable problem requiring concerted effort from ICANN, UNESCO, and communities worldwide.
Ms. Swinehart described scenarios where users attempting to use an email address in their local language and script might receive an error message and be unable to complete a transaction, such as signing up for a class, ordering food delivery, or subscribing to a newsletter . She stressed that this type of scenario happens every day for internet users but that it is solvable , and identified it as the universal acceptance challenge that ICANN, in collaboration with UNESCO and communities around the world, are working to address .
on: Technical standards for internationalised domain names and email addresses are already in place, but practical implementation lags significantly
Delineation of stakeholder roles - The brief specifies the roles that technology developers, email software and service providers, government policymakers, civil society, academia, and international organisations must each play in achieving universal acceptance (Ms. Theresa Swinehart)
Arg. 4The UNESCO–ICANN policy brief goes beyond identifying the problem by clearly delineating the specific responsibilities of each category of stakeholder in achieving universal acceptance. This includes technology developers, email software and service providers, government policymakers, civil society, and academia. The brief is particularly intended for the public sector, which is identified as a major stakeholder capable of driving demand for universal acceptance.
Ms. Swinehart noted that the policy brief delineates the role that all stakeholders must play, including technology developers, email software and service providers, government policymakers, civil society, and academia . She also highlighted that the brief suggests how progress can be measured , and that it is intended for the public sector, which is a major stakeholder that can help drive demand .
on: The UNESCO–ICANN policy brief is a practical and actionable tool for advancing universal acceptance across all stakeholder groups
Engagement with big tech and open source - ICANN has been promoting universal acceptance by engaging with large technology organisations, submitting code fixes in open source projects, and supporting the domain name industry in enabling universal acceptance in their systems (Ms. Theresa Swinehart)
Arg. 5ICANN has pursued a multi-pronged approach to promoting universal acceptance by engaging directly with large technology organisations to support UA in their applications and services, and by submitting code fixes in open source projects. The organisation has also supported the domain name industry in enabling UA in their systems and has updated its own software, reaching 92% UA readiness. These efforts are complemented by awareness-raising activities and engagement with intergovernmental organisations.
Ms. Swinehart described ICANN's efforts to promote universal acceptance capacity development by talking with big tech organisations to support UA in their applications and services, submitting code fixes in open source projects, and engaging with open source code maintainers to incorporate these fixes . She noted that ICANN has been supporting the domain name industry in enabling UA in their systems, including through a roadmap publication report , and that ICANN's own software systems are now 92% UA ready .
on: Capacity building, awareness campaigns, and education are essential tools for advancing universal acceptance
Universal acceptance defined - Universal acceptance ensures that all valid domain names and email addresses, regardless of script, language, or character length, can be equally used by all internet-enabled applications, devices, and systems (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
Arg. 1Universal acceptance is a technical best practice and standard that requires all valid domain names and email addresses to function correctly across all internet-enabled applications, devices, and systems, irrespective of the script, language, or character length used. The core technology and standards to support internationalised domain names and email addresses are already in place, but the challenge lies in ensuring that websites and applications are updated to recognise and process them correctly. All stakeholders, including governments, have a role to play in achieving this.
Dr. Hussain explained that universal acceptance focuses on ensuring that all valid domain names and valid email addresses, regardless of their script, language, and character length, can be used equally by all internet-enabled application devices and systems . He noted that the technology, standards, and policy are already in place for both domain names and email addresses , and illustrated this with examples of real registered domain names in Armenian, Oriya, Georgian, and other scripts .
on: Universal acceptance is a prerequisite for genuine digital inclusion, not merely a technical issue
Low acceptance rates in practice - Testing of approximately 1,000 websites across 20 countries showed that on average only around 12% of websites accept email addresses in local languages, meaning over 850 websites fail to support them (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
Arg. 2Empirical testing conducted by ICANN across approximately 1,000 websites in 20 countries revealed that the vast majority of websites still fail to accept email addresses in local languages and scripts. The testing covered diverse sectors including government, banking, academia, and media, and involved submitting local-language email addresses on contact pages. The average acceptance rate of only around 12% demonstrates a significant awareness and implementation gap.
Dr. Hussain described a study in which 50 websites in each of 20 different countries, totalling approximately 1,000 websites, were tested by submitting email addresses in the local language of each country on their contact pages . The results showed that acceptance rates on average are around 12%, meaning more than 850 out of 1,000 websites would not accept email addresses and domain names in their own local languages and scripts .
on: Technical standards for internationalised domain names and email addresses are already in place, but practical implementation lags significantly
Email server support remains insufficient - Analysis of approximately 32 million email servers worldwide found that acceptance of internationalised email addresses is still less than 30%, despite improvement over time (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
Arg. 3Beyond website-level testing, ICANN also analysed the response of email servers globally to internationalised email addresses, finding that acceptance rates remain below 30% despite gradual improvement over time. This analysis covered approximately 32 million email servers deployed across the world. The finding underscores that the universal acceptance challenge extends throughout the email infrastructure, not just at the level of individual websites.
Dr. Hussain reported that ICANN surveyed approximately 32 million email servers deployed across the world and found that, while the response of email servers to support internationalised email addresses has been improving over time, the acceptance rate of local language email addresses is still less than 30% .
on: Technical standards for internationalised domain names and email addresses are already in place, but practical implementation lags significantly
Governments as key drivers - Governments are significant stakeholders who can mandate or incentivise the use of multilingual domain names and email services, particularly in e-services provided to citizens (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
Arg. 4Governments are identified as one of the most significant stakeholders in advancing universal acceptance because they have the authority to mandate or incentivise the adoption of multilingual domain names and email services. This is particularly relevant in the context of e-government services, where governments can lead by example and create demand for UA-compliant systems. The policy brief developed with UNESCO specifically highlights this governmental role.
Dr. Hussain noted that governments are one of the significant stakeholders because they can mandate or incentivise the use of multilingual domain names and email services, especially in the e-services they provide to their citizens . He also described the policy brief as identifying the different areas where universal acceptance can contribute, the gaps in awareness, technology, capacity, and policy, and the role of different stakeholders including governments .
on: The UNESCO–ICANN policy brief is a practical and actionable tool for advancing universal acceptance across all stakeholder groups
UA Day events - ICANN, in close collaboration with UNESCO and the community, has held more than 200 UA Day events over four years in 86 countries and 42 languages, reaching more than 29,000 participants (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
Arg. 5ICANN has been organising UA Day events in close collaboration with UNESCO and the broader community as a key mechanism for creating awareness and building capacity around universal acceptance. Over four years, these events have achieved significant global reach, covering 86 countries and 42 languages. The scale of these events reflects the breadth of the effort required to address the awareness gap identified in the universal acceptance challenge.
Dr. Hussain stated that ICANN holds UA Day events in very close collaboration with UNESCO and the community, and has been doing so for the last four years to create more awareness and capacity around the world . He reported that more than 200 UA Day events have been held over the last four years in 86 countries and 42 languages, reaching more than 29,000 participants .
on: Capacity building, awareness campaigns, and education are essential tools for advancing universal acceptance
University curriculum integration - ICANN is working with universities globally, including institutions in Bahrain, Mexico, India, Zimbabwe, and Bolivia, to integrate internationalised domain names and email addresses into technology degree programmes so future developers are equipped to support universal acceptance (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
Arg. 6To ensure sustainable capacity development, ICANN is partnering with universities around the world to embed knowledge of internationalised domain names and email addresses into technology degree programmes. The goal is to ensure that the next generation of software developers graduates with the awareness and skills needed to build UA-compliant systems. This initiative spans multiple continents and continues to expand.
Dr. Hussain described ICANN's work with universities around the world to integrate the concept of domain names and email addresses in local languages into curricula, so that technology students are well-versed in these areas when they develop technology . He cited specific partner institutions including the American University of Bahrain, University of Modelo in Mexico, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology in India, Women's University in Zimbabwe, and recently signed collaborations in Bolivia and India .
on: Capacity building, awareness campaigns, and education are essential tools for advancing universal acceptance
Scale of the linguistic divide - Despite three decades of WSIS, 2 billion people remain unconnected, and the linguistic divide continues to persist and even expand in the AI era (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
Arg. 1Despite the progress made since the inception of the WSIS process, the global digital divide and global inequality continue to persist, with 2 billion people still not connected to the internet. Language is identified as one of the key barriers to connectivity, and the linguistic divide is described as not only persisting but actually expanding in the era of artificial intelligence. The lack of universal acceptance in the digital ecosystem further limits the potential of AI to serve all communities.
Dr. Hu noted that despite being at the third decade of WSIS, 2 billion people are not yet connected to the internet, and that the global digital divide and global inequality continue to persist . She identified language as one of the barriers and stated that the scale of the linguistic divide is still outstanding and even expanding in the AI era . She also noted that the lack of universal acceptance in the digital ecosystem significantly limits the potential for AI and limits what AI can learn, perform, and benefit .
Gaps in awareness, technology, capacity, and policy - The key barriers to universal acceptance adoption span multiple dimensions beyond the purely technical, requiring human dimensions and significant policy development involving all stakeholders (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
Arg. 2The barriers to achieving universal acceptance are not solely technical in nature but span awareness, technology, capacity, and policy dimensions. Dr. Hu emphasised that achieving UA is fundamentally a human and governance challenge requiring significant policy development and the involvement of all stakeholders. This holistic understanding is reflected in the structure and recommendations of the joint policy brief.
Dr. Hu highlighted that the policy brief unpacks barriers ranging from awareness and technical barriers to capacity, policy, and regulations . She stressed that achieving UA is not just a technical issue but really requires human dimensions and significant policy development involving all stakeholders .
on: Technical standards for internationalised domain names and email addresses are already in place, but practical implementation lags significantly
on: Whether universal acceptance is primarily a technical issue or a governance and political issue
Holistic scope of the brief - The policy brief identifies challenges, provides actionable policy recommendations for all stakeholders, and highlights the comprehensive benefits of universal acceptance for digital economic growth, linguistic diversity, education, and e-governance (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
Arg. 3The UNESCO–ICANN policy brief is presented as a holistic knowledge product that serves both advocacy and action purposes. It not only identifies the challenges of language as a barrier to meaningful connectivity but also provides actionable policy recommendations for all stakeholders. The brief highlights the comprehensive benefits of universal acceptance, spanning digital economic growth, linguistic diversity, education delivery, and e-governance.
Dr. Hu described the policy brief as a unique knowledge product for both advocacy and action, identifying challenges of language as a barrier for meaningful connectivity and participation, and providing actionable policy recommendations and actions for all stakeholders . She drew attention to the holistic perspective of the brief, noting that it sheds light on the comprehensive importance and benefits of UA, including contributions to digital economic growth, safeguarding linguistic diversity, supporting education delivery online, and helping with e-governance and digital services .
on: The UNESCO–ICANN policy brief is a practical and actionable tool for advancing universal acceptance across all stakeholder groups
Measurement framework - The policy brief proposes a suite of measurements to guide progress assessment, and UNESCO has integrated universal acceptance into its monitoring of the Recommendation on the Promotion and Use of Multilingualism (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
Arg. 4The policy brief includes a suite of proposed measurements to help stakeholders assess and track progress on universal acceptance adoption. UNESCO has also integrated universal acceptance into its sixth monitoring cycle of the Recommendation on the Promotion and Use of Multilingualism, with national reports due by February 2027. Member states and stakeholders are encouraged to conduct voluntary assessments and to integrate UA aspects into their reporting.
Dr. Hu noted that the policy brief proposes a suite of measurements as useful guidance to measure the progress of UA, and encouraged member states and stakeholders to consider conducting a voluntary assessment of universal acceptance along these dimensions as a good starting point for UA adoption . She also reported that UNESCO has integrated UA into its current sixth monitoring of the Recommendation on Multilingualism, with national reports on implementation due by February 2027, and encouraged member states and stakeholders to integrate UA aspects into this reporting .
on: The UNESCO–ICANN policy brief is a practical and actionable tool for advancing universal acceptance across all stakeholder groups
UNESCO's normative and convening role - UNESCO is positioned to develop international cooperation, accelerate cross-border alignment on technical protocols, and promote universal acceptance as a core pillar of the digital inclusion agenda at the national level (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
Arg. 5UNESCO's unique mandate, normative authority, technical expertise, and global convening power position it to play a distinctive role in advancing universal acceptance. This includes developing international cooperation, accelerating cross-border alignment on technical protocols, and supporting national-level capacity building and implementation. UNESCO also promotes universal acceptance as a core pillar of the digital inclusion agenda at the national level.
Dr. Hu stated that with its normative authority, technical expertise, and global convening power, UNESCO is positioned to help develop international cooperation, accelerate cross-border alignment and collaboration on the technical protocols of UA, and support national-level capacity building and implementation . She also noted UNESCO's role in promoting UA as a core pillar of the digital inclusion agenda at the national level , and highlighted UNESCO's decade-long collaboration with ICANN, with a cooperation agreement recently renewed in 2025 with UA Day celebration identified as a major collaboration area .
on: Capacity building, awareness campaigns, and education are essential tools for advancing universal acceptance
Linguistic divide expanding in the AI era - The lack of universal acceptance in the digital ecosystem significantly limits what AI can learn, perform, and benefit, making the resolution of the linguistic divide even more urgent (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
Arg. 6The emergence of artificial intelligence has added a new dimension of urgency to the universal acceptance challenge, as the linguistic divide now directly affects the quality and representativeness of AI training data and outputs. Languages that are not fully present in the digital ecosystem are also likely to be underrepresented in AI systems, compounding existing inequalities. This makes resolving the linguistic divide through universal acceptance even more critical.
Dr. Hu noted that the lack of universal acceptance in the digital ecosystem significantly limits the potential for AI and limits what AI can learn, can perform, and can benefit . She also referenced the latest global responses, including the WSIS Plus 20 review and the Global Digital Compact, which recognised the urgent need to promote and preserve cultural diversity, heritage, and language, and to expand the multilingual nature of the internet including IDNs and universal acceptance .
on: Whether AI sovereignty and locally developed language models are compatible with or in tension with universal accessibility goals
Language as the first gateway to digital inclusion - If citizens cannot use their own language or script in domain names or email addresses, digital inclusion remains incomplete, and universal acceptance is about enabling full participation in digital society (Mr. Henri Monceau)
Arg. 1Mr. Monceau argued that language is the primary gateway through which billions of people access the digital world, and that digital inclusion cannot be considered complete if citizens are unable to use their own language or script in domain names or email addresses. Universal acceptance is therefore not merely a matter of technical interoperability but a prerequisite for enabling every individual to participate fully in digital society while preserving their linguistic identity. This ambition aligns with UNESCO's vision of inclusive knowledge societies.
Mr. Monceau stated that for billions of people, language is the first gateway to the digital world, and that if citizens cannot use their own language or script in a domain name or an email address, digital inclusion remains incomplete . He characterised universal acceptance as being about enabling every individual to participate fully in the digital society while preserving his or her linguistic identity, and noted that this ambition lies at the heart of UNESCO's vision of inclusive knowledge societies .
on: Universal acceptance is a prerequisite for genuine digital inclusion, not merely a technical issue
UA as a prerequisite for representative AI - Languages that remain marginalised in internet infrastructure are likely to remain marginalised in AI training datasets; therefore, universal acceptance is not only about making languages work online but about ensuring every language can help shape the future of artificial intelligence (Mr. Henri Monceau)
Arg. 2Mr. Monceau argued that the rise of artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed the significance of universal acceptance, because AI systems increasingly rely on multilingual digital content generated through websites, email exchanges, and online interactions. Languages that remain marginalised in internet infrastructure will also be marginalised in AI training datasets, perpetuating and deepening existing inequalities. Universal acceptance is therefore now as much about shaping the future of AI as it is about enabling languages to function online.
Mr. Monceau argued that tomorrow's AI systems will increasingly rely on multilingual digital content, and that the richer and more linguistically diverse the internet becomes, the richer and more representative AI training data will become . Conversely, he noted that languages that remain marginalised in the internet's infrastructure are also likely to remain marginalised in the datasets that shape artificial intelligence . He therefore concluded that universal acceptance is no longer simply about making every language work on the internet but about ensuring that every language can help shape the future of artificial intelligence .
on: Whether AI sovereignty and locally developed language models are compatible with or in tension with universal accessibility goals
Need to integrate UA into AI and digital strategies - Governments and stakeholders need to incorporate universal acceptance into national digital strategies and AI strategies, alongside procurement policies that encourage universal acceptance by design (Mr. Henri Monceau)
Arg. 3Mr. Monceau called for stronger political support for universal acceptance, arguing that technology alone cannot achieve it and that governments, international organisations, the technical community, the private sector, academia, and civil society all have roles to play. He specifically called for universal acceptance to be integrated into national digital strategies and AI strategies, and for procurement policies that encourage universal acceptance by design. Capacity building, particularly in developing countries, was also highlighted as a necessity.
Mr. Monceau stated that technology alone will not achieve universal acceptance and that governments, international organisations, the technical community, the private sector, academia, and civil society all have a role to play . He called for awareness, standards, implementation, and capacity building, particularly in developing countries , as well as procurement policies that encourage universal acceptance by design . He also called for the integration of universal acceptance into national digital strategies and AI strategies .
on: A multi-stakeholder approach involving governments, technical community, civil society, academia, and international organisations is essential to achieve universal acceptance
on: Whether universal acceptance is primarily a technical issue or a governance and political issue
Role of francophone communities - Francophone communities, including organisations such as Point Québec and the Internet Society in Quebec, have been essential advocates in carrying the universal acceptance agenda forward as a political as well as technical issue (Mr. Henri Monceau)
Arg. 4Mr. Monceau highlighted the important advocacy role played by francophone communities, particularly organisations in Quebec such as Point Québec and the Internet Society, in advancing the universal acceptance agenda. He emphasised that these communities have been essential in framing universal acceptance not merely as a technical issue but as a fundamentally political one. The OIF continues to stand alongside UNESCO, ICANN, and other partners committed to making universal acceptance a cornerstone of a multilingual digital future.
Mr. Monceau underlined the work of communities that have carried the universal acceptance dossier, citing specifically the friends from Quebec, both from the Internet Society and Point Québec, as having been absolutely essential in this debate and fight, which he described as fundamentally political and not only technical . He also reaffirmed that the OIF will continue to stand alongside UNESCO, ICANN, and all partners committed to making universal acceptance not simply a technical standard but the cornerstone of a multilingual, culturally diverse, and human society-centred digital future .
on: The degree to which end users and civil society are currently centred in the universal acceptance effort
User and civil society participation - End users and civil society are both the ultimate beneficiaries and participants in the universal acceptance effort, with roles in monitoring, raising awareness, advocating for implementation, and sharing experiences (Audience)
Arg. 1An audience member raised the importance of recognising and including end users in the universal acceptance discussion, noting that the entire effort is ultimately for the benefit of users who need to be able to use the internet in good conditions. The comment pointed to the challenges faced when tools are developed without adequate consideration of multilingual users, particularly those outside the dominant technological centres. This prompted responses from panellists affirming that users and civil society are central to the policy brief and to ICANN's outreach programmes.
The audience member commented in French that it is complicated when there is no multilingual voice and when tools are made on one side of the Atlantic and not for the rest of the world, and emphasised the importance of accepting the place of users, since everything is done for them so that they can use the internet in good conditions . In response, Dr. Hussain confirmed that the entire universal acceptance effort is focused on the ability of end users to come online in their own language, and described ICANN's work with the at-large advisory committee and at-large structures representing local communities . Dr. Hu also noted that users are at the centre of the policy brief, both as the end goal and as participants in monitoring, raising awareness, and advocating for UA implementation .
on: The degree to which end users and civil society are currently centred in the universal acceptance effort
Session framing - The session is jointly convened by UNESCO and ICANN to mark the launch of the policy brief on advancing universal acceptance of all domain names and email addresses for a multilingual internet (Mr. David Castillo Parra)
Arg. 1Mr. Castillo Parra opened the session by establishing its institutional context and purpose, noting that it is jointly convened by UNESCO and ICANN and marks an important milestone with the launch of a new policy brief. He set the stage for the subsequent presentations by introducing the topic and the speakers. His role throughout the session was to facilitate the discussion and ensure orderly participation.
Mr. Castillo Parra described the session as jointly convened by UNESCO and ICANN and noted that it marks a very important milestone, namely the launch of the UNESCO ICANN policy brief advancing universal acceptance of all domain names and email addresses for a multilingual internet .
Continuation of the conversation - Participants are invited to a follow-up ICANN-organised event the next day to continue discussions on universal acceptance and multilingualism (Mr. David Castillo Parra)
Arg. 2At the close of the session, Mr. Castillo Parra drew attention to a follow-up event organised by ICANN scheduled for the following day at the same time, encouraging participants to attend and continue the conversation on universal acceptance. This reflects the ongoing and iterative nature of the policy dialogue around multilingualism and universal acceptance. His invitation underscores the importance of sustained engagement beyond a single session.
Mr. Castillo Parra invited all participants in the room to an event the next day at the same time, organised by ICANN, where Sarmad and other colleagues would also be present, describing it as a good opportunity to talk a little bit more about the topic and continue the conversation .
Session Knowledge Graph
Speakers · Topics · Arguments · Relationships
All speakers converged on the view that universal acceptance is not simply a technical matter but a fundamental prerequisite for digital inclusion. Canela stated that language and scripts are an essential part of ensuring everyone can fully participate in the digital world . Swinehart emphasised that multilingual support is fundamental to human nature and essential for bridging the digital divide . Hussain defined UA as ensuring all valid domain names and email addresses can be equally used regardless of script or language . Hu stressed that achieving UA requires human dimensions and significant policy development . Monceau argued that if citizens cannot use their own language in domain names or email addresses, digital inclusion remains incomplete .
Linguistic diversity bridges the digital divide - A multilingual internet allows everyone to navigate online in their native language and script, which is fundamental to human nature and essential for bridging the digital divide (Ms. Theresa Swinehart)
Universal acceptance defined - Universal acceptance ensures that all valid domain names and email addresses, regardless of script, language, or character length, can be equally used by all internet-enabled applications, devices, and systems (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
Language as the first gateway to digital inclusion - If citizens cannot use their own language or script in domain names or email addresses, digital inclusion remains incomplete, and universal acceptance is about enabling full participation in digital society (Mr. Henri Monceau)
Gaps in awareness, technology, capacity, and policy - The key barriers to universal acceptance adoption span multiple dimensions beyond the purely technical, requiring human dimensions and significant policy development involving all stakeholders (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
Multiple speakers agreed that while the technical standards exist, practical implementation remains severely lacking. Canela noted that internationalised domain names and multilingual email addresses are already supported by global technical standards, yet many websites and applications still fail to recognise or process them correctly . Swinehart confirmed that the challenge exists because many software applications and systems do not yet recognise or appropriately process domain names or email addresses in local languages, but stressed this is solvable . Hussain provided empirical evidence showing average acceptance rates of only around 12% across approximately 1,000 websites and less than 30% acceptance among approximately 32 million email servers . Hu characterised the barriers as spanning awareness, technical, capacity, policy, and regulatory dimensions .
The problem is solvable - Many software applications and systems do not yet recognise or appropriately process domain names or email addresses in local languages, but this is a solvable technical and awareness challenge (Ms. Theresa Swinehart)
Low acceptance rates in practice - Testing of approximately 1,000 websites across 20 countries showed that on average only around 12% of websites accept email addresses in local languages, meaning over 850 websites fail to support them (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
Email server support remains insufficient - Analysis of approximately 32 million email servers worldwide found that acceptance of internationalised email addresses is still less than 30%, despite improvement over time (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
Gaps in awareness, technology, capacity, and policy - The key barriers to universal acceptance adoption span multiple dimensions beyond the purely technical, requiring human dimensions and significant policy development involving all stakeholders (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
All speakers agreed that no single actor can achieve universal acceptance alone and that a multi-stakeholder approach is essential. Swinehart noted that the policy brief delineates the role that all stakeholders must play, including technology developers, email software and service providers, government policymakers, civil society, and academia . Hussain highlighted governments as significant stakeholders who can mandate or incentivise the use of multilingual domain names and email services, especially in e-services provided to citizens . Hu described UNESCO's normative authority, technical expertise, and global convening power as positioning it to develop international cooperation and support national-level capacity building . Monceau called for governments, international organisations, the technical community, the private sector, academia, and civil society all to play a role, including through procurement policies and integration into national digital and AI strategies .
Delineation of stakeholder roles - The brief specifies the roles that technology developers, email software and service providers, government policymakers, civil society, academia, and international organisations must each play in achieving universal acceptance (Ms. Theresa Swinehart)
Governments as key drivers - Governments are significant stakeholders who can mandate or incentivise the use of multilingual domain names and email services, particularly in e-services provided to citizens (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
UNESCO's normative and convening role - UNESCO is positioned to develop international cooperation, accelerate cross-border alignment on technical protocols, and promote universal acceptance as a core pillar of the digital inclusion agenda at the national level (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
Need to integrate UA into AI and digital strategies - Governments and stakeholders need to incorporate universal acceptance into national digital strategies and AI strategies, alongside procurement policies that encourage universal acceptance by design (Mr. Henri Monceau)
Multiple speakers emphasised the critical importance of capacity building and awareness as tools for advancing universal acceptance. Swinehart described ICANN's efforts to engage with big tech organisations, submit code fixes in open source projects, and support the domain name industry , noting that ICANN's own software systems are now 92% UA ready . Hussain reported that more than 200 UA Day events have been held over four years in 86 countries and 42 languages, reaching more than 29,000 participants , and described the university curriculum integration programme spanning multiple continents . Hu highlighted UNESCO's role in supporting national-level capacity building and implementation . Monceau called for awareness, standards, implementation, and capacity building, particularly in developing countries .
Engagement with big tech and open source - ICANN has been promoting universal acceptance by engaging with large technology organisations, submitting code fixes in open source projects, and supporting the domain name industry in enabling universal acceptance in their systems (Ms. Theresa Swinehart)
UA Day events - ICANN, in close collaboration with UNESCO and the community, has held more than 200 UA Day events over four years in 86 countries and 42 languages, reaching more than 29,000 participants (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
University curriculum integration - ICANN is working with universities globally, including institutions in Bahrain, Mexico, India, Zimbabwe, and Bolivia, to integrate internationalised domain names and email addresses into technology degree programmes so future developers are equipped to support universal acceptance (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
UNESCO's normative and convening role - UNESCO is positioned to develop international cooperation, accelerate cross-border alignment on technical protocols, and promote universal acceptance as a core pillar of the digital inclusion agenda at the national level (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
All speakers presented the joint UNESCO-ICANN policy brief as a key practical tool for advancing universal acceptance. Canela described it as one of the very practical tools on how to advance the rights and policy agenda approved as multilateral agreements by UNESCO member states . Swinehart noted that the brief delineates the roles of all stakeholders and suggests how progress can be measured, and is particularly intended for the public sector as a major stakeholder that can help drive demand . Hussain described the brief as identifying all the different areas where universal acceptance can contribute, the gaps in awareness, technology, capacity, and policy, and the role of different stakeholders . Hu characterised it as a unique knowledge product for both advocacy and action, providing actionable policy recommendations and a suite of measurements to guide progress assessment .
Delineation of stakeholder roles - The brief specifies the roles that technology developers, email software and service providers, government policymakers, civil society, academia, and international organisations must each play in achieving universal acceptance (Ms. Theresa Swinehart)
Governments as key drivers - Governments are significant stakeholders who can mandate or incentivise the use of multilingual domain names and email services, particularly in e-services provided to citizens (Dr. Sarmad Hussain)
Holistic scope of the brief - The policy brief identifies challenges, provides actionable policy recommendations for all stakeholders, and highlights the comprehensive benefits of universal acceptance for digital economic growth, linguistic diversity, education, and e-governance (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
Measurement framework - The policy brief proposes a suite of measurements to guide progress assessment, and UNESCO has integrated universal acceptance into its monitoring of the Recommendation on the Promotion and Use of Multilingualism (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
Both Hu and Monceau independently argued that the rise of artificial intelligence has fundamentally elevated the urgency of universal acceptance, because languages marginalised in internet infrastructure will also be marginalised in AI training data and outputs. Hu stated that the lack of universal acceptance in the digital ecosystem significantly limits the potential for AI and limits what AI can learn, can perform, and can benefit . Monceau argued that languages that remain marginalised in the internet's infrastructure are also likely to remain marginalised in the datasets that shape artificial intelligence , and therefore concluded that universal acceptance is no longer simply about making every language work on the internet but about ensuring that every language can help shape the future of artificial intelligence . Both Swinehart and Hussain, as ICANN representatives, shared a detailed technical perspective on the current state of universal acceptance, emphasising that the core technology and standards are already in place but that practical implementation remains the key challenge. Swinehart described the DNS expansion from 2009 onwards, resulting in more than 150 internationalised top-level domains representing 37 languages and 23 scripts , and noted that many software applications and systems do not yet recognise or appropriately process domain names or email addresses in local languages . Hussain confirmed that the technology, standards, and policy are already in place , and provided empirical data showing acceptance rates of only around 12% across approximately 1,000 websites and less than 30% among approximately 32 million email servers . Both Canela and Hu, as UNESCO representatives, shared a broader perspective on the persistent and even worsening linguistic divide, situating the universal acceptance challenge within the wider context of global digital inequality. Hu noted that despite being at the third decade of WSIS, 2 billion people are not yet connected to the internet and the linguistic divide is still outstanding and even expanding in the AI era . Canela acknowledged the complexity of the AI sovereignty question, noting that locally developed models in smaller or indigenous languages can serve valuable purposes for specific communities, such as Quechua speakers across different countries , while also recognising the broader tensions involved . Canela, Swinehart, and Monceau all framed multilingualism and universal acceptance as rooted in international commitments and normative frameworks, tracing the agenda back to the WSIS Tunis Agenda in 2005 and UNESCO's 2003 Recommendation. Canela referenced UNESCO's 2003 recommendation adopted by 194 member states and the subsequent 23 years of monitoring . Swinehart noted that participants at the WSIS meeting in Tunis in 2005 committed to advancing the introduction of multilingualism in domain names and email addresses . Monceau affirmed that the OIF fully shares the ambition of UNESCO's vision of inclusive knowledge societies and will continue to stand alongside UNESCO, ICANN, and all partners committed to making universal acceptance a cornerstone of a multilingual digital future . Hussain, Hu, and the audience member all converged on the view that end users and civil society must be recognised as central to the universal acceptance effort, both as its ultimate beneficiaries and as participants. The audience member raised the importance of accepting the place of users, since everything is done for them so that they can use the internet in good conditions . Hussain confirmed that the entire universal acceptance effort is focused on the ability of end users to come online in their own language, and described ICANN's work with at-large advisory committees representing local communities . Hu affirmed that users are at the centre of the policy brief, both as the end goal and as participants in monitoring, raising awareness, and advocating for UA implementation .
When an audience member raised the potential tension between AI sovereignty efforts and universal accessibility, Canela offered a nuanced and unexpectedly positive assessment of locally developed AI models in smaller or indigenous languages. Rather than dismissing such models as inherently exclusionary, he acknowledged that they can serve valuable purposes for specific communities, giving the example of a Quechua-language model developed in Peru that could benefit Quechua speakers across different countries . He also noted that smaller, locally focused models may consume less water and energy, pointing to environmental benefits . This response went beyond the session's primary focus on universal acceptance and introduced an unexpected dimension of consensus around the potential value of locally sovereign AI models, even within a session otherwise focused on global interoperability and universal standards.
An unexpected area of consensus emerged around the explicitly political framing of universal acceptance. Monceau, representing the OIF, characterised the universal acceptance debate as fundamentally political and not only technical , and called for stronger political support including integration into national digital and AI strategies . Hu, from UNESCO, similarly stressed that achieving UA requires human dimensions and significant policy development . The audience member also implicitly reinforced this framing by noting the challenges arising when tools are made on one side of the Atlantic without adequate consideration of multilingual users elsewhere . This convergence between a regional intergovernmental organisation, a UN specialised agency, and a civil society voice on the political nature of what is often presented as a technical problem represents an unexpected but significant area of consensus.
In a session dominated by technical and policy discussions, Monceau's specific acknowledgement of the pioneering advocacy role of francophone communities, particularly organisations in Quebec such as Point Québec and the Internet Society, was unexpected. He described these communities as having been absolutely essential in this debate and fight , framing their contribution as political advocacy rather than technical work. This recognition of grassroots and regional community advocacy as foundational to a global technical standard represents an unexpected dimension of consensus, as it implicitly acknowledged that the universal acceptance agenda was driven not only by international organisations and technical bodies but also by specific linguistic communities fighting for their digital rights.
The session demonstrated an exceptionally high level of consensus among all speakers on the core issues of universal acceptance and multilingualism. All speakers agreed that: (1) universal acceptance is a prerequisite for genuine digital inclusion and not merely a technical issue ; (2) the technical standards for internationalised domain names and email addresses are already in place but practical implementation lags severely, with acceptance rates as low as 12% for websites and less than 30% for email servers ; (3) a multi-stakeholder approach involving governments, technical community, civil society, academia, and international organisations is essential ; (4) capacity building, awareness campaigns, and education are critical tools ; and (5) the AI era has added new urgency to the universal acceptance challenge, as linguistically marginalised languages risk being further marginalised in AI training data . The joint UNESCO-ICANN policy brief was unanimously presented as a practical and actionable tool for advancing these goals .
Ms. Swinehart characterised universal acceptance primarily as 'a technical best practice' , while Dr. Hu explicitly stressed that 'achieving UA is just a technical issue. It really requires human dimensions and significant policy development involving all stakeholders' . Mr. Canela similarly noted that universal acceptance 'require[s] a governance decision' and 'policy decisions to move ahead' . Mr. Monceau reinforced this by stating that 'technology alone will not achieve universal acceptance' and calling for integration into national digital and AI strategies . Dr. Hussain occupied a middle ground, acknowledging both the technical standards already in place and the need for governments to mandate or incentivise adoption . The tension is between framing UA as a solvable technical problem versus a fundamentally political and governance challenge.
Universal acceptance is a technical best practice - Universal acceptance is a technical best practice that ensures that all valid domain names and email addresses, regardless of the script language or character length, can be equally used by all internet-enabled applications, devices, and systems (Ms. Theresa Swinehart)
Gaps in awareness, technology, capacity, and policy - The key barriers to universal acceptance adoption span multiple dimensions beyond the purely technical, requiring human dimensions and significant policy development involving all stakeholders (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
Need to integrate UA into AI and digital strategies - Governments and stakeholders need to incorporate universal acceptance into national digital strategies and AI strategies, alongside procurement policies that encourage universal acceptance by design (Mr. Henri Monceau)
An audience member from Georgia raised the dilemma of AI sovereignty, asking whether local efforts to create sovereign AI in small languages might result in content that is intentionally not universally accessible . Mr. Monceau and Dr. Hu had argued that languages marginalised in internet infrastructure would be marginalised in AI datasets , and that the lack of universal acceptance limits what AI can learn and benefit . Mr. Canela, however, offered a more nuanced response, acknowledging that 'there are different ways of using' AI and that locally developed models, such as a Quechua-language model in Peru, 'can be very useful for other Quechua speakers in different' countries . He also noted environmental benefits of smaller models , suggesting that local sovereignty and broader accessibility are not necessarily contradictory, in contrast to the more universalist framing of Monceau and Hu.
UA as a prerequisite for representative AI - Languages that remain marginalised in internet infrastructure are likely to remain marginalised in AI training datasets; therefore, universal acceptance is not only about making languages work online but about ensuring every language can help shape the future of artificial intelligence (Mr. Henri Monceau)
Linguistic divide expanding in the AI era - The lack of universal acceptance in the digital ecosystem significantly limits what AI can learn, perform, and benefit, making the resolution of the linguistic divide even more urgent (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
AI sovereignty and local language models - There is a tension between efforts to build locally sovereign AI models in smaller or indigenous languages and the goal of universal accessibility, though such models can serve specific educational and community purposes and may also offer benefits in terms of energy and resource consumption (Mr. Guilherme Canela)
An audience member challenged the panel by noting that it is 'complicated when there is no multilingual voice' and when 'tools are made on one side of the Atlantic and not on the rest of the world', emphasising the importance of 'accepting the place of users' . This implied that the current UA effort is insufficiently user-centred. Dr. Hussain responded by affirming that 'this whole effort is to ensure that the multilingual internet universal acceptance... is a feature of internet which is available for the end users themselves' and cited work with at-large structures . Dr. Hu similarly asserted that 'users really are at the center of this policy brief' . However, Mr. Monceau's response highlighted that the real drivers have been specific advocacy communities such as those in Quebec , suggesting that user engagement has been uneven and geographically concentrated rather than truly global.
User and civil society participation - End users and civil society are both the ultimate beneficiaries and participants in the universal acceptance effort, with roles in monitoring, raising awareness, advocating for implementation, and sharing experiences (Audience)
Role of francophone communities - Francophone communities, including organisations such as Point Québec and the Internet Society in Quebec, have been essential advocates in carrying the universal acceptance agenda forward as a political as well as technical issue (Mr. Henri Monceau)
In a session explicitly dedicated to multilingualism and digital inclusion, it was unexpected that an audience member would challenge the panel on the very issue of user-centredness and geographic bias in tool development . The comment that 'tools are made on one side of the Atlantic and not on the rest of the world' implicitly critiqued the institutional framing of the session, which was dominated by ICANN and UNESCO perspectives. While panellists responded by affirming user-centredness , Mr. Monceau's subsequent comment that the real advocacy drivers have been specific francophone communities in Quebec inadvertently reinforced the audience member's point that engagement has been geographically uneven. This tension between the stated goal of global inclusion and the actual geographic concentration of advocacy was an unexpected undercurrent in what was otherwise a consensus-oriented session.
The audience question from Georgia about AI sovereignty introduced an unexpected tension that the session had not anticipated. The dominant framing of the session was that more linguistic diversity online is unambiguously good and that universal acceptance enables this. However, the question raised the possibility that some local efforts to develop sovereign AI in small languages might deliberately limit universal accessibility for reasons of digital sovereignty . Mr. Canela's response acknowledged this complexity, noting that 'it's not that easy to answer the question in a broader manner because there are different ways of using that' , and even suggested environmental benefits of smaller local models . This was unexpected because it introduced a scenario where the goals of linguistic preservation and universal accessibility could be in conflict, rather than mutually reinforcing as assumed throughout the session.
The session was broadly consensus-oriented, as befitting a joint UNESCO-ICANN policy launch event. All speakers agreed on the importance of universal acceptance, the inadequacy of the current situation, and the need for multistakeholder engagement. The main areas of disagreement were: (1) whether UA is primarily a technical or a political/governance challenge; (2) whether locally sovereign AI models in minority languages are compatible with or in tension with universal accessibility; and (3) whether the current UA effort adequately centres users outside dominant technological regions. These disagreements were largely implicit rather than explicit, emerging through differences in framing and emphasis rather than direct contradiction. The most substantive tension arose from the audience question on AI sovereignty , which prompted Mr. Canela to offer a more nuanced and partially divergent view from the universalist framing of Mr. Monceau and Dr. Hu .
All speakers agreed that multilingualism and universal acceptance are essential for digital inclusion and that the current situation is inadequate. Ms. Swinehart noted that a linguistically diverse internet 'helps to bridge the digital divide' , Mr. Monceau stated that 'digital inclusion remains incomplete' without the ability to use one's own language in domain names and email addresses , and Dr. Hu highlighted that 2 billion people remain unconnected and the linguistic divide is 'even expanding in the AI era' . However, they disagreed on the primary mechanism for achieving UA: Ms. Swinehart and Dr. Hussain emphasised technical fixes and engagement with big tech , Mr. Canela and Dr. Hu stressed policy and governance decisions , and Mr. Monceau called for political will and integration into national strategies .
Linguistic diversity bridges the digital divide - A multilingual internet allows everyone to navigate online in their native language and script, which is fundamental to human nature and essential for bridging the digital divide (Ms. Theresa Swinehart) Language as the first gateway to digital inclusion - If citizens cannot use their own language or script in domain names or email addresses, digital inclusion remains incomplete, and universal acceptance is about enabling full participation in digital society (Mr. Henri Monceau) Scale of the linguistic divide - Despite three decades of WSIS, 2 billion people remain unconnected, and the linguistic divide continues to persist and even expand in the AI era (Dr. Xianhong Hu)
All speakers agreed that governments have an important role to play in advancing universal acceptance. Dr. Hussain noted that governments 'can mandate or incentivise use of such domain names and email services' , Ms. Swinehart identified the public sector as 'a major stakeholder' that 'can help drive the demand' , and Mr. Monceau called for procurement policies and integration of UA into national digital and AI strategies . However, they differed in emphasis: Dr. Hussain and Ms. Swinehart focused on governments as demand-drivers within a broader multistakeholder framework , while Mr. Monceau called for stronger and more explicitly political government commitment , and Dr. Hu emphasised UNESCO's normative authority as a vehicle for driving government action through monitoring and reporting mechanisms .
Delineation of stakeholder roles - The brief specifies the roles that technology developers, email software and service providers, government policymakers, civil society, academia, and international organisations must each play in achieving universal acceptance (Ms. Theresa Swinehart) Governments as key drivers - Governments are significant stakeholders who can mandate or incentivise the use of multilingual domain names and email services, particularly in e-services provided to citizens (Dr. Sarmad Hussain) Need to integrate UA into AI and digital strategies - Governments and stakeholders need to incorporate universal acceptance into national digital strategies and AI strategies, alongside procurement policies that encourage universal acceptance by design (Mr. Henri Monceau)
Mr. Monceau and Dr. Hu agreed that the AI era makes universal acceptance more urgent, with Monceau arguing that languages marginalised in internet infrastructure will be marginalised in AI datasets and Hu noting that lack of UA 'significantly limits the potential for AI' . Mr. Canela agreed that the AI dimension is important and complex , but diverged by introducing the possibility that locally sovereign AI models in smaller languages could be valuable rather than problematic, even if not universally accessible . This represents agreement on the importance of the AI-UA nexus but disagreement on whether local/sovereign AI development is a threat to or an opportunity for linguistic diversity online.
UA as a prerequisite for representative AI - Languages that remain marginalised in internet infrastructure are likely to remain marginalised in AI training datasets; therefore, universal acceptance is not only about making languages work online but about ensuring every language can help shape the future of artificial intelligence (Mr. Henri Monceau) Linguistic divide expanding in the AI era - The lack of universal acceptance in the digital ecosystem significantly limits what AI can learn, perform, and benefit, making the resolution of the linguistic divide even more urgent (Dr. Xianhong Hu) AI sovereignty and local language models - There is a tension between efforts to build locally sovereign AI models in smaller or indigenous languages and the goal of universal accessibility, though such models can serve specific educational and community purposes and may also offer benefits in terms of energy and resource consumption (Mr. Guilherme Canela)
- Universal acceptance (UA) ensures that all valid domain names and email addresses, regardless of script, language, or character length, can be equally used by all internet-enabled applications, devices, and systems, and is fundamental to genuine digital inclusion.
- Despite significant technical progress — including over 150 internationalised top-level domains representing 37 languages and 23 scripts — practical adoption remains critically low, with only approximately 12% of tested websites accepting local-language email addresses and fewer than 30% of email servers supporting internationalised email addresses.
- The barriers to universal acceptance are not purely technical; they span awareness, capacity, policy, and governance dimensions, requiring coordinated action from governments, technology developers, civil society, academia, and international organisations.
- The UNESCO–ICANN joint policy brief 'Advancing Universal Acceptance of All Domain Names and Email Addresses for Multilingual Internet' was formally launched at this session as a practical advocacy and action tool providing stakeholder-specific recommendations and a measurement framework.
- Universal acceptance has become directly linked to the future of artificial intelligence: languages marginalised in internet infrastructure risk being marginalised in AI training datasets, making UA a prerequisite for linguistically representative and inclusive AI systems.
- Governments are identified as particularly significant stakeholders who can mandate or incentivise multilingual domain name and email use, especially in citizen-facing e-services, and should integrate UA into national digital and AI strategies.
- UNESCO's normative authority, monitoring mechanisms (including the sixth monitoring cycle of its Recommendation on Multilingualism), and global convening power position it as a key driver of international cooperation and cross-border alignment on UA.
- ICANN has achieved 92% UA readiness in its own systems and has conducted over 200 UA Day events in 86 countries and 42 languages, reaching more than 29,000 participants, demonstrating measurable progress in awareness and capacity building.
- End users and civil society are both the ultimate beneficiaries and participants in the UA effort, with roles in monitoring, advocacy, and sharing lived experiences of linguistic exclusion online.
- The linguistic divide continues to persist and even expand in the AI era, with approximately 2 billion people still unconnected, underscoring the urgency of the multilingualism and UA agenda.
“Universal acceptance is no longer simply about making every language work on the Internet. It is about ensuring that every language can help shape the future of artificial intelligence. Languages that remain marginalised in the Internet's infrastructure are also likely to remain marginalised in the datasets that shape artificial intelligence.”
“Imagine trying to complete a transaction online, signing up for a class, ordering a food delivery, or subscribing to your favourite newsletter. And if you're using an email address in your local language and script, you might get an error message back and be unable to complete your transaction. And this type of scenario happens every day for Internet users.”
“Out of 1,000 websites tested across 20 countries, the acceptance rate for local language email addresses on average is around 12%. Even among 32 million email servers surveyed globally, the acceptance rate of local language email addresses is still less than 30%.”
“The lack of universal acceptance in the digital ecosystem significantly limits the potential for AI and limits what AI can learn, can perform, and can benefit. The scale of the linguistic divide is still outstanding and even expanding in the AI era.”
“An audience member (speaking in French) raised the point that beyond technical interoperability, it is essential to accept the place of users, because everything being done should be for them — so they can use the Internet in good conditions — and they have a voice that should not be forgotten.”
“There is this AI sovereignty on the table. Local efforts in small languages, in the name of digital or AI sovereignty, might create materials that exist in a readable format but may not be universally available on purpose. So is there any way out of this?”
“For UNESCO, multilingualism is not simply about preserving languages. It is about ensuring that everyone can fully participate in the digital world. While universal acceptance may seem like a technical issue, it has profound implications for the different areas of our lives, and hence they require governance decisions and policy decisions to move ahead.”
How can end users and civil society be more meaningfully integrated into the universal acceptance process, beyond awareness campaigns?
The questioner highlighted that tools are often built from one side of the world and do not reflect the needs of users globally, suggesting that user participation and inclusion should be a more central pillar of universal acceptance efforts, not just a downstream beneficiary.
How can the tension between AI sovereignty (local, restricted AI models) and universal accessibility of multilingual digital content be resolved?
The questioner raised a genuine dilemma: local efforts to build sovereign or small-language AI models may intentionally restrict universal accessibility, potentially undermining the goals of universal acceptance. This tension between digital sovereignty and open multilingual access requires further policy and technical exploration.
What are the implications of smaller, locally developed AI models for linguistic diversity and universal acceptance, particularly for indigenous and minority language communities?
Canela acknowledged the complexity of this question and noted that smaller models built for specific language communities (e.g., Quechua speakers in Peru) could be both beneficial and limiting. He suggested this topic warrants deeper discussion, particularly regarding energy consumption, digital sovereignty, and cross-border usability.
How can universal acceptance be integrated into national digital strategies and AI strategies as a core policy requirement rather than an optional technical standard?
Monceau called for stronger political support and the embedding of universal acceptance into procurement policies, national digital strategies, and AI strategies. This implies a need for further research into how governments can be guided or incentivised to adopt such policies systematically.
How will the impact and progress of universal acceptance adoption be measured across different countries and stakeholder groups over time?
Hu introduced a suite of proposed measurements in the policy brief and encouraged member states to conduct voluntary assessments. However, the methodology, comparability, and uptake of these measurements remain areas requiring further development and research.
How can the universal acceptance curriculum integration programme be expanded to more universities globally, particularly in underrepresented regions?
Hussain mentioned existing partnerships with universities in Bahrain, Mexico, India, Zimbabwe, and Bolivia, but noted the network is still expanding. Further research is needed into how to scale this initiative effectively and ensure it reaches regions with the greatest linguistic diversity and digital exclusion.
What additional languages should the UNESCO-ICANN policy brief be translated into, and how can stakeholders support this translation effort?
Hu noted the brief is currently available in English and French, with more languages forthcoming, and explicitly encouraged stakeholders to support translation into their own languages. This raises questions about prioritisation, resourcing, and coordination of translation efforts globally.
How can the role of language communities, including indigenous peoples, be better formalised within universal acceptance governance and implementation frameworks?
Hu referenced indigenous peoples as a key stakeholder group in the policy brief's recommendations, and UNESCO's role as Secretariat for the UN International Decade of Indigenous Languages. Further research is needed into how these communities can be structurally included in UA governance rather than treated as passive beneficiaries.
How can procurement policies be designed to require universal acceptance by default in software and digital services?
Monceau specifically called for procurement policies that encourage universal acceptance by design, suggesting this is an underexplored policy lever. Research into how such policies could be structured, enforced, and adopted across different national contexts would be valuable.
What is the relationship between the marginalisation of languages in internet infrastructure and their marginalisation in AI training datasets, and how can this cycle be broken?
Monceau argued that languages excluded from internet infrastructure are also likely to be underrepresented in AI training data, creating a compounding disadvantage. This relationship warrants dedicated research to understand the feedback loop and identify intervention points.
How can the acceptance rate of internationalised email addresses (currently below 30% among global email servers) be improved, and what barriers are preventing faster adoption?
Hussain presented data showing that fewer than 30% of approximately 32 million email servers globally support internationalised email addresses, and that website acceptance rates average around 12%. Understanding the specific technical, organisational, and awareness barriers preventing improvement is critical for targeted intervention.
