This high-level dialogue focused on digital connectivity as a catalyst for sustainable development in landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), with particular reference to the Awaza Programme of Action 2024-2034 . The moderator, Amanda Khozi Mukwashi, highlighted that the 32 LLDCs, home to more than 620 million people, have long faced higher trade costs and infrastructure deficits, but that digital connectivity offers an unprecedented opportunity to redefine what it means to be landlocked .
ITU's Cosmas Zavazava framed digital transformation around three pillars, infrastructure, capacity, and governance, arguing that connectivity is a moral imperative and not merely a technical challenge . A message from Under-Secretary-General Rabab Fatima underscored the urgency, noting that in 2024 only 39% of LLDC populations used the internet, compared with 68% globally, leaving approximately 359 million people offline . She called for stronger regulatory frameworks, blended finance, and the proposed Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFF) to mobilise investment at scale .
Country representatives echoed these priorities. Zimbabwe's Minister identified resource constraints as the primary barrier, stressing the need for shared infrastructure and collective policy frameworks . Botswana highlighted that all its internet broadband transits through neighbouring countries at nearly four times the cost of coastal nations . Paraguay noted that its international connectivity depends entirely on regional land fibre networks, making cross-border cooperation a shared regional responsibility .
Namibia, as a transit country, offered to serve as a regional digital corridor, citing existing bilateral arrangements with Botswana - including passport-free travel and no roaming fees - as evidence of its commitment to regional solidarity . The EU Ambassador to the UN in Geneva, Deike Potzel, outlined Global Gateway investments in satellite connectivity and cross-border fibre, emphasising the importance of de-risking projects to attract private capital . The World Bank announced a new Digital Access Fund and public-private partnership mechanisms to incentivise private sector investment in LLDCs . Huawei reported having connected 170 million people across 80 countries through its Partner to Connect pledge, with 34 of those countries among the least developed economies . MTN stressed that digital infrastructure has become as essential as roads and railways, and called for risk-adjusted capital and harmonised regulatory environments to move projects from concept to bankability .
The discussion concluded with a broad consensus that connectivity is not merely a technical goal but a catalyst for economic transformation, regional integration, and sustainable development, requiring political will, innovative financing, and coordinated multilateral partnerships to translate the ambitions of the Awaza Programme of Action for the LLDCs 2024-2034 into tangible results for LLDC populations .
Overall Purpose
- The discussion is a high-level dialogue on digital connectivity for landlocked developing countries (LLDCs). Its central aim is to explore how digital transformation can serve as a catalyst for overcoming the structural and geographic disadvantages faced by the 32 LLDCs, and to mobilise partnerships, financing, and policy commitments to accelerate implementation of the Awaza Programme of Action 2024-2034.
- --
Major Discussion Points
- Digital connectivity as a fundamental development imperative for LLDCs, not merely a technical issue. Multiple speakers emphasised that connectivity is the foundational enabler of economic transformation, healthcare, education, and trade for landlocked nations. The stark statistic that only 39% of LLDC populations used the internet in 2024, compared to 68% globally, underscored the urgency. Tajikistan, speaking on behalf of the LLDC group, reinforced that connectivity directly affects trade, jobs, education, health, and economic growth. - The three core pillars required for digital transformation: infrastructure, capacity, and governance. Dr Cosmas Zavazava of the ITU articulated that broadband investment and last-mile connectivity must be paired with digital literacy for all citizens, and underpinned by trustworthy governance frameworks, including data privacy, cybersecurity, and inclusive design. Zimbabwe and Botswana both highlighted resource constraints and the high cost of importing ICT equipment and international bandwidth as primary barriers, with Botswana noting that broadband transit costs are approximately four times higher than for coastal countries.
- The critical role of regional cooperation and transit countries in building cross-border digital corridors. Namibia presented itself as a willing regional digital hub, offering dry ports, data centre infrastructure, and undersea cable landing points to serve neighbouring LLDCs. Paraguay highlighted its dependence on regional land fibre networks to access submarine cables, stressing that connectivity resilience for LLDCs is inherently a regional, not merely national, responsibility. Türkiye similarly argued that transport corridors must evolve into platforms for digital integration and resilient supply chains. Eswatini raised the concern of guaranteed access to submarine cables in the event of geopolitical deterioration with transit neighbours, calling for a more secure multilateral framework. - Innovative financing mechanisms and public-private partnerships as essential to closing the investment gap. Speakers consistently noted that public resources alone are insufficient to fund the scale of digital infrastructure required. The proposed Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFF) under the AWASA Programme was highlighted as a key vehicle for de-risking projects and mobilising private capital. The World Bank announced a new Digital Access Fund and emphasised the need for blended finance, de-risking instruments, and holistic country compacts to stimulate private sector engagement. The EU's Global Gateway was cited as a concrete example, with lessons including thinking regionally, combining hard and soft infrastructure, and building pipelines of bankable projects. - The private sector's indispensable role and the need for enabling policy and regulatory environments. Huawei shared that its cost-effective rural connectivity solution (RuralStar) and partnership model had connected 170 million people across 80 countries, exceeding its Partner to Connect pledge. MTN stressed that digital infrastructure is now as economically critical as roads and railways, and called for transparent licensing frameworks, harmonised regulations, and risk-adjusted capital to move projects from concept to bankability. Both private sector representatives welcomed the IIFF and urged governments to create predictable investment environments.
- --
Overall Tone
- The overall tone of the discussion is constructive, collaborative, and solution-oriented, with an undercurrent of urgency. Opening remarks by Amanda Khozi Mukwashi set a warm but purposeful register, grounding the conversation in human impact and the imperative that 'geography no longer determines opportunity.' Dr Zavazava's keynote was notably aspirational and morally charged, framing connectivity as 'not a technical challenge but a moral imperative.' As the dialogue progressed through ministerial interventions, the tone became more pragmatic and candid, with speakers openly acknowledging resource constraints, high transit costs, and financing gaps. Towards the close, the tone shifted slightly towards cautious realism - particularly when Eswatini raised the vulnerability of LLDCs to geopolitical disruptions in transit access - though the moderator and other participants responded with reassurance. Throughout, there was a consistent spirit of solidarity and shared commitment and the session concluded on an optimistic note, emphasising the power of partnerships to translate ambition into impact.
High-Level Dialogue on Digital Connectivity for Landlocked Developing Countries - YCS Forum 2026: Expanded Summary
#
Opening and Context
The high-level dialogue on digital connectivity for landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) was convened as part of the YCS Forum 2026, under the theme "Connectivity as a Catalyst: Delivering on the AWASA Programme of Action Through Digital Transformation" . The session was moderated by Amanda Khozi Mukwashi, United Nations Resident Coordinator in Angola, standing in for her colleague George Wachira, the UN Resident Coordinator in Eswatini, who had been unable to attend due to a bereavement . Mukwashi brought personal authority to the role, having previously served as Resident Coordinator in Lesotho - itself a landlocked country - describing the subject as "very close to my heart" and one she had spent four years working on .
Mukwashi opened by framing the structural challenge facing the 32 LLDCs, home to more than 620 million people, for whom "distance from seaports has long translated into higher trade costs, infrastructure deficits, and barriers to economic transformation" . She argued, however, that the digital era offers "an unprecedented opportunity to redefine what it means to be landlocked" , and that digital infrastructure, affordable broadband, trusted digital ecosystems, and digital skills are "no longer optional" but "essential foundations for inclusive growth, resilient economies, better public services, and meaningful participation in the global digital economy" . She added her own conviction that these foundations are "absolutely essential for ensuring that no one is left behind," particularly in terms of access to healthcare, education, food systems, and economic participation . She also stressed the urgency of the transition required, noting that people in rural areas and provinces need "to have the floor lifted from below their feet" .
The dialogue was situated within two overarching policy frameworks: the AWASA Programme of Action 2024-2034, which places digital transformation and resilient infrastructure "at the very centre of sustainable development for LLDCs" , and the WSIS process, which "reminds us that achieving universal and meaningful connectivity requires strong partnerships, innovative financing, and international cooperation" . Mukwashi was clear that the session's purpose was not merely to identify challenges but to share practical solutions, mobilise investments, strengthen regional cooperation, and build partnerships capable of translating ambition into action . She also proposed that the dialogue could give rise to a dedicated partnership platform or roundtable for digital transformation in LLDCs - one that could bring together governments, investors, development partners, and technical experts around a shared pipeline of digital projects, linking financing with opportunities on the ground, supporting regional cooperation, and accelerating the exchange of knowledge and best practices .
---
#
ITU Keynote: Connectivity as a Moral Imperative
Dr Cosmas Luckyson Zavazava, Director of the ITU's Telecommunication Development Bureau, delivered the keynote address, framing digital transformation in explicitly human and moral terms. He argued that "digital transformation is not about replacing human judgement with algorithms" but rather "about amplifying human capacity through data, speed, and reach" . He described the AWASA Programme of Action not as "a set of targets, but as a promise - a promise to bridge digital divides, to unlock potential, and to leave no one behind" , and stated that this promise "can only be fulfilled if we recognise one simple truth: connectivity is the catalyst" .
Zavazava illustrated the transformative potential of connectivity through three concrete examples: a rural farmer accessing real-time market prices on a mobile device, "transforming subsistence into sustainability"; a remote clinic connecting to a central hospital via telemedicine, "saving lives not with bricks and mortar, but with bandwidth"; and a young student in an underserved region accessing a virtual classroom, "gaining the same quality of education as someone in the capital city" . He warned, however, that "a vision without infrastructure is just a dream" , and that "connectivity without purpose is just noise" , introducing the concept of purpose-driven connectivity in which "every megabyte serves a mission, every connection builds resilience, and every digital service empowers the citizens" .
To deliver on the AWASA Programme, Zavazava articulated three pillars. The first is infrastructure: "we cannot have digital transformation without digital access," requiring investment in broadband, satellite coverage, and resilient last-mile networks, because "connectivity is not a luxury, it is a utility" . The second is capacity: "technology is only as good as the people using it," necessitating investment in digital literacy for everyone - not just the young - and the building of a workforce that can "use, manage, and innovate with digital tools" . The third is governance: "transformation requires trust, and trust requires security and transparency," meaning that as public services are digitised, data privacy, cybersecurity, and inclusive design must be ensured, so that "digital transformation must leave no one behind, not by accident, but by design" . He concluded by calling on participants to "treat connectivity not as a technical challenge but as a moral imperative" .
---
#
Video Message from the Under-Secretary-General
A video message was delivered by Her Excellency Rabab Fatima, Under-Secretary-General and High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries, and Small Island Developing States . She commended the ITU's leadership in advancing inclusive digital transformation and ensuring that the specific needs of countries in special situations remain visible in global digital cooperation , and described the dialogue as occurring at "a very important moment" as the international community begins implementing the AWASA Programme .
Fatima introduced a critical statistical anchor for the discussion: in 2024, only 39% of the population in LLDCs were using the internet, compared with 68% globally, leaving approximately 359 million people across LLDCs offline . She argued that "closing this digital divide is therefore not merely a technological challenge - it is a development imperative" , and introduced the concept of "digital exclusion as a new dimension of landlockedness": whereas landlockedness has traditionally been measured by distance from the sea, "today it is further compounded by distance from digital opportunity" . In a world where growth, innovation, and services are increasingly digital, "inadequate connectivity risks creating a new form of exclusion" .
Fatima outlined three priorities. First, she noted that despite recent progress, many LLDCs continue to face "inadequate broadband infrastructure, limited network coverage, high costs of connectivity, and persistent gaps in digital access," which reinforce existing structural constraints . She confirmed that her office, UNOHR LLS, is already working with member states, development partners, international financial institutions, and the private sector to advance the connectivity and digital transformation agenda under AWASA . Second, she argued that digital transformation can help LLDCs reduce the cost of distance through "paperless trade, single window systems, digital customs procedures, and improved cross-border data exchange," but that these opportunities require "predictable, transparent, and interoperable regulatory frameworks" . Third, she stressed that digital transformation will not happen without adequate financing: broadband networks, data centres, digital public infrastructure, innovation ecosystems, and digital skills development all require sustained investment, yet many LLDCs face "limited fiscal space, elevated borrowing costs, and persistent investment gaps" . She called for stronger engagement from development banks, greater use of blended finance and risk-sharing instruments, and deeper private sector partnerships , and highlighted the proposed Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF) under AWASA as "an important opportunity to explore how catalytic financing can help mobilise investment" . She closed by affirming that "when connectivity meets purpose, transformation is not just possible, it is inevitable" .
---
#
LLDC Group Statement: Tajikistan
Speaking on behalf of the group of landlocked developing countries, Mirzo Khurshed, Director of the Agency for Innovation and Digital Technologies under the President of the Republic of Tajikistan, grounded the discussion in the lived realities of LLDC populations . He emphasised that connectivity "is not only about technology - it is also about trade, jobs, education, health, and economic growth" , and described the compounding geographic disadvantages faced by LLDCs: many are far from seaports, goods must cross multiple borders, and mountainous terrain makes it harder to build roads, railways, and internet networks . As a result, "many landlocked countries face high costs, delays, and limited access to digital services" .
Khurshed made a point of intellectual honesty that resonated throughout the discussion: "digital connectivity cannot change geography, but it can reduce the problems caused by geography" . He argued that connectivity can help people do business more easily, improve access to education, healthcare, and financial services, and help LLDC economies join regional and global digital markets . However, he stressed that infrastructure alone is insufficient: LLDCs also need digital skills, innovation, support for small and medium-sized enterprises, and policies that build trust and attract investment . He noted that new technologies - including AI, digital trade platforms, and smart logistics - can improve public services and facilitate trade, but that LLDCs need "more financing, technology, training, and international support" to benefit from them . Tajikistan reaffirmed its readiness to work with all partners - member states, transit countries, development partners, international organisations, and the private sector - to close the connectivity gap and support digital transformation .
---
#
Country Perspectives: Zimbabwe and Botswana
The ministerial segment opened with a question directed to the Minister of Zimbabwe, Honourable Tatenda Anastacia Mavetera, and the Minister of Botswana, Honourable David Tshere, on the single biggest digital connectivity challenge facing their countries and the policy or investment priority most likely to have transformative impact over the next five years .
Minister Mavetera acknowledged that Zimbabwe, as a landlocked developing country, "fully understands the structural constraints" of high trade costs and limited market access . She identified resources as the primary constraint, noting that "resources are quite a constraint" and that all pillars of digital transformation - including AI infrastructure, computational sovereignty, and capacity development - require significant financing . She described Zimbabwe's launch of a national AI strategy anchored on four pillars: capacity development, AI infrastructure, computational sovereignty, and AI adoption . She called for shared infrastructure policies and collective solutions, asking why countries like Zimbabwe cannot access infrastructure already available in neighbouring countries such as Botswana - for example, shared GPU resources . She argued that "connectivity definitely is the foundation of any digital transformation journey" and called for a digital compact to pool resources collectively, including through what ITU and the UN are offering .
Minister Tshere of Botswana provided detailed context on his country's connectivity landscape, noting that mobile subscriptions had reached a penetration rate of 190%, while mobile broadband subscriptions had reached 3.3 million, representing a penetration rate of 139%, and that over 1.6 million mobile money subscriptions reflected growing adoption of digital financial services . However, he highlighted the structural disadvantages facing Botswana as a landlocked country: all imports, including internet broadband, transit through neighbouring countries at a cost "estimated at almost four times compared to the coastal countries" . The low and widely spread population makes ICT service delivery costly, particularly in remote areas across challenging terrain . Because Botswana imports nearly all its ICT equipment, it "remains vulnerable to global price fluctuations that directly affect affordability and access" . As a result, the Botswana government "continues to serve as a primary investor in large-scale ICT infrastructure," relying on the Universal Access and Savings Fund and private sector partnerships . He described the Botswana Economic Transformation Programme (BETP) as the national vehicle for positioning Botswana as "a regional technological and financial hub," alongside the Digital Services Act and Cybersecurity Act . He called for collaboration in trade, multi-stakeholder partnerships, and multinational solutions to address the high transit costs facing landlocked countries, and invited ITU to be an partner .
---
#
Transit Country Perspective: Namibia
Honourable Emma Inamutila Theofelus, Minister of Information Communication Technology of the Republic of Namibia, spoke as a representative of a transit country . She described Namibia's advantages: coastal access enabling the landing of undersea cables (including the WACS and Equinox cables), stable governance, heavy investment in emerging energy industries, and a large territory of approximately 825,000 square kilometres with a population of only around 3 million . She highlighted Namibia's growing port infrastructure at Walvis Bay, through which landlocked sister countries can access dry ports .
Theofelus made a proactive and concrete offer, inviting landlocked developing countries - from both public and private sectors - to invest in "national data embassies, green data centres, interworlds" in Namibia, positioning the country as "a regional digital corridor" . She cited existing bilateral cooperation with Botswana as evidence of genuine commitment: citizens of Namibia and Botswana do not require passports for cross-border travel, needing only national identity cards, and roaming fees between the two countries have been eliminated . She stated that these examples demonstrate that Namibia's offer to host digital infrastructure for landlocked neighbours is sincere, and expressed readiness to be "an equitable transit and cross-border infrastructure country that can support the holistic growth of the entire region" .
---
#
Development Partner Perspectives: EU Global Gateway and World Bank
EU Ambassador Deike Potzel described the Global Gateway as a model of "mutually beneficial partnerships" based on partners' own development priorities, with the EU providing "standards, transparency, sustainable and trusted technology" . She gave two concrete examples of Global Gateway investments benefiting LLDCs: in Central Asia, the EU is supporting secure satellite connectivity to reach remote and underserved communities where terrestrial infrastructure is too costly, while also expanding regional fibre networks to strengthen cross-border connectivity . Through the EU FinFund Global Connected programme, European Fund for Sustainable Development guarantees are being used to reduce investment risks and mobilise private investment, with specific examples including data centres in Nepal and fibre deployment in African LLDCs .
Potzel drew three key lessons for scaling up. First, "think regionally": cross-border cooperation, transit agreements, and shared infrastructure are essential . Second, "combine hard and soft infrastructure": cables and satellites only work with strong regulation, cybersecurity skills, and affordability measures . Third, "build pipelines of bankable projects": facilities like the proposed IIFFF can help prepare projects, reduce risk, and crowd in private capital, with the Global Gateway Investment Hub potentially playing a key role . She confirmed that the EU is ready to work constructively with LLDCs to implement these approaches .
Sangbu Kim, representing the World Bank, noted the seriousness with which the institution views the 39% internet penetration figure for LLDCs - roughly half the global average - and described connecting landlocked countries as "a World Bank priority project" . He announced the creation of a Digital Access Fund under the World Bank's Digital Strategy and Implementation Plan, incorporating public-private partnership mechanisms . The approach involves "de-risking mechanisms through some kind of grant or concessional support from the public side" to attract and incentivise private sector participation . He also stressed the importance of "streamlining public policy" and "holistic country compact approaches" to create real demand for digital ecosystems, arguing that without demand creation, supply-side infrastructure investment alone is insufficient . He highlighted practical AI applications in healthcare, education, and agriculture as particularly important for generating the demand needed to attract private sector investment in the future .
---
#
Private Sector Perspectives: Huawei and MTN
Ahmed Riad Ismail, Vice President of Global Standardisation at Huawei, argued that while LLDCs face a harder route to trade by geographic definition, "this should not be the case when it comes to digital technology, access to data, and access to connectivity," and that a well-connected LLDC "will have a direct access to global markets" . He identified three factors proven most effective in accelerating digital infrastructure deployment. First, making economics work alongside technology innovation: Huawei's RuralSTAR solution is "way more cost-effective" than a normal tower or cell, making connectivity in underserved areas "much more of an investment than actually a cost" . Second, partnership model innovation requiring four ingredients: governments providing enabling policies and universal service funds with incentive-based spectrum models; operators enabling open access and infrastructure sharing; vendors acting as "strategic long-term partners" rather than "short-term equipment sellers"; and international organisations such as ITU serving as a convening power . Third, he cited Huawei's ITU Partner to Connect pledge as a concrete example: having pledged to connect 120 million people in 80 countries in rural areas by 2023, Huawei exceeded this target by connecting 170 million people, with 34 of those countries listed among the UN's least developed economies .
Lele Modise of MTN, operating across 16 African markets including LLDCs such as Uganda, Rwanda, Zambia, South Sudan, and Eswatini , argued that "connectivity is no longer simply a telecommunications issue - it's an economic development issue, an investment issue, a competitiveness issue across Africa" . She stated that "digital infrastructure has become as important to economic development as roads, railways, ports, and power networks" , and that digital networks have "the unique ability to overcome physical distance" . She identified the core financing challenge with precision: "the greatest barrier to infrastructure development in many developing markets is not the absence of opportunity, it's the absence of sufficient risk-adjusted capital and inability to move projects from concept to bankability" . She strongly welcomed the proposed IIFFF, arguing it can play a catalytic role by "supporting project preparation, de-risking strategic investments, and mobilising both public and private capital at scale" . She also called for policy and regulatory reforms to give investors certainty through "transparent licensing frameworks, efficient rights-of-way processes, harmonised regulations, and predictable investment environments" . Notably, she challenged the dominant deficit-focused narrative, arguing that "we should not think of LLDCs as countries with challenges - we should also recognise them as countries with enormous opportunity" . MTN's three priorities for the next decade were: connecting every community through resilient and affordable digital infrastructure; building regional digital corridors to enable trade, innovation, and economic integration; and mobilising significantly greater levels of public and private investment to close Africa's infrastructure gap .
---
#
Latin American Perspective: Paraguay
Ambassador Raúl Cano Ricciardi, Permanent Representative of Paraguay to the UN in Geneva, described Paraguay's primary digital connectivity challenge as ensuring "resilient, affordable, and reliable international connectivity" . He explained that Paraguay's international connectivity depends entirely on regional land fibre optic networks providing access to submarine cable systems through neighbouring countries . The geographic distances involved are formidable: reaching the Pacific requires crossing the Andes over approximately 2,000 kilometres, while reaching the Atlantic through Brazil involves travelling at least 1,200 kilometres . He argued that "connectivity for LDCs is not only a national issue, it is also a regional one," with the resilience, quality, and affordability of digital connectivity depending on "strong cross-border infrastructure and effective regional cooperation" .
Looking ahead, Paraguay identified strengthening regional cooperation and sustained investment in cross-border fibre optic infrastructure as the priority most likely to have transformative impact over the next five years . More diversified international connectivity routes through both the Atlantic and Pacific would "improve resilience, increase redundancy, foster competition, and contribute to more affordable and reliable connectivity" . He noted that Paraguay's National ICT Plan 2022-2030 identifies "sovereign access to international submarine cable connectivity" as a strategic objective , and called on all stakeholders - governments, regulators, development partners, and the private sector - to work together to ensure that "geography is no longer a barrier to digital inclusion, innovation, and sustainable development" .
---
#
Transit Country Perspective: Türkiye
Aysel Kandemir, General Director of Communications at Türkiye's Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure, argued that "geographical constraints continue to result in higher trade costs, longer transit times, and limited access to digital opportunities" for LLDCs , but that "digital technologies provide greater opportunities to overcome these barriers" through smart logistics, paperless trade, and interoperable digital platforms . She stated that "Türkiye strongly believes that transport corridors must evolve beyond just routes moving goods - they should become platforms for digital integration, resilient supply chains, and inclusive economic transformation" . She cited the Middle Corridor as a strategic and sustainable route linking Central Asia with Europe, creating new opportunities for development . She noted that investments in broadband, e-government services, intelligent transportation systems, and digital services contribute "not only to economic growth but also to greater resilience and inclusion" , and confirmed Türkiye's readiness to share its experience and cooperate with partner countries in advancing digital transformation and smart connectivity .
---
#
Open Floor: Regional and Thematic Contributions
Noting that he was deliberately "breaking protocol" to invite additional voices into the discussion, Zavazava opened the floor to further contributions from participants. The OECD Development Centre expressed full support for the partnership roundtable approach, reflecting "a broader shift in development from specific and isolated projects to approaches that bring everybody together to really catalyse change" . Ambassador Ronepa of Nepal introduced the Asian LLDC perspective, describing Nepal as "a country of 30 million people living in the lap of Himalayas - a beautiful geography but as we try to engage in international trade we feel really remote" . He identified digital tools for cargo tracking and customs modernisation as key to cutting trade costs and enhancing competitiveness .
Armenia's representative highlighted that the country has prioritised digital transformation as a key pillar of its national development strategy, investing in broadband infrastructure, digital public services, cybersecurity, and digital skills, while strengthening regional and international cooperation . Cambodia's representative, invited by Zavazava to share lessons, described the country's adoption of a digital policy framework for a digital economy and society, its school connectivity work through the GIGA project, and its piloting of digital society concepts . Zavazava noted that Cambodia is "leading in bridging the digital skills divide and also bridging the gap between urban and rural areas," and cited a cell broadcasting early warning system test as an example of innovation .
The Eswatini representative raised the most challenging question of the session: whether good relations with neighbouring transit countries can be guaranteed at all times, and whether an ITU resolution could provide guarantees for continued access to submarine cables "should at any point in time things come to the worst" . He also noted that satellite connectivity, while an alternative, may not always be viable given "the issue of costs that is being charged to the consumer" . Zavazava responded with candour, acknowledging that "ITU resolutions are not binding - the sovereignty of nation states reigns supreme" , and that the UN faces the same constraint . He argued instead for maintaining alternative systems such as low-earth orbit satellites as backup in case submarine cables are disrupted by conflict, natural disasters, or sabotage , and noted that spectrum interference across borders remains an unresolved challenge where compliance with resolutions is ultimately voluntary .
UNFPA's Pernille Fenger, speaking on behalf of Executive Director Jenny Katie, brought a gender and inclusion perspective, arguing that "consistent connectivity and technological innovations can ensure that women and girls and vulnerable populations stay safe, not only through the purpose of a technological invention, but also through its design" . She described UNFPA's support for women- and youth-led social enterprises and community-built solutions, and stressed the importance of "responsibly designed innovation embedded in safety, ethics, and data privacy in the design by default" . She concluded by affirming that "digital transformation only succeeds if technology is inherently fair and equitable" .
---
#
ITU's Institutional Commitment and Closing Remarks
In his closing remarks, Zavazava highlighted the depth of ITU's institutional commitment to LLDC issues, noting that he had restructured the Telecommunication Development Bureau in 2024 to establish a dedicated division focused exclusively on the interests of least developed countries, landlocked developing countries, and small island developing states . He also announced that ITU and the World Bank had signed a memorandum of understanding on the Sunday preceding the dialogue to collaborate on regulatory and related issues . He acknowledged the contributions of private sector partners - Huawei, through the Partner to Connect initiative and innovation challenges for young women and youth ; MTN, through work on strengthening regulatory frameworks for investment ; and UNFPA, through a joint project in Papua New Guinea .
Zavazava summarised the session's core message: "connectivity is not only a technical goal, but a catalyst for economic transformation, regional integration, and sustainable development in landlocked developing countries" . He stressed that delivering on this vision requires "political will, practical partnerships, innovative financing, and coordinated action to turn the ambitions of the AWASA programme into results" . He called on member states to "integrate the outcomes of the AWASA programme of action into your policy framework and regulatory frameworks" , and expressed ITU's commitment to continuing this momentum through cooperation with the private sector, investment interventions, and member state engagement .
---
#
Overall Assessment
The dialogue demonstrated a high degree of consensus across all categories of participants on the fundamental importance of digital connectivity for LLDC development, the AWASA Programme of Action as the shared framework for action, and the indispensability of multi-stakeholder partnerships. Key areas of agreement included the need for innovative financing mechanisms - particularly de-risking instruments and the proposed IIFFF - regional cooperation and cross-border digital infrastructure, and the principle that digital transformation must be inclusive by design rather than by accident .
Beneath this surface consensus, however, lay several notable tensions. The Eswatini representative's question about binding connectivity guarantees exposed a structural gap in the international governance framework: ITU resolutions are non-binding, and the sovereignty of nation states ultimately prevails, leaving transit-dependent LLDCs without formal guarantees of continued access . Participants also offered differing emphases between supply-side infrastructure investment and demand-side ecosystem development , and between government-led and private-sector-led financing models . MTN's explicit reframing of LLDCs as countries of "enormous opportunity" rather than merely countries with challenges offered a counterpoint to the deficit-focused statistical framing that opened the session . On regional cooperation, while all participants endorsed the principle, the models proposed ranged from hub-and-spoke arrangements - such as Namibia's offer to serve as a regional digital corridor - to Paraguay's call for diversified multi-directional connectivity routes, reflecting different structural contexts and priorities .
The session concluded with broad agreement that the conversation must not end in the room , and that translating the AWASA Programme from a document into a lived reality for 620 million people will require sustained political will, coordinated financing, and genuine partnership across governments, international organisations, the private sector, and civil society .
Geography compounds digital exclusion, with only 39% of LLDC populations online compared to 68% globally, leaving 359 million people offline - Digital exclusion as new landlockedness
Arg. 1Rabab Fatima argues that landlockedness is no longer only a physical geographic constraint but is now compounded by digital exclusion. The gap between LLDC internet usage and global averages represents a new form of structural disadvantage that limits participation in the digital economy.
She cited 2024 data showing that only 39% of the LLDC population were using the internet, compared with 68% globally , and noted that as a result nearly 359 million people across LLDCs remained offline . She framed this as a development imperative rather than merely a technological challenge .
The AWASA programme recognises the reality of digital exclusion and places strong emphasis on high-speed broadband expansion, resilient digital infrastructure, and enhanced regional connectivity - AWASA's digital priorities
Arg. 2Fatima highlights that the AWASA Programme of Action directly addresses the digital challenges facing LLDCs by prioritising broadband expansion and resilient infrastructure. She emphasises that the international community must now shift from making commitments to actively implementing these priorities.
She noted that the AWASA programme places strong emphasis on high-speed broadband expansion, resilient digital infrastructure, and enhanced regional connectivity , and that the collective task is to move from commitment to implementation .
on: Regional cooperation and cross-border digital infrastructure are critical for LLDCs to overcome geographic disadvantages and participate in the digital economy
The collective task is to move from commitment to implementation of the AWASA programme, with UNOHR LLS already working with member states, development partners, and the private sector - Moving from commitment to implementation
Arg. 3Fatima stresses that the AWASA programme's value lies not in its written commitments but in its implementation. Her office is already engaged with a broad range of stakeholders to advance the connectivity and digital transformation agenda.
She stated that her office, UNOHR LLS, is already working closely with member states, development partners, international financial institutions, and private sector stakeholders to advance the implementation of the connectivity and digital transformation agenda under the AWASA programme of action .
on: The AWASA Programme of Action provides the shared framework and roadmap for digital transformation in LLDCs, and the collective task is to move from commitment to implementation
The scale of investment required for broadband networks, data centres, digital public infrastructure, and digital skills development is significant, yet many LLDCs face limited fiscal space and elevated borrowing costs - Financing gap for digital infrastructure
Arg. 4Fatima identifies a significant financing gap as one of the central obstacles to digital transformation in LLDCs. She argues that public resources alone are insufficient and that stronger engagement from development banks, blended finance, and private sector partnerships are essential.
She noted that broadband networks, data centres, digital public infrastructure, innovation ecosystems, and digital skills development all require sustained financing , yet many LLDCs face limited fiscal space, elevated borrowing costs, and persistent investment gaps . She called for stronger engagement from development banks, greater use of blended finance and risk-sharing instruments, and deeper private sector partnerships .
on: Significant and innovative financing mechanisms, including de-risking instruments, blended finance, and the proposed Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF), are essential to close the digital infrastructure gap in LLDCs
on: Whether government should serve as the primary infrastructure investor or whether private sector mobilisation through de-risking should be the central financing strategy
LLDCs face structural constraints including high trade costs, limited market access, and inadequate broadband infrastructure that reinforce each other - Structural constraints of LLDCs
Arg. 1Zimbabwe's minister acknowledges the structural constraints outlined in the AWASA concept, noting that high trade costs and limited market access are deeply interconnected challenges for landlocked developing countries. These constraints compound one another and make digital transformation more difficult without external support.
She stated that as a landlocked developing country, Zimbabwe fully understands the structural constraints outlined in the concept, from high trade costs to limited market access .
on: Digital connectivity is not merely a technical issue but a multidimensional development imperative encompassing trade, jobs, education, health, and economic growth
Resources are the main constraint for Zimbabwe, as all pillars of digital transformation—including AI infrastructure, computational sovereignty, and capacity development—require significant financing - Resource constraints as primary barrier
Arg. 2Mavetera identifies resource scarcity as Zimbabwe's primary digital connectivity challenge, arguing that without adequate financing, none of the pillars of digital transformation can be achieved. She calls for collective solutions, including shared infrastructure policies and pooled resources.
She described Zimbabwe's national AI strategy anchored on four pillars-capacity development, AI infrastructure, computational sovereignty, and AI adoption-and noted that all of these require resources . She suggested that shared infrastructure policies and collective approaches, such as accessing GPUs from regional partners like Botswana, could help address this constraint .
Zimbabwe launched a national AI strategy anchored on four pillars—capacity development, AI infrastructure, computational sovereignty, and AI adoption—and is seeking shared infrastructure policies and collective solutions with regional partners - National AI strategy and shared infrastructure
Arg. 3Zimbabwe has taken a proactive step by launching a national AI strategy, demonstrating political leadership in digital transformation. The minister emphasises the need for regional collaboration to share infrastructure and resources, particularly for AI capabilities.
She noted that Zimbabwe launched its national AI strategy in 2024, anchored on four pillars: capacity development, AI infrastructure, computational sovereignty, and AI adoption . She also referenced the need for complementary policies including a cybersecurity strategy, a child online protection policy, and an AI charter , and called for a digital compact to pool resources collectively .
on: Digital infrastructure alone is insufficient; digital skills, capacity building, and enabling policy and regulatory environments are equally essential components of digital transformation
Being landlocked means higher transport costs, longer supply chains, dependence on neighbouring states for international connectivity, and limited access to global markets - Geography shapes economic outcomes
Arg. 1Modise argues that for many African countries, geography continues to directly shape economic outcomes, with landlocked status creating a cascade of structural disadvantages. These include not only physical trade barriers but also digital connectivity dependencies on neighbouring states.
She stated that being landlocked often means higher transport costs, longer supply chains, dependence on neighbouring states for international connectivity, and limited access to global markets . She affirmed that the AWASA programme rightfully recognises that digital transformation can help reduce these structural disadvantages .
MTN operates across 16 African markets including several LLDCs and argues that digital infrastructure has become as important to economic development as roads, railways, ports, and power networks, and that connectivity is now an economic development and competitiveness issue - Connectivity as economic infrastructure
Arg. 2Modise reframes connectivity as a fundamental economic infrastructure issue rather than a purely telecommunications matter. She draws a direct parallel between digital networks and traditional physical infrastructure, arguing that both are equally essential for economic development.
She noted that MTN operates across 16 markets on the African continent, including landlocked countries such as Uganda, Rwanda, Zambia, South Sudan, and Eswatini . She argued that digital infrastructure has become as important to economic development as roads, railways, ports, and power networks , and that connectivity is now an economic development, investment, and competitiveness issue .
on: Digital connectivity is not merely a technical issue but a multidimensional development imperative encompassing trade, jobs, education, health, and economic growth
The greatest barrier to infrastructure development in developing markets is not the absence of opportunity but the absence of sufficient risk-adjusted capital and the inability to move projects from concept to bankability - Risk-adjusted capital gap
Arg. 3Modise identifies the core financing problem as not a lack of investment opportunities but a lack of appropriately structured capital and project preparation capacity. She argues that the proposed infrastructure investment facility can play a catalytic role in addressing this gap.
She stated that the greatest barrier to infrastructure development in many developing markets is not the absence of opportunity but the absence of sufficient risk-adjusted capital and the inability to move projects from concept to bankability . She welcomed the proposal for an infrastructure investment financing facility under the AWASA programme as a mechanism to support project preparation, de-risk strategic investments, and mobilise both public and private capital at scale .
on: Significant and innovative financing mechanisms, including de-risking instruments, blended finance, and the proposed Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF), are essential to close the digital infrastructure gap in LLDCs
on: Whether government should serve as the primary infrastructure investor or whether private sector mobilisation through de-risking should be the central financing strategy
Investors need certainty through transparent licensing frameworks, efficient rights-of-way processes, harmonised regulations, and predictable investment environments alongside financing mechanisms - Policy and regulatory certainty for investors
Arg. 4Modise argues that financing alone is insufficient to attract private investment; investors also require a stable and predictable regulatory environment. She calls for policy and regulatory reforms to accompany financing mechanisms.
She stated that investors need certainty, including transparent licensing frameworks, efficient rights-of-way processes, harmonised regulations, and predictable investment environments . She also called for ensuring that emerging technologies such as sovereign AI, cloud computing, satellite broadband, and digital financial services work for developing countries .
on: Digital infrastructure alone is insufficient; digital skills, capacity building, and enabling policy and regulatory environments are equally essential components of digital transformation
MTN calls for building regional digital corridors to enable trade, innovation, and economic integration across borders, and for the infrastructure investment facility to prioritise regional infrastructure connecting multiple LLDCs - Regional digital corridors for Africa
Arg. 5Modise advocates for a regional approach to digital infrastructure, arguing that corridors connecting multiple LLDCs would generate greater economic benefits than isolated national projects. She calls on the proposed infrastructure investment facility to prioritise such regional connectivity.
She outlined three priorities for the next decade: connecting every community through resilient and affordable digital infrastructure, building regional digital corridors to enable trade, innovation, and economic integration across borders, and mobilising greater levels of public and private investment . She also called for the infrastructure investment facility to prioritise regional infrastructure connecting multiple LLDCs and creating digital corridors across Africa .
on: Regional cooperation and cross-border digital infrastructure are critical for LLDCs to overcome geographic disadvantages and participate in the digital economy
Digital connectivity is not merely a technology issue but encompasses trade, jobs, education, health, and economic growth for landlocked nations - Connectivity beyond technology
Arg. 1Speaking on behalf of the group of landlocked developing countries, Khurshed broadens the definition of connectivity beyond its technical dimensions to encompass its social and economic impacts. He argues that for LLDCs, connectivity is a multidimensional development issue.
He stated that for landlocked developing countries, connectivity is not only about technology but also about trade, jobs, education, health, and economic growth . He noted that many landlocked countries face high costs, delays, and limited access to digital services due to geographic and infrastructure challenges .
on: Digital connectivity is not merely a technical issue but a multidimensional development imperative encompassing trade, jobs, education, health, and economic growth
The AWASA programme provides a clear way forward requiring better and more affordable digital infrastructure, stronger internet access, and stronger regional connections - AWASA as roadmap
Arg. 2Khurshed presents the AWASA programme as a concrete and actionable framework for addressing the digital challenges of LLDCs. He emphasises that digital connectivity, while unable to change geography, can significantly reduce the problems caused by geographic isolation.
He stated that the AWASA programme of action gives a clear way forward, requiring better and more affordable digital infrastructure, stronger internet access, better broadband, and stronger regional connections . He noted that digital connectivity cannot change geography but can reduce the problems caused by geography, helping people do business more easily and improving access to education, healthcare, and financial services .
on: Regional cooperation and cross-border digital infrastructure are critical for LLDCs to overcome geographic disadvantages and participate in the digital economy
LLDCs need not only infrastructure but also digital skills, innovation support for small and medium-sized businesses, and policies that build trust and attract investment, including for AI, digital trade platforms, and smart logistics - Holistic digital ecosystem development
Arg. 3Khurshed argues that a holistic approach to digital transformation is required, going beyond physical infrastructure to encompass skills, innovation, and enabling policies. He highlights the potential of emerging technologies such as AI and smart logistics to improve public services and trade.
He stated that infrastructure alone is not enough and that LLDCs also need digital skills, innovation, support for small and medium-sized businesses, and policies that build trust and attract investment . He noted that new technologies including AI, digital trade platforms, and smart logistics can help improve public services and make trade easier, but that LLDCs need more financing, technology, training, and international support to benefit from them .
on: Digital infrastructure alone is insufficient; digital skills, capacity building, and enabling policy and regulatory environments are equally essential components of digital transformation
Digital connectivity is essential for ensuring no one is left behind, particularly in accessing quality healthcare, education, strong food systems, and performing economic systems in rural areas and provinces - Connectivity for universal service delivery
Arg. 1Mukwashi adds a personal dimension to the discussion by emphasising that digital connectivity is a prerequisite for universal access to essential services. She frames connectivity as a moral imperative for lifting people out of poverty and ensuring equitable development.
She stated that digital infrastructure, affordable broadband, trusted digital ecosystems, and digital skills are absolutely essential for ensuring that no one is left behind , particularly in terms of access to good quality healthcare services, good education, strong food systems, and performing economic systems . She also noted the urgency of ensuring that people in rural areas and provinces are able to have the floor lifted from below their feet .
on: Digital connectivity is not merely a technical issue but a multidimensional development imperative encompassing trade, jobs, education, health, and economic growth
Nepal, surrounded by the Himalayas, feels remote in international trade and sees digital solutions as the way to bridge geographic divides and reduce trade costs - Himalayan geographic isolation
Arg. 1The Ambassador of Nepal (speaking through the EU Ambassador's slot in the transcript) describes how Nepal's mountainous geography creates a profound sense of remoteness in international trade. Digital tools such as cargo tracking and customs modernisation are seen as essential means of overcoming this isolation.
The speaker described Nepal as a country of 30 million people living in the lap of the Himalayas, noting that while the geography is beautiful, it makes engagement in international trade feel very remote . Digital approaches to cargo tracking and customs modernisation were highlighted as ways to cut the cost of trade and enhance competitiveness .
The EU Global Gateway uses public-private partnerships and European Fund for Sustainable Development guarantees to reduce investment risks and mobilise private investment, with examples including data centres in Nepal and fibre deployment in African LLDCs - EU de-risking investment model
Arg. 2Potzel presents the EU Global Gateway as a model for de-risking digital infrastructure investment in LLDCs through public-private partnerships and financial guarantees. She argues that this approach generates concrete development impact and bankable projects.
She described how the EU Global Gateway supports secure satellite connectivity to reach remote and underserved communities in Central Asia and expands regional fibre networks to strengthen cross-border connectivity . Through the EU FIN Fund Global Connected programme, European Fund for Sustainable Development guarantees are used to reduce investment risks and mobilise private investment, with concrete examples including data centres in Nepal and fibre deployment in African LLDCs .
on: Significant and innovative financing mechanisms, including de-risking instruments, blended finance, and the proposed Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF), are essential to close the digital infrastructure gap in LLDCs
Cross-border cooperation including transit agreements and shared infrastructure is essential, and combining hard infrastructure with strong regulation, cybersecurity skills, and affordability measures is key to scaling digital connectivity - Think regionally, combine hard and soft infrastructure
Arg. 3Potzel outlines three key lessons from the EU's experience in scaling digital connectivity, emphasising that regional thinking and the combination of physical and regulatory infrastructure are both essential. She argues that cables and satellites alone are insufficient without complementary soft infrastructure.
She outlined three key lessons: first, think regionally, as cross-border cooperation including transit agreements and shared infrastructure is key ; second, combine hard and soft infrastructure, as cables and satellites only work with strong regulation, cybersecurity skills, and affordability ; and third, build pipelines of bankable projects, with facilities like the proposed IIFFF helping to prepare projects, reduce risk, and crowd in private capital .
on: Regional cooperation and cross-border digital infrastructure are critical for LLDCs to overcome geographic disadvantages and participate in the digital economy
Armenia has prioritised digital transformation as a key pillar of its national development strategy, investing in broadband, digital public services, cybersecurity, and digital skills - National digital development priority
Arg. 1The Armenian representative highlights that Armenia, as a landlocked country, has made digital transformation central to its national development strategy. The country is investing across multiple dimensions of digital infrastructure and skills while strengthening regional and international cooperation.
The representative stated that Armenia has prioritised digital transformation as a key pillar of its national development strategy, investing in broadband infrastructure, digital public services, cybersecurity, and digital skills while strengthening regional and international cooperation to enhance connectivity across borders .
The AWASA Programme of Action 2024–2034 places digital transformation and resilient infrastructure at the centre of sustainable development for LLDCs, representing a promise to bridge digital divides - AWASA as a development promise
Arg. 1Zavazava frames the AWASA programme not as a set of bureaucratic targets but as a moral promise to bridge digital divides and unlock the potential of landlocked developing countries. He argues that this promise can only be fulfilled if connectivity is recognised as the central catalyst for transformation.
He stated that he wanted to talk about the AWASA programme of action for LLDCs not as a set of targets but as a promise-a promise to bridge digital divides, to unlock potential, and to leave no one behind . He argued that this promise can only be fulfilled if one simple truth is recognised: connectivity is the catalyst that turns ambition into reality .
on: The AWASA Programme of Action provides the shared framework and roadmap for digital transformation in LLDCs, and the collective task is to move from commitment to implementation
Digital transformation must be delivered through three pillars: infrastructure investment, capacity building for digital literacy, and governance frameworks ensuring data privacy and cybersecurity - Three pillars of digital transformation
Arg. 2Zavazava outlines a comprehensive three-pillar framework for delivering digital transformation under the AWASA programme. He argues that infrastructure, human capacity, and governance must all be addressed simultaneously to achieve meaningful and inclusive digital transformation.
He outlined three pillars: first, infrastructure, noting that broadband, satellite coverage, and resilient networks reaching the last mile are needed because connectivity is a utility, not a luxury ; second, capacity, emphasising investment in digital literacy for everyone and building a workforce that can use, manage, and innovate with digital tools ; and third, governance, requiring data privacy, cybersecurity, and inclusive design to ensure transformation leaves no one behind .
on: Digital connectivity is not merely a technical issue but a multidimensional development imperative encompassing trade, jobs, education, health, and economic growth
The AWASA programme is a shared roadmap built with partnerships between governments, private sector, civil society, and international organisations, as no single entity can deliver it alone - Partnership-based roadmap
Arg. 3Zavazava emphasises that the AWASA programme's success depends on a multi-stakeholder partnership approach, as no single actor has the capacity to deliver digital transformation alone. He highlights the Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility as a key mechanism for mobilising such partnerships.
He stated that the AWASA programme is a shared roadmap built with partnerships between governments, private sector, civil society, and international organisations, as no single entity can deliver this alone . He highlighted the AWASA programme's Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF) as important for mobilising financing, strengthening project preparation, and helping countries turn priorities into bankable, high-impact investments .
on: No single entity can deliver digital transformation alone; multi-stakeholder partnerships between governments, private sector, civil society, and international organisations are essential
Digital transformation should not be seen as replacing human judgement with algorithms but as amplifying human capacity through data, speed, and reach - Human-centred digital transformation
Arg. 4Zavazava offers a philosophical clarification on the nature of digital transformation, arguing that it is fundamentally about enhancing human capability rather than replacing human agency. This framing positions digital transformation as a tool for empowerment rather than displacement.
He stated that digital transformation is not about replacing human judgement with algorithms but about amplifying human capacity through data, speed, and reach . He illustrated this with concrete examples such as a rural farmer accessing real-time market prices, a remote clinic connecting to a hospital via telemedicine, and a student in an underserved region accessing a virtual classroom .
The Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF) under the AWASA programme is important for mobilising financing, strengthening project preparation, and helping countries turn priorities into bankable, high-impact investments - IIFFF as catalytic financing mechanism
Arg. 5Zavazava highlights the IIFFF as a critical institutional mechanism for translating the AWASA programme's ambitions into concrete, financeable projects. He argues that the facility can bridge the gap between development priorities and investment-ready projects.
He stated that the AWASA programme's Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF) is important because it provides an opportunity to mobilise financing, strengthen project preparation, and help countries turn priorities into bankable, high-impact investments . He also proposed a dedicated partnership platform or roundtable for digital transformation in LLDCs that could bring together governments, investors, development partners, and technical experts around a shared pipeline of digital projects .
on: Significant and innovative financing mechanisms, including de-risking instruments, blended finance, and the proposed Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF), are essential to close the digital infrastructure gap in LLDCs
ITU resolutions are not binding on sovereign states, so alternative systems such as satellite connectivity must be maintained alongside submarine cables to ensure resilience for LLDCs - Satellite as resilience backup
Arg. 6Zavazava responds to concerns about guaranteed access to submarine cables by acknowledging the limits of ITU's authority, noting that resolutions are not binding on sovereign states. He advocates for maintaining alternative connectivity systems such as satellite to ensure resilience.
He clarified that ITU resolutions are not binding and that the sovereignty of nation states reigns supreme . He noted that alternative systems such as satellite must be in place in case submarine cables are disrupted due to conflict with a neighbour, natural disasters, or sabotage , and affirmed that universal access remains an important goal .
on: Whether multilateral binding guarantees can or should ensure LLDCs' access to submarine cables and digital connectivity
Technology is only as good as the people using it; investment in digital literacy must extend beyond the young to everyone, building a workforce that can use, manage, and innovate with digital tools - Universal digital literacy investment
Arg. 7Zavazava argues that the human dimension of digital transformation is as important as the technical infrastructure. He calls for broad-based investment in digital literacy that encompasses all age groups and builds a workforce capable of driving innovation.
He stated that technology is only as good as the people using it and that investment in digital literacy must extend not just to the young but to everyone . He called for building a workforce that can use, manage, and innovate with digital tools .
on: Digital infrastructure alone is insufficient; digital skills, capacity building, and enabling policy and regulatory environments are equally essential components of digital transformation
Botswana imports nearly all ICT equipment and pays almost four times the broadband transit costs compared to coastal countries, with the government serving as the primary investor in large-scale ICT infrastructure - High transit costs and import dependency
Arg. 1Tshere illustrates the concrete financial burden of landlockedness on Botswana's digital connectivity, highlighting the disproportionate costs of importing internet bandwidth through neighbouring countries. He explains that these structural disadvantages have forced the government to become the primary infrastructure investor.
He noted that all of Botswana's imports, including internet broadband, transit through neighbouring countries at a cost estimated at almost four times that of coastal countries . He also noted that the low and widely spread population makes ICT service delivery costly, particularly in remote areas , and that because Botswana imports nearly all its ICT equipment, it remains vulnerable to global price fluctuations . As a result, the government continues to serve as the primary investor in large-scale ICT infrastructure .
on: Significant and innovative financing mechanisms, including de-risking instruments, blended finance, and the proposed Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF), are essential to close the digital infrastructure gap in LLDCs
on: Whether government should serve as the primary infrastructure investor or whether private sector mobilisation through de-risking should be the central financing strategy
Cambodia is connecting schools through the GIGA project, piloting digital society concepts, and building policy frameworks for a digital economy, positioning itself as a model for bridging urban-rural digital divides and fostering innovation and entrepreneurship - Cambodia's digital society model
Arg. 2The Deputy Minister of Cambodia describes the country's multifaceted approach to digital transformation, encompassing policy development, infrastructure deployment, and practical pilots. He positions Cambodia as an example of how developing countries can bridge urban-rural divides through coordinated digital initiatives.
He noted that Cambodia has adopted a digital policy framework for a digital economy and society , is connecting schools through the GIGA project and other programmes , and is conducting pilots of digital society concepts . He invited investors and banks to explore Cambodia's digital development journey and consider becoming part of it .
The World Bank is creating a Digital Access Fund under its Digital Strategy and Implementation Plan, exploring public-private partnership mechanisms with de-risking instruments such as grants and concessional support to attract private sector investment - World Bank Digital Access Fund
Arg. 1Kim outlines the World Bank's new financing initiative specifically designed to address the digital connectivity gap in landlocked developing countries. The fund uses public-side de-risking mechanisms to incentivise private sector participation in digital infrastructure investment.
He stated that the World Bank is creating a Digital Access Fund under its Digital Strategy and Implementation Plan , and is looking for public-private partnership mechanisms to invest in landlocked countries together with the private sector . He described de-risking mechanisms through grants or concessional support from the public side as a means to attract and incentivise private sector investment .
on: Significant and innovative financing mechanisms, including de-risking instruments, blended finance, and the proposed Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF), are essential to close the digital infrastructure gap in LLDCs
on: Whether government should serve as the primary infrastructure investor or whether private sector mobilisation through de-risking should be the central financing strategy
Practical AI applications in healthcare, education, and agriculture are as important as supply-side investments in data centres and computing power, as they create real demand that attracts private sector investment - Demand-side AI applications
Arg. 2Kim argues that the focus on supply-side digital infrastructure must be complemented by attention to demand-side applications, particularly in sectors such as healthcare, education, and agriculture. He contends that creating real demand through practical applications is essential for attracting private sector investment.
He stated that while supply-side funding such as data centres and computing power is important, thinking about practical applications for healthcare, education, and agriculture is equally important . He argued that these applications can bring more demand and attract private sector investment in the future .
on: Whether supply-side infrastructure investment or demand-side application development should be the primary focus for attracting private sector investment in LLDCs
Huawei's RuralSTAR solution offers a cost-effective approach to terrestrial connectivity in underserved areas, making connectivity an investment rather than a cost, and the company has connected 170 million people in 80 countries through the ITU Partner to Connect initiative - Cost-effective technology innovation for rural connectivity
Arg. 1Ismail presents Huawei's RuralSTAR technology as a concrete example of how innovation can make connectivity economically viable in underserved areas. He argues that by reducing the cost and time of deployment, such solutions transform connectivity from a cost burden into a genuine investment.
He described the RuralSTAR solution as a way more cost-effective approach that can be built on a fraction of the cost and time of a normal tower or cell for terrestrial connectivity, making connecting underserved areas more of an investment than a cost . He also noted that through the ITU Partner to Connect initiative, Huawei pledged to connect 120 million people in 80 countries in rural areas and overachieved this by connecting 170 million people, with 34 of these countries listed in the UN list of least developed economies .
on: Whether supply-side infrastructure investment or demand-side application development should be the primary focus for attracting private sector investment in LLDCs
Effective partnership models require four ingredients working together: governments providing enabling policies and universal service funds, operators sharing infrastructure and enabling open access, vendors acting as long-term strategic partners, and international organisations such as ITU serving as a convening power - Four-ingredient partnership model
Arg. 2Ismail argues that successful digital infrastructure deployment requires a carefully structured multi-stakeholder partnership model with four distinct but complementary roles. He emphasises that vendors should be seen as long-term strategic partners rather than short-term equipment suppliers.
He outlined four ingredients for effective partnership models: governments providing enabling policies and incentive-based models for spectrum and universal service funds ; operators enabling open access and infrastructure sharing, especially in rural areas ; vendors acting as long-term strategic partners rather than short-term equipment sellers ; and international organisations such as ITU serving as a convening power to bring all three together, citing the ITU Partner to Connect as a good example .
on: No single entity can deliver digital transformation alone; multi-stakeholder partnerships between governments, private sector, civil society, and international organisations are essential
Paraguay's international connectivity depends on regional land fibre optic networks through neighbouring countries, with enormous geographic distances to reach submarine cables - Geographic connectivity constraints
Arg. 1Ricciardi illustrates Paraguay's specific geographic connectivity challenge, explaining that the country must traverse enormous distances through neighbouring countries to access submarine cable systems. This dependency creates significant vulnerabilities in terms of resilience, cost, and reliability.
He noted that Paraguay's international connectivity depends on regional land fibre optic networks that provide access to the submarine cable system through neighbouring countries . He described the geographic scale of the challenge: to reach the Pacific, Paraguay must overcome the Andean mountains over 2,000 kilometres, and to reach Brazil requires travelling at least 1,200 kilometres .
Strengthening regional cooperation and sustained investment in cross-border fibre optic infrastructure, with more diversified international connectivity routes through both the Atlantic and Pacific, would have the greatest transformative impact for LLDCs - Regional fibre optic cooperation
Arg. 2Ricciardi argues that regional cooperation and diversified cross-border fibre optic infrastructure represent the single most transformative investment priority for Paraguay and other LLDCs. He frames this as both a technical priority and a shared regional responsibility.
He stated that strengthening regional cooperation together with sustained investment in cross-border fibre optic infrastructure will be a key factor in the future . He argued that more diversified international connectivity routes through both the Atlantic and the Pacific would improve resilience, increase redundancy, foster competition, and contribute to more affordable and reliable connectivity . He also noted that Paraguay's National ICT Plan 2022-2030 identifies securing sovereign access to international submarine cable connectivity as a strategic objective .
on: Regional cooperation and cross-border digital infrastructure are critical for LLDCs to overcome geographic disadvantages and participate in the digital economy
Namibia, as a coastal country with undersea cable landing stations, dry ports, and stable governance, positions itself as a regional digital corridor and invites landlocked countries to invest in data centres and digital infrastructure on its territory - Namibia as regional digital hub
Arg. 1Theofelus presents Namibia as an ideal transit and digital hub country for landlocked neighbours, leveraging its coastal access, stable governance, and growing infrastructure. She actively invites landlocked countries to use Namibia as a platform for their digital infrastructure needs.
She noted that Namibia has the ability to land undersea cables, including the WACS and Equinox cables , and has growing port infrastructure through which landlocked sister countries can have dry ports . She invited landlocked developing countries to invest in national data embassies, green data centres, and other digital infrastructure in Namibia, positioning it as a regional digital corridor . She also cited the example of Namibia and Botswana removing roaming fees between their countries as evidence of their commitment to regional cooperation .
on: Regional cooperation and cross-border digital infrastructure are critical for LLDCs to overcome geographic disadvantages and participate in the digital economy
Transport corridors must evolve beyond routes for moving goods to become platforms for digital integration, resilient supply chains, and inclusive economic transformation, with Türkiye's Middle Corridor linking Central Asia with Europe as a strategic example - Transport corridors as digital platforms
Arg. 1Kandemir argues that the traditional conception of transport corridors as purely physical routes must be expanded to encompass digital integration and economic transformation. She presents Türkiye's Middle Corridor as a strategic example of how transport infrastructure can serve as a platform for broader digital and economic connectivity.
She stated that Türkiye strongly believes that transport corridors must evolve beyond just routes moving goods to become platforms for digital integration, resilient supply chains, and inclusive economic transformation . She noted that the Middle Corridor has emerged as a strategic and sustainable route linking Central Asia with Europe , and that investments in broadband, e-government services, intelligent transportation systems, and digital services contribute to economic growth, resilience, and inclusion .
on: Regional cooperation and cross-border digital infrastructure are critical for LLDCs to overcome geographic disadvantages and participate in the digital economy
The OECD Development Centre supports the partnership roundtable approach, reflecting a broader shift in development from isolated projects to approaches that bring all partners together to catalyse change - Partnership roundtable approach
Arg. 1The OECD Development Centre representative endorses the multi-stakeholder partnership roundtable model proposed during the dialogue, situating it within a broader trend in development cooperation. The representative commits the OECD Development Centre as a partner in this collaborative approach.
The representative expressed full support for the approach of bringing all partners together in partnership roundtables , and noted that this reflects an overall move in development from specific and isolated projects to approaches that bring everybody together to catalyse change . The representative committed the OECD Development Centre as a partner in the road ahead .
on: No single entity can deliver digital transformation alone; multi-stakeholder partnerships between governments, private sector, civil society, and international organisations are essential
UNFPA invests in digital health solutions and women- and youth-led social enterprises, emphasising that digital transformation only succeeds if technology is inherently fair, equitable, and designed with safety, ethics, and data privacy by default - Gender-equitable and ethical digital design
Arg. 1Fenger argues that digital transformation must be designed with equity and safety at its core, particularly for women, girls, and vulnerable populations. She presents UNFPA's work in digital health and community-led innovation as examples of how responsible design can ensure inclusive outcomes.
She noted that UNFPA invests in digital health solutions and has supported women- and youth-led social enterprises, building solutions that come from communities themselves . She emphasised that consistent connectivity and technological innovations can ensure that women, girls, and vulnerable populations stay safe through both the purpose and design of technological interventions . She stressed that digital transformation only succeeds if technology is inherently fair and equitable , and called for responsibly designed innovation embedded in safety, ethics, and data privacy by default .
on: No single entity can deliver digital transformation alone; multi-stakeholder partnerships between governments, private sector, civil society, and international organisations are essential
Connectivity and technological innovation can ensure that women, girls, and vulnerable populations stay safe and economically empowered, and solutions built from communities themselves with responsible design are essential for inclusive digital transformation - Women and community-centred digital solutions
Arg. 2Fenger highlights the particular importance of digital connectivity for women and vulnerable groups, arguing that it serves both as an economic driver and a safety mechanism. She emphasises that community-led solutions with responsible design are more effective than top-down approaches.
She stated that for LLDCs, digital connectivity is certainly not a luxury and that consistent connectivity and technological innovations can ensure that women, girls, and vulnerable populations stay safe . She noted that UNFPA has supported women- and youth-led social enterprises and reinforced the importance of responsibly designed innovation embedded in safety, ethics, and data privacy in the design by default .
Eswatini raises the concern that good relations with neighbouring transit countries cannot be guaranteed at all times, and calls for a multilateral mechanism or ITU resolution to ensure LLDCs' continued access to submarine cables in worst-case scenarios - Guaranteed access to connectivity
Arg. 1The Eswatini representative raises a critical vulnerability for landlocked countries: their dependence on good diplomatic relations with transit neighbours for internet access. The representative calls for a formal multilateral guarantee mechanism to protect LLDCs' connectivity rights in worst-case scenarios.
The representative questioned whether good relations with neighbours can be guaranteed at all times , and asked whether there could be an ITU resolution to give guarantees to countries to have access at all times to submarine cables should things go wrong . The representative also acknowledged satellite connectivity as an alternative but noted that cost issues make it an imperfect solution , and called for a multifaceted approach potentially involving multiple UN agencies .
on: Whether multilateral binding guarantees can or should ensure LLDCs' access to submarine cables and digital connectivity
Session Knowledge Graph
Speakers · Topics · Arguments · Relationships
All major speakers agreed that digital connectivity transcends its technical dimensions and must be understood as a fundamental development issue. Zavazava stated that 'digital transformation is not about replacing human judgement with algorithms but about amplifying human capacity' , while Khurshed emphasised that connectivity is 'not only about technology but also about trade, jobs, education, health, and economic growth' . Fatima framed closing the digital divide as 'a development imperative' , and Mukwashi stressed that digital infrastructure is 'absolutely essential for ensuring that no one is left behind' . Modise argued that 'connectivity is now an economic development, investment, and competitiveness issue' , and Mavetera acknowledged the structural constraints of high trade costs and limited market access .
Digital transformation must be delivered through three pillars: infrastructure investment, capacity building for digital literacy, and governance frameworks ensuring data privacy and cybersecurity - Three pillars of digital transformation
Digital exclusion is becoming a new dimension of landlockedness, with only 39% of LLDC populations online compared to 68% globally, leaving 359 million people offline - Digital exclusion as new landlockedness
Digital connectivity is not merely a technology issue but encompasses trade, jobs, education, health, and economic growth for landlocked nations - Connectivity beyond technology
Digital connectivity is essential for ensuring no one is left behind, particularly in accessing quality healthcare, education, strong food systems, and performing economic systems in rural areas and provinces - Connectivity for universal service delivery
MTN operates across 16 African markets including several LLDCs and argues that digital infrastructure has become as important to economic development as roads, railways, ports, and power networks, and that connectivity is now an economic development and competitiveness issue - Connectivity as economic infrastructure
LLDCs face structural constraints including high trade costs, limited market access, and inadequate broadband infrastructure that reinforce each other - Structural constraints of LLDCs
There was broad consensus that the AWASA Programme of Action represents the agreed framework for action. Zavazava framed it as 'a promise to bridge digital divides, to unlock potential, and to leave no one behind' , while Fatima stressed that 'our collective task now is to move from commitment to implementation' . Khurshed stated that 'the AWASA programme of action gives us a clear way forward' , and Modise affirmed that 'the AWASA programme rightfully recognises that digital transformation can help reduce these structural disadvantages' . Theofelus and Kandemir both expressed support for the programme's goals through their respective offers of regional cooperation .
The AWASA Programme of Action 2024–2034 places digital transformation and resilient infrastructure at the centre of sustainable development for LLDCs, representing a promise to bridge digital divides - AWASA as a development promise
The collective task is to move from commitment to implementation of the AWASA programme, with UNOHR LLS already working with member states, development partners, and the private sector - Moving from commitment to implementation
The AWASA programme provides a clear way forward requiring better and more affordable digital infrastructure, stronger internet access, and stronger regional connections - AWASA as roadmap
MTN calls for building regional digital corridors to enable trade, innovation, and economic integration across borders, and for the infrastructure investment facility to prioritise regional infrastructure connecting multiple LLDCs - Regional digital corridors for Africa
Namibia, as a coastal country with undersea cable landing stations, dry ports, and stable governance, positions itself as a regional digital corridor and invites landlocked countries to invest in data centres and digital infrastructure on its territory - Namibia as regional digital hub
Transport corridors must evolve beyond routes for moving goods to become platforms for digital integration, resilient supply chains, and inclusive economic transformation, with Türkiye's Middle Corridor linking Central Asia with Europe as a strategic example - Transport corridors as digital platforms
Speakers from across government, international organisations, and the private sector unanimously agreed that partnerships are indispensable. Zavazava stated that 'no single entity can deliver this alone' , while Fatima called for 'stronger engagement from development banks, greater use of blended finance and risk-sharing instruments, and deeper partnerships with the private sector' . Ismail outlined a four-ingredient partnership model requiring governments, operators, vendors, and international organisations . Potzel described the EU Global Gateway as a public-private partnership model , and the OECD representative affirmed that 'you can count on us as partners in this road ahead' . Fenger added that 'the road is paved with partnerships' .
The AWASA programme is a shared roadmap built with partnerships between governments, private sector, civil society, and international organisations, as no single entity can deliver it alone - Partnership-based roadmap
The scale of investment required for broadband networks, data centres, digital public infrastructure, and digital skills development is significant, yet many LLDCs face limited fiscal space and elevated borrowing costs - Financing gap for digital infrastructure
The greatest barrier to infrastructure development in developing markets is not the absence of opportunity but the absence of sufficient risk-adjusted capital and the inability to move projects from concept to bankability - Risk-adjusted capital gap
Effective partnership models require four ingredients working together: governments providing enabling policies and universal service funds, operators sharing infrastructure and enabling open access, vendors acting as long-term strategic partners, and international organisations such as ITU serving as a convening power - Four-ingredient partnership model
Cross-border cooperation including transit agreements and shared infrastructure is essential, and combining hard infrastructure with strong regulation, cybersecurity skills, and affordability measures is key to scaling digital connectivity - Think regionally, combine hard and soft infrastructure
The OECD Development Centre supports the partnership roundtable approach, reflecting a broader shift in development from isolated projects to approaches that bring all partners together to catalyse change - Partnership roundtable approach
UNFPA invests in digital health solutions and women- and youth-led social enterprises, emphasising that digital transformation only succeeds if technology is inherently fair, equitable, and designed with safety, ethics, and data privacy by default - Gender-equitable and ethical digital design
There was strong consensus on the need for innovative financing. Zavazava highlighted the IIFFF as providing 'an opportunity to mobilise financing, strengthen project preparation, and help countries turn priorities into bankable, high-impact investments' . Fatima called for 'stronger engagement from development banks, greater use of blended finance and risk-sharing instruments' . Kim described the World Bank's Digital Access Fund with 'de-risking mechanisms through grants or concessional support' . Potzel cited the EU's use of 'European Fund for Sustainable Development guarantees to reduce investment risks and mobilise private investment' . Modise identified the core problem as 'the absence of sufficient risk-adjusted capital and the inability to move projects from concept to bankability' , and Tshere illustrated the concrete burden with Botswana paying 'almost four times' the broadband costs of coastal countries .
The Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF) under the AWASA programme is important for mobilising financing, strengthening project preparation, and helping countries turn priorities into bankable, high-impact investments - IIFFF as catalytic financing mechanism
The scale of investment required for broadband networks, data centres, digital public infrastructure, and digital skills development is significant, yet many LLDCs face limited fiscal space and elevated borrowing costs - Financing gap for digital infrastructure
The greatest barrier to infrastructure development in developing markets is not the absence of opportunity but the absence of sufficient risk-adjusted capital and the inability to move projects from concept to bankability - Risk-adjusted capital gap
The World Bank is creating a Digital Access Fund under its Digital Strategy and Implementation Plan, exploring public-private partnership mechanisms with de-risking instruments such as grants and concessional support to attract private sector investment - World Bank Digital Access Fund
The EU Global Gateway uses public-private partnerships and European Fund for Sustainable Development guarantees to reduce investment risks and mobilise private investment, with examples including data centres in Nepal and fibre deployment in African LLDCs - EU de-risking investment model
Botswana imports nearly all ICT equipment and pays almost four times the broadband transit costs compared to coastal countries, with the government serving as the primary investor in large-scale ICT infrastructure - High transit costs and import dependency
Regional cooperation emerged as a near-universal consensus point. Fatima emphasised 'enhanced regional connectivity' as a core AWASA priority . Khurshed called for 'stronger regional connections' . Theofelus actively invited landlocked countries to use Namibia as 'a regional digital corridor' . Ricciardi argued that 'strengthening regional cooperation together with sustained investment in cross-border fibre optic infrastructure will be a key factor in the future' . Modise called for 'building regional digital corridors to enable trade, innovation, and economic integration across borders' . Potzel's first lesson was to 'think regionally' , and Kandemir argued that 'transport corridors must evolve beyond just routes moving goods' to become 'platforms for digital integration' .
The AWASA programme recognises the reality of digital exclusion and places strong emphasis on high-speed broadband expansion, resilient digital infrastructure, and enhanced regional connectivity - AWASA's digital priorities
The AWASA programme provides a clear way forward requiring better and more affordable digital infrastructure, stronger internet access, and stronger regional connections - AWASA as roadmap
Namibia, as a coastal country with undersea cable landing stations, dry ports, and stable governance, positions itself as a regional digital corridor and invites landlocked countries to invest in data centres and digital infrastructure on its territory - Namibia as regional digital hub
Strengthening regional cooperation and sustained investment in cross-border fibre optic infrastructure, with more diversified international connectivity routes through both the Atlantic and Pacific, would have the greatest transformative impact for LLDCs - Regional fibre optic cooperation
MTN calls for building regional digital corridors to enable trade, innovation, and economic integration across borders, and for the infrastructure investment facility to prioritise regional infrastructure connecting multiple LLDCs - Regional digital corridors for Africa
Cross-border cooperation including transit agreements and shared infrastructure is essential, and combining hard infrastructure with strong regulation, cybersecurity skills, and affordability measures is key to scaling digital connectivity - Think regionally, combine hard and soft infrastructure
Transport corridors must evolve beyond routes for moving goods to become platforms for digital integration, resilient supply chains, and inclusive economic transformation, with Türkiye's Middle Corridor linking Central Asia with Europe as a strategic example - Transport corridors as digital platforms
Multiple speakers agreed that physical infrastructure must be complemented by human capacity and enabling policies. Zavazava stated that 'technology is only as good as the people using it' and called for investment in digital literacy for everyone . Khurshed argued that 'infrastructure alone is not enough' and that LLDCs also need 'digital skills, innovation, support for small and medium-sized businesses, and policies that build trust' . Modise called for 'policy and regulatory reforms' alongside financing, noting that 'investors need certainty' through 'transparent licensing frameworks' and 'harmonised regulations' . Mavetera described Zimbabwe's AI strategy anchored on capacity development alongside infrastructure , and Fatima called for 'predictable, transparent, and interoperable regulatory frameworks' .
Technology is only as good as the people using it; investment in digital literacy must extend beyond the young to everyone, building a workforce that can use, manage, and innovate with digital tools - Universal digital literacy investment
LLDCs need not only infrastructure but also digital skills, innovation support for small and medium-sized businesses, and policies that build trust and attract investment, including for AI, digital trade platforms, and smart logistics - Holistic digital ecosystem development
Investors need certainty through transparent licensing frameworks, efficient rights-of-way processes, harmonised regulations, and predictable investment environments alongside financing mechanisms - Policy and regulatory certainty for investors
Zimbabwe launched a national AI strategy anchored on four pillars—capacity development, AI infrastructure, computational sovereignty, and AI adoption—and is seeking shared infrastructure policies and collective solutions with regional partners - National AI strategy and shared infrastructure
LLDCs need predictable, transparent, and interoperable regulatory frameworks that promote investment, foster innovation, support trusted data flows, and facilitate seamless cross-border digital trade - Enabling policy and regulatory environment
Zavazava, Fatima, and Khurshed all framed the AWASA Programme of Action not merely as a policy document but as a living commitment requiring implementation. Zavazava described it as 'a promise to bridge digital divides, to unlock potential, and to leave no one behind' . Fatima noted that the AWASA programme 'places strong emphasis on high-speed broadband expansion, resilient digital infrastructure, and enhanced regional connectivity' and that 'our collective task now is to move from commitment to implementation' . Khurshed stated that 'the AWASA programme of action gives us a clear way forward' requiring 'better and more affordable digital infrastructure' and 'stronger regional connections' . All three emphasised urgency in translating the programme's written commitments into concrete action. Private sector and multilateral financial institution representatives converged on the view that de-risking mechanisms are the key to unlocking private investment in LLDC digital infrastructure. Modise identified the core problem as 'the absence of sufficient risk-adjusted capital and the inability to move projects from concept to bankability' . Ismail described a four-ingredient partnership model where governments provide enabling policies and universal service funds to incentivise private investment . Kim described the World Bank's approach of 'providing some de-risking mechanism through some kind of the grant or concessional support from the public side' to 'attract and incentivise private sector coming to the market' . Potzel described the EU's use of 'European Fund for Sustainable Development guarantees to reduce investment risks and mobilise private investment' . Transit and neighbouring countries shared a common vision of physical corridors evolving into digital connectivity platforms. Theofelus positioned Namibia as a 'regional digital corridor' where landlocked countries could invest in 'national data embassies, green data centres' and other digital infrastructure . Ricciardi argued that 'strengthening regional cooperation together with sustained investment in cross-border fibre optic infrastructure' would have 'the greatest transformative impact for LDCs over the next five years' . Kandemir stated that 'Türkiye strongly believes that transport corridors must evolve beyond just routes moving goods' to become 'platforms for digital integration, resilient supply chains, and inclusive economic transformation' , citing the Middle Corridor as a strategic example . Ministers and representatives from LLDC governments shared a common experience of structural disadvantage compounded by resource constraints. Mavetera identified resources as Zimbabwe's primary constraint, noting that 'all these needs resources' . Tshere described Botswana paying 'almost four times' the broadband costs of coastal countries and being 'vulnerable to global price fluctuations' . Khurshed noted that 'many landlocked countries face high costs, delays, and limited access to digital services' . Ricciardi described Paraguay's geographic challenge of traversing thousands of kilometres to reach submarine cables , with connectivity being 'not only a national issue, it is also a regional one' . Fenger, Mukwashi, and Zavazava all emphasised that digital transformation must be inclusive by design and must prioritise the most vulnerable. Fenger stressed that 'digital transformation only succeeds if technology is inherently fair and equitable' and called for 'responsibly designed innovation embedded in safety, ethics, and data privacy in the design by default' . Mukwashi stated that digital infrastructure is 'absolutely essential for ensuring that no one is left behind' , particularly for 'access to good quality healthcare services, good education, strong food systems' . Zavazava's third pillar of governance required 'data privacy, cybersecurity, and inclusive design' to ensure 'digital transformation must leave no one behind, not by accident, but by design' . Kim, Khurshed, and Mavetera all highlighted the importance of AI and emerging technologies as tools for LLDC development, while emphasising that their benefits require complementary investments in skills and applications. Kim argued that 'thinking about some more application for healthcare education and agriculture cases is really important' as these 'can bring more demand and more attraction to the private sector investment' . Khurshed noted that 'new technologies including AI, digital trade platforms, and smart logistics can help improve public services and make trade easier' but that LLDCs need 'more financing, technology, training, and international support' . Mavetera described Zimbabwe's national AI strategy anchored on 'capacity development, AI infrastructure, computational sovereignty, and AI adoption' .
Rather than simply expressing sympathy for LLDC challenges, transit and coastal country representatives made concrete and proactive offers of partnership. Theofelus went beyond diplomatic language to actively invite landlocked countries to 'invest in national data embassies, green data centres, interworlds' in Namibia, stating 'Namibia is definitely your place' . She also cited the concrete example of Namibia and Botswana eliminating roaming fees between their countries as evidence of genuine commitment . Kandemir argued that Turkey's transport corridors should become 'platforms for digital integration, resilient supply chains, and inclusive economic transformation' , while Potzel provided concrete examples of EU investments already benefiting LLDCs . This level of proactive commitment from non-LLDC countries was notably stronger than typical diplomatic expressions of solidarity.
It was somewhat unexpected that private sector actors (MTN and Huawei) and multilateral institutions (World Bank and EU) converged so precisely on the same diagnosis and solution. Modise (MTN) identified the problem as 'the absence of sufficient risk-adjusted capital and the inability to move projects from concept to bankability' , which aligned almost exactly with Kim's (World Bank) description of de-risking mechanisms and Potzel's (EU) description of using guarantees to 'reduce investment risks and mobilise private investment' . Ismail (Huawei) added that vendors should be seen as 'long-term strategic partners' rather than 'short-term equipment sellers' . This convergence between commercial actors and development institutions on both the problem definition and the solution suggests a maturing consensus on how to structure digital infrastructure financing.
The Eswatini representative raised a politically sensitive question about whether good diplomatic relations with transit neighbours can be guaranteed, asking whether an ITU resolution could provide guarantees for continued access to submarine cables 'should at any point in time things come to the worst' . Rather than deflecting this uncomfortable question, Zavazava responded with candid honesty, acknowledging that 'ITU resolutions are not binding' and that 'the sovereignty of nation states reigns supreme' . He then constructively pivoted to advocate for satellite connectivity as a resilience backup . This frank exchange about the limits of international governance mechanisms, and the consensus that emerged around the need for technological redundancy as a practical solution, was unexpected in a high-level diplomatic forum.
It was notable that the principle of inclusive design-that digital transformation must leave no one behind 'not by accident, but by design' -was endorsed not only by UN agencies but also implicitly by private sector and government representatives. Zavazava explicitly stated this principle , Mukwashi framed it as a moral imperative , Fenger stressed that 'digital transformation only succeeds if technology is inherently fair and equitable' , and Fatima framed closing the digital divide as 'a development imperative' . The unexpected element is that this principle was not contested or qualified by any speaker, including private sector representatives, suggesting a genuine cross-sectoral consensus on the ethical dimensions of digital transformation.
The dialogue demonstrated a remarkably high level of consensus across all categories of participants-LLDC governments, transit countries, multilateral institutions, private sector actors, and UN agencies. Key areas of agreement included: (1) the multidimensional nature of digital connectivity as a development imperative beyond technology; (2) the AWASA Programme of Action as the shared framework requiring urgent implementation; (3) the indispensability of multi-stakeholder partnerships; (4) the need for innovative financing mechanisms including de-risking instruments and the IIFFF; (5) the centrality of regional cooperation and cross-border digital infrastructure; (6) the equal importance of digital skills, capacity building, and enabling regulatory environments alongside physical infrastructure; and (7) the principle that digital transformation must be inclusive by design. The only area of tension was the Eswatini representative's question about guaranteed connectivity access, which revealed the limits of international governance mechanisms, though even this was resolved through consensus around technological redundancy as a practical solution .
The Eswatini representative questioned whether good relations with transit neighbours can be guaranteed at all times and called for an ITU resolution to give countries guaranteed access to submarine cables in worst-case scenarios . Zavazava directly countered this by clarifying that ITU resolutions are not binding and that the sovereignty of nation states reigns supreme , arguing instead that alternative systems such as satellite must be maintained as backup in case submarine cables are disrupted due to conflict, natural disasters, or sabotage . This represents a genuine disagreement about the appropriate institutional mechanism for protecting LLDC connectivity rights.
Eswatini raises the concern that good relations with neighbouring transit countries cannot be guaranteed at all times, and calls for a multilateral mechanism or ITU resolution to ensure LLDCs' continued access to submarine cables in worst-case scenarios - Guaranteed access to connectivity
ITU resolutions are not binding on sovereign states, so alternative systems such as satellite connectivity must be maintained alongside submarine cables to ensure resilience for LLDCs - Satellite as resilience backup
Ismail from Huawei focused primarily on supply-side infrastructure innovation, presenting the RuralSTAR solution as a cost-effective means of deploying terrestrial connectivity in underserved areas and emphasising the importance of making the economics of connectivity work through technology innovation . Kim from the World Bank, by contrast, argued that while supply-side funding such as data centres and computing power is important, thinking about practical applications for healthcare, education, and agriculture is equally important , contending that these demand-side applications create the real demand needed to attract private sector investment in the future . This reflects a divergence between a technology-deployment-first approach and a demand-creation-first approach.
Huawei's RuralSTAR solution offers a cost-effective approach to terrestrial connectivity in underserved areas, making connectivity an investment rather than a cost, and the company has connected 170 million people in 80 countries through the ITU Partner to Connect initiative - Cost-effective technology innovation for rural connectivity
Practical AI applications in healthcare, education, and agriculture are as important as supply-side investments in data centres and computing power, as they create real demand that attracts private sector investment - Demand-side AI applications
Botswana's minister described a situation where the government continues to serve as the primary investor in large-scale ICT infrastructure , relying on special vehicles like the Universal Access and Savings Fund and private sector partnerships. This reflects a government-led model born of necessity. In contrast, Fatima argued that public resources alone will not be enough and called for stronger engagement from development banks, greater use of blended finance, and deeper private sector partnerships . Modise from MTN identified the core problem as the absence of sufficient risk-adjusted capital and the inability to move projects from concept to bankability , while Kim from the World Bank described creating de-risking mechanisms through grants and concessional support to incentivise private sector entry . The disagreement lies in whether government-led investment is a sustainable model or whether the priority should be restructuring incentives to crowd in private capital.
Botswana imports nearly all ICT equipment and pays almost four times the broadband transit costs compared to coastal countries, with the government serving as the primary investor in large-scale ICT infrastructure - High transit costs and import dependency
The scale of investment required for broadband networks, data centres, digital public infrastructure, and digital skills development is significant, yet many LLDCs face limited fiscal space and elevated borrowing costs - Financing gap for digital infrastructure
The greatest barrier to infrastructure development in developing markets is not the absence of opportunity but the absence of sufficient risk-adjusted capital and the inability to move projects from concept to bankability - Risk-adjusted capital gap
The World Bank is creating a Digital Access Fund under its Digital Strategy and Implementation Plan, exploring public-private partnership mechanisms with de-risking instruments such as grants and concessional support to attract private sector investment - World Bank Digital Access Fund
In a forum ostensibly united around digital connectivity, an unexpected divergence emerged in how speakers fundamentally framed the nature of digital transformation. Zavazava explicitly stated that digital transformation is not about technology but about amplifying human capacity , and Fenger argued that digital transformation only succeeds if technology is inherently fair and equitable , with community-led solutions and responsible design being essential . By contrast, Ismail from Huawei, while acknowledging the importance of partnership models , focused primarily on technology innovation and deployment metrics - connecting 170 million people and developing cost-effective hardware solutions - reflecting a more technology-centric framing. This was unexpected in a high-level dialogue where all speakers were ostensibly aligned on human-centred development goals, yet the private sector representative's framing diverged meaningfully from the UN and civil society framing in terms of what constitutes success and how progress should be measured.
An unexpected framing disagreement emerged around how LLDCs should be positioned in the investment narrative. Modise explicitly stated that LLDCs should not be thought of as countries with challenges but as countries with enormous opportunity , arguing that this reframing is important for attracting investment. This contrasts with Fatima's approach, which led with stark deficit statistics - only 39% internet penetration versus 68% globally, with 359 million people offline - framing LLDCs primarily through the lens of exclusion and development imperatives . Khurshed similarly emphasised challenges such as high costs, delays, and limited access . While all three ultimately sought to attract investment and support, their divergent framings - opportunity-led versus challenge-led - reflect a genuine strategic disagreement about how to most effectively mobilise international attention and financing for LLDCs.
This disagreement was unexpected because it emerged between countries that are ostensibly partners in the same regional cooperation framework. Theofelus from Namibia enthusiastically invited landlocked countries to invest in digital infrastructure on Namibian territory and cited existing bilateral cooperation with Botswana - including passport-free travel and no roaming fees - as evidence of reliable partnership . However, the Eswatini representative raised the uncomfortable question of whether such good relations can be guaranteed at all times , implicitly questioning the reliability of the very model Theofelus was promoting. Ricciardi from Paraguay independently reinforced the need for diversified routes rather than dependence on any single transit partner, suggesting that the vulnerability Eswatini identified is a shared concern among LLDCs even when not explicitly stated. This reveals an underlying tension between the optimistic bilateral cooperation narrative and the structural vulnerability of LLDCs dependent on transit neighbours.
The dialogue was characterised by a high degree of surface-level consensus around the importance of digital connectivity for LLDCs, the AWASA Programme of Action as a framework, and the need for multi-stakeholder partnerships. However, beneath this consensus lay several meaningful divergences: (1) whether binding multilateral guarantees or technical redundancy (satellite) is the appropriate response to LLDC connectivity vulnerability ; (2) whether supply-side infrastructure deployment or demand-side application development should drive private sector investment ; (3) whether government-led investment or private sector de-risking should be the primary financing model ; (4) whether LLDCs should be framed as opportunity-rich or challenge-laden for investment mobilisation purposes ; and (5) whether digital transformation is fundamentally a technology challenge or a human and ethical imperative . Regional cooperation was universally endorsed but with divergent models - hub-and-spoke versus diversified corridors - and an underlying tension about the reliability of transit arrangements .
All four speakers agreed that infrastructure alone is insufficient for digital transformation and that a holistic approach encompassing skills, governance, and policy is required. Zavazava outlined three pillars — infrastructure, capacity, and governance ; Khurshed stated that infrastructure alone is not enough and that LLDCs also need digital skills, innovation, and policies that build trust ; Modise argued that the challenge is building resilient digital ecosystems including national fibre networks, data centres, and digital payment systems . However, they diverged on the relative priority and sequencing: Mavetera emphasised that resources are the primary constraint and that without financing, none of the pillars can be achieved [173, 185], implying a sequencing where financing must come first, while Zavazava and Khurshed presented the pillars as simultaneously necessary rather than sequentially dependent.
Digital transformation must be delivered through three pillars: infrastructure investment, capacity building for digital literacy, and governance frameworks ensuring data privacy and cybersecurity - Three pillars of digital transformation LLDCs need not only infrastructure but also digital skills, innovation support for small and medium-sized businesses, and policies that build trust and attract investment, including for AI, digital trade platforms, and smart logistics - Holistic digital ecosystem development MTN operates across 16 African markets including several LLDCs and argues that digital infrastructure has become as important to economic development as roads, railways, ports, and power networks, and that connectivity is now an economic development and competitiveness issue - Connectivity as economic infrastructure Resources are the main constraint for Zimbabwe, as all pillars of digital transformation—including AI infrastructure, computational sovereignty, and capacity development—require significant financing - Resource constraints as primary barrier
All four speakers agreed that regional cooperation is essential for LLDC digital connectivity. Theofelus actively invited landlocked countries to use Namibia as a regional digital hub ; Ricciardi called for strengthening regional cooperation and sustained investment in cross-border fibre optic infrastructure ; Modise called for building regional digital corridors connecting multiple LLDCs [363, 368-370]; and Potzel emphasised that cross-border cooperation including transit agreements and shared infrastructure is key . However, they diverged on the model: Theofelus proposed a hub-and-spoke model centred on Namibia as a coastal anchor , Ricciardi emphasised diversified routes to reduce dependency on any single path , and Modise focused on corridor infrastructure connecting multiple LLDCs rather than routing through a single hub . Potzel added that hard infrastructure must be combined with soft infrastructure such as regulation and cybersecurity skills , a dimension not prominently featured in the other speakers' proposals.
Namibia, as a coastal country with undersea cable landing stations, dry ports, and stable governance, positions itself as a regional digital corridor and invites landlocked countries to invest in data centres and digital infrastructure on its territory - Namibia as regional digital hub Strengthening regional cooperation and sustained investment in cross-border fibre optic infrastructure, with more diversified international connectivity routes through both the Atlantic and Pacific, would have the greatest transformative impact for LLDCs - Regional fibre optic cooperation MTN calls for building regional digital corridors to enable trade, innovation, and economic integration across borders, and for the infrastructure investment facility to prioritise regional infrastructure connecting multiple LLDCs - Regional digital corridors for Africa Cross-border cooperation including transit agreements and shared infrastructure is essential, and combining hard infrastructure with strong regulation, cybersecurity skills, and affordability measures is key to scaling digital connectivity - Think regionally, combine hard and soft infrastructure
All four speakers endorsed the AWASA Programme of Action as the central framework for addressing LLDC digital challenges. Fatima called for moving from commitment to implementation ; Zavazava framed AWASA as a promise rather than a set of targets ; Khurshed described it as giving a clear way forward ; and Mavetera acknowledged the structural constraints it addresses . However, they diverged on the urgency and mechanism of implementation: Fatima emphasised that her office is already working with stakeholders to advance implementation , suggesting institutional momentum; Zavazava proposed a dedicated partnership platform or roundtable as the implementation vehicle ; Mavetera called for a digital compact to pool resources collectively , suggesting a different institutional form; and Khurshed emphasised the need for more financing, technology, training, and international support , implying that implementation is contingent on resource mobilisation rather than already underway.
The collective task is to move from commitment to implementation of the AWASA programme, with UNOHR LLS already working with member states, development partners, and the private sector - Moving from commitment to implementation The AWASA Programme of Action 2024–2034 places digital transformation and resilient infrastructure at the centre of sustainable development for LLDCs, representing a promise to bridge digital divides - AWASA as a development promise The AWASA programme provides a clear way forward requiring better and more affordable digital infrastructure, stronger internet access, and stronger regional connections - AWASA as roadmap LLDCs face structural constraints including high trade costs, limited market access, and inadequate broadband infrastructure that reinforce each other - Structural constraints of LLDCs
All four speakers agreed that digital transformation must be inclusive and serve the needs of marginalised populations. Fenger emphasised that digital transformation only succeeds if technology is inherently fair and equitable and called for responsibly designed innovation embedded in safety, ethics, and data privacy ; Zavazava called for investment in digital literacy extending to everyone, not just the young ; Kim highlighted practical AI applications in healthcare, education, and agriculture as essential ; and Mukwashi stressed that connectivity is essential for ensuring no one is left behind in accessing healthcare, education, and food systems . However, they diverged on the primary mechanism: Fenger focused on design ethics and community-led solutions ; Zavazava focused on literacy and skills ; Kim focused on demand-side applications as an investment driver ; and Mukwashi focused on the urgency of lifting people in rural areas . These represent different entry points into the same inclusion challenge.
UNFPA invests in digital health solutions and women- and youth-led social enterprises, emphasising that digital transformation only succeeds if technology is inherently fair, equitable, and designed with safety, ethics, and data privacy by default - Gender-equitable and ethical digital design Technology is only as good as the people using it; investment in digital literacy must extend beyond the young to everyone, building a workforce that can use, manage, and innovate with digital tools - Universal digital literacy investment Practical AI applications in healthcare, education, and agriculture are as important as supply-side investments in data centres and computing power, as they create real demand that attracts private sector investment - Demand-side AI applications Digital connectivity is essential for ensuring no one is left behind, particularly in accessing quality healthcare, education, strong food systems, and performing economic systems in rural areas and provinces - Connectivity for universal service delivery
- Digital exclusion represents a new dimension of landlockedness: with only 39% of LLDC populations online compared to 68% globally, approximately 359 million people across LLDCs remain offline, compounding existing structural disadvantages such as high trade costs, limited market access, and geographic isolation.
- Connectivity is a moral imperative and development catalyst, not merely a technical goal: speakers consistently framed digital connectivity as essential for economic transformation, regional integration, healthcare, education, food systems, and sustainable development, with geography no longer being permitted to determine opportunity.
- The AWASA Programme of Action 2024–2034 provides the shared roadmap for digital transformation in LLDCs, centred on three pillars: infrastructure investment (broadband, satellite, last-mile networks), capacity building (universal digital literacy and workforce development), and governance (data privacy, cybersecurity, and inclusive design).
- Financing gaps and risk-adjusted capital shortfalls are the primary barriers to digital infrastructure development in LLDCs, not the absence of opportunity; limited fiscal space, elevated borrowing costs, and the inability to move projects from concept to bankability prevent progress.
- Regional cooperation and transit country partnerships are indispensable: LLDCs' international connectivity depends on neighbouring transit countries, making cross-border fibre optic corridors, shared infrastructure, harmonised regulations, and transit agreements critical priorities.
- Innovative financing mechanisms are essential, including the proposed Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF) under AWASA, the World Bank's Digital Access Fund, and EU Global Gateway de-risking instruments, all aimed at mobilising private capital alongside public investment.
- Effective partnership models require four ingredients working in concert: governments providing enabling policies and universal service funds; operators sharing infrastructure and enabling open access; vendors acting as long-term strategic partners; and international organisations such as ITU serving as a convening power.
- Demand-side digital applications in healthcare, education, and agriculture are as important as supply-side infrastructure investments, as they generate real demand that attracts private sector participation and ensures connectivity serves a clear developmental purpose.
- Digital transformation must be inherently fair, equitable, and human-centred, ensuring women, girls, and vulnerable populations are included by design rather than by accident, with community-built solutions embedded in safety, ethics, and data privacy.
- No single entity can deliver the AWASA programme alone; the transition from isolated projects to partnership-based, regionally coordinated approaches is essential for catalysing transformative change across LLDCs.
“Technology is the vehicle, and connectivity is the engine... connectivity is the catalyst that turns ambition into reality. A rural farmer accessing real-time market prices on a mobile device, transforming subsistence into sustainability. A remote clinic connecting to a central hospital via telemedicine, saving lives not with bricks and mortar, but with bandwidth.”
“In 2024, only 39% of the population in the LLDCs were using the internet, compared with 68% globally. As a result, nearly 359 million people across the LLDCs remained offline. Closing this digital divide is therefore not merely a technological challenge. It is a development imperative.”
“Digital connectivity cannot change geography, but it can reduce the problems caused by geography. It can help people do business more easily. It can improve access to education, healthcare, and financial services. It can also help our countries join regional and global digital markets.”
“When it comes to cross-border immigration issues, our citizens between the Republic of Namibia and the Republic of Botswana do not need passports. They only need their national identity cards. We have also made it possible that we do not have roaming fees between the Republic of Namibia and the Republic of Botswana. I mentioned these examples to indicate that when we do say we are ready to become a country where you can invest in data centre embassies, where you can have your digital infrastructure placed in a country like ours, we mean it.”
“Could there be a way that maybe there could be an ITU resolution to the effect that that will sort of give guarantees to countries to have access at all times to the submarine cables should at any point in time things come to the worst? I know there is perhaps the alternative of satellite connectivity. However, that too in some cases may not be the solution because there is also the issue of costs.”
“The greatest barrier to infrastructure development in many developing markets is not the absence of opportunity, it's the absence of sufficient risk-adjusted capital and inability to move projects from concept to bankability. The proposed facility can play a catalytic role by supporting project preparation, de-risking strategic investments, and mobilising both public and private capital at scale.”
“We should not think of LLDCs as countries with challenges. We should also recognise them as countries with enormous opportunity.”
“Digital transformation only succeeds if technology is inherently fair and equitable... we have supported women and youth-led social enterprises. We have built or supported the building of solutions that come from the communities themselves. And we have reinforced the importance of responsibly designed innovation that are embedded in safety, ethics, and data privacy in the design by default.”
How can shared digital infrastructure policies between neighbouring landlocked countries be developed and implemented, particularly around shared GPU resources and computational infrastructure?
The Minister raised the question of why countries like Zimbabwe cannot access infrastructure already available in neighbouring countries like Botswana, suggesting a need for further exploration of shared infrastructure models and regional digital compacts to pool resources.
What specific policy and regulatory frameworks are needed to create predictable, transparent, and interoperable environments that promote investment, foster innovation, and facilitate seamless cross-border digital trade in LLDCs?
The Undersecretary General highlighted that digital opportunities cannot be realised without enabling policy and regulatory environments, implying a need for further research into what specific frameworks would be most effective for LLDCs.
How can the proposed Infrastructure Investment Financing Facility (IIFFF) for LLDCs be structured to most effectively mobilise private capital, including from pension funds, and move projects from concept to bankability?
Multiple speakers raised the challenge of translating the IIFFF concept into a functioning mechanism that can de-risk investments and attract long-term private capital, indicating a need for further research into its optimal design and implementation.
Could there be an ITU resolution or international legal mechanism that guarantees landlocked developing countries continued access to submarine cable connectivity, even in cases of geopolitical conflict or deteriorating relations with transit neighbours?
The representative raised a critical worst-case scenario question about the vulnerability of LLDCs' connectivity to political instability with transit neighbours, and whether binding international guarantees could be established, which warrants further legal and policy research.
What role can satellite connectivity play as a reliable and affordable backup or alternative to terrestrial and submarine cable infrastructure for LLDCs, particularly given cost concerns for end consumers?
The discussion highlighted that satellite connectivity is not always a viable alternative due to cost, suggesting a need for further research into how satellite solutions can be made more affordable and integrated into resilient connectivity strategies for LLDCs.
How can transport corridors be systematically transformed into platforms for digital integration, resilient supply chains, and inclusive economic transformation for LLDCs?
The discussion touched on the Middle Corridor and other transit routes but did not fully resolve how physical transport infrastructure can be comprehensively upgraded to also serve as digital corridors, requiring further research into integrated planning models.
What dedicated partnership platform or roundtable mechanism for digital transformation in LLDCs could be established to link financing with on-the-ground opportunities, support regional cooperation, and accelerate knowledge exchange?
The idea of a dedicated partnership platform was floated but not fully developed, suggesting a need for further research into its governance structure, membership, funding, and operational modalities.
How can digital tools such as cargo tracking, customs modernisation, paperless trade, and single window systems be scaled across LLDCs to reduce trade costs and enhance competitiveness?
Both speakers identified digital trade facilitation tools as key opportunities but noted they remain underutilised, indicating a need for further research into implementation barriers and scaling strategies across diverse LLDC contexts.
How can blended finance instruments and risk-sharing mechanisms be better designed and deployed to crowd in private sector investment in digital infrastructure in LLDCs, particularly given their limited fiscal space and elevated borrowing costs?
Multiple speakers acknowledged the financing gap but did not resolve how blended finance can be optimally structured for LLDC contexts, pointing to a need for further research into instrument design and risk allocation.
How can demand-side digital ecosystems be built in LLDCs — particularly through practical AI applications in healthcare, education, and agriculture — to attract private sector investment beyond supply-side infrastructure funding?
The World Bank representative stressed that supply-side infrastructure investment alone is insufficient without creating demand, suggesting a need for further research into how application-layer development can stimulate investment and ecosystem growth in LLDCs.
How can universal service funds and spectrum allocation policies be redesigned with incentive-based models to make connectivity in rural and underserved areas of LLDCs commercially viable for operators?
The Huawei representative identified government policy design around universal service funds and spectrum as critical enablers, but the question of optimal policy design for LLDC contexts remains open and requires further research.
How can open-access and infrastructure-sharing models among telecommunications operators, including intra-regional roaming agreements, be expanded across LLDCs to reduce costs and improve coverage?
Both speakers pointed to sharing models as effective tools, with Namibia citing its roaming-free arrangement with Botswana as an example, suggesting a need for research into how such bilateral or multilateral agreements can be replicated and scaled.
How can digital health solutions, particularly those designed with safety, ethics, and data privacy by default, be scaled to serve women, girls, and vulnerable populations in LLDCs?
The UNFPA representative highlighted the importance of responsibly designed digital health innovations for vulnerable populations in LLDCs, but the question of how to scale community-led and women-led digital health enterprises remains an area requiring further research.
How can LLDCs diversify their international connectivity routes — for example, through both Atlantic and Pacific access — to improve resilience, redundancy, and affordability?
Paraguay's ambassador highlighted the extreme geographic constraints on international connectivity and the strategic importance of route diversification, raising a need for further research into the technical, financial, and diplomatic pathways to achieving this for LLDCs in South America and beyond.
How can cross-border spectrum interference issues between neighbouring countries be more effectively managed within the existing ITU framework, given that ITU resolutions are non-binding?
The ITU Director acknowledged that spectrum interference across borders remains an unresolved challenge and that compliance with resolutions is voluntary, suggesting a need for further research into alternative governance or diplomatic mechanisms to address this.
What lessons can be drawn from Cambodia's experience in bridging the urban-rural digital divide, fostering innovation and entrepreneurship, and implementing early warning systems such as cell broadcasting, that could be applied to other LLDCs?
The ITU Director highlighted Cambodia as a leading example of digital inclusion and innovation but did not elaborate on the specific transferable lessons, indicating a need for further comparative research and knowledge-sharing.
How can the ITU's newly established dedicated division for least developed countries, landlocked developing countries, and small island developing states most effectively coordinate with other UN agencies and development partners to address connectivity challenges?
The ITU Director announced the creation of this division but did not detail its operational strategy or inter-agency coordination mechanisms, suggesting a need for further planning and research into how it can maximise impact.
