Helping SMEs Succeed in Digital Trade: Lessons from European & ASEAN Trade Promotion Organisations
This discussion, held at the World Summit on the Information Society, brought together researchers, trade promotion organisation (TPO) representatives, and private sector experts to examine how TPOs can help small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) succeed in digital trade, with perspectives drawn from Europe, the Philippines, Senegal, and Switzerland . The global context was set by noting that e-commerce is estimated at 28 trillion dollars, with 56% of services exports now digitally deliverable .
Jesse Weltevreden outlined the European landscape, noting that B2C e-commerce turnover reached approximately 911 billion euros in 2025, with growth concentrated in Southern and Eastern Europe . He cautioned that government-backed local platforms have largely failed to survive once public funding ends, arguing that governments should focus on creating the right environment for trade rather than operating commercial platforms themselves . Joe Schembri added that European TPOs have increasingly shifted towards advisory services, marketplace support on platforms such as Amazon and Alibaba, and capacity-building for SMEs, including guidance on regulatory compliance .
From the Philippines, Maria Katrina Rivera described the PHX Source platform, an online discovery tool giving exporters microsites with company profiles and product listings, co-developed with the private sector to ensure sustainability . Xavier Cornut explained Switzerland Global Enterprise's MySGE platform, which aggregates over 56,000 live tenders and procurement opportunities, combining digital self-service with direct access to human consultants . Ndeye Birame Sock recounted Senegal's COVID-era experience building a national e-commerce platform through a public-private collaboration, noting that governance disputes over whether to run it as a startup or within a government agency ultimately undermined its long-term viability .
On the topic of artificial intelligence, panellists broadly agreed that TPOs should resist hype and focus on adopting the right AI tools for specific business problems, including traditional forms such as predictive modelling and recommendation systems, rather than pursuing generative AI indiscriminately . Sock emphasised that Africa remains underrepresented in AI datasets and that solutions must be localised to meet populations where they already are, such as on WhatsApp and social commerce platforms .
The discussion concluded with a shared consensus that sustainable digital trade support requires long-term institutional commitment, regular performance measurement, meaningful public-private collaboration, and a problem-first approach to technology adoption .
Overall Purpose
- The discussion was convened as part of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), bringing together representatives from trade promotion organisations (TPOs), academia, and the private sector to examine how TPOs can help SMEs succeed in digital trade. The session drew on perspectives from Europe, the Philippines, Senegal, and Switzerland to identify best practices, common challenges, and future directions - particularly regarding AI - for government-backed digital trade support. ---
Major Discussion Points
- The scale and uneven growth of digital trade markets. Global e-commerce was estimated at $28 trillion for 2024, with 56% of services exports now digitally deliverable. In Europe, B2C e-commerce reached approximately €911 billion in 2024, with growth concentrated in Western and Northern Europe, while Southern and Eastern Europe still show significant potential. Increasing competitive pressure, particularly from Chinese sellers and platforms, is reshaping the policy environment for European governments. - The role and limitations of government-built digital platforms. A recurring theme across all regions was the difficulty of sustaining publicly funded e-commerce platforms once initial funding ends. In Senegal, a COVID-era platform built through a public-private partnership collapsed partly because governance was handed to a government agency rather than run as a private startup, leading to a loss of innovation and execution speed. In Europe, similar patterns were observed, with many local and COVID-era platforms disappearing as quickly as they arose. Switzerland Global Enterprise's experience showed that platforms must be self-service and regularly reviewed against engagement KPIs to remain viable. - The importance of public-private collaboration and trust. Across all regions, successful digital trade initiatives depended on meaningful private sector involvement. In Senegal, a two-college governance model brought together payment systems, logistics companies, wireless operators, and technology firms, enabling the platform to be built within six months. In the Philippines, the PHX Source platform was co-developed with the private sector specifically to ensure long-term sustainability. A key barrier identified was the lack of trust - both between the public and private sectors, and among private sector actors who view one another as competitors. - Challenges specific to different regional contexts. In Europe, the absence of a single digital market means SMEs must develop localised strategies for each country, covering differing consumer preferences, payment systems, and logistics. In the Philippines, infrastructure gaps in rural areas, resistance to changing established business processes, and concerns about data security and trustworthiness of digital systems were highlighted as significant obstacles. In Africa, underrepresentation in AI datasets, language barriers, and a lack of consumer awareness of trade frameworks such as the AfCFTA were identified as critical gaps. - AI adoption: avoiding hype and focusing on appropriate tools. Panellists broadly agreed that TPOs must resist the temptation to adopt AI for its own sake. Jesse Weltevreden highlighted a paradox in which over 100,000 AI solutions exist yet the top four tools attract more than 50% of all users, and argued that TPOs should help SMEs adopt the right AI for their specific business problems - including traditional forms such as predictive modelling and computer vision - rather than focusing solely on generative AI. Joe Schembri emphasised that AI should enhance existing TPO strengths, particularly personalised advisory services, rather than be treated as a standalone project. Biram Sock stressed that AI must be localised to meet populations where they are, noting that in Africa, WhatsApp and TikTok are the dominant commercial channels, and that data quality and local context are prerequisites for effective AI deployment. ---
Overall Tone
- The discussion maintained a consistently constructive and collegial tone throughout. Speakers were candid about failures and limitations - particularly regarding government-built platforms - without becoming critical or adversarial. There was a notable sense of shared learning across very different regional contexts, with panellists frequently affirming one another's points. Towards the end of the session, when the conversation turned to AI, the tone became slightly more cautionary and measured, with multiple speakers urging restraint and pragmatism over enthusiasm. Overall, the discussion felt collaborative and solution-oriented, reflecting a community of practitioners genuinely invested in improving outcomes for SMEs in digital trade.
Expanded Summary: How Trade Promotion Organisations Can Help SMEs Succeed in Digital Trade
#
Session Overview and Global Context
This discussion was convened as part of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), bringing together researchers, trade promotion organisation (TPO) representatives, and private sector experts to examine how TPOs can help small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) succeed in digital trade . The session drew on perspectives from Europe, the Philippines, Senegal, and Switzerland, with the moderator, Martin Labbe, noting that the panel would offer more than originally advertised on the WSIS website, including an African perspective that had not been initially promoted . The global context was established at the outset: e-commerce was estimated at 28 trillion dollars for 2024, with 56% of services exports now digitally deliverable, and in some parts of Europe, 70% of procurement was already happening online through purely digital B2B engagement . This last point - that large buyers increasingly prefer not to meet their sellers in person and want all transactions to occur online - was highlighted as a significant driver of change for TPOs and the companies they support .
The panel comprised Jesse Weltevreden, Professor of Digital Commerce at Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences and CEO of RankMyAI, a soon-to-be spin-off of the university ; Joe Schembri, a researcher for Trade Promotion Europe affiliated with the University of Malta ; Maria Katrina Rivera, Assistant Director at the Philippine Department of Trade and Industry's Export Marketing Bureau ; Xavier Cornut, Special Adviser on Europe and the CIS at Switzerland Global Enterprise ; and Birame Sock, founder and CEO of Quilly Group, operating between Senegal and the United States, with a background in programming and technology . The session was organised with the support of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and structured around three rounds of questions .
---
#
The European E-Commerce Landscape and the Role of Government
Jesse Weltevreden opened the substantive discussion by providing an overview of the European e-commerce market. He noted that despite global economic and political uncertainties, Europe's B2C e-commerce turnover reached approximately 911 billion euros in 2025, with the market expected to hit the trillion-euro mark in 2026 or 2027 . However, this growth is uneven: Western and Northern Europe are highly mature markets with near-universal online shopping penetration, whilst Southern and Eastern Europe still show significant growth potential and are recording the highest growth rates . At the same time, competitive pressure is intensifying across Europe, particularly from sellers and platforms originating in China, which is reshaping the policy environment for European governments .
Weltevreden argued that the European government's primary role in this space is regulatory rather than commercial - focused on creating a level playing field, protecting domestic sellers from foreign competition, and legislating on sustainability, consumer protection, and fair use . He was critical of government attempts to go beyond this enabling role by building and operating commercial platforms. Observing that many local and regional government-backed platforms had been established - including initiatives to help municipalities support local SMEs to sell online, and COVID-era platforms to help physical retailers move online - he noted that these platforms tended to disappear as quickly as they arose once public funding ended . His conclusion was clear: government support should focus on providing the right context for trade and stimulating traders to go online, rather than becoming commercial operators, because the latter approach does not work .
Weltevreden further argued that competitive pressure from both China and the United States makes life increasingly difficult for SMEs, and that this pressure represents an opportunity for business support organisations, TPOs, and governments to help SMEs - particularly by giving them the right skill sets to succeed internationally .
---
#
The Role of TPOs as a Sustainable Intermediary
Joe Schembri, drawing on his background as a former TPO practitioner and his current research on European TPOs, built upon Weltevreden's analysis by distinguishing between ad hoc government projects and the more durable institutional role of TPOs . He noted that TPOs facilitate trade, and that trade depends on travel - meaning that when travel ceased during COVID-19, the consequences for TPOs were catastrophic, and this crisis became a powerful catalyst for TPO investment in digital services . He argued that TPOs occupy a unique position as a sustainable interface between the public and private sectors: they have been in existence for a long time, are likely to remain, and therefore offer the continuity that one-off government-funded projects typically lack . This continuity, he suggested, is precisely what allows TPOs to sustain digital initiatives over time, even when individual projects fail or require adaptation.
Schembri described the findings of a research project examining seven good-practice case studies of European TPOs, including Switzerland Global Enterprise . He observed that, particularly since COVID-19, TPOs have increasingly shifted towards digital advisory services, helping SMEs access major marketplaces such as Amazon and Alibaba, building digital capacity, upgrading online presence, and providing guidance on regulatory compliance . He highlighted the growing emphasis on advisory services as a positive trend, noting that TPOs possess significant internal expertise and are deploying their staff as advisers with ground-level knowledge of digital trade conditions . Schembri noted, referencing a point raised by Labbe in session preparation, the eMarketplace services offered by ICEX in Spain (which has since changed its name) as one example of a long-standing initiative in this space .
---
#
The Philippine Experience: PHX Source and AI-Enabled Trade Facilitation
Maria Katrina Rivera described the range of digital trade support tools deployed by the Philippine Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) through its Export Marketing Bureau . On market intelligence, DTI operates TradeLine Philippines and an FTA information portal, which provides exporters with easy access to information on all of the Philippines' free trade agreements and generalised system of preferences . Notably, this portal uses AI to allow exporters to simulate whether their products qualify for preferential origin status under specific FTAs - an example of AI being applied to a concrete and practical trade facilitation problem .
Rivera then focused on PHX Source, DTI's flagship digital platform for export market access and visibility . She explained that the inspiration for the platform came from a striking observation: many Philippine exporters had been exporting for years but had no online presence, relying instead on email or Facebook to communicate with buyers, without a professional website to introduce their company and products . PHX Source addresses this gap by providing each onboarded exporter with a microsite containing their company profile, promotional videos, and detailed product or service listings - without pricing information, which is left to direct negotiation between buyers and exporters . The platform is used by Philippine trade posts in different countries as an online directory of exporters, enabling direct buyer-to-exporter communication . Rivera emphasised that PHX Source was co-developed with the private sector specifically to ensure long-term sustainability, reflecting a lesson learned about the risks of purely government-driven platform development .
---
#
Switzerland Global Enterprise: Aggregating Procurement Opportunities and the Human-Digital Hybrid
Xavier Cornut described Switzerland Global Enterprise's (SGE) approach, which he presented as a replicable model for TPOs of any size . He explained that Swiss exporters face a critical information challenge: they lack the critical mass and personnel to monitor all new regulations, standards, and procurement opportunities published across multiple international institutions and in multiple languages . In response, SGE developed MySGE, a unified platform offering marketing tools, business opportunities, step-by-step export guides, and - most distinctively - a tender aggregation service . At the time of the session, the platform hosted 56,000 live projects and tenders, with between 1,000 and 1,500 new ones added daily, representing a combined value of approximately 500 billion dollars, drawn from sources including the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, and governments worldwide . Listings published in other languages are automatically translated and consolidated into the single platform .
Cornut highlighted two key design principles. First, the platform saves companies the time and cost of registering with multiple individual tender websites, allowing them to register only where they have a genuine interest . Second, and crucially, SGE trains not only its own staff but also Swiss ambassadors and diplomats to use the platform to identify and publish new tenders from the field, creating a self-reinforcing ecosystem in which users, customers, SGE personnel, and diplomatic staff all contribute to keeping the platform current . Cornut described SGE's philosophy as "digital first, but only one click away from a human consultant," noting that during the US tariff crisis, clients did not want to rely solely on a static database - particularly because the situation was changing every week - and needed human advisers to help them navigate rapidly evolving information that no static database could adequately capture . This human-digital hybrid model, he argued, is essential for sustainable and genuinely useful digital trade support.
Labbe noted during the session that ITC also operates its own procurement map tool offering procurement opportunities, inviting comparison with SGE's MySGE platform.
---
#
Senegal's COVID-Era E-Commerce Platform: A Case Study in Public-Private Collaboration
Birame Sock recounted her experience working on a national e-commerce platform built in Senegal during the COVID-19 pandemic . When the pandemic struck and movement was restricted, the Ministry of Commerce decided it needed to build an e-commerce platform rapidly to support vendors across the entire country, not just in the capital Dakar . Recognising that building from scratch was not feasible in the time available, the government turned to the private sector and invited it into the conversation - which is how Birame Sock became involved .
The governance model adopted was innovative: two "colleges" were established, one for the private sector and one for the public sector, each with its own lead, sitting beneath a joint board of private and public sector members, which in turn reported to the Ministry of Commerce . Birame Sock led the private sector college. The model brought together payment systems providers, wireless operators, the national postal service, logistics companies, and technology firms . The Ministry's ability to push through approvals quickly, combined with the board's capacity for rapid decision-making and the use of the Chamber of Commerce's existing network in different regions to identify private sector participants, meant that the platform - including its name and branding - was ready within six months . The platform achieved notable technical successes, including a single sign-on system across multiple platforms and a logistics matching system whereby the first logistics company to accept a delivery order would fulfil it .
Birame Sock also highlighted an important nuance about trust and competition: not only is there tension between the public and private sectors, but competition exists within the private sector itself, with private operators sometimes questioning why the government is building something they are already attempting to build - and even TPOs can face similar competitive dynamics .
---
#
Governance Disputes and the Challenge of Long-Term Sustainability
Despite its successful launch, the Senegalese platform encountered serious challenges once the question of long-term governance arose . Birame Sock described a fundamental dispute between two competing visions: the private sector advocated for a public-private partnership model in which the government retained a stake but the platform was operated as a startup or private company, with the innovation and execution speed that entails . The government, however, preferred to house the platform within an existing government agency . Birame Sock expressed regret that the public sector prevailed in this dispute, arguing that the resulting lack of innovation, speed, and expertise - compounded by internal competition between different agencies - ultimately hampered the platform's sustainability . She concluded that had the original collaborative governance model been maintained, the platform would likely have survived many of the challenges it subsequently faced .
This account resonated strongly with Weltevreden's earlier observations about European platforms. Martin Labbe explicitly connected the two experiences, noting that the problem of resources being available only for a limited period before running out sounded very similar across contexts . Weltevreden confirmed that this pattern is widespread in Europe, and further argued that the more fundamental issue is that governments in Europe simultaneously want to promote international trade and innovation whilst also pursuing consumer protection, fair competition, and sustainability - objectives that create significant regulatory pressure, particularly for SMEs . He added that Europe's fragmented digital market, with differing consumer preferences, payment systems, and logistics across countries, means that SMEs wishing to sell cross-border must develop a localised strategy for every individual country, requiring substantial skills and resources .
---
#
Challenges in the Philippines and the Importance of Mindset Change
Rivera acknowledged that the Philippines faces its own distinctive set of challenges. As an archipelago of 7,641 islands, managing technology deployment and digitalising services is inherently difficult, with ongoing infrastructure gaps in rural areas that the government is continuously working to address . However, she emphasised that the challenge of digital transformation is not purely technological: it is fundamentally about mindset change . Organisations must rethink long-established business processes and workflows rather than simply replacing paper with online systems . She noted that many exporters who had been operating for years without any online presence were now having to adapt to responding to inquiries digitally - a significant cultural and operational shift .
Rivera also highlighted a trust dimension that cuts across both the private sector and government regulatory agencies: concerns about data security, confidentiality, and the overall trustworthiness of digital systems are significant barriers to adoption . She noted that overcoming these concerns requires time, practice, repeated demonstrations of how platforms work, and sustained engagement with stakeholders - but expressed optimism that resistance to digitalisation is not widespread, with most stakeholders willing to embrace change once they understand the technology .
---
#
Switzerland Global Enterprise: Self-Service, KPIs, and Digital Sovereignty
Cornut added two further lessons from SGE's experience. First, he described how SGE had operated a digital exhibitor directory that ultimately generated more work for SGE staff than for the customers it was meant to serve - a clear sign that self-service design is not optional but mandatory for any platform intended to scale . He argued that self-service is the only way to scale an offer sustainably, whilst acknowledging that quality requirements mean it cannot be entirely unmediated . Second, he described SGE's practice of conducting quarterly reviews of all services - including digital services - measuring engagement and adapting or discontinuing offerings that are not performing . He stressed that organisations should not shy away from pausing a service if the evidence shows it is not working.
Cornut also raised the issue of digital sovereignty, arguing that it is critically important for TPOs and governments to ensure that AI and digital tools are hosted within Switzerland or Europe rather than relying on foreign infrastructure . Martin Labbe strongly endorsed this point, noting that digital sovereignty is already a live issue and that recent disruptions caused by the disconnection of AI services from one day to the next illustrate the vulnerability created by dependence on foreign-hosted digital infrastructure . Cornut added that TPOs are well placed to advise governments on which sovereign AI capabilities to develop domestically .
---
#
AI and the Future of Digital Trade Support: Avoiding the Hype
The final round of the discussion turned to artificial intelligence and its implications for TPOs. Weltevreden urged all participants to move beyond the hype surrounding generative AI, noting that whilst AI will be a significant driver of international trade, it is important to remain realistic about which technologies will have meaningful market impact . He highlighted a striking paradox: whilst more than 100,000 AI solutions exist globally, the top four AI tools attract more than 50% of all users, meaning that the vast majority of solutions attract very few users at all . He argued that the question for TPOs should not be how to help SMEs adopt AI in general, but how to help them adopt the right AI for their specific business problems - including traditional forms of AI such as predictive modelling, machine learning, computer vision, and recommendation systems, which offer substantial value in e-commerce contexts that is often overlooked in the rush to focus on generative AI .
Schembri agreed emphatically with the anti-hype message, drawing a historical parallel with the earlier wave of digitisation: just as TPOs learned from failures during the digitisation era and eventually developed strong digital services, the same iterative process will apply to AI . He warned against TPOs rushing to launch AI projects simply to appear current, arguing instead for an experimental, adaptive approach . He identified two areas where AI offers immediate and concrete benefits for TPOs: enhancing the personalisation of services tailored to the diagnosed needs of individual companies, and improving the quality of trade advisory services . His core principle was that AI should be used to do existing valued services better, not adopted for its own sake .
---
#
AI Adoption in the Philippines, Switzerland, and Africa
Rivera confirmed that DTI Philippines is taking a similarly measured approach to AI, focusing on ensuring that exporters and industries adopt appropriate technology for their specific needs rather than the newest available AI . She also emphasised the importance of sustaining existing platforms that are already effectively serving exporters, rather than replacing them with new AI-driven alternatives simply because they are available .
Cornut offered two additional perspectives from SGE's experience. First, he noted that AI requires large amounts of data, but that too much data can be as problematic as too little - with up to 1,500 new tenders added to MySGE daily, AI should help make this volume manageable and affordable for SMEs to search . Second, he described how SGE trains its own personnel across a range of AI tools - not just one or two - to discover which tools best serve which sectors and client needs, arguing that internal preparation is essential before deploying AI in client-facing services .
Birame Sock brought a distinctive perspective from the African context, grounding her analysis in the primacy of data quality and local context . She argued that Africa remains significantly underrepresented in AI training data and language coverage, meaning that AI tools do not yet adequately serve African populations in the languages and communication styles they use . She observed that in Africa, technology adoption is not primarily an infrastructure problem: populations have demonstrated their willingness to adopt technology when it meets their practical needs, as evidenced by the widespread adoption of mobile payments and WhatsApp-based commerce - the latter valued for its voice messaging functionality in local languages . She noted that social commerce through TikTok is also a dominant channel . Her conclusion was that AI must be developed and deployed in ways that meet populations where they already are, rather than transplanting solutions from other markets . She also highlighted that despite widespread excitement about the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), ordinary consumers and traders do not understand what it means for them or how to use it - and that AI, if properly localised, could help close this information gap more rapidly .
---
#
Cross-Cutting Themes and Conclusions
Several cross-cutting themes emerged consistently across all regional perspectives. First, there was broad agreement that government-funded digital platforms tend to fail once initial public funding ends, and that governments and TPOs should focus on creating enabling environments and providing advisory support rather than acting as commercial platform operators - a finding confirmed across European, Philippine, Senegalese, and Swiss contexts . Second, meaningful private sector co-development was identified as essential for platform sustainability across all contexts - from Senegal's two-college governance model to the Philippines' co-development of PHX Source to SGE's integration of diplomatic networks into its platform ecosystem . Third, the challenge of digital transformation was consistently framed as fundamentally about people, mindset, and organisational adaptation rather than technology alone .
On the question of AI, there was a notably strong consensus across speakers from very different institutional and geographic backgrounds that the hype must be resisted and that a problem-first, solution-second approach is essential . The emerging issue of digital sovereignty - the risk of dependence on foreign-hosted AI and digital infrastructure - was flagged as an urgent and growing concern . Finally, localisation was identified as a universal principle: digital trade solutions must be adapted to local conditions, languages, user behaviours, and market structures rather than applied uniformly across contexts .
Martin Labbe closed the session by thanking the panellists and the ITU team for hosting, and by highlighting localisation as the key takeaway from the discussion .
Europe's e-commerce market is large and growing unevenly, with Western and Northern Europe being mature markets and Southern and Eastern Europe showing higher growth potential - E-commerce growth and regional disparities (Jesse Weltevreden)
Arg. 1Europe's B2C e-commerce market reached approximately 911 billion euros in 2025 and is expected to hit one trillion by 2026 or 2027. However, growth is uneven: Western and Northern Europe are highly mature with near-universal online shopping penetration, while Southern and Eastern Europe still have significant growth potential and are currently recording the highest growth rates.
Jesse Weltevreden cited the total B2C e-commerce turnover in Europe as around 911 billion euros in 2025, with expectations of reaching the trillion-euro mark in 2026 or 2027 . He noted that Western and Northern Europe are very mature markets with high penetration and turnover rates, whereas Southern and Eastern Europe still have a lot of potential for growth and are showing the highest growth figures .
Government's role in Europe is primarily focused on creating a level playing field, consumer protection, sustainability legislation, and fair competition rather than direct commercial involvement - Government's regulatory focus (Jesse Weltevreden)
Arg. 2European governments are primarily focused on policy-level interventions such as protecting domestic sellers from foreign competition, particularly from China, and legislating on sustainability, consumer protection, and fair use. Jesse Weltevreden argues that governments should create the right environment for trade rather than becoming commercial actors themselves by setting up platforms.
He observed that competition is increasing across Europe, particularly from sellers and platforms outside Europe, especially from China, and that the government is mainly focusing on creating a level playing field to protect European sellers and traders . He further argued that government support should focus on providing the right context to stimulate traders to go online, rather than setting up commercial platforms, as government-funded platforms tend to fail once funding stops .
on: Whether governments and TPOs should build and operate digital platforms or focus solely on creating an enabling environment
Europe is not a single digital market, with differing consumer preferences, payment systems, and logistics across countries, making cross-border selling complex for SMEs - Fragmented European digital market (Jesse Weltevreden)
Arg. 3Despite being a large economic bloc, Europe remains fragmented in terms of digital commerce, with significant differences in consumer preferences, payment methods, and logistics infrastructure across member states. This means that SMEs wishing to sell cross-border within Europe must develop localised strategies for each country, which demands considerable skills and resources.
Jesse Weltevreden stated that Europe is still not a single digital market, as consumer preferences, payment preferences, and logistics differ significantly across countries . He noted that an SME in Europe wanting to sell cross-border needs a localised strategy for every country, making international success difficult and requiring a lot of skills .
TPOs and governments must move beyond the Gen AI hype and focus on helping SMEs adopt the right AI tools for their specific business problems, including traditional AI such as predictive modelling and recommendation systems - Avoiding AI hype, focusing on appropriate tools (Jesse Weltevreden)
Arg. 4Jesse Weltevreden warns that while AI is a significant driver of future international trade, it is important to remain realistic and not be swept up in the hype around generative AI. He argues that trade promotion organisations should help SMEs identify and adopt the right AI tools for their specific business problems, including more traditional forms of AI that offer substantial value in e-commerce contexts.
He drew parallels with past technology hypes such as the metaverse and voice commerce, cautioning that not all technologies will have the same market impact . He specifically highlighted that in e-commerce, traditional AI forms such as predictive modelling, machine learning, computer vision, and recommendation systems offer significant business value that is often overlooked in favour of generative AI .
on: TPOs and governments must avoid the AI hype and focus on adopting the right, appropriate AI tools for specific business problems rather than adopting AI for its own sake
on: The extent to which generative AI should be the focus of TPO digital trade support versus traditional or sector-specific AI tools
There is a paradox in AI adoption: while over 100,000 AI solutions exist, the top four tools attract more than 50% of all users, highlighting concentration risks and the need for careful tool selection - AI market concentration paradox (Jesse Weltevreden)
Arg. 5Despite the proliferation of AI tools globally, user adoption is highly concentrated among a very small number of platforms. This paradox suggests that most AI solutions fail to attract meaningful user bases, and that trade promotion organisations and SMEs must be selective and strategic in their choice of AI tools.
Jesse Weltevreden noted that there are more than 100,000 AI solutions in the world, yet the top four AI tools attract more than 50% of total users, with many tools attracting very few or no users at all .
Regulatory pressure in Europe is extremely high and disproportionately burdensome for SMEs, compounded by competitive pressure from Chinese and US platforms - Regulatory and competitive pressures on European SMEs (Jesse Weltevreden)
Arg. 6European SMEs face a dual challenge: an extremely high regulatory burden that is difficult to comply with, and intensifying competition from large foreign platforms, particularly from China and the United States. Jesse Weltevreden argues that this creates a significant opportunity for business support organisations and trade promotion organisations to help SMEs develop the right skill sets to succeed internationally.
He stated that the regulatory pressure in Europe is extremely high and very hard for SMEs to comply with . He also highlighted that there is a lot of competitive pressure coming especially from China and the US, and argued that this creates an opportunity for TPOs and governments to help SMEs with the right skill sets to sell across borders .
TPOs serve as a sustainable interface between the public and private sectors, offering continuity that one-off government projects lack - TPOs as a stable intermediary (Joe Schembri)
Arg. 1Unlike ad hoc government projects that often collapse when funding ends, trade promotion organisations have existed for a long time and are likely to remain, providing the institutional continuity needed to sustain digital trade support. Joe Schembri argues that this makes TPOs a more reliable vehicle for digital trade facilitation than short-term government initiatives.
Joe Schembri noted that TPOs are different from government itself in that they have been there for a long time, are likely to remain, and therefore provide continuity as an interface between the private and public sectors . He linked this to Jesse Weltevreden's earlier observation about government-funded platforms failing once funding stops .
on: Whether governments and TPOs should build and operate digital platforms or focus solely on creating an enabling environment
TPOs have increasingly shifted towards advisory services, helping SMEs with marketplace access, capacity building, skills development, and regulatory compliance - TPO advisory and capacity-building role (Joe Schembri)
Arg. 2Over the past decade, trade promotion organisations have significantly expanded their digital support services, moving beyond simple information provision to advisory roles. This includes assisting SMEs in accessing major marketplaces such as Amazon and Alibaba, building digital skills, upgrading online presence, and navigating regulatory compliance in e-commerce.
Joe Schembri described how TPOs assist their SME clients to be on platforms such as Amazon and Alibaba, and also help them build capacity by upgrading their online presence and developing skills, including in AI . He noted a growing trend towards advisory services, with TPO personnel offering advice on compliance and the complexities of doing e-commerce, and highlighted the eMarketplace services by ISEX in Spain as one exciting example .
AI will most immediately benefit TPOs in two areas: delivering more personalised services tailored to diagnosed company needs, and enhancing the quality of trade advisory services - AI benefits for personalisation and advisory (Joe Schembri)
Arg. 3Joe Schembri identifies personalisation and advisory services as the two areas where AI can deliver the most immediate and tangible benefits for trade promotion organisations. He argues that AI should be used to enhance existing services that companies already want, rather than being adopted for its own sake.
He argued that over the last few years TPOs have become more focused on offering personalised services tailored to the diagnosed needs of companies, and that AI will make this even better . He also stated that AI will significantly help trade advisors in their work, and emphasised that the approach should be to use AI to improve existing valued services such as personalisation, rather than adopting AI for the sake of it .
on: TPOs and governments must avoid the AI hype and focus on adopting the right, appropriate AI tools for specific business problems rather than adopting AI for its own sake
on: The extent to which generative AI should be the focus of TPO digital trade support versus traditional or sector-specific AI tools
TPOs rarely get digital initiatives right on the first attempt; adaptation and iteration over time are natural and necessary parts of the process - Iterative adaptation in TPO digitalisation (Joe Schembri)
Arg. 4Joe Schembri observes that most TPOs in Europe have gone through multiple rounds of digital initiatives, learning and adapting from earlier failures before arriving at effective services. He cautions that the same iterative approach will be necessary with AI, warning against rushing to launch AI projects simply to appear current.
He noted that TPOs' current digitisation initiatives were rarely their first attempt, and that adaptation over time is natural and necessary because take-up of technology takes time and TPOs often do not get it right the first time . He warned that TPOs should not treat AI as a single project to be launched all at once, drawing a parallel with how digitisation evolved through learning from failures , and urged TPOs to experiment and improve as they go along rather than going all out just to call something AI .
The PHX Source platform provides Philippine exporters with microsites, product listings, and direct buyer communication, functioning as an advanced online directory used by trade posts globally - PHX Source platform for Philippine exporters (Maria Katrina Rivera)
Arg. 1The PHX Source is an online discovery platform developed by the Philippine Department of Trade and Industry that gives each onboarded exporter a dedicated microsite with company profiles, promotional videos, and product or service listings. It enables direct communication between buyers and exporters and is used by Philippine trade posts in different countries as an advanced online directory.
Maria Katrina Rivera explained that PHX Source provides each exporter with a microsite containing their company profile, promotional videos, and product or service listings, without pricing details to allow for negotiation . She noted that the platform ensures updated information for buyers to communicate directly with exporters, and is used by Philippine trade posts in different countries as an advanced online directory .
on: Whether governments and TPOs should build and operate digital platforms or focus solely on creating an enabling environment
DTI also offers TradeLine Philippines and an FTA information portal using AI to help exporters simulate product origin eligibility under free trade agreements - AI-enabled trade facilitation tools (Maria Katrina Rivera)
Arg. 2The Philippine DTI has developed digital platforms that provide exporters with easy access to information on free trade agreements and generalised system of preferences, including an AI-powered feature that allows exporters to simulate whether their products qualify for preferential treatment under specific FTAs. The DTI also digitises some trade facilitation processes to help exporters avail of preferential tariffs.
She described TradeLine Philippines and an FTA information portal that provides easy access to information on all FTAs the Philippines has and all GSPs available to Philippine exporters . She highlighted that this platform uses AI to allow exporters to simulate whether their products are of origin under a specific FTA, and that the DTI also digitalises some processes for exporters to avail of preferential tariffs .
Digital transformation challenges are not purely technological but involve organisational mindset change, workflow adaptation, and building trust in digital systems among both businesses and regulators - Mindset and trust barriers to digitalisation (Maria Katrina Rivera)
Arg. 3Maria Katrina Rivera argues that the biggest challenge in digital transformation is not technology adoption per se, but the need for organisations and individuals to fundamentally rethink their established business processes and workflows. Building trust in digital systems is also a significant barrier, both for SMEs and for regulatory agencies.
She observed that digital transformation is not just about technology adoption but more so about a change in mindset, and that organisations must rethink their long-established business processes and workflows rather than simply replacing paper with online systems . She also noted that both exporters and regulatory agencies are concerned about data security, confidentiality, and the overall trustworthiness of digital systems, and that convincing stakeholders takes considerable time and effort .
DTI Philippines is focused on ensuring appropriate technology adoption for specific industries rather than chasing the newest AI trends, and on sustaining existing effective platforms - Appropriate and sustainable technology adoption (Maria Katrina Rivera)
Arg. 4The Philippine DTI's approach to AI is guided by the principle of appropriateness: ensuring that the technology adopted is the best fit for the specific industries and companies it serves, rather than simply adopting the latest trends. The DTI also prioritises sustaining and strengthening existing platforms that are already effectively serving exporters.
She noted that Philippine exporters do not want to simply adopt the newest AI or technology available, but rather want the appropriate technology for their industries that is best applicable to their companies . She also stated that it is important to ensure sustainability of platforms already in place, particularly those that are effectively helping exporters access more markets or making exporting easier .
on: TPOs and governments must avoid the AI hype and focus on adopting the right, appropriate AI tools for specific business problems rather than adopting AI for its own sake
In the Philippines, geographic fragmentation across 7,641 islands creates inherent infrastructure challenges for digital trade, particularly in rural areas - Geographic infrastructure challenges in the Philippines (Maria Katrina Rivera)
Arg. 5The Philippines' unique geography as an archipelago of over 7,600 islands presents inherent challenges for digital infrastructure, particularly in rural and remote areas. The government has been continuously working to address these connectivity gaps, which are a prerequisite for enabling broader participation in digital trade.
Maria Katrina Rivera highlighted that as an archipelago of 7,641 islands, managing technology and digitalising services is not easy, and there are still challenges in terms of infrastructure for some rural areas in the Philippines that the government has been continuously addressing .
on: Whether the primary barrier to digital trade adoption in developing markets is infrastructure or cultural and contextual fit
MySGE aggregates 56,000 live tenders and procurement opportunities from international institutions, auto-translates listings, and combines digital self-service with direct access to human consultants - MySGE tender aggregation platform (Xavier Cornut)
Arg. 1Switzerland Global Enterprise's MySGE platform consolidates a large volume of procurement opportunities from international institutions such as the World Bank and Asian Development Bank into a single portal, automatically translating listings published in other languages. The platform is designed to save companies time and money by allowing them to register only on sites where they have genuine interest, while also providing direct access to human consultants when needed.
Xavier Cornut described MySGE as a unique platform offering marketing sites, business opportunities, step-by-step export guides, and a tender service with 56,000 live projects and tenders, with 1,500 new ones added per day, representing a value of approximately $500 billion . He noted that the platform auto-translates listings published in other languages and allows companies to register only on websites where they already have an interest, saving time and financial burden . He also emphasised the platform's 'digital first, one click away from a human consultant' philosophy .
on: Whether governments and TPOs should build and operate digital platforms or focus solely on creating an enabling environment
Switzerland Global Enterprise trains its own staff and ambassadors to use digital tools and update the platform, ensuring sustainability through a combined human and digital approach - Human-digital integration strategy (Xavier Cornut)
Arg. 2SGE's approach to platform sustainability involves training its own embassy staff, ambassadors, and diplomats to use and contribute to the MySGE platform, creating a virtuous cycle where both users and SGE personnel can update and benefit from the tool. This human-digital integration is seen as the only way to build something truly sustainable.
Xavier Cornut explained that SGE trains its ambassadors and diplomats to use the platform to spot new tenders and projects in the field and publish them on the platform, so that everyone from the user to the customer to SGE personnel can use and update it . He described this as the only way to really build something sustainable, combining a digital-first strategy with direct access to a human consultant .
Self-service design is essential for platform scalability and sustainability; platforms that generate more work for TPO staff than for users are not viable long-term - Self-service as a sustainability requirement (Xavier Cornut)
Arg. 3Xavier Cornut argues that digital platforms must be designed for self-service by users in order to be scalable and sustainable over time. Platforms that require significant staff effort to maintain, rather than empowering users to manage their own information, are not viable in the long run.
He gave the example of a digital exhibitor directory at SGE that ended up generating more work for the SGE team than for the customers themselves, leading to the realisation that self-service was mandatory for scaling up an offer . He also noted the importance of regularly measuring engagement with digital tools and not shying away from pausing a service if it is not working, describing SGE's quarterly review process for all digital and consulting services .
TPOs should train their own personnel across a range of AI tools to understand which best serves different sectors, and should advise governments on developing sovereign AI solutions - Internal AI training and digital sovereignty (Xavier Cornut)
Arg. 4Xavier Cornut argues that TPOs should invest in training their own staff across a broad range of AI tools, rather than focusing on just one or two, so that they can identify which tools best serve different sectors and client needs. He also argues that TPOs have a role in advising governments on the development of sovereign AI solutions to reduce dependence on foreign technology.
He described how SGE trains its TPO personnel on multiple AI tools through an internal platform, and noted that staff are often surprised to discover which AI best serves the needs of different customers and sectors . He also argued that TPOs should advise governments on which sovereign AI they should create and give incentives to government to develop AI that supports their specific needs .
on: The extent to which generative AI should be the focus of TPO digital trade support versus traditional or sector-specific AI tools
Digital sovereignty is an emerging critical concern, as reliance on foreign-hosted AI and digital services creates vulnerability when those services are disrupted or withdrawn - Digital sovereignty as a strategic risk (Xavier Cornut)
Arg. 5Xavier Cornut raises digital sovereignty as a major strategic concern for TPOs and governments, arguing that AI and digital tools should be hosted within one's own country or region to avoid vulnerability to disruption. He sees this as one of the biggest topics in the years to come for digital trade and public digital services.
He stated that it is very important to use AI and digital tools that are hosted in Switzerland or in Europe, and that developing digital infrastructure within one's own neighbourhood rather than relying on other countries will be the biggest topic in the years to come . Martin Labbe reinforced this point by noting the recent example of AI services being disconnected from one day to the next and the impact this can have on organisations whose top layer runs on those AI solutions .
In Senegal, a government-led e-commerce platform was rapidly built during COVID through a public-private partnership model involving payment systems, logistics companies, and technology firms - Senegal's COVID-driven e-commerce platform (Ndeye Birame Sock)
Arg. 1When COVID-19 struck Senegal, the Ministry of Commerce rapidly decided to build an e-commerce platform to support vendors across the country, recognising that building from scratch was not feasible and that the private sector needed to be involved. A collaborative governance structure with two colleges — one public, one private — was established, and the platform was ready within six months.
Ndeye Birame Sock described how the Senegalese government decided to build an e-commerce platform quickly during COVID, using existing market solutions and inviting the private sector into the conversation . She explained that collaboration tools were used to bring together stakeholders from payment systems, wireless operators, the local post system, logistics companies, and technology companies . The platform was built within six months, including naming and branding, through a joint effort of both the public and private sectors .
on: Whether governments and TPOs should build and operate digital platforms or focus solely on creating an enabling environment
The Senegalese platform faced a governance dispute between a public-private startup model and full government agency ownership, with the latter winning and ultimately limiting innovation and execution speed - Governance and business model conflict (Ndeye Birame Sock)
Arg. 2After the initial successful build of the Senegalese e-commerce platform, a fundamental disagreement arose over its long-term governance: the private sector advocated for a public-private partnership run as a startup, while the government preferred to house it within an existing agency. The government's preference prevailed, and the resulting lack of innovation, speed, and expertise ultimately hampered the platform's sustainability.
She described the private sector's preference for an incubator-type public-private partnership model where the government would retain a stake but the platform would be run as a private company . She noted that the public sector won the governance debate, and that the platform subsequently faced challenges due to a lack of innovation, speed, and expertise in executing and solving problems quickly, compounded by internal competition between government agencies .
on: The appropriate governance model for publicly supported digital platforms: public-private startup model versus full government agency ownership
In Africa, technology adoption is driven by practical fit rather than infrastructure gaps; mobile payments and WhatsApp-based commerce have succeeded because they meet users where they are - Technology adoption driven by local fit in Africa (Ndeye Birame Sock)
Arg. 3Ndeye Birame Sock argues that technology adoption in Africa is not primarily an infrastructure problem but rather a question of whether technology meets users' practical needs and communication habits. Technologies such as mobile payments and WhatsApp have been widely adopted because they fit the local context, while e-commerce is increasingly happening through social media platforms such as TikTok.
She noted that in Africa, communication is largely conducted through WhatsApp because of its voice messaging functionality that allows people to speak in their natural language, and that many people skipped earlier technologies to go straight to WhatsApp . She also observed that mobile payments are working much better than wire transfers or cash in most African countries, and argued that when technology works for people, they adopt it, suggesting the issue is not infrastructure but fit .
on: Whether the primary barrier to digital trade adoption in developing markets is infrastructure or cultural and contextual fit
Awareness and accessibility of trade frameworks such as the AfCFTA remain low among ordinary traders and consumers, and AI could help bridge this information gap faster - AI to close trade information gaps in Africa (Ndeye Birame Sock)
Arg. 4Despite the existence of the African Continental Free Trade Area, ordinary consumers and traders in Africa largely do not know what it is, how to use it, or what benefits it offers them. Ndeye Birame Sock argues that AI, if deployed in a locally appropriate way, could help close this information and awareness gap more quickly than traditional methods.
She stated that while there is a lot of excitement about the AfCFTA, the actual consumer does not know what it is, does not know how to use it, and does not know what it does for them . She argued that AI, used as a tool in a way that works for the local context, could help narrow this gap faster and assist countries that are trying to catch up .
AI tools require quality data to function effectively, and Africa is currently underrepresented in AI training data and language coverage, making localisation critical - Data quality and African AI representation (Ndeye Birame Sock)
Arg. 5Ndeye Birame Sock emphasises that the effectiveness of AI depends fundamentally on the quality and relevance of the underlying data, and that Africa is currently poorly represented in AI training data and language models. She argues that AI must be localised to meet people where they are, rather than simply transplanting technology developed for other markets.
She argued that the most important part of any technology is the data and content, and that without the right content, AI will not work . She noted that Africa is still not well represented in AI, that AI does not yet speak African languages in the way it should, and that it is not meeting people where they are . She stressed that AI must be developed in a way that works for the local context rather than simply importing technology from another market .
on: The extent to which generative AI should be the focus of TPO digital trade support versus traditional or sector-specific AI tools
Global e-commerce is a massive and growing market, with digital services now representing the majority of services exports - Scale and significance of global digital trade (Martin Labbe)
Arg. 1Martin Labbe frames the discussion by highlighting the enormous scale of global e-commerce, estimated at 28 trillion dollars for 2024, and the fact that digitally deliverable services now account for 56% of services exports. He also notes that in some parts of Europe, 70% of B2B procurement is happening online, signalling a fundamental shift in how trade is conducted.
He stated that global e-commerce is estimated at 28 trillion dollars for 2024, that 56% of services exports are now digitally deliverable, and that in some parts of Europe 70% of procurement is happening online, with many buyers no longer wanting to meet sellers in person .
B2B digital procurement is a critically important but often overlooked dimension of digital trade, distinct from the more commonly discussed B2C e-commerce - Importance of B2B digital procurement (Martin Labbe)
Arg. 2Martin Labbe draws attention to the fact that public discourse around digital trade tends to focus on B2C e-commerce, while B2B procurement conducted entirely online is actually a much larger and more significant channel. He highlights Switzerland Global Enterprise's tender aggregation platform as an example of how TPOs can support this dimension of digital trade.
He noted that the database of procurement opportunities described by Xavier Cornut is not what is typically discussed when it comes to digital trade, as most people have a B2C view, whereas the B2B part is much more important and substantial, with purely digital engagement becoming the first channel for companies to sell and procure .
Government-supported digital platforms face a recurring challenge of sustainability once public funding ends, and lessons from past failures should inform future initiatives - Sustainability challenge for publicly funded digital platforms (Martin Labbe)
Arg. 3Martin Labbe repeatedly draws attention to the pattern of government-supported digital platforms failing once their initial funding runs out, framing this as a key lesson to be learned from across different regional contexts. He uses this theme to connect the experiences shared by panellists from Europe, Senegal, and the Philippines.
He linked Jesse Weltevreden's earlier observations about European platforms failing when government funding stops to Ndeye Birame Sock's experience in Senegal, noting that the problem of resources being available only for a certain amount of time and then running out sounds very similar across contexts . He also framed the discussion of challenges as an opportunity to identify lessons learned for the future and avoid replicating mistakes .
on: The appropriate governance model for publicly supported digital platforms: public-private startup model versus full government agency ownership
Public sector organisations cannot always afford to fail fast, as they are accountable for public funding, which requires a more cautious approach to digital experimentation than the private sector - Public sector accountability in digital investment (Martin Labbe)
Arg. 4Martin Labbe nuances the 'fail fast' approach often advocated in technology circles by pointing out that public sector organisations are accountable for public funds and cannot always afford rapid failure. This creates a tension between the need for experimentation and the obligation to use public resources responsibly.
He stated that in the public sector, organisations cannot always afford to fail fast and may fail slowly instead, and that they must be conscious that public funding is being engaged, meaning that failing is not always an option .
AI and digital trade support from TPOs will be a transformative force in the coming years, and panellists should consider how to prepare for this shift with limited resources - AI as a future driver of TPO digital trade support (Martin Labbe)
Arg. 5Martin Labbe introduces the topic of AI as a major upcoming driver of change for trade promotion organisations, inviting panellists to reflect on how TPOs should prepare for AI-enabled digital trade support, particularly given resource constraints. He frames this as a forward-looking question requiring practical, prioritised responses.
He stated that AI is the big topic today and is going to impact trade promotion organisations for the next years to come, and invited all panellists to take out their crystal ball and tell how they see the future of AI-enabled digital trade support from TPOs . He also specifically asked what TPOs should focus on if they have limited resources in the next 24 months .
Digital sovereignty is an emerging and critical concern for all organisations relying on foreign-hosted AI and digital services, as sudden disruptions can have severe operational consequences - Digital sovereignty as a strategic risk for TPOs (Martin Labbe)
Arg. 6Martin Labbe reinforces Xavier Cornut's point about digital sovereignty by highlighting the real-world risk of organisations becoming dependent on AI services hosted in foreign jurisdictions, which can be disconnected or disrupted without warning. He frames this as a massive and already present topic for all digital trade stakeholders.
He stated that digital sovereignty is going to be a massive topic for all, noting that it is already in the room, and cited the recent example of certain AI services being disconnected from one day to the next and the impact this can have if an organisation's top layer is running on those AI solutions .
Localisation of digital trade solutions is essential across all regional contexts, as technology must be adapted to local conditions rather than transplanted wholesale from other markets - Localisation as a universal principle for digital trade (Martin Labbe)
Arg. 7In his closing remarks, Martin Labbe identifies localisation as an extremely important principle that applies not only to Senegal but to all the countries discussed in the session. He uses this point to synthesise the session's discussions and underline a common thread across diverse regional experiences.
He concluded by stating that localisation is an extremely important point that is suitable for Senegal and for all the other countries discussed, drawing on Ndeye Birame Sock's argument that AI and technology must be developed in a way that works for the local context rather than simply importing solutions from another market .
Trade promotion organisations should be supported by private sector co-development to ensure the sustainability of digital platforms, as purely government-built tools risk losing relevance once funding ends - Private sector co-development for platform sustainability (Martin Labbe)
Arg. 8Martin Labbe highlights the importance of involving the private sector in the co-development of government digital platforms, drawing on the example of the PHX Source platform in the Philippines, which was developed with private sector input to ensure its long-term sustainability.
He noted that the PHX Source platform in the Philippines was highlighted as one of those projects co-developed with the private sector, taking into consideration that there should really be sustainability in these kinds of government projects , and invited Maria Katrina Rivera to elaborate further on the platform's functionalities and how buyers can engage through it .
Session Knowledge Graph
Speakers · Topics · Arguments · Relationships
All speakers converged on the observation that government-supported digital platforms tend to collapse once their initial funding runs out. Jesse Weltevreden noted that platforms set up by municipalities 'vanished as quickly as they arise' once COVID ended , and that 'when government funding stops, also those platforms stop' . Joe Schembri linked this to the broader pattern of TPOs investing in digital initiatives during COVID, with some surviving and others not . Ndeye Birame Sock described how the Senegalese platform faced challenges once the government took full ownership, lacking innovation and execution speed . Martin Labbe explicitly connected these experiences, noting that 'the problem of resources being available only for a certain amount of time and then running out' sounded very similar across contexts .
Government's regulatory focus (Jesse Weltevreden)
TPOs as a stable intermediary (Joe Schembri)
Governance and business model conflict (Ndeye Birame Sock)
Sustainability challenge for publicly funded digital platforms (Martin Labbe)
There was strong agreement that governments and TPOs should not attempt to run commercial platforms themselves. Jesse Weltevreden argued that government support 'should be more focused on providing the right context to trade and to stimulate traders to go online, but not becoming commercial themselves by setting up all kinds of platforms because I don't think that that works' . Joe Schembri reinforced this by noting that TPOs 'don't usually kind of set it up in an entrepreneurial venture because their role is to stimulate and to kind of guide the sector' . Ndeye Birame Sock expressed regret that the Senegalese government chose to house the platform within a government agency rather than running it as a startup, arguing this led to a lack of innovation and speed .
Government's regulatory focus (Jesse Weltevreden)
TPOs as a stable intermediary (Joe Schembri)
Governance and business model conflict (Ndeye Birame Sock)
Multiple speakers agreed that the core challenge of digital transformation is not the technology itself but how people and organisations adapt to it. Maria Katrina Rivera stated that 'digital transformation or digital services is not just about the challenge is not just about technology adoption, but more so in the change in the mindset' , and that organisations must 'rethink their long established business processes and practices' . Joe Schembri echoed this, noting that 'it's never about technology, it's always about how an organisation adopts the technology and people and how people adapt to it' . Ndeye Birame Sock argued that in Africa, technology adoption is not primarily an infrastructure problem but a question of whether technology meets users' practical needs .
Mindset and trust barriers to digitalisation (Maria Katrina Rivera)
Iterative adaptation in TPO digitalisation (Joe Schembri)
Technology adoption driven by local fit in Africa (Ndeye Birame Sock)
There was broad consensus across speakers that the AI hype must be resisted and that the focus should be on appropriate, problem-driven adoption. Jesse Weltevreden warned against falling for the hype, arguing that 'the question should be, how can we help SMEs adopt the right AI for their business problems' , and that traditional AI forms such as predictive modelling and recommendation systems offer significant value that is often overlooked . Joe Schembri agreed, urging TPOs to 'adopt an experiment and improve as you go along' rather than going 'all out just to call it AI because everyone is on AI' . Maria Katrina Rivera confirmed that Philippine exporters 'don't really want to just like adopt the newest AI or technology that is there' but want 'appropriate technology for their industries' . Xavier Cornut described how SGE trains its personnel across multiple AI tools to identify which best serves different sectors .
TPOs and governments must move beyond the Gen AI hype and focus on helping SMEs adopt the right AI tools for their specific business problems, including traditional AI such as predictive modelling and recommendation systems - Avoiding AI hype, focusing on appropriate tools (Jesse Weltevreden)
AI will most immediately benefit TPOs in two areas: delivering more personalised services tailored to diagnosed company needs, and enhancing the quality of trade advisory services - AI benefits for personalisation and advisory (Joe Schembri)
DTI Philippines is focused on ensuring appropriate technology adoption for specific industries rather than chasing the newest AI trends, and on sustaining existing effective platforms - Appropriate and sustainable technology adoption (Maria Katrina Rivera)
Internal AI training and digital sovereignty (Xavier Cornut)
Speakers consistently emphasised that digital tools must be complemented by human expertise. Xavier Cornut described SGE's 'digital first strategy but it's only one click away from a human consultant' philosophy , noting that during the US tariff crisis 'people didn't want only to use a custom database... you actually also want to have a human answering to you at some point' . Joe Schembri highlighted the growing trend towards advisory services in TPOs, noting that 'a lot of TPOs have a lot of experience internally, and they're using their people as kind of advisors who really have information and knowledge on the ground' . Jesse Weltevreden argued that TPOs and governments should focus on 'giving them the right skill set to succeed also internationally' , implying a human-led capacity-building role.
MySGE tender aggregation platform (Xavier Cornut)
Human-digital integration strategy (Xavier Cornut)
TPO advisory and capacity-building role (Joe Schembri)
Regulatory and competitive pressures on European SMEs (Jesse Weltevreden)
There was clear agreement that digital solutions must be localised to be effective. Ndeye Birame Sock stressed that AI 'must be developed in a way that works for the local context, not necessarily just taking technology from another market and bringing it on' , and that Africa is still not well represented in AI language coverage . Maria Katrina Rivera noted the importance of technology that works for specific industries and local contexts . Martin Labbe concluded the session by identifying localisation as 'an extremely important point that is suitable for Senegal and for all the other countries we've been discussing' .
Data quality and African AI representation (Ndeye Birame Sock)
Technology adoption driven by local fit in Africa (Ndeye Birame Sock)
Mindset and trust barriers to digitalisation (Maria Katrina Rivera)
Localisation as a universal principle for digital trade (Martin Labbe)
Both Jesse Weltevreden and Joe Schembri share the view that TPOs occupy a unique and more sustainable position than ad hoc government projects, and that iterative adaptation over time is the natural and necessary path for digital initiatives. Jesse Weltevreden argued that government-funded platforms fail when funding stops and that governments should focus on creating the right environment rather than becoming commercial operators . Joe Schembri built on this by noting that TPOs 'have been there for a long time, are likely to remain, and therefore there is that continuity' as an interface between the private and public sectors . Both also agreed that digital initiatives rarely succeed on the first attempt: Jesse Weltevreden noted that platforms 'vanished as quickly as they arise' , while Joe Schembri observed that 'many times, TPOs don't get it right the first time' and that 'adjustment and adaptation is natural' . Both Ndeye Birame Sock and Maria Katrina Rivera, representing developing and emerging market contexts, shared similar perspectives on the importance of private sector co-development and the challenges of trust and mindset in digital platform adoption. Ndeye Birame Sock described how the Senegalese platform was built through a collaborative public-private structure and argued that the private sector model would have been more sustainable . Maria Katrina Rivera similarly highlighted that PHX Source was 'co-developed with the private sector, taking into consideration that there should really be sustainability in these kinds' of government projects . Both also identified trust as a significant barrier: Ndeye Birame Sock noted the challenge of trust between the private and public sectors , while Maria Katrina Rivera highlighted concerns about data security and the trustworthiness of digital systems among both exporters and regulatory agencies . Both Xavier Cornut and Martin Labbe expressed strong alignment on the emerging strategic risk of digital sovereignty. Xavier Cornut argued that 'it's very important that we use all our AI digital tools if they are hosted in Switzerland or in Europe' and that 'you cannot rely on other countries' . Martin Labbe reinforced this immediately, stating that 'digital sovereignty is going to be a massive topic for all of us' and citing the recent example of AI services being disconnected from one day to the next . Both framed this not as a future concern but as an already present and urgent issue for TPOs and governments relying on foreign-hosted digital infrastructure. Jesse Weltevreden, Joe Schembri, and Maria Katrina Rivera all shared the view that AI should be adopted to enhance existing valued services rather than as an end in itself. Jesse Weltevreden argued that the question should be 'how can we help SMEs adopt the right AI for their business problems' and that traditional AI forms offer significant value beyond generative AI . Joe Schembri argued that 'we do personalisation because companies want it — let's use AI to do it better, not just do AI' . Maria Katrina Rivera confirmed that Philippine exporters want 'appropriate technology for their industries' rather than the newest AI available . All three effectively argued for a problem-first, solution-second approach to AI adoption. Xavier Cornut, Ndeye Birame Sock, and Maria Katrina Rivera all shared the view that platform sustainability requires careful design choices around governance, self-service, and private sector involvement. Xavier Cornut emphasised that 'self-service was mandatory' for scaling and sustainability, and described SGE's quarterly review process to assess engagement and adapt or discontinue services . Ndeye Birame Sock argued that the Senegalese platform needed to be run as a startup with private sector governance to survive , and that the government's choice to house it within an agency led to its challenges . Maria Katrina Rivera highlighted that PHX Source was co-developed with the private sector to ensure sustainability , and emphasised the importance of sustaining platforms that are already effectively serving exporters . Both Martin Labbe and Jesse Weltevreden shared a perspective that the B2B dimension of digital trade is critically important and often underappreciated relative to B2C e-commerce. Martin Labbe noted that 'the B2B part is much more important, much more substantial' and that 'purely digital engagement is something that we see really becoming the first channel for companies to sell and procure' . Jesse Weltevreden's discussion of the fragmented European digital market and the challenges for SMEs selling cross-border implicitly reinforced this, as did his argument that TPOs should focus on giving SMEs 'the skill sets they need to sell across the border to specific markets' .
It was somewhat unexpected that speakers from such diverse contexts - a West African entrepreneur, a Philippine government official, a European academic, and a trade promotion researcher - all converged on the same conclusion: that private sector co-development and involvement is essential for the sustainability of government digital platforms. Ndeye Birame Sock argued explicitly that the Senegalese platform needed a public-private startup model to survive , and expressed regret that the government chose otherwise . Maria Katrina Rivera highlighted that PHX Source was specifically co-developed with the private sector to ensure sustainability . Jesse Weltevreden argued from a European perspective that governments should not become commercial operators but should create enabling environments . Joe Schembri noted that TPOs succeed precisely because they serve as an interface between the private and public sectors . This consensus across such different institutional and geographic contexts was notably strong and consistent.
It was unexpected that trust emerged as a shared concern across speakers from Africa, Asia, and Europe, given that the session was primarily framed around technical and operational challenges. Ndeye Birame Sock explicitly identified trust as 'one big challenge' between the private and public sectors, and even between members of the private sector themselves who 'all see each other as competitors' . Maria Katrina Rivera noted that both exporters and regulatory agencies are concerned about 'data security, concerned on confidentiality, and practically the overall trustworthiness of the digital system' . Jesse Weltevreden's observation that government-funded platforms fail because they cannot structurally sustain commercial operations also implicitly reflects a trust and legitimacy gap. The convergence on trust as a cross-cutting barrier was not anticipated given the diversity of contexts represented.
It was somewhat unexpected that even speakers with private sector backgrounds acknowledged the limitations of the 'fail fast' approach in public sector contexts. Martin Labbe explicitly stated that 'in the public sector, we cannot always afford to fail fast' and that 'failing is not always an option' given public funding accountability . Joe Schembri, while urging TPOs to 'experiment and improve as you go along' , also cautioned against rushing to launch AI projects simply to appear current , implicitly acknowledging the need for a more measured approach. Ndeye Birame Sock's account of the Senegalese platform illustrated the real consequences of governance failures in publicly funded initiatives . The consensus that public sector digital initiatives require a more cautious, iterative approach than pure startup logic was notable given the session's otherwise entrepreneurial tone.
It was somewhat unexpected that all four speakers who addressed AI directly converged on the view that AI's primary value is in augmenting and improving existing services rather than creating new AI-first offerings. This consensus was unexpected because the session was held at a major technology summit where enthusiasm for AI innovation might have been expected to dominate. Instead, Jesse Weltevreden warned against the hype and argued for focusing on traditional AI forms that add business value . Joe Schembri argued that 'we do personalisation because companies want it - let's use AI to do it better, not just do AI' . Xavier Cornut described training staff across multiple AI tools to find the best fit for existing client needs . Maria Katrina Rivera confirmed that exporters want appropriate technology for their industries rather than the newest AI . This collective pragmatism was notably consistent across speakers from academia, government, and the private sector.
The discussion revealed a remarkably high level of consensus across speakers from very different regional, institutional, and sectoral backgrounds. The main areas of agreement centred on: (1) the recurring failure of government-funded digital platforms once public funding ends; (2) the unsuitability of governments and TPOs as commercial platform operators; (3) the necessity of private sector co-development for platform sustainability; (4) the primacy of people, mindset, and organisational adaptation over technology in digital transformation; (5) the need to resist AI hype and focus on appropriate, problem-driven AI adoption; (6) the indispensability of human advisory services alongside digital tools; (7) the critical importance of localisation; and (8) the emerging strategic risk of digital sovereignty. These agreements were consistent across speakers from Senegal, the Philippines, Switzerland, Malta, and the Netherlands, suggesting that these are genuinely universal challenges and principles in the field of TPO-supported digital trade.
Jesse Weltevreden argues strongly that governments should not become commercial actors by setting up platforms, as government-funded platforms tend to fail once funding stops , and that government support should focus on providing the right context and stimulating traders to go online . By contrast, Maria Katrina Rivera describes how DTI Philippines has built and operates the PHX Source platform and TradeLine Philippines , while Xavier Cornut describes SGE's MySGE platform , and Ndeye Birame Sock recounts how the Senegalese government built an e-commerce platform during COVID . Joe Schembri partially bridges the gap by arguing that TPOs, unlike governments, have the continuity to sustain such platforms , but also acknowledges that many platform initiatives have failed . The disagreement is not absolute - all speakers acknowledge the risks of government-built platforms - but they differ on whether the solution is to avoid building platforms altogether or to build them with better governance and private sector involvement.
Government's role in Europe is primarily focused on creating a level playing field, consumer protection, sustainability legislation, and fair competition rather than direct commercial involvement - Government's regulatory focus (Jesse Weltevreden)
In Senegal, a government-led e-commerce platform was rapidly built during COVID through a public-private partnership model involving payment systems, logistics companies, and technology firms - Senegal's COVID-driven e-commerce platform (Ndeye Birame Sock)
TPOs serve as a sustainable interface between the public and private sectors, offering continuity that one-off government projects lack - TPOs as a stable intermediary (Joe Schembri)
The PHX Source platform provides Philippine exporters with microsites, product listings, and direct buyer communication, functioning as an advanced online directory used by trade posts globally - PHX Source platform for Philippine exporters (Maria Katrina Rivera)
MySGE aggregates 56,000 live tenders and procurement opportunities from international institutions, auto-translates listings, and combines digital self-service with direct access to human consultants - MySGE tender aggregation platform (Xavier Cornut)
Ndeye Birame Sock explicitly describes a governance dispute in Senegal where the private sector advocated for a public-private partnership run as a startup, while the government preferred to house the platform within an existing agency . She argues that the public sector won that battle 'regretfully' and that the resulting lack of innovation, speed, and expertise hampered the platform's sustainability . Martin Labbe frames this as a recurring pattern across contexts , but does not take a strong position on which governance model is preferable, instead noting that the public sector cannot always afford to fail fast given its accountability for public funds . The disagreement here is primarily between Ndeye Birame Sock's clear preference for the public-private startup model and the implicit position of the Senegalese government that favoured full agency ownership.
The Senegalese platform faced a governance dispute between a public-private startup model and full government agency ownership, with the latter winning and ultimately limiting innovation and execution speed - Governance and business model conflict (Ndeye Birame Sock)
Government-supported digital platforms face a recurring challenge of sustainability once public funding ends, and lessons from past failures should inform future initiatives - Sustainability challenge for publicly funded digital platforms (Martin Labbe)
Ndeye Birame Sock explicitly argues that digital adoption in Africa is not primarily an infrastructure problem, stating 'I don't believe that it's an infrastructure issue because now we look at the population and they know how to use technology. When it works for them, they adopt it' , pointing to the widespread adoption of mobile payments and WhatsApp as evidence . In contrast, Maria Katrina Rivera highlights that the Philippines' geography as an archipelago of 7,641 islands creates real infrastructure challenges, particularly in rural areas, that the government has been continuously addressing . While both acknowledge mindset and cultural factors, they differ on the relative weight of infrastructure versus contextual fit as the primary barrier.
In Africa, technology adoption is driven by practical fit rather than infrastructure gaps; mobile payments and WhatsApp-based commerce have succeeded because they meet users where they are - Technology adoption driven by local fit in Africa (Ndeye Birame Sock)
In the Philippines, geographic fragmentation across 7,641 islands creates inherent infrastructure challenges for digital trade, particularly in rural areas - Geographic infrastructure challenges in the Philippines (Maria Katrina Rivera)
Jesse Weltevreden argues most forcefully that TPOs should move beyond generative AI hype and focus on traditional AI forms such as predictive modelling, machine learning, computer vision, and recommendation systems that offer substantial e-commerce value . Joe Schembri agrees on avoiding hype but focuses on personalisation and advisory services as the immediate AI opportunity for TPOs . Xavier Cornut takes a more practical, tool-agnostic approach, arguing that TPOs should train staff across multiple AI tools to discover which best serves different sectors , and adds the dimension of digital sovereignty . Ndeye Birame Sock shifts the frame entirely to data quality and African representation in AI training data , arguing that localisation is the critical issue rather than which type of AI to use . While all agree that AI should not be adopted for its own sake, they differ on what the primary focus should be.
TPOs and governments must move beyond the Gen AI hype and focus on helping SMEs adopt the right AI tools for their specific business problems, including traditional AI such as predictive modelling and recommendation systems - Avoiding AI hype, focusing on appropriate tools (Jesse Weltevreden)
AI will most immediately benefit TPOs in two areas: delivering more personalised services tailored to diagnosed company needs, and enhancing the quality of trade advisory services - AI benefits for personalisation and advisory (Joe Schembri)
TPOs should train their own personnel across a range of AI tools to understand which best serves different sectors, and should advise governments on developing sovereign AI solutions - Internal AI training and digital sovereignty (Xavier Cornut)
AI tools require quality data to function effectively, and Africa is currently underrepresented in AI training data and language coverage, making localisation critical - Data quality and African AI representation (Ndeye Birame Sock)
This disagreement is unexpected because both speakers represent developing or emerging market contexts and might have been expected to share similar views on barriers to digital adoption. Instead, Ndeye Birame Sock explicitly rejects the infrastructure narrative for Africa, stating 'I don't believe that it's an infrastructure issue because now we look at the population and they know how to use technology. When it works for them, they adopt it' , and pointing to the widespread adoption of mobile payments and WhatsApp as evidence . Maria Katrina Rivera, by contrast, leads with infrastructure as a key challenge for the Philippines, noting that as an archipelago of 7,641 islands, managing technology and digitalising services is not easy, with ongoing infrastructure challenges in rural areas . This divergence suggests that the infrastructure-versus-culture debate in digital development is not settled even among practitioners from the Global South, and that regional context matters enormously.
Both speakers raise the issue of trust, but in unexpectedly different ways. Ndeye Birame Sock frames trust as a challenge between the public and private sectors themselves, and even between members of the private sector who see each other as competitors , noting that this was a major challenge in building the Senegalese platform. Maria Katrina Rivera, however, frames trust as a challenge between businesses and digital technology itself, noting that both exporters and regulatory agencies are concerned about data security, confidentiality, and the overall trustworthiness of digital systems . This is unexpected because the session's framing focused on platform sustainability and governance, yet both speakers independently identified trust - albeit in different dimensions - as a fundamental barrier, suggesting it is a more pervasive and multi-layered challenge than the discussion's initial framing anticipated.
Joe Schembri advocates for an iterative, experimental approach to digital and AI initiatives, urging TPOs to 'adopt an experiment and improve as you go along' and drawing on the observation that TPOs rarely get it right the first time . He even references a discussion about 'fail early' . Martin Labbe, however, pushes back unexpectedly by noting that 'in the public sector we cannot always afford to fail fast. We might fail slowly. And we also have to be conscious that this is public. And it's the public funding that we are engaging. So failing is not always an option' . This is an unexpected moment of disagreement between the moderator and a panellist, and it highlights a genuine tension between the agile, iterative approach common in technology and startup culture and the accountability constraints of public sector organisations.
The discussion reveals a moderate level of disagreement among speakers, primarily centred on four main areas: (1) whether governments and TPOs should build and operate digital platforms or focus on enabling environments ; (2) the appropriate governance model for publicly supported platforms, particularly the tension between public-private startup models and full government agency ownership ; (3) the relative importance of infrastructure versus cultural and contextual fit as barriers to digital adoption in developing markets ; and (4) the appropriate focus for AI adoption by TPOs, with disagreements on generative AI versus traditional AI, personalisation, digital sovereignty, and data localisation . There is broad consensus on the importance of digital trade for SMEs, the need to avoid AI hype, the value of private sector involvement, and the challenge of platform sustainability. However, speakers diverge significantly on implementation approaches, governance models, and regional priorities.
All speakers agree that government-supported digital platforms frequently fail to sustain themselves once initial funding ends , and that this is a critical challenge to be addressed. Jesse Weltevreden notes that platforms 'vanished as quickly as they arise' and argues government should not set up commercial platforms . Joe Schembri acknowledges that TPOs often do not get it right the first time and that adaptation is natural . Ndeye Birame Sock describes how the Senegalese platform faced sustainability challenges due to governance disputes . Xavier Cornut describes how SGE's own digital exhibitor directory failed because it generated more work for staff than users . Maria Katrina Rivera emphasises the importance of sustaining existing effective platforms . However, they disagree on the solution: Jesse Weltevreden argues governments should not build platforms at all , while others advocate for better governance models, private sector co-development, or self-service design as the path to sustainability.
Government's role in Europe is primarily focused on creating a level playing field, consumer protection, sustainability legislation, and fair competition rather than direct commercial involvement - Government's regulatory focus (Jesse Weltevreden) TPOs rarely get digital initiatives right on the first attempt; adaptation and iteration over time are natural and necessary parts of the process - Iterative adaptation in TPO digitalisation (Joe Schembri) The Senegalese platform faced a governance dispute between a public-private startup model and full government agency ownership, with the latter winning and ultimately limiting innovation and execution speed - Governance and business model conflict (Ndeye Birame Sock) Self-service design is essential for platform scalability and sustainability; platforms that generate more work for TPO staff than for users are not viable long-term - Self-service as a sustainability requirement (Xavier Cornut) DTI Philippines is focused on ensuring appropriate technology adoption for specific industries rather than chasing the newest AI trends, and on sustaining existing effective platforms - Appropriate and sustainable technology adoption (Maria Katrina Rivera)
All speakers agree that AI should not be adopted for its own sake and that TPOs must avoid the hype, focusing instead on practical, problem-driven applications . Jesse Weltevreden warns against falling for the hype and urges focus on the right AI for specific business problems . Joe Schembri urges TPOs not to 'go all out just to call it AI' and to use AI to improve existing valued services . Maria Katrina Rivera confirms that Philippine exporters want appropriate technology for their industries, not the newest AI . Xavier Cornut advocates for training staff across multiple AI tools to find the best fit . Ndeye Birame Sock emphasises that AI must work for the local context . However, they differ on what the primary focus should be: traditional AI forms, personalisation and advisory, digital sovereignty, or data localisation for underrepresented regions.
TPOs and governments must move beyond the Gen AI hype and focus on helping SMEs adopt the right AI tools for their specific business problems, including traditional AI such as predictive modelling and recommendation systems - Avoiding AI hype, focusing on appropriate tools (Jesse Weltevreden) TPOs rarely get digital initiatives right on the first attempt; adaptation and iteration over time are natural and necessary parts of the process - Iterative adaptation in TPO digitalisation (Joe Schembri) TPOs should train their own personnel across a range of AI tools to understand which best serves different sectors, and should advise governments on developing sovereign AI solutions - Internal AI training and digital sovereignty (Xavier Cornut) DTI Philippines is focused on ensuring appropriate technology adoption for specific industries rather than chasing the newest AI trends, and on sustaining existing effective platforms - Appropriate and sustainable technology adoption (Maria Katrina Rivera) AI tools require quality data to function effectively, and Africa is currently underrepresented in AI training data and language coverage, making localisation critical - Data quality and African AI representation (Ndeye Birame Sock)
Ndeye Birame Sock, Maria Katrina Rivera, and Joe Schembri all agree that private sector involvement is essential for the success and sustainability of government digital platforms . Ndeye Birame Sock describes how the Senegalese platform was built through a two-college public-private structure and argues that a public-private startup model would have been more sustainable . Maria Katrina Rivera notes that PHX Source was co-developed with the private sector to ensure sustainability . Joe Schembri highlights that TPOs function as a sustainable interface between the public and private sectors . However, they differ on the degree of private sector control: Ndeye Birame Sock advocates for running the platform as a private company with a government stake , while Maria Katrina Rivera's model keeps the platform within the government agency with private sector input in development .
In Senegal, a government-led e-commerce platform was rapidly built during COVID through a public-private partnership model involving payment systems, logistics companies, and technology firms - Senegal's COVID-driven e-commerce platform (Ndeye Birame Sock) Digital transformation challenges are not purely technological but involve organisational mindset change, workflow adaptation, and building trust in digital systems among both businesses and regulators - Mindset and trust barriers to digitalisation (Maria Katrina Rivera) TPOs serve as a sustainable interface between the public and private sectors, offering continuity that one-off government projects lack - TPOs as a stable intermediary (Joe Schembri)
Jesse Weltevreden, Joe Schembri, and Xavier Cornut all agree that TPOs should focus on advisory and capacity-building services to help SMEs navigate the complex digital trade environment . Jesse Weltevreden argues that TPOs should help SMEs develop the right skill sets to succeed internationally rather than setting up platforms . Joe Schembri describes how TPOs have increasingly shifted towards advisory services, including compliance advice and skills development . Xavier Cornut describes SGE's 'digital first, one click away from a human consultant' philosophy . However, they differ on the balance between digital tools and human advisory: Xavier Cornut emphasises that digital tools must always be backed by human consultants , while Jesse Weltevreden focuses more on skill-set development and Joe Schembri on AI-enhanced personalisation .
Regulatory pressure in Europe is extremely high and disproportionately burdensome for SMEs, compounded by competitive pressure from Chinese and US platforms - Regulatory and competitive pressures on European SMEs (Jesse Weltevreden) TPOs have increasingly shifted towards advisory services, helping SMEs with marketplace access, capacity building, skills development, and regulatory compliance - TPO advisory and capacity-building role (Joe Schembri) Human-digital integration strategy (Xavier Cornut)
- Europe's e-commerce market is large and growing unevenly, with Western and Northern Europe being mature markets whilst Southern and Eastern Europe show higher growth potential and rates.
- The European government's role is primarily regulatory — focused on creating a level playing field, consumer protection, sustainability legislation, and fair competition — rather than direct commercial platform operation.
- Europe is not a single digital market; differing consumer preferences, payment systems, and logistics across countries make cross-border selling complex and resource-intensive for SMEs.
- Trade Promotion Organisations (TPOs) serve as a sustainable interface between the public and private sectors, offering continuity and stability that one-off government-funded projects typically lack.
- TPOs have increasingly shifted towards advisory services, helping SMEs with marketplace access, capacity building, skills development, and regulatory compliance.
- The PHX Source platform (Philippines) provides exporters with microsites, product listings, and direct buyer communication, functioning as an advanced online directory used by trade posts globally.
- DTI Philippines also offers AI-enabled tools such as TradeLine Philippines and an FTA information portal to help exporters simulate product origin eligibility under free trade agreements.
- Switzerland Global Enterprise's MySGE platform aggregates over 56,000 live tenders and procurement opportunities from international institutions, auto-translates listings, and combines digital self-service with direct access to human consultants.
- Switzerland Global Enterprise trains its own staff and ambassadors to use digital tools and update the platform, ensuring sustainability through a combined human-digital approach.
- In Senegal, a government-led e-commerce platform was rapidly built during COVID through a public-private partnership model involving payment systems, logistics companies, and technology firms, but ultimately faced governance and sustainability challenges.
- Government-funded local platforms in Europe tend to collapse once public funding ends, reinforcing the view that governments should focus on creating the right environment rather than operating commercial platforms.
- The Senegalese platform faced a governance dispute between a public-private startup model and full government agency ownership; the latter prevailed and ultimately limited innovation and execution speed.
- Digital transformation challenges are not purely technological but involve organisational mindset change, workflow adaptation, and building trust in digital systems among both businesses and regulators.
- Self-service design is essential for platform scalability and sustainability; platforms that generate more work for TPO staff than for users are not viable in the long term.
- TPOs rarely get digital initiatives right on the first attempt; adaptation and iteration over time are natural and necessary parts of the process.
- TPOs and governments must move beyond the Gen AI hype and focus on helping SMEs adopt the right AI tools for their specific business problems, including traditional AI such as predictive modelling, machine learning, computer vision, and recommendation systems.
- There is a paradox in AI adoption: whilst over 100,000 AI solutions exist globally, the top four tools attract more than 50% of all users, highlighting concentration risks and the need for careful tool selection.
- AI will most immediately benefit TPOs in two areas: delivering more personalised services tailored to diagnosed company needs, and enhancing the quality of trade advisory services.
- DTI Philippines is focused on ensuring appropriate technology adoption for specific industries rather than chasing the newest AI trends, and on sustaining existing effective platforms.
- AI tools require quality data to function effectively, and Africa is currently underrepresented in AI training data and language coverage, making localisation critical.
- TPOs should train their own personnel across a range of AI tools to understand which best serves different sectors, and should advise governments on developing sovereign AI solutions.
- In Africa, technology adoption is driven by practical fit rather than infrastructure gaps; mobile payments and WhatsApp-based commerce have succeeded because they meet users where they are.
- Awareness and accessibility of trade frameworks such as the AfCFTA remain low among ordinary traders and consumers, and AI could help bridge this information gap more rapidly.
- In the Philippines, geographic fragmentation across 7,641 islands creates inherent infrastructure challenges for digital trade, particularly in rural areas.
- Regulatory pressure in Europe is extremely high and disproportionately burdensome for SMEs, compounded by competitive pressure from Chinese and US platforms.
- Digital sovereignty is an emerging critical concern, as reliance on foreign-hosted AI and digital services creates vulnerability when those services are disrupted or withdrawn.
“In my view, when it comes to government support in Europe, it should be more focused on providing the right context to trade and to stimulate traders to go online, but not becoming commercial themselves by setting up all kinds of platforms because I don't think that that works. They need to create the right environment where companies can prosper to sell online.”
“There's one big challenge — it's really the trust, right, between the private sector and the public sector, but also between members of the private sector themselves. They all see each other as competitors. Even at the TPO level, we tend to have challenges in saying, why is the government building it when I'm already trying to build this? They should be engaging me to build this.”
“The opinion from the private sector was this needs to go to an incubator programme type model where we really needed to pursue a public-private partnership where the government would still have a stake in it, but we would actually run it as a startup, as a private company that could support the overall community. On the other side, the pull was to just have it live within one of the government agencies. The concern there was — is it going to go there to die?”
“We always say we have a digital first strategy, but it's only one click away from a human consultant. Because I'm working in the consulting service, we always have a direct link to actually a human being who is going to answer your question. And we saw that especially during the US tariff crisis that actually people didn't want only to use a custom database — they actually also want to have a human answering to you at some point.”
“We realised that self-service was mandatory but it's the only way to actually scale up an offer. It has to be self-service up to a certain point because you have also quality requirements. And we also realised that the click rates were not worth the investment at some point. So the second lesson would be: you have to measure on a regular basis what is the engagement in your tool and do not shy away from actually pausing a service if you realise that the service is not working.”
“The question for trade promotion organisations shouldn't be 'helping SMEs adopt AI', but the question should be 'how can we help SMEs adopt the right AI for their business problems?' Go further than just Gen AI because there's a lot of value, especially in e-commerce, for traditional AI, like predictive modelling, machine learning, computer vision, recommendation systems, and so on.”
“TPOs and government and business support organisations will start thinking that now there's AI, we're really in a hurry to launch a project which somehow, in the future, has AI, and we treat it as one project. No — it happened with digitisation. It's not one project. We learn from the failures, and eventually we have very good services now in digital. And in AI, it's going to be the same.”
“When we look at AI, I say that we have to understand and meet the population where they are and the way they're using it. Africa is still not well represented when it comes to AI. It still doesn't speak the languages it's supposed to speak in the way it's supposed to speak it. And it's not meeting people where they are. In Africa, it's all about WhatsApp... everybody's selling through TikTok and some of the other social media platforms.”
What are the specific KPIs and measurement frameworks that trade promotion organisations use to evaluate the success of their digital services?
Xavier mentioned that Switzerland Global Enterprise conducts quarterly reviews of all services including digital ones, measuring engagement and adapting accordingly. Martin expressed interest in this approach, suggesting it warrants deeper investigation as a replicable model for other TPOs to assess the sustainability and impact of their digital offerings.
How can public-private partnership models be structured to ensure the long-term sustainability of government-initiated e-commerce platforms?
The Senegal case study and European examples both highlighted that platforms tend to collapse when government funding ends. The tension between keeping platforms within government agencies versus spinning them off as private or hybrid entities remains unresolved and requires further research into viable governance and business models.
What are the most effective business models for government-supported e-commerce platforms to achieve financial self-sufficiency after initial public funding?
Biram explicitly raised the challenge of finding a business model that allows a platform to pay for itself and survive independently. This is a critical unresolved issue that affects TPOs globally, particularly in developing economies, and merits dedicated research into revenue generation strategies for public-interest digital trade platforms.
How can trade promotion organisations help SMEs identify and adopt the right type of AI for their specific business problems, beyond generative AI?
Jesse highlighted a paradox where most attention is on generative AI, yet traditional AI tools such as predictive modelling, machine learning, and recommendation systems offer significant value for e-commerce. He and Joe both stressed that TPOs should guide SMEs towards appropriate AI solutions rather than chasing hype, which requires further research into AI literacy frameworks tailored to SME needs.
How can AI tools be developed and adapted to better represent African languages, cultures, and local contexts to support trade in Africa?
Biram pointed out that Africa remains underrepresented in AI development, with tools failing to adequately support local languages and communication norms. This gap is particularly significant for trade facilitation and warrants research into localised AI development strategies that meet African populations where they are, including platforms like WhatsApp and TikTok.
What is the actual awareness and utilisation rate of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) among SMEs and consumers, and how can AI bridge this information gap?
Biram noted that despite excitement around the AfCFTA, ordinary consumers and traders do not understand what it means for them or how to use it. Research is needed into awareness levels and into how AI-powered tools could be designed to translate complex trade agreements into actionable, accessible information for local traders.
How can trade promotion organisations balance the need for digital sovereignty with the practical demands of adopting widely available AI and digital tools?
Xavier raised the issue of hosting AI and digital tools within national or regional jurisdictions, warning against dependency on foreign platforms. Martin reinforced this by referencing recent disruptions caused by AI service disconnections. This is an emerging and underexplored area that requires policy research and guidance for TPOs on how to advise governments on sovereign AI development.
What lessons can be drawn from failed government-supported local e-commerce platforms in Europe to inform future public investment decisions?
Jesse described numerous local and national platforms that collapsed once government funding ceased, particularly those set up during COVID-19. Martin invited further reflection on these failures. A systematic study of these cases would provide valuable lessons for policymakers and TPOs considering future digital trade infrastructure investments.
How can trade promotion organisations in ASEAN address the dual challenge of digital infrastructure gaps in rural areas and the mindset change required for digital adoption among SMEs?
Katrina highlighted that in the Philippines, and likely across ASEAN, the challenge is not purely technological but also cultural and organisational, requiring businesses to rethink established processes. Research into change management strategies tailored to archipelagic and geographically dispersed economies would be highly valuable for regional TPOs.
How should trade promotion organisations approach AI adoption incrementally, learning from the iterative process of earlier digitalisation efforts, rather than treating it as a single large-scale project?
Joe warned that TPOs risk repeating past mistakes by rushing into AI projects driven by hype rather than need. He drew a parallel with earlier digitalisation waves and urged an experimental, adaptive approach. Research into best-practice frameworks for incremental AI adoption within public-sector trade support organisations would help prevent costly failures.
What role should trade promotion organisations play in advising governments on which sovereign AI capabilities to develop at a national level?
Xavier suggested that TPOs, given their position at the interface of public and private sectors and their knowledge of business needs, are well placed to advise governments on which AI tools to develop domestically. This advisory role is novel and requires further exploration in terms of scope, capacity, and governance frameworks.
How can the trust deficit between the public and private sectors, and among private sector actors themselves, be addressed to enable more effective collaboration on digital trade platforms?
Biram identified trust as a fundamental barrier to successful public-private collaboration in building e-commerce platforms, noting that private sector actors often view each other as competitors and are sceptical of government involvement. Research into trust-building mechanisms and collaborative governance models would be highly relevant for TPOs seeking to co-develop digital trade infrastructure.
How can the B2B digital procurement dimension of digital trade be better integrated into the support services offered by trade promotion organisations?
Martin noted that the conversation around digital trade tends to focus on B2C e-commerce, whereas B2B procurement conducted entirely online is increasingly dominant and financially more significant. Further research is needed into how TPOs can develop services specifically tailored to helping SMEs navigate and succeed in digital B2B procurement environments.
How can trade promotion organisations ensure that AI-driven personalisation of advisory services genuinely meets the diagnosed needs of SMEs rather than simply adding a technological veneer?
Joe highlighted that TPOs have been moving towards more personalised services and that AI offers an opportunity to enhance this further. However, he cautioned against adopting AI for its own sake. Research into how AI-powered personalisation can be meaningfully integrated into TPO advisory workflows, with measurable outcomes for SMEs, is needed.
What are the comparative advantages and disadvantages of different platform models (self-service versus consultant-assisted) for digital trade support, and under what conditions does each model work best?
Xavier shared that Switzerland Global Enterprise learned from experience that self-service is essential for scalability, but that human consultants remain indispensable, particularly during periods of rapid regulatory change such as the US tariff crisis. A comparative study of hybrid models across different TPO contexts would help identify best practices for balancing automation with human expertise.
