Connecting the Unconnected in the field of Education Excellence, Cyber Security & Rural Solutions and Women Empowerment in ICT
This session, held at the WSIS 2026 and AI for Good platform in Geneva, brought together policymakers, academics, and technology leaders to discuss the theme of "connecting the unconnected," with a particular focus on India's digital transformation and its global implications across education, cybersecurity, rural development, and women's empowerment in ICT .
Representing the Government of India, Atul Sinha highlighted that connectivity is a developmental mission rather than merely a technological objective, pointing to initiatives such as BharatNet, Aadhaar, DigiLocker, and the Samridh Gram Digital Village Initiative, which received global recognition as a WSIS Prize champion . Bharat Bhatia of the ITU-APT Foundation of India noted that India leads the world in digital financial transactions through UPI and is actively working towards 6G standardisation to bring 1.4 billion Indians online . Professor P.B. Sharma underscored the scale of India's digital education efforts, citing platforms such as Diksha, which hosts 20,000 courses and connects 282 million students, and SWAYAM, which enrols 61 million people in higher education .
Ayush Singh proposed a shift away from infrastructure-dependent communication, arguing that existing smartphones could form decentralised, self-healing mesh networks to maintain connectivity even during disasters . Vineet Kumar and Dr Pavan Duggal both stressed the importance of digital trust and legal accountability, with Duggal warning that the Global South faces a legal vacuum in which algorithmic discrimination goes unaddressed, and calling for urgent legal guardrails before the arrival of artificial general intelligence .
ITU Deputy Secretary-General Thomas Lamanauskas acknowledged that 2.2 billion people remain offline and emphasised the urgency of inclusive digital transformation, noting that nearly half of the world's schools still lack internet connectivity and that the GIGA initiative is working to connect every school across 53 countries . Ludvig Nobel, in accepting his award, argued that technology must remain human-centred, guided by responsibility and conscience, warning that intelligence without ethics risks building systems that are powerful but not truly aligned with human values .
The session concluded with Professor Tim Unwin commending the passion and commitment of all speakers towards reaching the poorest and most marginalised communities, and Professor N.K. Goyal was recognised for his role in bringing together this diverse range of perspectives on India's digital journey and its significance for global digital cooperation .
Overall Purpose
- The discussion took place at the WSIS Forum 2026 / AI for Good platform in Geneva, bringing together policymakers, technologists, academics, and regulators - primarily from India but also from Africa and Europe - to share perspectives on "connecting the unconnected." The session aimed to showcase practical initiatives, policy frameworks, and emerging technologies that advance digital inclusion, with particular focus on education, cybersecurity, rural connectivity, and women's empowerment in ICT.
- --
Major Discussion Points
- India's large-scale digital public infrastructure as a model for inclusive connectivity. Multiple speakers highlighted India's achievements in bridging the digital divide through initiatives such as BharatNet, UPI, Aadhaar, DigiLocker, and Bhashini. These were presented not merely as technological achievements but as instruments of social development and dignity. The Samridh Gram / Digital Village Initiative was specifically cited as a globally recognised example of converting connectivity into tangible services at the village level, winning the WCISP Prize's 26th Global Champion award. - Cybersecurity, digital trust, and AI accountability as prerequisites for meaningful inclusion. Several speakers argued that connectivity alone is insufficient without a secure and trustworthy digital environment. Vineet Kumar stressed that digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete, calling for security by design, responsible AI governance, and a multi-stakeholder approach. Dr. Pavan Duggal went further, warning that the Global South faces a legal vacuum in which AI systems can discriminate against citizens - for example, in loan applications - with no effective remedy, and called urgently for legal guardrails before the arrival of AGI.
- Decentralised and infrastructure-independent communication as a frontier for resilience. Ayush Singh challenged the 40-year assumption that all communication depends on centralised infrastructure such as mobile towers and servers. He proposed that Bluetooth/Wi-Fi mesh networks could enable smartphones to communicate directly with one another, forming a self-healing, decentralised network that functions even when conventional infrastructure fails - particularly relevant in disaster scenarios. - Education as a critical equalizer requiring both connectivity and digital skills. Thomas Lamanauskas (ITU Deputy Secretary-General) noted that nearly half of the world's schools still lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful digital learning access. He highlighted the ITU-UNICEF GIGA initiative, which has mapped over 2.3 million schools and monitors real-time connectivity for over 140,000 schools across 38 countries. Professor P.B. Sharma reinforced this from India's perspective, citing platforms such as Diksha (20,000 courses, 282 million students) and SWAYAM (61 million enrolments in higher education). - The need for human-centred technology and ethical governance of AI. Ludvig Nobel and Dr. Govind Pathak both emphasised that technology must remain in service of humanity, guided by conscience, accountability, and wisdom rather than speed alone. Dr. Pathak's book Entangled Realities encapsulated this theme, arguing that civilisation has always been built on trust and governance rather than technology in isolation, and that as intelligent systems are built, more trusted societies and resilient institutions must be built alongside them. ---
Overall Tone
- The overall tone of the discussion was optimistic, collaborative, and celebratory, with an undercurrent of urgency. The opening and moderation segments were warm and informal, with Professor Tim Unwin setting a light-hearted atmosphere through his football-card timing system and personal reflections on his 50-year connection to India. As the substantive presentations began, the tone became more earnest and aspirational, with speakers expressing genuine pride in India's digital achievements and a shared commitment to inclusion.
- Towards the latter part of the session, the tone shifted slightly towards caution and concern, particularly in the contributions of Ayush Singh, Vineet Kumar, and Dr. Pavan Duggal, who raised pointed warnings about infrastructure fragility, cybersecurity risks, algorithmic discrimination, and the legal vacuum surrounding AI. Thomas Lamanauskas's address restored a sense of measured confidence, acknowledging challenges whilst pointing to concrete multilateral progress. The session closed on a warm and appreciative note, with Professor Unwin drawing the proceedings together through a metaphor of a "tapas menu" of insights, and acknowledging the passion and humility of all contributors.
Expanded Summary: Connecting the Unconnected - WSIS Forum 2026 / AI for Good Platform, Geneva
#
Session Overview and Opening
This session was convened at the WSIS Forum 2026 and AI for Good platform in Geneva, bringing together policymakers, technologists, academics, and regulators - primarily from India but also from Africa and Europe - to discuss the theme of "connecting the unconnected" . The session was organised by Professor N.K. Goyal of CMAI and moderated by Professor Tim Unwin, who set a characteristically warm and light-hearted tone from the outset, noting that he was "the only person foolish enough" to moderate the event . Unwin introduced a two-minute speaking format enforced by yellow and red cards, with the audience encouraged to act as a "football or rugby crowd" to signal when speakers had exceeded their time . He also offered a personal reflection, noting that fifty years earlier he had first worked as an academic researcher in what was then South Bihar, now Jharkhand, describing India as a place where he had "left a lot of my soul" . The session was structured around nine rapid-fire presentations, followed by award ceremonies and a keynote address from ITU Deputy Secretary-General Thomas Lamanauskas, who arrived slightly late - Professor Goyal noted he had received a message from the Deputy Secretary-General's office that he would be around five or six minutes delayed - due to other commitments during the busy Geneva summit week, including the AI for Good Global Summit and the UN General Assembly's mandated UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance . It should also be noted that Abdoulaye Latsouck Faye was scheduled to speak during the session but did not join.
#
India's Digital Public Infrastructure as a Model for Inclusive Development
The opening substantive contribution came from Atul Sinha, Director General of the National Communication Academy, Ministry of Communications, Government of India, who framed India's approach to connectivity as a developmental mission rather than a purely technological objective . He argued that the goal is to ensure every citizen - "whether in a metropolitan city or a remote village" - has access to opportunity, knowledge, services, and dignity through digital empowerment . Sinha situated this within the broader vision of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to build an inclusive Digital India and a Viksit Bharat (the transcript renders this as "Vixit Bharat," likely referring to the well-known "Viksit Bharat" or Developed India vision), "where technology becomes a bridge, not a barrier" . He cited a range of digital public infrastructure initiatives - BharatNet, digital payments, Aadhaar-enabled services, DigiLocker, and Bhashini for language inclusion - as concrete expressions of this vision .
Sinha placed particular emphasis on the four pillars of the session's theme - education excellence, cybersecurity, rural solutions, and women's empowerment in ICT - arguing that these are not separate themes but "deeply interconnected" . He illustrated this interdependence by noting that a student cannot benefit from digital education without reliable connectivity, that rural citizens cannot use online services unless they trust the digital ecosystem, and that women cannot fully participate in the digital economy unless technology is accessible, affordable, safe, and locally relevant . He highlighted India's Samridh Gram Digital Village Initiative, led by the Department of Telecom, which has received global recognition as the WSIS Prize's 26th Global Champion under the Enabling Environment category . This initiative, he argued, demonstrates a "simple but powerful idea" - that connectivity must be converted into service - delivering healthcare, education, agriculture, digital banking, e-governance, skilling, and livelihood services at the village level through BharatNet fibre connectivity .
Bharat Bhatia, President of the ITU-APT Foundation of India, reinforced this picture of India's digital achievements, noting that the Foundation has been instrumental in bringing over 400 contributions to the ITU over the past two to three years in areas including 4G, 5G, and 6G . He highlighted India's leadership in digital financial transactions, noting that billions of dollars are transacted daily through UPI on 4G and 5G networks , and expressed the ambition to bring 1.4 billion Indians fully online, describing this as "a connectivity challenge for all of us" . He also noted that he chairs the ITU working group on 6G general aspects, responsible for standardising IMT 2030, and that the aim is to extend India's digital financial success into the 6G era within the next three years .
Professor N.K. Goyal, in his framing remarks following Lamanauskas's arrival, credited Prime Minister Modi's leadership for India's global recognition in telecom, UPI, Aadhaar, 5G, and digital infrastructure, setting the tone for the formal proceedings.
#
Digital Education at Scale: India's Platforms and Global Gaps
Professor P.B. Sharma, founder Vice-Chancellor of DTU and Vice-Chancellor of Amity University Gurugram, spoke online to describe the digital revolution he and his colleagues are witnessing in India . He emphasised the integration of AI advances in education and the use of ICT connectivity to reach every person throughout the country . He cited the government's Diksha platform, which hosts 20,000 courses and connects 282 million students, and the SWAYAM portal (transcribed as "SWIM" in the session) for higher education, which currently enrols 61 million people . He articulated the vision of transforming rural villages into "great hubs of learning as well as skilling" , whilst also acknowledging the responsibility to ensure that connectivity and portals offer the highest security and safety .
ITU Deputy Secretary-General Thomas Lamanauskas provided a sobering global counterpoint to India's achievements, noting that education remains "one of the most powerful equalizers" yet nearly half of the world's 6 million schools still lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning . He highlighted the ITU-UNICEF GIGA initiative, which supports governments in 53 countries, has pinpointed over 2.3 million schools, and monitors real-time connectivity for over 140,000 schools across 38 countries . He stressed that as AI transforms education, every learner must be equipped not only with connectivity but also with digital skills, AI literacy, and lifelong learning opportunities needed for tomorrow's jobs . Professor Alfredo Ronchi added a complementary perspective, describing the World Summit Award, conceived in 2002 at the time of WSIS in Tunis, which brought together young people from 175 countries to develop e-content and e-services projects across eight thematic families, enabling knowledge sharing between connected and unconnected communities - an initiative still running today . Dr. Lincy NL of Rajagiri College of Management and Applied Science affirmed that educational institutions have a vital role in translating technology into community impact through innovation, research, and local capacity building , and that India's experience demonstrates that when government, academia, industry, and communities collaborate, digital transformation becomes truly inclusive . Shriyance Jain, accepting an award on behalf of Co-University (the institution name as transcribed in the session), described the institution's transformation into an AI-enabled university where artificial intelligence is integrated into teaching, learning, research, administration, and innovation, with the goal of enabling every student and educator to use AI responsibly, ethically, and creatively to solve real-world challenges .
#
Cybersecurity, Digital Trust, and the Shift Beyond Connectivity
One of the session's most significant conceptual contributions came from Vineet Kumar, who reframed the central challenge of the session. He argued that "the challenge is no longer simply connecting people - people are already getting connected" and that the real challenge is ensuring the digital world is trusted, secure, inclusive, and beneficial for everyone . He noted a sharp rise in the misuse and abuse of technologies, including scams, deepfakes, and AI-generated disinformation and misinformation . Proposing a set of guiding principles for the implementation of WSIS Plus 20 and the Global Digital Compact, he stated that "digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete" and that every citizen deserves not only access to technology but also confidence that it is safe, secure, resilient, and respects human rights . He proposed four priorities for achieving a trusted digital world: security by design in every digital system and AI application, responsible AI governance, digital capacity building, and a multi-stakeholder approach involving government, industry, academia, and civil society .
Dr. Lincy NL echoed this position, stating explicitly that "connectivity alone is not enough" and calling for strengthened cybersecurity awareness, improved digital literacy, and the equipping of rural youth and women with future-ready digital skills . Raj Shah approached the security challenge from a market and technical perspective, noting that the global telecom security market is estimated at approximately 50 billion dollars and the AI cybersecurity market at approximately 30 billion dollars . He also cited figures of approximately 6 billion global internet users, 2.7 billion 5G connections, and a mobile economy contribution across the world of approximately 6.5 to 7.6 billion dollars (as stated in the transcript) . He identified key strategic imperatives for telecom operators, including a focus on data-driven security operations, zero trust architecture as a foundational principle, cloud-native protection, and crypto agility and quantum readiness .
#
Decentralised Communication: Challenging the Infrastructure Paradigm
Ayush Singh, Head of Cybersecurity Research Panel at C3IR and CEO of ARP Syndicate India, offered the session's most technically disruptive contribution, directly challenging an assumption that has underpinned telecommunications for four decades . He argued that almost every communication system has depended on centralised infrastructure - mobile towers, servers, and clouds - and illustrated the vulnerability of this model through a disaster scenario in which towers are down, internet cables are damaged, and thousands of smartphones remain switched on but cannot communicate with each other . He proposed that Bluetooth and Wi-Fi mesh networks could change this bottleneck by enabling phones to communicate directly with nearby devices, passing messages from phone to phone until they reach their destination, creating a people-powered, self-healing, decentralised network that functions even when the internet disappears . He argued that the real innovation is not the technology itself - Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and mesh networks have existed for years - but the realisation that billions of smartphones already possess the hardware needed to build a secure, self-healing, decentralised communication network requiring no new towers, cables, or expensive infrastructure . He called for the exploration and promotion of such technologies to connect the unconnected without dependence on centralised infrastructure .
Arthur Carnival of AFRONIC offered a complementary perspective on resilient local infrastructure, arguing that connecting the unconnected is not only about expanding access but about making connectivity more reliable, secure, affordable, and sustainable for everyone everywhere . He described AFRONIC's work with governments, regulators, network operators, universities, and technical communities through training, technical assistance, and awareness programmes , and highlighted the importance of developing national and local internet exchange points, which help keep local internet traffic within countries, reducing connectivity costs and latency, improving network resilience, and making online education and digital services more accessible in underserved and rural communities .
#
AI Governance, Legal Accountability, and the Rights of the Unconnected
Dr. Pavan Duggal, advocate of the Supreme Court of India and chief strategist of the Global AI Accountability Convener, delivered the session's most urgent and rights-focused contribution. He argued that the unconnected require more respect and risk being locked out and discriminated against by algorithms, making AI rights a crucial necessity for digital have-nots in the AI ecosystem . He referenced the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights, adopted at the International AI Accountability Forum, as a framework to ensure that every citizen has rights against AI and that AI does not remain a black box . He noted that the New Delhi Compact on AI Law and Governance provides categorical steps to prevent algorithmic bias and discrimination .
Duggal warned that the Global South continues to be locked out of AI governance conversations, with voices few and far between , and that when AI discriminates against a person - for example, in a loan application - they have nowhere to go because of a legal vacuum . He reported that the Global South AI Law and Governance Dialogue, on 25 May 2026, formally adopted and launched a legal architecture for AI law and governance providing categorical steps that nations can take going forward . He concluded with an urgent warning that this legal vacuum must be addressed quickly, describing it as a race against time with the arrival of artificial general intelligence and superintelligence, which could supersede the cumulative intelligence of humanity, and calling for legal guardrails to be established "now and today" .
#
Human-Centred Technology and the Civilisational Stakes of Digital Transformation
Two contributions towards the close of the session elevated the discussion to a philosophical and civilisational level. Dr. Govind Pathak, co-author of the book Entangled Realities between Commerce and Economics, argued that humanity is at an important inflection point and that the future will be shaped not by individual technologies alone but by the convergence of technologies, economics, governance, institutions, and human values . Drawing on historical perspective, he argued that "technology has never built civilisation" - trust has built civilisation, governance has sustained it, and collaboration has advanced it . He described this as the central message of Entangled Realities between Commerce and Economics, calling on participants to ensure that as more intelligent systems are built, more trusted societies, more resilient institutions, and a more inclusive world are built alongside them .
Ludvig Nobel, founder of Ludvig Nobel Media Sweden, accepting his award for Leadership in Human-Centred Technology and Cybersecurity, argued that technology is advancing faster than collective wisdom about how to guide it, and that AI, digital systems, and cyber infrastructure now shape communication, education, governance, security, and the texture of everyday life . He stated his conviction simply: "technology must remain in service of humanity" and must protect human dignity, strengthen trust, and support a future in which innovation is guided by responsibility, conscience, and wisdom . He warned that the systems being built today will influence not only markets and institutions but human relationships, social trust, and the moral atmosphere in which future generations will live . He cautioned that if intelligence grows without ethics, if capability advances without accountability, and if speed outruns judgement, the risk is building systems that are powerful but not truly human-centred . He described the challenge as "not merely technical" but "civilisational", arguing that the infrastructure of intelligence must remain aligned with human values, social trust, and the common good .
#
ITU's Global Perspective: Scale, Progress, and Urgency
Thomas Lamanauskas, ITU Deputy Secretary-General, provided the session's most authoritative global overview. He acknowledged that the ITU's mission remains clear - connecting the 2.2 billion people still offline - whilst also ensuring that everyone can benefit from digital transformation, including women, marginalised communities, and remote regions . He described the current era as one of unprecedented convergence across the Internet of Things, cloud, artificial intelligence, 5G, and more, with quantum technologies and 6G on the horizon . He noted that AI is ready to transform healthcare, finance, and transport whilst improving energy efficiency and enabling smarter cities , and that digital government is expanding access to services at scale, with the share of people living in countries with lower levels of digital government development having halved in just two years . He highlighted space-based connectivity as extending progress to remote and underserved communities beyond the reach of traditional networks .
Lamanauskas placed the session in the context of broader global progress and challenges, noting that only 35% of SDG targets are on track or making moderate progress, whilst 18% are actually moving backwards . He observed that global internet use has risen from 40% to 68% since 2015 , and that digital technologies can directly support approximately 70% of the 169 SDG targets . He praised India's achievements, noting its one of the world's fastest 5G rollouts with services reaching virtually all districts and its growing role in global 6G research, standards, and innovation . He also referenced India's digital public infrastructure tools - Aadhaar, UPI, and others - as having shown the way to bring the power of digital to everyone . He noted that India hosts the ITU's Area office and Innovation Center in New Delhi, opened in 2003, deepening cooperation across South Asia . He further noted that the ITU Council has recommended to the Berlin Plenipotentiary that the next Plenipotentiary Conference in 2030 take place in India, building on the successful experience of what the transcript refers to as "the World Transformation Organization Assembly" held in New Delhi - described as the first such assembly ever held in Asia . He described WSIS as "the strongest example of multistakeholder digital cooperation" and noted that the WSIS Plus 20 resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly has renewed the approach for the age of AI . He also referenced the UN General Assembly's mandated UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance taking place during the same week in Geneva. He announced that the previous Global AI Summit had been held in New Delhi in February 2026, and that the next Global AI Summit will move to Geneva, taking place on 21-22 June 2027, carrying forward momentum for inclusive international cooperation on AI .
#
Areas of Consensus and Underlying Tensions
Across the session, a strong consensus emerged that physical connectivity is a necessary but insufficient condition for genuine digital inclusion. Sinha's argument that connectivity must be converted into service , Vineet Kumar's principle that digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete , Dr. Lincy NL's statement that connectivity alone is not enough , and Lamanauskas's call for every learner to be equipped with digital skills and AI literacy all converged on this shared position. There was also broad agreement on the importance of multistakeholder collaboration, with Kumar , Dr. Lincy NL , Carnival , and Lamanauskas all emphasising the need for government, academia, industry, and civil society to work together.
However, beneath this surface consensus, several substantive tensions were evident. The most striking concerned the architectural basis of future connectivity: whilst Sinha, Bhatia, and Lamanauskas celebrated and advocated for expanding centralised digital infrastructure - BharatNet fibre, 5G and 6G towers, school connectivity programmes - Singh directly challenged the 40-year dependence on such infrastructure as itself the bottleneck, proposing decentralised mesh networks as a fundamentally different paradigm . A further tension existed between the broadly optimistic framing of AI's transformative potential offered by Lamanauskas and the urgent warnings of Duggal, who argued that harm has already begun to be caused to humans in both the Global South and Global North , and that a legal vacuum leaves people without effective remedy . Duggal's implicit critique of existing international frameworks - arguing that the Global South had to develop its own legal architecture precisely because it continues to be locked out of AI governance conversations - also sat in tension with Lamanauskas's presentation of WSIS as the strongest example of multistakeholder digital cooperation .
#
Closing Reflections and Awards
The session concluded with a series of CMAI ICT World Communication Awards, recognising excellence in rural digital transformation (Atul Sinha), IT and technical education (Shriyance Jain and Dr. Charu Jain of Co-University - both were named as recipients by Professor Goyal, though only Shriyance Jain spoke to accept the award), telecom innovation (Dr. Rajesh Sharma, CEO of TCOE - who was introduced to speak but appeared to be disconnected and did not complete his remarks), and leadership in human-centred technology and cybersecurity (Ludvig Nobel) . Tassarajen Pillay Chedumbrum, introduced by Professor Goyal as Chairman of ICTA Mauritius, also received an award; he described himself as having served as Minister of ICT in Mauritius between 2010 and 2014 and as National Regulator in Mauritius from December of the current year . The award category for Pillay Chedumbrum was not explicitly named in the transcript. The launch of the book Entangled Realities between Commerce and Economics, co-authored by Professor N.K. Goyal and Dr. Govind Pathak, was also marked during the session .
Professor Tim Unwin drew the proceedings together in his closing remarks, commending the passion and commitment of all speakers towards making a difference "not least for the rich but also for the poorest and most marginalised" . He picked up Ludvig Nobel's phrase "human-centred" as particularly resonant , and paid tribute to Professor N.K. Goyal for his indomitable energy and enthusiasm in bringing "this flavour of India" to the WSIS Forum . In a characteristically warm closing metaphor, he described the session as a "tapas menu" of insights - little bits of food from many different people - and invited participants to take Indian food away with them as a gift from the organisers, reminding the room that "it's not just technology, it's being humans, we still have to eat" . The session thus closed on a note that was simultaneously celebratory, reflective, and grounded in the human dimension that had animated its most memorable contributions.
India's connectivity mission is developmental, not merely technological, aiming to bring digital access to every citizen through BharatNet, Aadhaar, DigiLocker, and Bhashini - India as a bridge not a barrier
Arg. 1Atul Sinha argues that India's approach to connectivity goes beyond technical objectives and is fundamentally a developmental mission aimed at ensuring every citizen, whether in a city or remote village, has access to opportunity and dignity through digital empowerment. This vision, guided by Prime Minister Modi, positions technology as a bridge rather than a barrier. It is reflected in a wide range of digital public infrastructure initiatives.
Sinha cited India's digital public infrastructure including BharatNet, digital payments, Aadhaar-enabled services, DigiLocker, and Bhashini for language inclusion as concrete expressions of this vision . He emphasised that connectivity must reach every citizen regardless of location, ensuring access to opportunity, knowledge, services, and dignity .
on: Connectivity alone is insufficient; it must be accompanied by meaningful services, digital skills, cybersecurity, and trust to achieve genuine digital inclusion
on: Whether connectivity expansion alone is sufficient for digital inclusion, or whether trust, security, and legal frameworks are equally necessary preconditions
India's Samridh Gram Digital Village Initiative has received global recognition as a WSIS Prize champion, demonstrating that connectivity must be converted into tangible services at the village level
Arg. 2Sinha highlights the Samridh Gram Initiative as a model that goes beyond providing connectivity by converting it into actual services delivered at the village level. The initiative has been recognised internationally as a WSIS Prize Global Champion under the Enabling Environment category. It demonstrates that infrastructure alone is insufficient without the delivery of meaningful services.
The Samridh Gram Initiative, also known as the Digital Village Initiative and led by the Department of Telecom, received global recognition as the WSIS Prize's 26th Global Champion under the Enabling Environment category . Through BharatNet fibre connectivity, the project delivers healthcare, education, agriculture, digital banking, e-governance, skilling, and livelihood services at the village level through Samridhi Kensa .
India leads the world in digital financial transactions through UPI, and the goal is to extend this success further with 6G technology to bring 1.4 billion Indians fully online
Arg. 1Bharat Bhatia points to India's leadership in digital financial transactions via UPI as evidence of the transformative power of 4G and 5G networks. He argues that the next step is to leverage 6G technology, expected within three years, to bring all 1.4 billion Indians fully online. This represents both a connectivity challenge and an opportunity for the global community.
Bhatia noted that India has the highest number of digital financial transactions in the world, with billions of dollars being transacted every day using the 4G and 5G network . He expressed the aim to replicate this success with 6G coming in the next three years and described bringing 1.4 billion Indians online as a connectivity challenge for all .
on: Centralised infrastructure as the foundation of connectivity vs. decentralised, people-powered mesh networks as the necessary alternative
The ITU-APT Foundation of India has contributed over 400 technical contributions to ITU in areas including 4G, 5G, and 6G standardisation, supporting regional connectivity and international cooperation
Arg. 2Bhatia highlights the ITU-APT Foundation of India's role as a recognised regional international organisation that actively supports participation in ITU and APT activities. The Foundation has made substantial technical contributions to global standards, particularly in next-generation mobile technologies. This work underpins broader efforts to increase regional connectivity.
Bhatia stated that the ITU-APT Foundation of India has been instrumental in bringing over 400 contributions to the ITU during the last two to three years . He also noted that he chairs the working group on 6G general aspects, which is responsible for standardisation of 6G technology, IMT 2030 .
on: Multistakeholder collaboration among government, academia, industry, and civil society is essential for achieving inclusive digital transformation
Nearly half of the world's 6 million schools lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning, which the ITU-UNICEF GIGA initiative is working to address across 53 countries
Arg. 1This argument has already been captured above under Thomas Lamanauskas. It is repeated here as it appears in the arguments list under Digital Education and Skilling.
Lamanauskas stated that nearly half of the world's 6 million schools still lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning . The ITU-UNICEF GIGA initiative supports governments in 53 countries, has pinpointed over 2.3 million schools, and monitors real-time connectivity for over 140,000 schools across 38 countries .
on: Multistakeholder collaboration among government, academia, industry, and civil society is essential for achieving inclusive digital transformation
on: Whether the Global South is being meaningfully included in digital and AI governance, or is systematically excluded
Every learner must be equipped not only with connectivity but also with digital skills, AI literacy, and lifelong learning opportunities to prepare for tomorrow's jobs
Arg. 2This argument has already been captured above under Thomas Lamanauskas. It is repeated here as it appears in the arguments list under Digital Education and Skilling.
Lamanauskas stated that as AI transforms education, every learner must be equipped not only with connectivity but also with digital skills, AI literacy, and lifelong learning opportunities needed for their jobs tomorrow .
on: Digital education and skilling are transformative equalizers, but require both connectivity and complementary investments in skills, AI literacy, and institutional capacity
on: Optimistic framing of AI and digital transformation as broadly beneficial vs. urgent warnings about AI harm, discrimination, and the risk of superintelligence
Connecting the unconnected is not only about spending the access it's about the connectivity making uh more reliable secure affordable and sustainable for everyone and every individual everywhere
Arg. 1Arthur Carnival argues that the concept of connecting the unconnected must be broadened beyond simply expanding access to include the quality, reliability, security, affordability, and sustainability of that connectivity. True digital inclusion requires that connectivity works well for everyone, everywhere. This framing shifts the focus from quantity of connections to quality of connectivity.
Carnival stated that connecting the unconnected is not only about expanding access but about making connectivity more reliable, secure, affordable, and sustainable for everyone and every individual everywhere .
on: Connectivity alone is insufficient; it must be accompanied by meaningful services, digital skills, cybersecurity, and trust to achieve genuine digital inclusion
Local internet infrastructure and internet exchange points are essential to reduce connectivity costs, improve resilience, and make digital services more accessible in underserved and rural communities
Arg. 2Carnival highlights the strategic importance of local internet infrastructure, particularly internet exchange points (IXPs), as a means of keeping local internet traffic within countries. This reduces costs and latency, improves network resilience, and makes online education and digital services more accessible, especially in underserved and rural communities. AFRONIC actively supports this through work with governments, regulators, and technical communities.
Carnival noted that AFRONIC supports the development of national and local internet access points, which help keep local internet traffic within countries, reducing connectivity costs and latency, improving network resilience, and making online education and digital services more accessible, especially in underserved and rural communities . AFRONIC works with governments, regulators, network operators, universities, and technical communities through training, technical assistance, and awareness programmes .
AFRONIC works with governments, regulators, network operators, universities, and technical communities through training, technical assistance, and awareness programmes to build sustainable local internet infrastructure
Arg. 3Carnival presents AFRONIC's multistakeholder approach as a practical model for building sustainable local internet infrastructure. By engaging a wide range of actors including governments, regulators, operators, and universities, AFRONIC provides training, technical assistance, and awareness programmes. This collaborative model is presented as essential for achieving inclusive and resilient connectivity.
Carnival stated that AFRONIC works with governments, regulators, network operators, universities, and technical communities through training, technical assistance, and awareness programmes . He also noted that AFRONIC supports the development of national and local internet access points to improve connectivity for underserved and rural communities .
on: Multistakeholder collaboration among government, academia, industry, and civil society is essential for achieving inclusive digital transformation
India's digital education initiatives, including Diksha with 20,000 courses reaching 282 million students and the SWAYAM portal enrolling 61 million in higher education, are transforming learning across the country
Arg. 1Professor P.B. Sharma highlights the scale of India's government-led digital education initiatives as evidence of a genuine digital revolution in learning. The Diksha platform and SWAYAM portal together reach hundreds of millions of students at different levels of education. These initiatives demonstrate how ICT and AI can be integrated into education to reach every person across the country.
Sharma cited the government of India's Diksha initiative for education, which mounts 20,000 courses and connects 282 million students . He also referenced the SWAYAM portal for higher education, currently enrolling 61 million people .
on: Digital education and skilling are transformative equalizers, but require both connectivity and complementary investments in skills, AI literacy, and institutional capacity
on: Whether connectivity expansion alone is sufficient for digital inclusion, or whether trust, security, and legal frameworks are equally necessary preconditions
The vision is to transform rural villages into hubs of learning and skilling through ICT connectivity and AI-integrated education
Arg. 2Sharma articulates an ambitious vision of rural transformation through digital education, where villages become centres of learning and skilling rather than being left behind. This requires not only connectivity but also the integration of AI advances into educational delivery. The goal is to reach every nook and corner of the country.
Sharma expressed the desire to achieve the dream of reaching out to every single nook and corner of the country and transforming rural villages into great hubs of learning and skilling . He also emphasised the importance of ensuring that connectivity and portals offer the highest security and safety for the utilisation of technology .
Educational institutions have a vital role in translating technology into community impact through innovation, research, and local capacity building
Arg. 1Dr. Lincy NL argues that universities and educational institutions are not merely passive recipients of digital transformation but agents in translating technology into tangible community benefit. Through innovation, research, and local capacity building, they can bridge the gap between technological availability and community impact. India's experience demonstrates the power of collaboration between government, academia, industry, and communities.
Dr. Lincy NL stated that educational institutions have a vital role in translating technology into community impact through innovation, research, and local capacity building . She also noted that India's experience demonstrates that when government, academia, industry, and communities collaborate, digital transformation becomes truly inclusive .
on: Digital education and skilling are transformative equalizers, but require both connectivity and complementary investments in skills, AI literacy, and institutional capacity
Connectivity alone is not enough; cybersecurity awareness, digital literacy, and equipping rural youth and women with future-ready digital skills are equally necessary
Arg. 2Dr. Lincy NL makes the case that physical connectivity is a necessary but insufficient condition for genuine digital inclusion. Equally important are cybersecurity awareness, digital literacy, and the development of future-ready skills among rural youth and women. Without these complementary elements, connectivity cannot translate into meaningful participation in the digital economy.
Dr. Lincy NL stated that connectivity alone is not enough and that cybersecurity awareness, digital literacy, and equipping rural youth and women with future-ready digital skills must be strengthened . She noted that India is connecting the unconnected through large-scale digital public infrastructure, expanding broadband connectivity, digital education initiatives, and AI-enabled public services .
on: Connectivity alone is insufficient; it must be accompanied by meaningful services, digital skills, cybersecurity, and trust to achieve genuine digital inclusion
on: Whether connectivity expansion alone is sufficient for digital inclusion, or whether trust, security, and legal frameworks are equally necessary preconditions
When government, academia, industry, and civil society collaborate, digital transformation becomes truly inclusive, as demonstrated by India's experience
Arg. 3Dr. Lincy NL presents India's collaborative model as evidence that multistakeholder cooperation is the key to achieving truly inclusive digital transformation. By bringing together government, academia, industry, and communities, India has been able to translate connectivity into broader social and economic benefits. This model is offered as a lesson for other countries.
Dr. Lincy NL stated that India's experience demonstrates that when government, academia, industry, and communities collaborate, digital transformation becomes truly inclusive . She highlighted that these efforts are transforming how citizens learn, access healthcare, receive government services, and participate in the digital economy .
on: Multistakeholder collaboration among government, academia, industry, and civil society is essential for achieving inclusive digital transformation
Universities are transforming into AI-enabled institutions where artificial intelligence is integrated into teaching, learning, research, and administration to solve real-world challenges responsibly
Arg. 1Shriyance Jain describes the transformation of universities into AI-enabled institutions as a strategic imperative for preparing students to address real-world challenges. The goal is not simply to teach AI as a subject but to embed it responsibly and ethically across all aspects of university life, from teaching and learning to research and administration. This reflects a broader commitment to responsible and creative use of AI.
Jain stated that Co-University is transforming into an AI-enabled university where artificial intelligence is thoughtfully integrated into teaching, learning, research, administration, and innovation . He emphasised that the goal is not simply to teach AI but to enable every student and educator to use AI responsibly, ethically, and creatively to solve real-world challenges .
on: Digital education and skilling are transformative equalizers, but require both connectivity and complementary investments in skills, AI literacy, and institutional capacity
The World Summit Award, launched in 2002, brought together young people from 175 countries to develop e-content and e-services projects, enabling knowledge sharing between connected and unconnected communities
Arg. 1Professor Alfredo Ronchi presents the World Summit Award as a long-running initiative that has successfully bridged the gap between connected and unconnected communities by engaging young people in developing their own digital projects. Conceived alongside WSIS in Tunis in 2002, the initiative has grown to involve 175 countries and continues to operate today. It demonstrates a practical model for connecting the unconnected through shared knowledge and peer learning.
Ronchi described the World Summit Award, conceived in 2002 alongside WSIS in Tunis, which brought together young people and asked them to develop projects according to eight families of e-services and e-content, then share their experiences through collective events . He noted that 175 countries participated in this initiative and that it is still running today after some decades of hard work .
on: Digital education and skilling are transformative equalizers, but require both connectivity and complementary investments in skills, AI literacy, and institutional capacity
The real challenge is no longer simply connecting people but ensuring the digital world is trusted, secure, inclusive, and beneficial for everyone, as scams, deepfakes, and AI-generated disinformation are rising sharply
Arg. 1Vineet Kumar reframes the connectivity challenge, arguing that the primary issue has shifted from access to trust and safety. As people are increasingly getting connected, the more pressing concern is ensuring that the digital world they enter is secure, inclusive, and beneficial. The sharp rise in scams, deepfakes, and AI-generated disinformation makes this an urgent priority.
Kumar stated that the challenge is no longer simply connecting people as people are already getting connected, but rather ensuring the digital world is trusted, secure, inclusive, and beneficial for everyone . He noted that society is surrounded by AI and emerging technologies, yet alongside these opportunities there is a sharp rise in the misuse and abuse of these technologies, including scams, deepfakes, and AI-generated disinformation and misinformation .
on: Whether connectivity expansion alone is sufficient for digital inclusion, or whether trust, security, and legal frameworks are equally necessary preconditions
Digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete; every citizen deserves not only access to technology but also confidence that it is safe, secure, resilient, and respects human rights
Arg. 2Kumar argues that digital inclusion is meaningless without digital trust, and that every citizen has a right to confidence in the safety, security, and resilience of the technology they use. This framing elevates digital trust from a technical concern to a fundamental rights issue. It implies that governments and the international community have an obligation to ensure that digital access is accompanied by adequate protections.
Kumar proposed the guiding principle that digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete, and that every citizen deserves not only access to technology but also confidence that it is safe, secure, resilient, and respects human rights .
on: Connectivity alone is insufficient; it must be accompanied by meaningful services, digital skills, cybersecurity, and trust to achieve genuine digital inclusion
on: Whether connectivity expansion alone is sufficient for digital inclusion, or whether trust, security, and legal frameworks are equally necessary preconditions
Four priorities are essential for a trusted digital world: security by design in all digital systems and AI applications, responsible AI governance, digital capacity building, and a multi-stakeholder approach
Arg. 3Kumar proposes a four-pillar framework for achieving a trusted digital world, encompassing technical, governance, capacity, and process dimensions. Security must be built into digital systems and AI applications from the outset, not added as an afterthought. Responsible AI governance and digital capacity building must be complemented by a multi-stakeholder approach that brings together government, industry, academia, and civil society.
Kumar proposed four priorities for global cooperation: security by design in every digital system and AI application, responsible AI governance, digital capacity building, and a multi-stakeholder approach where government, industry, academia, and civil society all come together .
on: AI governance, accountability, and legal frameworks must be urgently developed to protect citizens, especially the unconnected and those in the Global South, from algorithmic discrimination and harm
on: Technical security measures vs. legal and governance frameworks as the primary solution to AI and digital safety risks
The global telecom security market is estimated at around 50 billion dollars, and AI cybersecurity at around 30 billion dollars; key imperatives include zero trust architecture, cloud-native protection, and quantum readiness
Arg. 1Raj Shah presents the cybersecurity challenge in the telecom sector through a market lens, highlighting the enormous scale of investment required and the strategic imperatives for industry players. He argues that zero trust architecture, cloud-native protection, and quantum readiness are essential for all ecosystem participants. Data-driven security operations are also identified as a critical focus area.
Shah estimated the market for telecom security at close to 50 billion dollars and the market for AI cybersecurity at around 30 billion dollars . He identified key strategic imperatives including data-driven security operations, zero trust architecture as foundational for all players, cloud-native protection, and crypto agility and quantum readiness .
on: Technical security measures vs. legal and governance frameworks as the primary solution to AI and digital safety risks
Technology must remain in service of humanity, protecting human dignity and strengthening trust; if intelligence grows without ethics and capability advances without accountability, we risk building powerful but not truly human-centred systems
Arg. 1Ludvig Nobel makes a philosophical argument that the central question of our technological age is not what technology can do but what it should serve. He argues that technology must remain anchored in human values, dignity, and trust, and that the failure to align intelligence with ethics and accountability risks producing systems that are powerful but fundamentally misaligned with human needs. This is framed as a civilisational challenge, not merely a technical one.
Nobel stated that technology must remain in service of humanity, protecting human dignity, strengthening trust, and supporting a future in which innovation is guided by responsibility, conscience, and wisdom . He warned that if intelligence grows without ethics, if capability advances without accountability, and if speed outruns judgement, we risk building systems that are powerful but not truly human-centred . He described this challenge as civilisational .
on: AI governance, accountability, and legal frameworks must be urgently developed to protect citizens, especially the unconnected and those in the Global South, from algorithmic discrimination and harm
on: Optimistic framing of AI and digital transformation as broadly beneficial vs. urgent warnings about AI harm, discrimination, and the risk of superintelligence
The unconnected and digital have-nots risk being locked out and discriminated against by algorithms, making AI rights a crucial necessity, as reflected in the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights
Arg. 1Dr. Pavan Duggal argues that the unconnected are not merely excluded from digital benefits but are actively at risk of being discriminated against by AI algorithms. This makes the establishment of AI rights a crucial necessity to protect the digital have-nots. The International AI Accountability Forum has responded by adopting the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights.
Duggal stated that the unconnected require more respect and are going to be locked out by algorithms, and that discrimination by algorithms makes AI rights crucial for the digital have-nots in the AI ecosystem . He noted that the International AI Accountability Forum has adopted the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights to address this .
on: AI governance, accountability, and legal frameworks must be urgently developed to protect citizens, especially the unconnected and those in the Global South, from algorithmic discrimination and harm
on: Optimistic framing of AI and digital transformation as broadly beneficial vs. urgent warnings about AI harm, discrimination, and the risk of superintelligence
The Global South continues to be excluded from AI governance conversations, and there is a legal vacuum leaving people without effective remedy when AI discriminates against them, for example in loan applications
Arg. 2Duggal highlights the systemic exclusion of the Global South from AI governance discussions and the practical consequences of this exclusion in the form of a legal vacuum. When AI systems discriminate against individuals, for example in loan applications, people in the Global South have no effective legal remedy. This vacuum is particularly dangerous given the accelerating pace of AI development.
Duggal stated that the Global South continues to be locked out of AI governance conversations, with voices few and far between . He gave the example that when AI discriminates against someone for a loan or any application, there is nowhere to go because there is a legal vacuum . He noted that harm has already begun to be caused to humans in both the Global South and Global North .
on: AI governance, accountability, and legal frameworks must be urgently developed to protect citizens, especially the unconnected and those in the Global South, from algorithmic discrimination and harm
on: Whether the Global South is being meaningfully included in digital and AI governance, or is systematically excluded
The Global South AI Law and Governance Dialogue has adopted a legal architecture providing categorical steps for nations to address algorithmic bias and discrimination
Arg. 3Duggal presents the Global South AI Law and Governance Dialogue as a concrete institutional response to the legal vacuum in AI governance. The dialogue has formally adopted and launched a legal architecture for AI law and governance that provides categorical steps nations can take to address algorithmic bias and discrimination. This is complemented by the New Delhi Compact on AI Law and Governance.
Duggal stated that the Global South AI Law and Governance Dialogue on 25th May 2026 formally adopted and launched the Global South's legal architecture for AI law and governance, providing categorical steps that nations can take going forward . He also referenced the New Delhi Compact on AI Law and Governance as providing categorical steps to prevent algorithmic bias and discrimination .
on: Whether the Global South is being meaningfully included in digital and AI governance, or is systematically excluded
Legal guardrails for AI must be established urgently before the arrival of artificial general intelligence and superintelligence, which could supersede the cumulative intelligence of humanity
Arg. 4Duggal argues that the window for establishing effective legal guardrails for AI is closing rapidly, given the imminent arrival of artificial general intelligence and superintelligence. He frames this as a race against time, warning that superintelligence could supersede the cumulative intelligence of humanity. The urgency of establishing legal frameworks now, before these technologies arrive, is the central message.
Duggal stated that the legal vacuum will have to be addressed quickly as soon as possible, otherwise it is going to be a race against time with AGI coming in . He warned that with superintelligence coming in, which will supersede the cumulative intelligence of humanity, the time has come that legal guardrails have to be put in now and today .
on: AI governance, accountability, and legal frameworks must be urgently developed to protect citizens, especially the unconnected and those in the Global South, from algorithmic discrimination and harm
on: Optimistic framing of AI and digital transformation as broadly beneficial vs. urgent warnings about AI harm, discrimination, and the risk of superintelligence
The book Entangled Realities argues that the future will be shaped not by individual technologies alone but by the convergence of technology, economics, governance, institutions, and human values; trust, not technology, has built civilisation
Arg. 1Dr. Govind Pathak presents the central thesis of the co-authored book Entangled Realities, arguing that humanity is at an inflection point where the future will be determined not by any single technology but by the convergence of multiple forces including economics, governance, institutions, and human values. He draws on historical perspective to argue that it is trust, governance, and collaboration, not technology alone, that have built and sustained civilisations. This message is offered as a guiding principle for the age of AI.
Pathak stated that the future will not be shaped by individual technology alone but by the convergence of technologies, economics, governance, institutions, and human values . He argued that technology has never built civilisation; rather, trust has built civilisation, governance has sustained it, and collaboration has advanced it . He described this as the central message of Entangled Realities .
on: AI governance, accountability, and legal frameworks must be urgently developed to protect citizens, especially the unconnected and those in the Global South, from algorithmic discrimination and harm
Current communication systems have depended on centralised infrastructure for 40 years; in disaster scenarios where towers and cables are down, smartphones cannot communicate with each other despite remaining switched on
Arg. 1Ayush Singh challenges the foundational assumption of modern communication systems, namely their dependence on centralised infrastructure such as mobile towers, servers, and clouds. He illustrates the vulnerability of this model through the scenario of a natural disaster where infrastructure is destroyed but smartphones remain functional yet unable to communicate. This dependency has persisted for approximately 40 years and represents a critical bottleneck.
Singh described a scenario where a disaster has hit, mobile towers are down, internet cables are damaged, and internet is gone, but thousands of smartphones are still switched on and cannot communicate with each other . He noted that for the last 40 years, almost every communication system has depended on centralised infrastructure such as a mobile tower, a server, or a cloud .
on: Centralised infrastructure as the foundation of connectivity vs. decentralised, people-powered mesh networks as the necessary alternative
Bluetooth and Wi-Fi mesh networks enable phones to communicate directly with nearby devices, creating a people-powered, self-healing, decentralised network that does not require towers, cables, or expensive infrastructure
Arg. 2Singh proposes Bluetooth and Wi-Fi mesh networking as a solution to the centralised infrastructure bottleneck, enabling phones to communicate directly with nearby devices and pass messages along a chain until they reach their destination. This creates a people-powered, self-healing, decentralised network that functions even when conventional internet infrastructure is unavailable. The network is created by the people carrying their phones.
Singh explained that a BLE or Wi-Fi mesh network changes the bottleneck by asking what if people themselves became a network . He described how phones can directly talk to nearby phones and pass messages to the next phone and then to the next until it reaches its destination, so that if the internet disappears, communication does not have to stop . He noted that the network is created by people carrying their phones .
on: Centralised infrastructure as the foundation of connectivity vs. decentralised, people-powered mesh networks as the necessary alternative
Billions of smartphones already possess the hardware needed to build a secure, decentralised communication network; the real innovation is recognising and harnessing this existing capability
Arg. 3Singh argues that the real innovation is not the invention of new hardware or protocols but the realisation that billions of existing smartphones already contain the hardware necessary to build a secure, self-healing, decentralised communication network. No new towers, cables, or expensive infrastructure are required. The challenge is to recognise and harness this latent capability.
Singh stated that the real innovation is not Bluetooth or Wi-Fi or mesh networks, which have existed for years, but the realisation that billions of smartphones already have the hardware needed to build a secure, self-healing, decentralised communication network, with no new towers, cables, or expensive infrastructure needed .
on: Centralised infrastructure as the foundation of connectivity vs. decentralised, people-powered mesh networks as the necessary alternative
Technologies such as decentralised mesh protocols should be explored and promoted to connect the unconnected without dependence on centralised infrastructure
Arg. 4Singh concludes by calling for the exploration and promotion of decentralised mesh protocols as a means of connecting the unconnected without relying on centralised infrastructure. He references specific technologies such as decentralised mesh protocols that can enable communication without a centralised question for success. This represents a paradigm shift in how connectivity is conceived and delivered.
Singh stated that technologies such as decentralised mesh protocols, which can connect the unconnected without the need of a centralised infrastructure, should be explored and promoted .
The session brought together policymakers, regulators, technology leaders, educators, and innovators to exchange practical solutions across education, cybersecurity, rural development, and women's empowerment
Arg. 1Professor N.K. Goyal, as the organiser and host of the session, frames the gathering as a multistakeholder forum designed to facilitate the exchange of practical solutions across four critical pillars: education, cybersecurity, rural development, and women's empowerment. The session's diversity of speakers reflects a deliberate effort to bring together different perspectives and expertise. This is presented as a contribution to the broader global digital cooperation agenda.
Goyal welcomed all participants and introduced the session's theme of connecting the unconnected, which he described as lying at the heart of India's national digital journey . The session featured speakers from government, academia, civil society, and the private sector, covering education, cybersecurity, rural solutions, and women's empowerment in ICT .
on: Multistakeholder collaboration among government, academia, industry, and civil society is essential for achieving inclusive digital transformation
Moderating diverse voices from across the global digital ecosystem, including those from India and the Global South, reflects a commitment to inclusive and human-centred digital progress
Arg. 1Professor Tim Unwin, as moderator, frames his role as facilitating a diverse and inclusive conversation that gives voice to perspectives from India and the Global South. He draws on his personal connection to India, having first worked there as an academic researcher 50 years ago, to underscore the importance of inclusive and human-centred approaches to digital development. His closing remarks highlight the passion and commitment of all speakers to making a difference for the poorest and most marginalised.
Unwin noted that 50 years ago he first started working in the field as an academic researcher in some of the poorest parts of India, what was then known as South Bihar, now Jharkhand, and described India as a place where he has left a lot of his soul . In his closing remarks, he highlighted the richness of the Indian IT sector and the passion and commitment of all speakers for making a difference not least for the poorest and most marginalised .
Recognition of long-standing contributions to ICT policy and regulation in Mauritius, both as Minister of ICT and as National Regulator, reflects the importance of sustained institutional leadership in digital development
Arg. 1Tassarajen Pillay Chedumbrum acknowledges the award he received as recognition of his work in ICT governance in Mauritius, spanning his tenure as Minister of ICT from 2010 to 2014 and his role as National Regulator. He frames this recognition as an acknowledgement of the value of sustained, long-term commitment to building ICT institutions and policy frameworks. He also credits colleagues and collaborators who supported him in reaching this level.
Pillay Chedumbrum stated that he was deeply honoured to receive the award and that it acknowledged the work he had been doing since he was Minister of ICT in Mauritius between 2010 and 2014 and also as National Regulator in Mauritius from December that year . He also thanked his friends who helped him attain that level .
TCOE's work in the telecom sector represents a commitment to innovation and excellence that merits recognition at the international level
Arg. 1Dr. Rajesh Sharma, receiving an award for excellence in innovation in the telecom sector on behalf of TCOE, expresses gratitude for the recognition from Professor Goyal and CMAI. Although his remarks were cut short due to connectivity issues, his acceptance reflects the importance of institutional innovation in advancing India's telecom ecosystem. The award itself signals the significance of applied innovation in the telecom sector as a driver of broader digital development.
Dr. Rajesh Sharma began his acceptance by thanking Professor Goyal and CMAI for the prestigious award, describing it as truly an honour to receive . His remarks were interrupted before he could elaborate further .
Session Knowledge Graph
Speakers · Topics · Arguments · Relationships
A strong consensus emerged across speakers that physical connectivity is a necessary but insufficient condition for genuine digital inclusion. Sinha argued that connectivity must be converted into service , with BharatNet delivering healthcare, education, and banking at the village level . Dr. Lincy NL stated explicitly that 'connectivity alone is not enough' and called for cybersecurity awareness, digital literacy, and future-ready skills for rural youth and women . Vineet Kumar proposed the guiding principle that 'digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete' . Arthur Carnival broadened the frame by arguing that connectivity must be made more reliable, secure, affordable, and sustainable . Lamanauskas reinforced this by stating that every learner must be equipped not only with connectivity but also with digital skills, AI literacy, and lifelong learning opportunities . Professor P.B. Sharma similarly emphasised the responsibility to ensure connectivity and portals offer the highest security and safety .
India's connectivity mission is developmental, not merely technological, aiming to bring digital access to every citizen through BharatNet, Aadhaar, DigiLocker, and Bhashini - India as a bridge not a barrier
Connectivity alone is not enough; cybersecurity awareness, digital literacy, and equipping rural youth and women with future-ready digital skills are equally necessary
Digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete; every citizen deserves not only access to technology but also confidence that it is safe, secure, resilient, and respects human rights
Connecting the unconnected is not only about spending the access it's about the connectivity making uh more reliable secure affordable and sustainable for everyone and every individual everywhere
Every learner must be equipped not only with connectivity but also with digital skills, AI literacy, and lifelong learning opportunities to prepare for tomorrow's jobs
Multiple speakers converged on the principle that technology must serve human values and be governed by ethical frameworks. Nobel argued that technology must remain in service of humanity, protecting human dignity and strengthening trust, and warned that if intelligence grows without ethics and capability advances without accountability, we risk building systems that are powerful but not truly human-centred . Pathak reinforced this historically, arguing that technology has never built civilisation; trust, governance, and collaboration have . Duggal warned urgently that legal guardrails must be established before the arrival of AGI and superintelligence . Kumar proposed responsible AI governance as one of four essential priorities for a trusted digital world . Jain emphasised that the goal is to enable students to use AI responsibly, ethically, and creatively .
Technology must remain in service of humanity, protecting human dignity and strengthening trust; if intelligence grows without ethics and capability advances without accountability, we risk building powerful but not truly human-centred systems
Legal guardrails for AI must be established urgently before the arrival of artificial general intelligence and superintelligence, which could supersede the cumulative intelligence of humanity
The book Entangled Realities argues that the future will be shaped not by individual technologies alone but by the convergence of technology, economics, governance, institutions, and human values; trust, not technology, has built civilisation
Four priorities are essential for a trusted digital world: security by design in all digital systems and AI applications, responsible AI governance, digital capacity building, and a multi-stakeholder approach
Universities are transforming into AI-enabled institutions where artificial intelligence is integrated into teaching, learning, research, and administration to solve real-world challenges responsibly
There was broad consensus that no single actor can achieve digital inclusion alone. Kumar explicitly proposed a multi-stakeholder approach where government, industry, academia, and civil society all come together as one of four essential priorities . Dr. Lincy NL stated that India's experience demonstrates that when government, academia, industry, and communities collaborate, digital transformation becomes truly inclusive . Carnival described AFRONIC's model of working with governments, regulators, network operators, universities, and technical communities . Lamanauskas highlighted ITU's role in bringing together 194 member states and more than 1,000 companies, universities, and research organisations . Goyal's session itself embodied this principle by bringing together policymakers, regulators, technology leaders, educators, and innovators . Bhatia demonstrated this through the ITU-APT Foundation's over 400 contributions to ITU standards .
Four priorities are essential for a trusted digital world: security by design in all digital systems and AI applications, responsible AI governance, digital capacity building, and a multi-stakeholder approach
When government, academia, industry, and civil society collaborate, digital transformation becomes truly inclusive, as demonstrated by India's experience
AFRONIC works with governments, regulators, network operators, universities, and technical communities through training, technical assistance, and awareness programmes to build sustainable local internet infrastructure
Nearly half of the world's 6 million schools lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning, which the ITU-UNICEF GIGA initiative is working to address across 53 countries
The session brought together policymakers, regulators, technology leaders, educators, and innovators to exchange practical solutions across education, cybersecurity, rural development, and women's empowerment
The ITU-APT Foundation of India has contributed over 400 technical contributions to ITU in areas including 4G, 5G, and 6G standardisation, supporting regional connectivity and international cooperation
A clear consensus emerged that AI governance frameworks are urgently needed. Duggal argued that the unconnected are at risk of being locked out and discriminated against by algorithms , that the Global South faces a legal vacuum with no effective remedy when AI discriminates , and that legal guardrails must be established before AGI arrives . Kumar proposed responsible AI governance as a core priority . Nobel warned that if capability advances without accountability, we risk building systems that are powerful but not truly human-centred . Lamanauskas noted that AI, cybersecurity challenges, and emerging technologies are reshaping economies and societies with particular urgency . Pathak argued that the future will be shaped by the convergence of technology, economics, governance, institutions, and human values .
The unconnected and digital have-nots risk being locked out and discriminated against by algorithms, making AI rights a crucial necessity, as reflected in the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights
The Global South continues to be excluded from AI governance conversations, and there is a legal vacuum leaving people without effective remedy when AI discriminates against them, for example in loan applications
Legal guardrails for AI must be established urgently before the arrival of artificial general intelligence and superintelligence, which could supersede the cumulative intelligence of humanity
Four priorities are essential for a trusted digital world: security by design in all digital systems and AI applications, responsible AI governance, digital capacity building, and a multi-stakeholder approach
Technology must remain in service of humanity, protecting human dignity and strengthening trust; if intelligence grows without ethics and capability advances without accountability, we risk building powerful but not truly human-centred systems
The book Entangled Realities argues that the future will be shaped not by individual technologies alone but by the convergence of technology, economics, governance, institutions, and human values; trust, not technology, has built civilisation
Speakers consistently identified education as a critical pillar of digital inclusion. Sharma highlighted the scale of India's digital education initiatives, including Diksha with 20,000 courses connecting 282 million students and the SWAYAM portal enrolling 61 million in higher education . Lamanauskas noted that education remains one of the most powerful equalizers, yet nearly half of the world's 6 million schools still lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning . He added that every learner must be equipped with digital skills, AI literacy, and lifelong learning opportunities . Dr. Lincy NL argued that educational institutions have a vital role in translating technology into community impact . Jain described the transformation of universities into AI-enabled institutions . Ronchi presented the World Summit Award as a model for knowledge sharing between connected and unconnected communities across 175 countries .
India's digital education initiatives, including Diksha with 20,000 courses reaching 282 million students and the SWAYAM portal enrolling 61 million in higher education, are transforming learning across the country
Educational institutions have a vital role in translating technology into community impact through innovation, research, and local capacity building
Every learner must be equipped not only with connectivity but also with digital skills, AI literacy, and lifelong learning opportunities to prepare for tomorrow's jobs
Universities are transforming into AI-enabled institutions where artificial intelligence is integrated into teaching, learning, research, and administration to solve real-world challenges responsibly
The World Summit Award, launched in 2002, brought together young people from 175 countries to develop e-content and e-services projects, enabling knowledge sharing between connected and unconnected communities
These speakers shared a common view of India's digital transformation as a model for inclusive development. Sinha framed India's approach as a developmental mission ensuring every citizen has access to opportunity and dignity , citing BharatNet, Aadhaar, DigiLocker, and Bhashini . Sharma highlighted the scale of digital education initiatives reaching hundreds of millions of students and articulated the vision of transforming rural villages into hubs of learning and skilling . Dr. Lincy NL affirmed that India is connecting the unconnected through large-scale digital public infrastructure and AI-enabled public services , and that collaborative models make digital transformation truly inclusive . Lamanauskas praised India's achievements, noting its one of the world's fastest 5G rollouts and its growing role in global 6G research , and highlighted the GIGA initiative to connect every school . These three speakers shared a concern about the vulnerabilities and security challenges of existing digital infrastructure. Kumar argued that the real challenge has shifted from access to ensuring the digital world is trusted, secure, inclusive, and beneficial, noting the sharp rise in scams, deepfakes, and AI-generated disinformation . Shah identified the telecom security market at approximately 50 billion dollars and AI cybersecurity at around 30 billion dollars, and proposed zero trust architecture, cloud-native protection, and quantum readiness as key imperatives . Singh challenged the 40-year dependence on centralised infrastructure and illustrated its vulnerability through disaster scenarios where smartphones remain switched on but cannot communicate . These three speakers shared a philosophical and ethical perspective on the relationship between technology and humanity. Duggal argued that the unconnected are at risk of being locked out and discriminated against by algorithms and that a legal vacuum leaves people without effective remedy . Nobel argued that technology must remain in service of humanity, protecting human dignity and strengthening trust, and described the challenge as civilisational . Pathak drew on historical perspective to argue that technology has never built civilisation; trust, governance, and collaboration have . All three converged on the view that the current trajectory of AI development poses fundamental risks to human dignity and social trust that require urgent governance responses. These speakers shared a data-driven, evidence-based approach to demonstrating the scale of both achievements and remaining challenges in digital connectivity. Bhatia cited India's leadership in digital financial transactions with billions of dollars transacted daily via UPI and the ambition to bring 1.4 billion Indians fully online through 6G . Sinha pointed to the Samridh Gram Initiative's recognition as a WSIS Prize Global Champion as evidence that connectivity must be converted into service . Lamanauskas provided global statistics, noting that nearly half of the world's 6 million schools lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning , and that global internet use has risen from 40% to 68% since 2015 . Both Singh and Carnival emphasised the importance of building resilient, locally-grounded internet infrastructure as an alternative or complement to centralised models. Singh proposed that Bluetooth and Wi-Fi mesh networks could create a people-powered, self-healing, decentralised communication network requiring no new towers, cables, or expensive infrastructure . Carnival argued that local internet exchange points help keep local internet traffic within countries, reducing connectivity costs and latency, improving network resilience, and making online education and digital services more accessible in underserved and rural communities . Both speakers thus converged on the principle that decentralised, locally-anchored infrastructure is key to connecting the unconnected sustainably.
It was somewhat unexpected that speakers from such diverse backgrounds - a cybersecurity researcher (Kumar), a technology innovator (Singh), an academic (Dr. Lincy NL), and a regional internet organisation representative (Carnival) - all independently arrived at the same reframing of the connectivity challenge. Kumar stated that the challenge is no longer simply connecting people as people are already getting connected . Singh challenged the 40-year assumption of centralised infrastructure dependency . Dr. Lincy NL stated that connectivity alone is not enough . Carnival argued that connecting the unconnected is not only about expanding access but about making connectivity more reliable, secure, affordable, and sustainable . This convergence across technical, policy, and academic perspectives suggests a genuine paradigm shift in how the field understands digital inclusion.
It was unexpected that speakers from such different professional backgrounds - a legal expert (Duggal), a media and technology leader (Nobel), an economist and author (Pathak), and a cybersecurity professional (Kumar) - all converged on the same urgent message about AI governance. Duggal warned that the legal vacuum must be addressed quickly before AGI arrives, describing it as a race against time and warning that superintelligence could supersede the cumulative intelligence of humanity . Nobel described the challenge as civilisational and warned that intelligence must not outpace conscience . Pathak argued that trust, not technology, has built civilisation . Kumar proposed responsible AI governance as a core priority . This cross-disciplinary consensus on the urgency of AI governance was a notable and somewhat unexpected feature of the session.
It was unexpected to find consensus across speakers on the value of decentralised and locally-grounded infrastructure models, given that the session was largely focused on national-level digital infrastructure programmes. Singh argued that billions of smartphones already have the hardware needed to build a secure, self-healing, decentralised communication network with no new towers or cables needed . Carnival argued that local internet exchange points reduce costs and improve resilience for underserved communities . Even Bhatia, who focused on 6G standardisation, implicitly acknowledged the need for diverse connectivity solutions to bring 1.4 billion Indians online . This convergence suggests a growing recognition that centralised infrastructure alone cannot close the digital divide.
The session demonstrated a remarkably high level of consensus across a diverse group of speakers representing government, academia, civil society, the private sector, and international organisations. The central areas of agreement were: (1) connectivity alone is insufficient for genuine digital inclusion and must be accompanied by services, skills, trust, and security ; (2) technology must remain in service of humanity and be governed by ethical frameworks ; (3) multistakeholder collaboration is essential for inclusive digital transformation ; (4) AI governance and legal frameworks are urgently needed to protect citizens, especially the unconnected and those in the Global South ; and (5) digital education and skilling are transformative equalizers requiring both connectivity and complementary investments . India's digital transformation was consistently cited as a model of inclusive development, with speakers from both within and outside India acknowledging its achievements in UPI, BharatNet, Aadhaar, and 5G rollout . There was also notable consensus on the need to move beyond centralised infrastructure models towards more resilient, decentralised, and locally-grounded approaches .
Atul Sinha , Bharat Bhatia , and Thomas Lamanauskas all celebrate and advocate for expanding centralised digital infrastructure - BharatNet fibre, 5G and 6G towers, school connectivity programmes - as the primary means of connecting the unconnected. Ayush Singh directly challenges this paradigm, arguing that the 40-year dependence on centralised infrastructure such as mobile towers, servers, and clouds is itself the bottleneck , and that in disaster scenarios this infrastructure fails entirely . He proposes instead that billions of existing smartphones can form a secure, self-healing, decentralised mesh network requiring no new towers or cables , and calls for the exploration and promotion of such technologies . This represents a fundamental disagreement about the architectural basis of future connectivity.
India's connectivity mission is developmental, not merely technological, aiming to bring digital access to every citizen through BharatNet, Aadhaar, DigiLocker, and Bhashini - India as a bridge not a barrier
India leads the world in digital financial transactions through UPI, and the goal is to extend this success further with 6G technology to bring 1.4 billion Indians fully online
Nearly half of the world's 6 million schools lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning, which the ITU-UNICEF GIGA initiative is working to address across 53 countries
Current communication systems have depended on centralised infrastructure for 40 years; in disaster scenarios where towers and cables are down, smartphones cannot communicate with each other despite remaining switched on
Bluetooth and Wi-Fi mesh networks enable phones to communicate directly with nearby devices, creating a people-powered, self-healing, decentralised network that does not require towers, cables, or expensive infrastructure
Billions of smartphones already possess the hardware needed to build a secure, decentralised communication network; the real innovation is recognising and harnessing this existing capability
Atul Sinha and Professor P.B. Sharma frame connectivity and digital infrastructure expansion as the central mission , presenting access as the primary vehicle for development. Vineet Kumar explicitly reframes this, stating that 'the challenge is no longer simply connecting people' as people are already getting connected, and that the real challenge is ensuring the digital world is trusted, secure, inclusive, and beneficial . Dr. Lincy NL similarly states that 'connectivity alone is not enough' and that cybersecurity awareness and digital literacy are equally necessary . Dr. Pavan Duggal goes further, arguing that the unconnected risk being actively discriminated against by algorithms and that a legal vacuum leaves people without effective remedy , making legal guardrails an urgent necessity . This reflects a substantive disagreement about whether access or trust and governance should be the primary focus.
India's connectivity mission is developmental, not merely technological, aiming to bring digital access to every citizen through BharatNet, Aadhaar, DigiLocker, and Bhashini - India as a bridge not a barrier
India's digital education initiatives, including Diksha with 20,000 courses reaching 282 million students and the SWAYAM portal enrolling 61 million in higher education, are transforming learning across the country
The real challenge is no longer simply connecting people but ensuring the digital world is trusted, secure, inclusive, and beneficial for everyone, as scams, deepfakes, and AI-generated disinformation are rising sharply
Digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete; every citizen deserves not only access to technology but also confidence that it is safe, secure, resilient, and respects human rights
Connectivity alone is not enough; cybersecurity awareness, digital literacy, and equipping rural youth and women with future-ready digital skills are equally necessary
The unconnected and digital have-nots risk being locked out and discriminated against by algorithms, making AI rights a crucial necessity, as reflected in the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights
Legal guardrails for AI must be established urgently before the arrival of artificial general intelligence and superintelligence, which could supersede the cumulative intelligence of humanity
Raj Shah approaches digital safety primarily through a market and technical lens, identifying zero trust architecture, cloud-native protection, crypto agility, and quantum readiness as the key imperatives for telecom operators , and framing the challenge in terms of a 50 billion dollar telecom security market . Dr. Pavan Duggal, by contrast, argues that technical measures are insufficient without legal frameworks, pointing to the legal vacuum that leaves people without remedy when AI discriminates against them , and calling for urgent legal guardrails before AGI arrives . Vineet Kumar takes a middle position, proposing both security by design and responsible AI governance as complementary priorities . Ludvig Nobel frames the issue as fundamentally ethical and civilisational rather than technical or legal , arguing that intelligence without ethics risks producing systems that are powerful but not human-centred . These speakers thus disagree on whether the primary solution is technical, legal, ethical, or some combination.
The global telecom security market is estimated at around 50 billion dollars, and AI cybersecurity at around 30 billion dollars; key imperatives include zero trust architecture, cloud-native protection, and quantum readiness
The unconnected and digital have-nots risk being locked out and discriminated against by algorithms, making AI rights a crucial necessity, as reflected in the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights
The Global South AI Law and Governance Dialogue has adopted a legal architecture providing categorical steps for nations to address algorithmic bias and discrimination
Legal guardrails for AI must be established urgently before the arrival of artificial general intelligence and superintelligence, which could supersede the cumulative intelligence of humanity
Four priorities are essential for a trusted digital world: security by design in all digital systems and AI applications, responsible AI governance, digital capacity building, and a multi-stakeholder approach
Technology must remain in service of humanity, protecting human dignity and strengthening trust; if intelligence grows without ethics and capability advances without accountability, we risk building powerful but not truly human-centred systems
Thomas Lamanauskas presents AI as a transformative force that is ready to transform healthcare, finance, and transport while improving energy efficiency and enabling smarter cities , and frames digital progress in broadly optimistic terms, noting that the share of people in countries with lower digital government development has halved in two years . Dr. Pavan Duggal presents a starkly different picture, warning that harm has already begun to be caused to humans in both the Global South and Global North , that the Global South is being locked out of AI governance , and that the arrival of AGI and superintelligence makes this a race against time . Ludvig Nobel similarly warns that if intelligence grows without ethics and capability advances without accountability, we risk building systems that are powerful but not truly human-centred , describing the challenge as civilisational . This represents a meaningful disagreement in tone and urgency about the current state and trajectory of AI.
Every learner must be equipped not only with connectivity but also with digital skills, AI literacy, and lifelong learning opportunities to prepare for tomorrow's jobs
The unconnected and digital have-nots risk being locked out and discriminated against by algorithms, making AI rights a crucial necessity, as reflected in the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights
The Global South continues to be excluded from AI governance conversations, and there is a legal vacuum leaving people without effective remedy when AI discriminates against them, for example in loan applications
Legal guardrails for AI must be established urgently before the arrival of artificial general intelligence and superintelligence, which could supersede the cumulative intelligence of humanity
Technology must remain in service of humanity, protecting human dignity and strengthening trust; if intelligence grows without ethics and capability advances without accountability, we risk building powerful but not truly human-centred systems
Thomas Lamanauskas presents a broadly inclusive picture of global digital progress, noting that ITU brings together 194 member states and more than 1,000 companies , that digital government development is improving , and that space-based connectivity is extending progress to remote and underserved communities . He frames the WSIS process as the strongest example of multistakeholder digital cooperation . Dr. Pavan Duggal directly contradicts this framing, stating that the Global South continues to be locked out of AI governance conversations, with voices few and far between , and that when AI discriminates against people in the Global South, they have nowhere to go because of a legal vacuum . He argues that the Global South's legal architecture for AI governance had to be developed independently precisely because of this exclusion . This is a direct disagreement about the extent to which existing international frameworks are genuinely inclusive of the Global South.
Nearly half of the world's 6 million schools lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning, which the ITU-UNICEF GIGA initiative is working to address across 53 countries
The Global South continues to be excluded from AI governance conversations, and there is a legal vacuum leaving people without effective remedy when AI discriminates against them, for example in loan applications
The Global South AI Law and Governance Dialogue has adopted a legal architecture providing categorical steps for nations to address algorithmic bias and discrimination
This disagreement is unexpected because both speakers were participating in the same WSIS Forum session and ostensibly supporting the same overarching agenda of inclusive digital development. Thomas Lamanauskas, as ITU Deputy Secretary-General, presents WSIS as 'the strongest example of multistakeholder digital cooperation' and describes the WSIS Plus 20 resolution as having renewed the approach for the age of AI . He frames existing international frameworks as broadly effective and inclusive. Dr. Pavan Duggal, however, implicitly challenges this by arguing that the Global South continues to be locked out of AI governance conversations and that a separate Global South legal architecture had to be developed precisely because existing frameworks were insufficient . The fact that this critique of the adequacy of existing international frameworks - including WSIS - was voiced within a WSIS Forum session, in the presence of the ITU Deputy Secretary-General, makes it an unexpectedly pointed disagreement.
It is unexpected that in a session largely celebrating India's digital infrastructure achievements and the expansion of centralised connectivity, Ayush Singh would directly challenge the foundational assumption of centralised infrastructure that underpins all of these achievements . While other speakers celebrated BharatNet fibre, 5G towers, and 6G standardisation as the path forward , Singh argued that the 40-year dependence on such infrastructure is itself the bottleneck and that the real innovation lies in recognising that billions of smartphones can form a decentralised network without any of this infrastructure . This was unexpected because it implicitly critiques the very infrastructure investments being celebrated by the majority of speakers, including senior government representatives.
It is unexpected that within a session primarily focused on celebrating digital progress and connectivity achievements, three speakers - Dr. Govind Pathak, Dr. Pavan Duggal, and Ludvig Nobel - each independently raised profound warnings about the trajectory of technology and civilisation. Dr. Pathak argued that technology alone has never built civilisation and that trust, governance, and collaboration are the true foundations . Dr. Pavan Duggal warned of a race against time with AGI and superintelligence that could supersede the cumulative intelligence of humanity . Ludvig Nobel described the challenge as civilisational, warning that intelligence without ethics risks producing systems that are powerful but not human-centred . The convergence of these three independently expressed existential warnings in a session otherwise dominated by optimistic progress narratives represents an unexpected undercurrent of deep concern that was not directly addressed or reconciled by other speakers.
The session was broadly collaborative and celebratory in tone, with most speakers aligned on the overarching goal of connecting the unconnected and advancing inclusive digital development. However, beneath this surface consensus, several substantive disagreements emerged. The most significant concerned: (1) whether centralised infrastructure or decentralised mesh networks represent the appropriate model for future connectivity ; (2) whether connectivity expansion alone is sufficient or whether trust, security, and legal frameworks are equally necessary preconditions ; (3) whether technical, legal, or ethical solutions should take priority in addressing AI and digital safety risks ; (4) whether AI's trajectory is broadly optimistic or urgently dangerous ; and (5) whether existing international frameworks like WSIS are genuinely inclusive of the Global South or are themselves part of the problem . Three speakers - Dr. Govind Pathak, Dr. Pavan Duggal, and Ludvig Nobel - independently raised civilisational-level warnings about technology's trajectory that were not directly addressed by other speakers, creating an unexpected undercurrent of existential concern.
All five speakers agree that digital safety and trust are essential components of genuine digital inclusion, and that the digital world must be made secure and trustworthy. However, they disagree significantly on how to achieve this. Vineet Kumar proposes a four-pillar framework combining security by design, responsible AI governance, digital capacity building, and a multistakeholder approach . Dr. Lincy NL emphasises cybersecurity awareness and digital literacy . Raj Shah focuses on technical imperatives such as zero trust architecture and quantum readiness . Dr. Pavan Duggal argues that legal frameworks and AI rights are the primary missing element [132-137, 146-149]. Ludvig Nobel frames the solution as fundamentally ethical and civilisational . They share the goal of a trusted digital world but diverge sharply on the primary mechanism for achieving it.
The real challenge is no longer simply connecting people but ensuring the digital world is trusted, secure, inclusive, and beneficial for everyone, as scams, deepfakes, and AI-generated disinformation are rising sharply Digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete; every citizen deserves not only access to technology but also confidence that it is safe, secure, resilient, and respects human rights Connectivity alone is not enough; cybersecurity awareness, digital literacy, and equipping rural youth and women with future-ready digital skills are equally necessary The unconnected and digital have-nots risk being locked out and discriminated against by algorithms, making AI rights a crucial necessity, as reflected in the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights Technology must remain in service of humanity, protecting human dignity and strengthening trust; if intelligence grows without ethics and capability advances without accountability, we risk building powerful but not truly human-centred systems The global telecom security market is estimated at around 50 billion dollars, and AI cybersecurity at around 30 billion dollars; key imperatives include zero trust architecture, cloud-native protection, and quantum readiness
All five speakers agree that digital education is a critical priority and that educational institutions play a central role in digital inclusion. However, they differ on emphasis and approach. Professor P.B. Sharma focuses on the scale of government-led platforms like Diksha and SWAYAM and the vision of transforming rural villages into learning hubs . Dr. Lincy NL emphasises that connectivity alone is insufficient and that cybersecurity awareness and digital literacy must accompany it . Shriyance Jain focuses on the transformation of universities into AI-enabled institutions . Thomas Lamanauskas highlights the structural gap of 500 million students without connectivity and the need for AI literacy . Professor Ronchi presents peer-learning and knowledge-sharing between connected and unconnected communities as the key model . They agree on the importance of digital education but disagree on whether the primary gap is infrastructure, skills, AI integration, or peer exchange.
India's digital education initiatives, including Diksha with 20,000 courses reaching 282 million students and the SWAYAM portal enrolling 61 million in higher education, are transforming learning across the country The vision is to transform rural villages into hubs of learning and skilling through ICT connectivity and AI-integrated education Educational institutions have a vital role in translating technology into community impact through innovation, research, and local capacity building Connectivity alone is not enough; cybersecurity awareness, digital literacy, and equipping rural youth and women with future-ready digital skills are equally necessary Universities are transforming into AI-enabled institutions where artificial intelligence is integrated into teaching, learning, research, and administration to solve real-world challenges responsibly Every learner must be equipped not only with connectivity but also with digital skills, AI literacy, and lifelong learning opportunities to prepare for tomorrow's jobs The World Summit Award, launched in 2002, brought together young people from 175 countries to develop e-content and e-services projects, enabling knowledge sharing between connected and unconnected communities
All four speakers agree that multistakeholder collaboration is essential for achieving inclusive digital transformation. Dr. Lincy NL presents India's collaborative model as evidence that when government, academia, industry, and communities work together, digital transformation becomes truly inclusive . Vineet Kumar explicitly includes the multistakeholder approach as one of his four essential priorities . Arthur Carnival describes AFRONIC's work with governments, regulators, operators, and universities as a practical model . Thomas Lamanauskas highlights ITU's convening of 194 member states and over 1,000 organisations . However, they differ on the scope and nature of collaboration: Dr. Lincy NL focuses on national-level collaboration , Arthur Carnival on regional technical communities , Vineet Kumar on governance and security , and Lamanauskas on global institutional frameworks . They agree on the principle but disagree implicitly on the level and type of collaboration that is most important.
When government, academia, industry, and civil society collaborate, digital transformation becomes truly inclusive, as demonstrated by India's experience Four priorities are essential for a trusted digital world: security by design in all digital systems and AI applications, responsible AI governance, digital capacity building, and a multi-stakeholder approach AFRONIC works with governments, regulators, network operators, universities, and technical communities through training, technical assistance, and awareness programmes to build sustainable local internet infrastructure Nearly half of the world's 6 million schools lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning, which the ITU-UNICEF GIGA initiative is working to address across 53 countries
All four speakers agree that closing the digital divide in rural and underserved communities is a priority. However, they differ on the approach. Atul Sinha emphasises converting connectivity into services at the village level through a government-led initiative . Bharat Bhatia focuses on extending 4G/5G/6G network coverage to bring all Indians online . Thomas Lamanauskas highlights the structural gap in school connectivity and the role of international initiatives like GIGA . Arthur Carnival argues that local internet exchange points and local infrastructure are the key to reducing costs and improving resilience for underserved communities . They share the goal of rural and underserved connectivity but disagree on whether the primary solution is service delivery, network coverage, international programmes, or local infrastructure development.
India's Samridh Gram Digital Village Initiative has received global recognition as a WSIS Prize champion, demonstrating that connectivity must be converted into tangible services at the village level India leads the world in digital financial transactions through UPI, and the goal is to extend this success further with 6G technology to bring 1.4 billion Indians fully online Nearly half of the world's 6 million schools lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning, which the ITU-UNICEF GIGA initiative is working to address across 53 countries Connecting the unconnected is not only about spending the access it's about the connectivity making uh more reliable secure affordable and sustainable for everyone and every individual everywhere Local internet infrastructure and internet exchange points are essential to reduce connectivity costs, improve resilience, and make digital services more accessible in underserved and rural communities
- 2 billion people remain offline globally, and ensuring that digital transformation benefits women, marginalised communities, and underserved regions is an urgent priority requiring reliable, secure, affordable, and sustainable connectivity. India's large-scale digital education platforms, including Diksha (20,000 courses, 282 million students) and SWAYAM (61 million higher education enrolments), are transforming learning nationwide, with the vision of turning rural villages into hubs of learning and skilling. Nearly half of the world's 6 million schools lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning; the ITU-UNICEF GIGA initiative is working to address this across 53 countries. Every learner must be equipped not only with connectivity but also with digital skills, AI literacy, and lifelong learning opportunities; universities are transforming into AI-enabled institutions integrating AI into teaching, research, and administration. The real challenge has shifted from simply connecting people to ensuring the digital world is trusted, secure, inclusive, and beneficial for everyone, as scams, deepfakes, and AI-generated disinformation are rising sharply. Digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete; four priorities are essential: security by design, responsible AI governance, digital capacity building, and a multi-stakeholder approach involving government, industry, academia, and civil society. The global telecom security market is estimated at approximately 50 billion dollars and AI cybersecurity at approximately 30 billion dollars; key technical imperatives include zero trust architecture, cloud-native protection, and quantum readiness. The unconnected and digital have-nots risk being locked out and discriminated against by algorithms; the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights and the Global South AI Law and Governance Dialogue's legal architecture represent steps towards addressing this legal vacuum. There is a critical and urgent need to establish legal guardrails for AI before the arrival of artificial general intelligence and superintelligence, particularly to protect Global South populations who currently have no effective remedy when AI discriminates against them. Current communication systems have depended on centralised infrastructure for 40 years; Bluetooth and Wi-Fi mesh networks could enable smartphones to form a people-powered, self-healing, decentralised communication network requiring no new towers or cables, harnessing hardware already present in billions of devices. Multistakeholder collaboration among government, academia, industry, and civil society is essential for truly inclusive digital transformation; ITU brings together 194 member states and over 1,000 organisations, and WSIS remains the strongest long-standing example of such cooperation. The convergence of technology, economics, governance, institutions, and human values — rather than individual technologies alone — will shape the future; trust, governance, and collaboration have historically built and sustained civilisations. Technology must remain in service of humanity, protecting human dignity and strengthening trust; if intelligence grows without ethics and capability advances without accountability, the risk is building systems that are powerful but not truly human-centred. Local internet infrastructure and internet exchange points are essential to reduce connectivity costs, improve network resilience, and make digital services more accessible in underserved and rural communities. The WSIS Plus 20 resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly has renewed the multistakeholder approach for the age of AI, and the next Global AI Summit will take place in Geneva in June 2027.
“The challenge is no longer simply connecting people — people are already getting connected. The real challenge is how do we ensure the digital world is trusted, secure, inclusive and beneficial for everyone. Digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete.”
“The unconnected require more respect, and therefore they're going to be locked out by algorithms. Discrimination by algorithms, the need for the digital have-nots in the AI ecosystem to have AI rights is crucial... when an AI discriminates against you for a loan or for any application, you have nowhere to go because there's a legal vacuum.”
“What if people themselves became a network? Instead of sending every message through a distant server, phones can directly talk to nearby phones... The real innovation is the realization that billions of smartphones already have the hardware needed to build a secure, self-healing, decentralised communication network. No new towers are needed, no new cables, no expensive infrastructure.”
“Technology has never built civilisation. Trust has built civilisation. Governance has sustained civilisation and collaboration has advanced civilisation. Let us ensure that as we build more intelligent systems, we also build more trusted societies, more resilient institutions and more inclusive world.”
“Technology must remain in service of humanity. It must protect human dignity, strengthen trust, and support a future in which innovation is guided by responsibility, conscience, and wisdom... The challenge before us is not merely technical. It is civilisational.”
“Nearly half of the world's 6 million schools still lack internet connectivity, leaving over 500 million students without meaningful access to digital learning... Digital technologies can directly support about 70% of the 169 SDG targets.”
How can mesh networking and decentralised communication technologies (such as BLE/Wi-Fi mesh and tools like 'jack doses') be further developed and standardised to enable communication without centralised infrastructure, particularly in disaster scenarios?
Singh highlighted that billions of smartphones already possess the hardware needed for decentralised, self-healing mesh networks, yet this potential remains largely unexplored. Further research into standardisation, security, and adoption pathways for such technologies could dramatically improve resilience and connectivity in underserved or disaster-affected areas.
How can legal frameworks and regulatory architectures be developed—particularly for the Global South—to address algorithmic bias, AI discrimination, and the absence of effective remedies for citizens harmed by AI systems?
Duggal identified a critical legal vacuum whereby citizens, especially in the Global South, have no effective recourse when AI systems discriminate against them (e.g., in loan applications). With AGI and superintelligence on the horizon, establishing legal guardrails urgently requires further research into international AI law, governance frameworks, and enforcement mechanisms.
What practical steps can be taken to ensure AI accountability and prevent AI systems from remaining 'black boxes', and how can the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights be operationalised globally?
The adoption of the Universal Declaration of AI Accountability Rights and the Global South's legal architecture for AI governance raises important questions about implementation. Further research is needed on how these instruments can be translated into enforceable national and international law.
How can digital inclusion initiatives be designed to simultaneously embed digital trust, cybersecurity by design, and responsible AI governance, rather than treating connectivity and security as separate objectives?
Kumar argued that digital inclusion without digital trust is incomplete. This raises the research question of how security-by-design principles can be integrated from the outset into connectivity programmes, particularly in rural and underserved communities, and what multi-stakeholder governance models best support this.
How can the remaining connectivity gap for schools—with nearly half of the world's 6 million schools still lacking internet access and over 500 million students without meaningful digital learning—be closed, and what role can initiatives like GIGA play in accelerating this?
Lamanauskas highlighted the stark scale of educational disconnection globally. Further research is needed into the most cost-effective and sustainable models for school connectivity, the impact of real-time monitoring tools, and how AI literacy can be embedded alongside infrastructure deployment.
How can quantum readiness and crypto agility be practically implemented across the telecom ecosystem, and what is the timeline for operators to transition to quantum-safe architectures?
Shah's strategic paper identified quantum readiness and crypto agility as key imperatives for telecom operators. Given the rapid pace of quantum technology development, further research is needed on transition roadmaps, cost implications, and international standards for quantum-safe telecommunications security.
How can zero trust architecture and cloud-native protection be adopted at scale by telecom operators, particularly in developing markets where resources and technical expertise may be limited?
Shah identified zero trust architecture as foundational for all ecosystem players, yet implementation challenges in resource-constrained environments remain underexplored. Research into scalable, affordable deployment models for developing-country operators would be valuable.
How can the convergence of AI, IoT, 5G, 6G, and quantum technologies be governed in a way that ensures benefits are equitably distributed, particularly to marginalised communities and women?
Lamanauskas described an era of unprecedented technological convergence. Further research is needed on governance frameworks that ensure this convergence does not deepen existing inequalities, and on how international bodies like the ITU can coordinate standards and policies to promote inclusive outcomes.
How can India's digital public infrastructure models—such as Aadhaar, UPI, BharatNet, and Bhashini—be adapted and replicated in other developing countries, and what governance and technical conditions are necessary for success?
Multiple speakers highlighted India's digital infrastructure as a global exemplar. Systematic research into the transferability of these models, including the legal, institutional, and infrastructural prerequisites, would help other nations benefit from India's experience.
How can local internet exchange points and local internet infrastructure be developed in underserved regions to reduce latency, lower connectivity costs, and improve resilience for rural and remote communities?
Carnival highlighted the role of local internet exchange points in keeping traffic within countries and reducing costs. Further research into the economic models, technical requirements, and policy environments that best support the development of such infrastructure in underserved regions is warranted.
How can AI literacy and digital skills be effectively integrated into education systems at scale, particularly for rural youth and women, to ensure that connectivity translates into genuine economic and social empowerment?
Both speakers noted that connectivity alone is insufficient without accompanying digital literacy and AI skills. Research into effective pedagogical models, curriculum design, and community-based capacity building—especially for women and rural populations—is needed to maximise the impact of connectivity investments.
How can the trust, governance, and collaborative frameworks necessary to sustain technological civilisation be built alongside the development of AI and quantum technologies, ensuring that institutions remain resilient and inclusive?
Pathak argued that technology alone has never built civilisation—trust, governance, and collaboration have. This raises important research questions about the institutional and social architectures needed to accompany rapid technological change, particularly in the context of AI and quantum computing.
How can human-centred design principles be embedded into cybersecurity and AI systems to ensure that innovation remains aligned with human dignity, social trust, and ethical responsibility rather than outpacing collective wisdom?
Nobel framed the challenge as civilisational rather than merely technical, warning that intelligence without ethics and capability without accountability risk producing powerful but dehumanising systems. Further research into frameworks for human-centred technology governance, ethical AI design, and the moral dimensions of digital infrastructure is needed.
How can the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) Plus 20 framework and the Global Digital Compact be implemented in practice to deliver on digital inclusion, cybersecurity, and AI governance commitments, particularly for the Global South?
Both speakers referenced these frameworks as guiding structures, but their practical implementation—especially in resource-constrained contexts—remains an open research question. Studies on monitoring mechanisms, accountability structures, and multi-stakeholder implementation models would be valuable.
