Fake news in the digital era

Fake news in the digital era is one of the latest issues that has raised concern among intermediaries, governments, and end users. Fake news can be described as deliberately created, factually incorrect stories, which are spread by outlets to promote their own interests. With the growth of social media, fake news has proliferated; it has found a platform to disseminate these stories to a massive audience.

According to a recent analysis, fake news stories created more Facebook engagement than the top election stories from 19 of the main news outlets combined. On top of that, a Stanford study recently found that more than 80% of students cannot identify sponsored content from ‘real’ news stories.

This space explores the impact of fake news on digital policy, and the latest developments on how stakeholders are tackling the issue of fake news.

The impact of fake news in the digital era

The issue of fake news became a mainstream concern in November 2016 right after the US Presidential election. Internet giants faced a backlash over the spread of ‘false news’ on their platforms. This - some critics said - may have convinced voters to vote for the Republican candidate.

The backlash prompted intermediaries to introduce changes to their policies, with Google and Facebook both announcing to be working on changes to prevent 'fake news' websites to use their respective advertising networks. Google announced it would change its policy to prevent websites that misrepresent content from using its AdSense advertising network. Facebook updated its advertising policies to spell out that its ban on deceptive and misleading content applies to fake news.

Meanwhile, intermediaries faced further criticism when German Chancellor Angela Merkel urged Internet platforms to reveal their search engine algorithms, over concerns that their lack of transparency would 'lead to a distortion of our perception' and 'shrink our expanse of information'. Merkel argued that Internet users have a right to know on what basis they receive information through search engines. She explained that the algorithms operated by search engines could lead to a lack of confrontation with opposing ideas - leading to so-called filter bubbles and echo chambers - which can harm a healthy democracy.

The issue of fake news was also addressed during the 3rd World Internet Conference. The Cyberspace Administration of China said that false news is a sign that ‘cyberspace has become dangerous and unwieldy’.

While the controversy shone a bright light on the role of intermediaries in the lead-up to the 11th Internet Governance Forum, held on 6-9 December in Guadalajara, the IGF discussions brought a slight shift in focus. Fake news was discussed more in connection with how to validate information (role of users), than how platforms should tackle the issue (role of intermediaries), as has been the case in public debate.

Speakers argued that there needs to be greater social media literacy ‘to understand that what we’re reading is not the whole picture’, while others discussed the distinction between reputable and non-reputable news outlets, acknowledging that even the most established outlets can get it wrong. On the other hand, the role of intermediaries was discussed in the context of content removal, hate speech, net neutrality and zero-rating practices, and the protection of human rights.

In 2017, the issue of fake news regained prominence. On one hand, news organisations are facing staunch criticism by US President Trump over the 'spread of lies', amid inquiries by several governments on how to tackle false news in their countries. On the other hand, intermediaries are taking steps to flag fake news and verify information.

As developments unfold, many questions are surfacing: Should intermediaries be solely responsible for the spread of fake news? Should governments step in? What are the main legal and technical mechanisms to stop the spread of false news?

Latest developments

13 November 2017: The European Commission launched public consultation on fake news and online disinformation

30 June 2017German parliament votes in favour of law on social media fines

22 June 2017Social media platforms to lose 'hundreds of millions' as advertisers pull out over inappropriate content

8 May 2017Facebook announces steps to combat fake news ahead of UK general election

14 March 2017Germany publishes draft law to fight hate speech

9 March 2017UK News Media Association calls for 'urgent investigation' into Google, Facebook, and fake news

20 February 2017Google expands its Fact Check tag to Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico

19 February 2017CNN blocked in Venezuela

6 February 2017Internet companies join forces with French news organisations to combat fake news

15 January 2017Fake news: inquiries in the UK and filtering tools in Germany

19 November 2016Fake news requires more rigid governance, Chinese officials say

16 November 2016Google and Facebook to restrict ads linking to fake news

 

Explore the issues

 

The GIP Digital Watch observatory is provided by

in partnership with

and members of the GIP Steering Committee



 

GIP Digital Watch is operated by

Scroll to Top