Fake News: The Role of Confirmation Bias in a Post-truth World

14 Jun 2017
Geneva, Switzerland


Event report/s:
Barbara Rosen Jacobson

Society is becoming more and more polarised. Around the world, the attitudes, beliefs and opinions expressed by political leaders, their constituencies and the media appear to be growing more extreme. But to what extent is this just a natural and expected result of the human condition?

This was the topic of a discussion guided by Mr Rolf Olsen (CEO and strategic counsel at Leidar and teacher at the Graduate Institute, Geneva.)

Olsen started the discussion by highlighting the importance of the phenomenon of fake news. Politicians and leaders are no longer in control of their message, and the interference by external events and messages ‘has become the new normal’. With the increasingly blurred line between true and false, fake news is not just a ‘PR-problem, but a democratic problem’.

Although fake news itself is not new, the scale of its dissemination is. And while the ‘most powerful enemy of fake news is a strong press corps’, the media has fewer and fewer resources to check and prevent fake stories. The financial pressure on journalism often leads to quick writing and sensationalist headlines. In addition, the social media echo chambers allow fake news to reinforce fake opinions.

Fake news comes in many facets, affecting society as a whole. Some of its varieties include:

  • An unknown or malicious originator;
  • The presence of confirmation bias and biased reporting;
  • Lies and made-up narratives, rapidly disseminated by technology; and
  • Alternative facts.

Dealing with this challenge could be done at the individual level and at a societal level. Olsen encourages individuals to rebut false information; to support the free press with paid subscriptions; and to participate in political dialogue. As a society, Olsen pleads for:

  • Transparency of Internet companies such as Facebook and Google, which have become primary sources of information;
  • Education and awareness raising; and
  • Adding warnings to sponsored content in a similar way to health warnings on cigarettes.

After Olsen’s introduction, there was a lively discussion on the complexities of fake news, journalism, and democracy. The importance of critical thinking was emphasised, and so were the intricate link between democracy and fake news, and the new challenges for journalists.

The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies will organise an event on 'Fake news: the role of confirmation bias in a post-truth world', on 14 June 2017, between 18.30 and 20.00 CEST, in Geneva. 

During the event, discussions will be held on the role confirmation bias plays in how we interpret news and information and the potential consequences with this. Questions to be explored include:

  • Is what we are witnessing today anything new?
  • Why do we believe what we want to believe, and is there such a thing as ‘the truth’?
  • Has the rise and resonance of ‘fake news’ been enabled by increasing numbers of real media outlets vying for attention with headlines and articles that push the boundaries of journalistic norms?
  • Where could all this lead, is this somewhere we want to go? If not, what can we and what should we do about it?

For more information, visit the event webpage.



The GIP Digital Watch observatory is provided by



and members of the GIP Steering Committee


GIP Digital Watch is operated by

Scroll to Top